straight up. Typical silly question from a nine year old who is watching too much YouTube and NFL network during the COVID emergency while locked up in a NYC apartment. I immediately answered yes because Edge is so much more important than RB. But as I have been thinking about it all morning it has gotten me to wonder if with the position differential, we have already seen that Barkley can thrive in this league, is it smart to trade a less important position although established star (budding maybe superstar) for a more important position but potential superstar without knowing if he will be able to make it in this league. I still would do it, but was wondering what other people had thought (knowing obviously it will never happen).
Tuck has 2 more rings than either of those guys.
Quote:
and Barkley turns out to have a Peterson, or Sanders career, who do you pick?
Tuck has 2 more rings than either of those guys.
Yup, because Tuck despite not being the best pass rusher in the league plays a position where he could disrupt the league’s MVP.
Quote:
and Barkley turns out to have a Peterson, or Sanders career, who do you pick?
Tuck has 2 more rings than either of those guys.
Yup, because Tuck despite not being the best pass rusher in the league plays a position where he could disrupt the league’s MVP.
Quote:
and Barkley turns out to have a Peterson, or Sanders career, who do you pick?
Tuck has 2 more rings than either of those guys.
Yup, because Tuck despite not being the best pass rusher in the league plays a position where he could disrupt the league’s MVP.