for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Who’s your most intriguing “project” prospect?

colin : 5/18/2020 7:42 am
Now that the draft dust has settled, I wanted to see who you guys think has the best chance to be the “diamond in the rough” type player from the late rounds(Post 5th round)/UDFAs. I’m sure this has been talked about a bit, but with all the Baker hoopla, figured it’d be nice to try to focus on some positives.

So, who do you think has the highest (semi) realistic upside? I’ll say it now, I don’t have a coaching or scouting background, just a fan, so I’m fine with being wrong. Basically I’m just unemployed, bored, going stir crazy, and wanna talk football. Here’s my list:

Cam Brown, LB - I always like guys who like to hit guys, and boy does this kid hit. Out of the players I’ll list, he’s probably the least instinctual player, at least in coverage, so the key with him is, can he be coached up? That being said, he’s a real downhill, guided missile type. Really stout against the run, and our big DT’s eating up blockers could offset one of his biggest weaknesses, lack of strength/size to shed bigger blockers. He’s someone who can certainly make the team via special teams, but I think if we intend to rely on blitzing for pressure, that’s an area where he could shine early. His upside could be huge if he responds to coaching. In a few years, I could see his ceiling as 3 true down LBer. He’s got the speed (ran a 4.7, but when he’s not caught flat footed, he plays much faster) and length to play sideline to sideline, and cover TEs and RBs. It’s just a matter of if he can be taught to use those skills. Plus he had a tweet where he said “the Cowboys will be forever ass” or something like that, so that’s a guy you can root for.

Carter Coughlin, Edge/LB - Probably the most interesting prospect of this type for me. We may have found our new “High Motor White Guy,” with this kid, haha. Doesn’t give up on plays, high football IQ, excellent straight line speed (4.57 40), great production, nose for the ball, and helluva strip-sack move. This is the exact type of player that I imagined when I heard Joe Judge’s first couple pressers. “Tell me what he can do, not what he can’t.” He’s a tweener college edge rusher, often playing with his hand in the ground, but he’s 6’3” 236lbs. In the NFL, he doesn’t have the strength or length (in the 19th percentile for arm length at his position) to NOT get swallowed up if he’s battling with OL every play. If they figure out a scheme to properly highlight his skillset, I really think he can end up a Swiss Army knife, hybrid type defensive player. He’s got the tools and intangibles to be, more than even just a plus starter, but a key piece to our defense down the road. I think that’s his ceiling, IF utilized properly. In the immediate future, obviously special teams, but he’s another one who can be a situational pass rush weapon blitzing on 3rd down packages.

Binjimen Victor, WR - Of all the UDFA WR pick ups, he’s the guy that jumps out to me. Mack seems to make tough catches, but really lacks run after catch ability. At least anything of his that I’ve seen, the catch is made, and he’s not gaining anything after. Dillon may be the guy to make the roster due to his special teams ability, but I think the Giants already have a better version of him on the roster in Coleman. Victor, to me, has the most upside. 6’4”, deceptive speed/shiftiness, incredible catch radius (his wingspan is huge, even for 6’4”), able to pluck the ball out of the air, and seems to have superior body control. I have to temper my excitement and not call him “the next coming of Plax.” I did that with Ramses Barden, and well, we know how that turned out. But it’s that time of year, for hyperbole and over exaggerating, right?! There is a stark difference, in that Victor is alarmingly slight. He’s 6’4” and not quite 200lbs. Definitely needs to add some lower body weight, and I don’t know if that’s going to ruin the speed that he does have (he runs a 4.6 as is). Also, like a lot of tall guys, he has trouble getting a good first step off the line or out of breaks. All that being said, if he can add weight without it being a detriment to his athleticism, the sky is the limit for this kid.

