for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

NFT: History Channel's mini series: Grant

montanagiant : 5/25/2020 1:07 pm
starts tonight.

Quote:
Based on Ron Chernow’s critically acclaimed 2017 biography of the same name, it’s a stirring tribute to an individual who embodied America’s finest ideals: hard work, determination, courage, resolve, and belief in democracy and equality for all, no matter the color of their skin.
montana  
ColHowPepper : 5/25/2020 1:16 pm : link
thanks, a worthy rec. Chernow's bio of Grant was outstanding, but put aside for a moment all the idealized characteristics. The bio was raw and real, describing a man who came out of nowhere, was reviled by his father-in-law, and revolutionized the 'art' of warfare. He was a terrific commander, but not a few times his persistence in following through on his strategy send thousands to unnecessary deaths.

Chernow's description of Reconstruction, and the extreme measures Grant was forced to take to prevent the Confederacy from taking back the Union's so hard fought victory, at such a cost (it did), blew my mind.
Agreed  
Bill2 : 5/25/2020 1:18 pm : link
and he deserves a balance between his weak spots and his accomplishments and actual character.
Thanks for the reminder!  
sb from NYT Forum : 5/25/2020 1:20 pm : link
Can't wait. Last year I saw Chernow speak about Grant but haven't read his book (too heavy!). Reason enough to finally switch to kindle books, I guess.
I've been looking forward to this  
Jay on the Island : 5/25/2020 1:36 pm : link
I really enjoyed their Washington series.
Grant was grossly  
section125 : 5/25/2020 1:56 pm : link
underrated, IMHO. Only 41/42 years old while commanding the Union Army; only in the war because the Governor of Illinois hired him to train Illinois regiments and after an illness to one of the regimental commanders prepared to enter the war, Grant was given a Commission, rank of Colonel and command of that Regiment. He had been turned down by the Department of War when he applied to have his commission reinstated in the regular army at the start of the war.

If you haven't read it, pick up his Memoirs. Fascinating.
I keep putting off reading the  
SFGFNCGiantsFan : 5/25/2020 2:07 pm : link
Chernow book.
What I remember most  
hammock man : 5/25/2020 2:12 pm : link
from the book is what a celebrity Grant was in his time. Masses of citizens would wait with great expectation to glimpse him when word got out that he'd be traveling their way. Banners and cheers welcomed his passing bye.Chernow compares his popularity to Lincoln.
Will not watch it.  
rmc3981 : 5/25/2020 3:25 pm : link
After watching the Washington three part series. Personally felt that it was shaded heavily with a modern day political agenda. In addition, Nicholas Rowe being cast as General/President Washington was a terrible miscast. Also, I don't need to see what modern day pundits have to say about either Washington or Grant. But, just my humble opinion.
Thanks for the heads up  
Watson : 5/25/2020 3:40 pm : link
.
RE: montana  
Coach Red Beaulieu : 5/25/2020 4:16 pm : link
In comment 14910314 ColHowPepper said:
Quote:
thanks, a worthy rec. Chernow's bio of Grant was outstanding, but put aside for a moment all the idealized characteristics. The bio was raw and real, describing a man who came out of nowhere, was reviled by his father-in-law, and revolutionized the 'art' of warfare. He was a terrific commander, but not a few times his persistence in following through on his strategy send thousands to unnecessary deaths.

Chernow's description of Reconstruction, and the extreme measures Grant was forced to take to prevent the Confederacy from taking back the Union's so hard fought victory, at such a cost (it did), blew my mind.

Grant likely undertook the only successful strategy against Lee, a attritional grind it out strategy against Lee defending the shorter interior lines with numerous perpendicular rivers flowing into the Chesepeake bay.
I’m looking forward to this ...  
Spider56 : 5/25/2020 8:04 pm : link
Grant was fortunate to have Sherman at his side when it mattered most ... It would have been an interesting matchup if Stonewall was still around to help Lee the same way,
RE: Grant was grossly  
HomerJones45 : 5/25/2020 8:04 pm : link
In comment 14910332 section125 said:
Quote:
underrated, IMHO. Only 41/42 years old while commanding the Union Army; only in the war because the Governor of Illinois hired him to train Illinois regiments and after an illness to one of the regimental commanders prepared to enter the war, Grant was given a Commission, rank of Colonel and command of that Regiment. He had been turned down by the Department of War when he applied to have his commission reinstated in the regular army at the start of the war.

If you haven't read it, pick up his Memoirs. Fascinating.
is Memoirs were a good read. Good rec.
RE: I keep putting off reading the  
Percy : 5/25/2020 8:05 pm : link
In comment 14910337 SFGFNCGiantsFan said:
Quote:
Chernow book.

I still have a ways to go (35% remains unread). It has been a gripping trip. Sent me off into long stuff about Reconstruction and legal developments that have rearranged my brain. How did I grow up -- New York close-in suburb, school in Connecticut, college and law school in Chicago 1954-1966 -- with no one teaching me about all this? The book just has to be read. The details are important.
Just watched first part (of three)  
JohnF : 5/25/2020 11:10 pm : link
Blown away. It's very good...excellent insights into Grant, so far faithful to his memoirs (Highly recommended, you can read the book or listen free on Librevox.