Last, but not least...
Kyle Murphy, OL - I’ll be honest, I’ve only seen one highlight reel of the kid, haven’t really bothered to read up much on him so I don’t know a ton about him. Also, I know he’s coming from a small school, but holy shit. His highlight reel is inches away from being “Exhibit A” in an assault case. He just rag dolls, EVERYONE. Like I said, I’m just a fan, and in Murphy’s case more than any of the others, I don’t know whether or not his skill can translate, but my god, he just decimates people. I don’t know if you guys have ever seen that 30 For 30 about Marcus Dupree, but they show highlights of him in high school, when he was basically the size of an NFL athlete already, just disrespecting children, running them over, and ruining their homecoming weekends. That’s what Murphy’s college tape looks like.

Honorable mention: RB Javon Leake looks like he’s got some skill, and I’m hopeful we may have found our KR/PR for the future.

So, sound off! Tell me who you like, who you hate, what you disagree with, that I’m a moron and struggle with sentence structure, spelling, grammar, and even the faintest understanding of what it means to evaluate a player, whatever. Looking forward to reading your responses.
Rysen John  
Giantsfan79 : 5/18/2020 7:48 am : link
his height and wingspan can't be coached. If he has any playing speed, he's going to have 5-8 inches of height on most DBs. I saw Daniel Jones overthrow receivers quite a bit last year, if John can catch some of those, he might be something.
If I'm using a strict definition of intriguing...  
Klaatu : 5/18/2020 7:53 am : link
Quote:
[T]o arouse the curiosity or interest of by unusual, new, or otherwise fascinating or compelling qualities...


Then the kid who stands out the most to me on offense is TE Rysen John. From Eric's Scouting Report:

Quote:
The Giants signed Rysen John as an undrafted rookie free agent after the 2020 NFL Draft. A collegiate wide receiver, the 6’7, 237-pound John has an intriguing combination of size and athletic ability. He could be used at a number of different positions including wide receiver, tight end, and H-Back.


On defense it's DE Niko Lalos.

Quote:
Lalos garnered national attention after being named the Hula Bowl MVP for Team Aina on January 26 in Honolulu, Hawaii. He finished with six tackles, two sacks and one forced fumble in the all-star game...

"The Giants see me outside on the edge,” Lalos said. “I talked to the defensive line coach [Sean Spencer], the outside linebacker coach [Bret Bielema] and the defensive coordinator [Patrick Graham] for the Giants, and they really liked my versatility.”
Christian Angulo and Alex Bachman ...  
Spider56 : 5/18/2020 7:59 am : link
Sign me up for this guy ... with Baker gone it leaves a CB slot wide open and I’m not sold on Beal staying healthy.
Link - ( New Window )
Rysen John is a solid choice,  
colin : 5/18/2020 8:01 am : link
The only thing that gives me pause with him is that reports are they want to make him a TE. Not that I think he can’t do it, but learning a whole new skill with inline blocking, coupled him coming from a small school, makes it seem like an even longer shot for him to transition to the NFL. That being said, 6’7” 240 running a 4.6/4.7 is hard to ignore.

Haven’t really looked into Lalos at all, I’ll check him out next.
RE: Christian Angulo and Alex Bachman ...  
colin : 5/18/2020 8:08 am : link
In comment 14905698 Spider56 said:
Quote:
Sign me up for this guy ... with Baker gone it leaves a CB slot wide open and I’m not sold on Beal staying healthy. Link - ( New Window )


I actually read this story recently, but outside of that I don’t know anything about Angulo, even less about Bachman. They got chops?
RE: Rysen John is a solid choice,  
Klaatu : 5/18/2020 8:13 am : link
In comment 14905700 colin said:
Quote:
The only thing that gives me pause with him is that reports are they want to make him a TE. Not that I think he can’t do it, but learning a whole new skill with inline blocking, coupled him coming from a small school, makes it seem like an even longer shot for him to transition to the NFL. That being said, 6’7” 240 running a 4.6/4.7 is hard to ignore.

Haven’t really looked into Lalos at all, I’ll check him out next.


I couldn't find it (but admittedly didn't look very long), but I believe I read somewhere that Lalos can long-snap. If that's true, and he makes the team, it would continue our tradition of Ivy League long-snappers.
Might not qualify but Levine Toilolo intrigues me  
George from PA : 5/18/2020 8:14 am : link
Massive TE....he is more blocker at 270....byt Garrett will use him multiple....and at 6'8" with massive hands....should fit well.

Also, Binjimen Victor reminds me of Plaxico....so who would not want that?

Chris Williamson can be our 4th safety and nickle backer.

I love Cam Brown....he was all over the field at Penn St.....
Tyler Haycraft  
mavric : 5/18/2020 8:20 am : link
Big, Strong, Smart, uber-Athletic OT, but too short to be NFL OT. However, perfect size for inside. Will compete for Center job and can back up along the line and eventually be a starting guard.

If the offensive line uses zone, he can be used much like Zack Martin. Only reason he wasn't drafted was he played RT his whole career at Louisville and teams saw him as a too small tackle. But he's going to be moved inside and should excel, especially in zone schemes. Don't sleep on him!

I think both Niko Lalos and Kyle Markway have a bright future. Both need NFL seasoning. Lalos could develop into a good edge rusher as he has the size, speed, strength to excel at it and is cerebral in the football sense. Markway was supposedly the best pure blocking TE in the draft and can be used like a 6th offensive lineman.
Rysen John all the way  
Dankbeerman : 5/18/2020 8:22 am : link
No clue what his play speed is based on highlights he doesnt get a lot of seperation but he also doesn't need it. His height and Arm length are huge. He also shows good body control and positioning. And he is an hands catcher which sounds redundant but really is something missing on a lot of the larger wr/Te types.

He can be a Redzone threat and if he acctually shows some speed maybe more. Need to find a spot for him cant see him gaining the strength for inline blocking but H back syle could work.
I think by the strict  
section125 : 5/18/2020 8:28 am : link
rules of the OP Cam Brown looks promising. Length, decent speed and looks to be a player in need of coaching and some pro weight training.

However, I think Matt Peart is the most intriguing because he has the frame and athleticism to be a VG tackle. Doesn't look like there is much "bulk" on that frame and he looks like good coaching will clean up his technique.
RE: I think by the strict  
colin : 5/18/2020 8:47 am : link
In comment 14905713 section125 said:
Quote:
rules of the OP Cam Brown looks promising. Length, decent speed and looks to be a player in need of coaching and some pro weight training.

However, I think Matt Peart is the most intriguing because he has the frame and athleticism to be a VG tackle. Doesn't look like there is much "bulk" on that frame and he looks like good coaching will clean up his technique.


Haha, didn’t mean to try to stifle anyone. Honestly it’s more selfish than anything. As far as Peart, or Lemieux go, for example, I’ve already done deep dives on them. I wanted to see who people thought could be the next Seubert/Bradshaw/Cruz type might be, and see who I should try to get familiarized with that I hadn’t put effort into learning about.

That being said, I’m very excited about Peart. The idea that we may be a year away from having bookend OT’s, our LG, and C (or RG if Lemieux doesn’t work at C but can supplant Zeitler in the near future) all on rookie contracts, is probably the biggest glimmer of hope I’ve had for this team in a while.
Matt Peart  
Torrag : 5/18/2020 8:56 am : link
If we can develop this kid it could be a game changer for our O-line in terms of accelerating the improvement of the level of play for the unit quickly.

And before anyone chimes in with he's not a project he definitely is. Small school guy with many facets of his game that need improvement. Look up the word raw and you'll find his big grin looking back at you.

Second is Carter Coughlin. He's a sleeper edge rusher with a lot of physical tools and he's just a football player. One of those guys that's immersed himself in the game. Of all the day 3 guys we took I think he's the one to watch. Ohio State came hard and heavy after him in recruiting and frankly if he'd played there with his numbers he'd probably have been drafted earlier.

RE: Matt Peart  
robbieballs2003 : 5/18/2020 10:14 am : link
In comment 14905733 Torrag said:
Quote:
If we can develop this kid it could be a game changer for our O-line in terms of accelerating the improvement of the level of play for the unit quickly.

And before anyone chimes in with he's not a project he definitely is. Small school guy with many facets of his game that need improvement. Look up the word raw and you'll find his big grin looking back at you.

Second is Carter Coughlin. He's a sleeper edge rusher with a lot of physical tools and he's just a football player. One of those guys that's immersed himself in the game. Of all the day 3 guys we took I think he's the one to watch. Ohio State came hard and heavy after him in recruiting and frankly if he'd played there with his numbers he'd probably have been drafted earlier.


Peart was exactly who I was thinking that fit this criteria. If we are talking about projects with upside he has to head the list. If it is late round or UDFA players who are sleepers that is different but Peart is the definition of a project.
Doesn't exactly fit your criteria given he's  
BlueLou'sBack : 5/18/2020 10:56 am : link
the Giants' 3rd round selection this year. But he's definitely a "project", so my nomination for most intriguing project by far is Matt Peart.

My oh my it would really be something if the Giants' drafted bookend OTs for the next decade this year.

If one really cares to fantasize about a cosmic shift level reorganization of the Giants' OL fate from the last decade, then imagine 5th rounder Lemeaux and UDFA Murphy also develop into viable starters by 2022. Those 4 plus Hernandez making up a quality OL would be Karmic level return, for what Eli endured from 2010 until 2019.
Put me in the  
ChicagoMarty : 5/18/2020 11:11 am : link
rooting for Williamson camp.

If he has the mental capability I can see him lining up as a safety, corner or lb depending on the D being run.

Under the radar kind of guy but I can see him eking out a roster spot
For me it's Coughlin  
Jim in Forest Hills : 5/18/2020 11:29 am : link
I liked that he stuck with Minny even after Ohio State came calling. His measurables were pretty damn good just by them selves AND he produced in a power conference. Looks like he has character, AA and hopefully a coach who can use him in the right way. Can he become a Ninkovich? I hope so.
Coughlin I don't see as a project,  
barens : 5/18/2020 11:41 am : link
I think he's a somewhat limited player who doesn't make may mistakes. Crowder or Brunson on the other hand, 2 players drafted late at a position of a much needed upgrade of talent.

Peart may be an obvious choice, but I expect him to struggle a lot year 1. I hope Giant fans are patient enough to realize he'll be far from a finished product after his first year.

RE: Matt Peart  
Anakim : 5/18/2020 11:42 am : link
In comment 14905733 Torrag said:
Quote:
If we can develop this kid it could be a game changer for our O-line in terms of accelerating the improvement of the level of play for the unit quickly.

And before anyone chimes in with he's not a project he definitely is. Small school guy with many facets of his game that need improvement. Look up the word raw and you'll find his big grin looking back at you.




This. Peart is a project and he was taken on Day 2. I think that makes him pretty damn intriguing.
RE: Matt Peart  
Klaatu : 5/18/2020 11:55 am : link
In comment 14905733 Torrag said:
Quote:
If we can develop this kid it could be a game changer for our O-line in terms of accelerating the improvement of the level of play for the unit quickly.

And before anyone chimes in with he's not a project he definitely is. Small school guy with many facets of his game that need improvement. Look up the word raw and you'll find his big grin looking back at you.

Second is Carter Coughlin. He's a sleeper edge rusher with a lot of physical tools and he's just a football player. One of those guys that's immersed himself in the game. Of all the day 3 guys we took I think he's the one to watch. Ohio State came hard and heavy after him in recruiting and frankly if he'd played there with his numbers he'd probably have been drafted earlier.


I don't like the word "project" to describe a player like Peart because it's too often used as a pejorative. I prefer "developmental prospect."

Semantics? Po-tay-to, po-tah-to?

Maybe, but that's how I roll.
RE: Matt Peart  
DCGMan : 5/18/2020 12:02 pm : link
In comment 14905733 Torrag said:
Quote:
If we can develop this kid it could be a game changer for our O-line in terms of accelerating the improvement of the level of play for the unit quickly.

And before anyone chimes in with he's not a project he definitely is. Small school guy with many facets of his game that need improvement. Look up the word raw and you'll find his big grin looking back at you.

+1 on Peart.
Second is Carter Coughlin. He's a sleeper edge rusher with a lot of physical tools and he's just a football player. One of those guys that's immersed himself in the game. Of all the day 3 guys we took I think he's the one to watch. Ohio State came hard and heavy after him in recruiting and frankly if he'd played there with his numbers he'd probably have been drafted earlier.
With Cam Brown's height.....  
No Where Man : 5/18/2020 12:03 pm : link
I wonder if he can be cross-trained to cover big TEs in a bracketed defense along with Peppers?
OFA WR Derrick Dillon  
Red Dog : 5/18/2020 1:41 pm : link
Wasn't a starter in college, but did make some big plays when given a chance. He just might be the kind of guy who takes a while to grow into a role. With his speed, he could become a serious deep threat for DJ to throw to.
Surprised no  
tyrik13 : 5/18/2020 2:49 pm : link
One mentioned Oluwole Beitku from Illinois. If he can stay healthy he can be a terrific player for us. I also second Carter Coughlin, watched a lot of his tape and I really like him
I'm excited about  
Eliyah : 5/18/2020 3:15 pm : link
Betiku as well.

I also have high hopes for Haycraft and Lemieux.
Lemieux by far  
YorkAveGiant : 5/18/2020 4:00 pm : link
if he can switch to C and succeed, the Line will be set for years.

Thomas, Hernandez, Lemieux, Zeitler, Peart.

Peart is a 3rd rounder, we should expect to see a lot of PT this year and be a starter next for sure.
I have a different take on Mack  
KeoweeFan : 5/18/2020 4:08 pm : link
I agree he "really lacks run after catch ability" but I see him in a different role and am intrigued as to whether he can be the guy you depend on to make the tough catch just past the 1st down marker.

As a Clemson fan it was easy to root for Adam Humphries and Hunter Renfro, neither in the class of Sammy Watkins, Mike Williams or Tee Higgins but both did make it to the pros.

Kyle Murphy  
David B. : 5/18/2020 4:46 pm : link
And it's not even close. Taking nothing away from Shane Lemieux, I hope Murphy makes it. His film is him DESTROYING guys. Hope one of these guys transitions to OC.
RE: RE: Matt Peart  
Percy : 5/18/2020 7:07 pm : link
In comment 14905956 Klaatu said:
Quote:
In comment 14905733 Torrag said:


Quote:


If we can develop this kid it could be a game changer for our O-line in terms of accelerating the improvement of the level of play for the unit quickly.

And before anyone chimes in with he's not a project he definitely is. Small school guy with many facets of his game that need improvement. Look up the word raw and you'll find his big grin looking back at you.

Second is Carter Coughlin. He's a sleeper edge rusher with a lot of physical tools and he's just a football player. One of those guys that's immersed himself in the game. Of all the day 3 guys we took I think he's the one to watch. Ohio State came hard and heavy after him in recruiting and frankly if he'd played there with his numbers he'd probably have been drafted earlier.




I don't like the word "project" to describe a player like Peart because it's too often used as a pejorative. I prefer "developmental prospect."

Semantics? Po-tay-to, po-tah-to?

Maybe, but that's how I roll.

Good point. I have the same reaction to "project."
Kyle Murphy  
DavidinBMNY : 5/18/2020 7:56 pm : link
The Giants , see Gates, believe in developing UDFA's OL. Murphy is a great candidate to be that next find. I hope he is. I also agree on Cam Brown because he is just really interesting with that length and wingspan and coming form a top program like PSU. But I'm very hopeful on Murphy being a game-day contributor in 2021.
Matt Peart, followed by  
CT Charlie : 5/18/2020 8:28 pm : link
Javon Leake. Peart is definitely in the "project" class, for we don't know how hungry he is to make a 10-year career in the NFL. Leake is not as much of a project, as he'll either have it -- for special teams -- or he won't. But, man, do I love watching his highlight reel. He has such good vision, instincts, speed and acceleration through the narrowest gaps.
Enjoying the thread  
dabru : 5/18/2020 8:55 pm : link
When I was younger I would pour over and fall in love with some prospects who mostly always failed, one of the last was Seawright. This year my optimism is with Joe Judge choosing the right guys. Every year is fun to watch, until it isn’t.
There are several good options to choose from  
Jay on the Island : 5/19/2020 12:19 am : link
I find LB Cam Brown, LB Carter Coughlin, OL Kyle Murphy, WR’s Austin Mack and Binjimen Victor, G/C Tyler Haycraft, TE Rysen John, and OLB Oluwole Betiku intriguing but I will pick OL Shane Lemieux.

Shane Lemieux has the strength, experience, and nasty streak that the Giants line could surely use. I am hoping that either Lemieux or Gates win the center job allowing the Giants to release Spencer Pulley. I think that Lemieux will be starter for the Giants at either guard or center. The Giants might have found their next Rich Seubert.

While I think Kyle Murphy has more upside I think that Tyler Haycraft might be the dark horse winner of a roster spot. He just sounds like a Joe Judge type of player.

Haycraft walked on at Louisville and through hard work he eventually won a starting role at RT.

Haycraft’s OC at Louisville Dwayne Ledford thinks that Haycraft has what it takes to be a “very, very good” center in the NFL.

I think it’s a safe bet that Haycraft will land a spot on the practice squad but if Pulley loses the starting center competition I could see the Giants moving on from him to save over two million in cap room. If that were to happen and Haycraft impresses enough in camp and the preseason then he could win the final backup OL spot but I think the practice squad is far more likely.
---  
Peppers : 5/19/2020 5:04 am : link
Of the late-round drafted players, Shane Lemieux playing center is the most intriguing project the Giants will have in camp in my opinion.
Include me on Matt Peart and Shane LeMieux....  
Milton : 5/19/2020 5:47 am : link
I'm sorry, Klaatu, but Peart is very much a project in every meaning of the word. It's not just that he needs to improve his technique and add strength/weight, he needs to learn how to be a professional. Of all the interviews following the draft, he came off the most immature and unprepared. He has the measurables of an elite OT prospect, but lasted until the 99th pick (lower than most draftniks projected) because he is far from ready for primetime. And his below average wonderlic score of 20 may not be the be-all and end-all, but it doesn't inspire confidence either. I think he's a three year project who is best served waiting until 2022 before seeing starter's reps. He's still a basketball player at heart, they need to change that and it takes time.

As for LeMieux, he is mainly a project because of the position switch to OC. I think that's the kind of thing where he will either take to it or he will not and the coaches will know by the end of camp whether he has a future there or not. I'm not saying that means he will be ready by September to be a starter, but they will know if he has the instincts for the position. Or whether they should just keep him at guard. But this is a guy who was born to play football and he will find a home somewhere on the OL eventually.

Of the undrafted, the one who intrigues me the most is Javon Leake. I was of the opinion on draft day that finding a backup RB for Barkley was a greater priority than people thought. If we're gonna be designing an offensive system and game plans to take advantage of Barkley's talent, having someone who could step in if/when he is hurt is pretty damn important. Gallman showed last year that he simply wasn't that guy. Maybe Leake can be.
RE: Include me on Matt Peart and Shane LeMieux....  
Klaatu : 5/19/2020 7:19 am : link
In comment 14906498 Milton said:
Quote:
I'm sorry, Klaatu, but Peart is very much a project in every meaning of the word. It's not just that he needs to improve his technique and add strength/weight, he needs to learn how to be a professional. Of all the interviews following the draft, he came off the most immature and unprepared. He has the measurables of an elite OT prospect, but lasted until the 99th pick (lower than most draftniks projected) because he is far from ready for primetime. And his below average wonderlic score of 20 may not be the be-all and end-all, but it doesn't inspire confidence either. I think he's a three year project who is best served waiting until 2022 before seeing starter's reps. He's still a basketball player at heart, they need to change that and it takes time.


Okay, Milton, so the kid who grew up rooting for the Giants gets drafted by the Giants and says this:

Quote:
“Growing up in New York, having the opportunity to put on the blue has always been a dream of mine...When I got the call, it was definitely a big surreal feeling.”


You describe as immature and unprepared in an interview he gave just after he was drafted, when he was clearly deliriously happy, and Papa, Diehl, and O'Hara were having fun with him. You must have missed the part where he said that he's already been in touch with the Giants' strength coach, who gave him some workouts via an App, and that he's already begun to "get after it" as his brother helped him build a gym in his basement (including a squat rack). Frankly, I don't think your "analysis" could have been any more petty and shallow.

About Peart, whom you said "needs to learn how to be a professional," Dave Gettleman said this:

Quote:
"We interviewed him a number of times, he’s a great kid, he’s athletic and he’s long, we just think he has a lot of upside...He’s a guy that the coaching staff really wanted to work with.”


Joe Judge echoed that sentiment:

Quote:
“This guy’s got tremendous upside. His athleticism, his physical build and then his character and work ethic...You put those things together and he’s a guy you really want to work with.”


But, yeah...I'm sure you must have interviewed Peart at length to conclude that, "He's still a basketball player at heart, they need to change that and it takes time." Perhaps you could recommend a behavior-modification program for Peart, to purge all of those basketball-player traits from his heart.

As for where he was drafted and what the draftniks thought about him, I'm surprised you were able to reach any conclusion about that, since Drew Boylhart didn't bother to do a write-up on him. However, looking at where he was drafted in relation to the OT's that went before and after him, I'd say he got picked right around where he should have been.

Finally, my point about the word "project" was that it's very often used as a pejorative, as a term to denigrate a developmental prospect.

Thanks for proving it.
Klaatu  
Milton : 5/19/2020 8:23 am : link
I call 'em like I see 'em. Of all the draft picks that were interviewed, he was the least impressive by a noticeable margin. People want to be pretend he was being diplomatic when he couldn't name his favorite offensive tackle, but it appeared to me that he couldn't think of any. I question whether he even knew who Diehl and O'Hara were. He certainly didn't say anything to give that indication. But, hey, give him credit, he knew who Eli Manning was.
p.s.--I'm hopeful when it comes to Peart, which is why he tops my list of "most intriguing prospect." His upside is quite high, but he's got a long way to go on several fronts.
Ouch! Even though K's diatribe was directed at Milton,  
BlueLou'sBack : 5/19/2020 9:06 am : link
it made me cringe reading it.

OK so I got after the OL and bypassed Colin's request (to some extent) re the "late round" guys.

Colin, as I continue to read up and listen to interviews with these players, I find myself more intrigued by Carter Coughlin.

Why? In a nutshell, because I'm guessing he's another ILB like Ryan Connelly in the making. I don't think he was graded or evaluated properly by the draft pundits (Lance Zierlein gave him a 5.59 rating: "chance to be a bottom of the roster guy") because he was evaluated as an extremely undersized EDGE player. But I doubt that's his position in the pros!

Listen to his post draft interviews; he was an off ball LB (ILB in Graham's base D) who moved to the edge position for the benefit of his team and actually performed pretty well there at edge, despite it being quite out of position for him ideally due to his body type and previous experience!

This kid has everything in speed and quickness that Martinez lacks, and he's a childhood pal of Connelly's, who grew up a few houses down the road from him.

His arms are "too short" for an EDGE, but two inches longer then Connelly's. He's lighter in the pants than Connelly but even faster (40) and quicker (10 yard split) and more explosive (36" VJ.).

We saw Connelly show plenty of potential last year at ILB; this kid might be even better and is even more the new prototype ILB who can run and cover and rush the passer on occasion, if somewhat light in the pants and ill suited to take on OL head on, stack and shed. But he appears to be exactly the type of quick, fast, and instinctive ILB who can thrive behind a host of hog Molly DL like Tomlinson, Lawrence, Williams, Hill, Johnson and co.

I'm looking forward to see where he is aligned to play, and would bet this kid makes the active roster early in his career as a Giant, if only for STs coverage teams.

NFL combine write up as EDGE Prospect - ( New Window )
Milton  
Klaatu : 5/19/2020 9:11 am : link
As George Carlin once said in his bit as a fictional sportscaster, "I call 'em like I see 'em, and when I don't see 'em, I make 'em up."

If you want to say Peart isn't ready for prime-time, yet, I'll agree. But the rest of your assessment is pure, unadulterated bullshit.
RE: Ouch! Even though K's diatribe was directed at Milton,  
colin : 5/19/2020 2:13 pm : link
In comment 14906541 BlueLou'sBack said:
Quote:
it made me cringe reading it.

OK so I got after the OL and bypassed Colin's request (to some extent) re the "late round" guys.

Colin, as I continue to read up and listen to interviews with these players, I find myself more intrigued by Carter Coughlin.

Why? In a nutshell, because I'm guessing he's another ILB like Ryan Connelly in the making. I don't think he was graded or evaluated properly by the draft pundits (Lance Zierlein gave him a 5.59 rating: "chance to be a bottom of the roster guy") because he was evaluated as an extremely undersized EDGE player. But I doubt that's his position in the pros!

Listen to his post draft interviews; he was an off ball LB (ILB in Graham's base D) who moved to the edge position for the benefit of his team and actually performed pretty well there at edge, despite it being quite out of position for him ideally due to his body type and previous experience!

This kid has everything in speed and quickness that Martinez lacks, and he's a childhood pal of Connelly's, who grew up a few houses down the road from him.

His arms are "too short" for an EDGE, but two inches longer then Connelly's. He's lighter in the pants than Connelly but even faster (40) and quicker (10 yard split) and more explosive (36" VJ.).

We saw Connelly show plenty of potential last year at ILB; this kid might be even better and is even more the new prototype ILB who can run and cover and rush the passer on occasion, if somewhat light in the pants and ill suited to take on OL head on, stack and shed. But he appears to be exactly the type of quick, fast, and instinctive ILB who can thrive behind a host of hog Molly DL like Tomlinson, Lawrence, Williams, Hill, Johnson and co.

I'm looking forward to see where he is aligned to play, and would bet this kid makes the active roster early in his career as a Giant, if only for STs coverage teams. NFL combine write up as EDGE Prospect - ( New Window )


Great post, exactly what I’ve been thinking.
Tons of great info!  
colin : 5/19/2020 2:16 pm : link
Admittedly, I may have been a little loose with the term “project.” My goal was to bring up names and info on guys we may not be talking much about. Peart and Lemieux are the obvious picks as far as projects go, but I wanted to see who people thought had the best chance to surprise, coming in with a high ceiling.

If anyone has more info on Betiku, Lalos, Haycraft, Markway, or Williamson, those are the names that have popped up that I probably know the least about.
Murphy  
WeekendLife56 : 5/19/2020 10:03 pm : link
WOW....I get it small school, less comp. But yall ain't lieing this kid is just throwing big men around. I love linemen who finish blocks to the ground like that.
Lemieux...  
Brown_Hornet : 5/20/2020 9:24 am : link
...for me.

Peart is a 3rd round pick. He better not be a project!

Incidentally, I'm redoing the interior of my 1967 C10. So, clearly Lemieux is my 2nd most intriguing project.

I'm most intrigued by Lemieux as well.  
Brown Recluse : 5/20/2020 9:44 am : link
Regarding Cam Brown, the lack of instincts is a HUGE turn off for me. I don't think you can really teach instincts.

Thats why they're called instincts lol.

Guys like this don't ever seem to pan out. He sounds a lot like a *poorer* mans version of the Lions Jarrad Davis.
Back to the Corner