I would have liked to see more of Grant in the Mexican war, but there's a lot packed into 2 hours. Don't miss it!
Is it me, or did it seem  
section125 : 5/26/2020 7:59 am : link
like it was 5 minutes of Grant, then five minutes of commercials?
Anyway, looking forward to tonight. Grant working with Flag Officer Foote was the key to winning the west.
section125  
ColHowPepper : 5/26/2020 8:28 am : link
Yeah, I was surprised at the level of advertising interest, maybe the diCaprio effect, coupled with country on the cusp of opening?

JohnF, there wasn't a ton of Mexican War material in Chernow's bio: focused on his first duties coming out of West Point and detailed much more than last night how, as Quartermaster, he was a natural at navigating the imperatives of armaments, food, cooking stations, men, horse drawn transportation, horse drawn artillery in order to achieve combat readiness. This would stand him in very good stead as he rose through the ranks in the Civil War from Commander of an all-volunteer force in Galena to General of the Union Army.

The other aspect of the Mexican War chapters I recall is that he met Stonewall Jackson (think I have it right) and Gen. Winfield Scott, observed their tactics and began stowing away this learning. The raw, naked aggression of the US in taking Mexico down and out of Texas and the Mexican Session territories was stunning, and of course the tabula rasa of those lands would figure large in the stakes of the War to come.
I keep looking up what  
section125 : 5/26/2020 8:57 am : link
years all these Generals were at West Point. Aside from Lee and Meade, most were in the early to mid 1840s. The classes were so small (25-40) then that they had to know each other well. Jeff Davis 1828, Lee 1829, Meade 1831.

Like WWII - West Point 1915
So far, nothing new  
HomerJones45 : 5/26/2020 9:24 am : link
having read both Grant's and Sherman's memoirs. The dramatizations were good, but thought it was boring and too broken up with commercials.
Was really looking forward to mini-series but wasn't that impressed  
LBH15 : 5/26/2020 9:37 am : link
with part one. Hope it gets better.

Really enjoyed the Chernow book though...just finished it this past weekend at the beach. Immense details and not a quick read but worth it.
LBH15  
ColHowPepper : 5/26/2020 10:07 am : link
What struck me most in reading Grant were how, literally out of nowhere and from rock bottom Grant rose to become Union's General of the Army and, then, just how extreme the measures he took during 'Reconstruction' in the attempt to preserve the achievements of the War for the Negro (used advisedly). Stunning.

The other: as a General, he was a master of logistics and brought 'modern' communication to the fields of battle.
RE: section125  
JohnF : 5/26/2020 11:12 am : link
In comment 14910737 ColHowPepper said:
Quote:
JohnF, there wasn't a ton of Mexican War material in Chernow's bio:


True, I though they would mix in more of Grant's memoirs on this war . From HistoryOnTheNet.com
Quote:
Early in 1847, therefore, Grant’s Fourth Infantry Regiment joined Scott’s famous campaign from Vera Cruz, on the coast, to Mexico City. After Vera Cruz surrendered, Grant fought in the major campaign battles of Cerro Gordo, Churubusco, Molino del Rey, Chapultepec, and Mexico City. Just outside Mexico City, Grant outflanked causeway-blocking Mexican artillery with a small detachment, hauled a disassembled mountain howitzer to the top of a church, enfiladed the Mexican position, and thereby opened the way into the city.


Quote:
The other aspect of the Mexican War chapters I recall is that he met Stonewall Jackson (think I have it right) and Gen. Winfield Scott, observed their tactics and began stowing away this learning.


He learned much from both Gen. Winfield Scott and Gen. Zachary Taylor in the Mexican war. From the same article:
Quote:
From both Taylor and Scott, he learned that aggressiveness on the offensive could lead to victory. This was a useful lesson for Grant, whose side in the Civil War would have the same offensive strategic burden as the United States had in the Mexican-American War. According to Jean Edward Smith, Grant “saw how time and again Taylor and Scott moved against a numerically superior foe occupying a fortified position, and how important it was to maintain the momentum of the attack.” Particularly from Taylor, he learned that speed and maneuver were real assets. From both, he learned the value of being cunning and deceptive about planned offensives.

From Scott’s abandoning his supply line midway through his march on Mexico City, Grant learned that an army could live off the countryside— a lesson that he applied during his 1863 Vicksburg Campaign.
.

Lastly, I would have liked the show to mention how Grant blasted the war afterwards, and how he tied the Mexican war to the eventual Civil war that followed:

Quote:
"For myself, I was bitterly opposed to the measure,and to this day regard the war [with Mexico] which resulted as one of the most unjust ever waged by a stronger against a weaker nation."

"The Southern rebellion was largely the outgrowth of the Mexican war. Nations, like individuals, are punished for their transgressions. We got our punishment in the most sanguinary and expensive war of modern times."

Ulysses S. Grant, Memoir on the Mexican War (1885)

Still, this was fun to watch, and I'm looking forward to tonight!!
Just downloaed  
section125 : 5/26/2020 11:53 am : link
Chernow's book for $1.99 from Barnes & Noble. Needed something to read.
Like others, I would also like to have seen more time  
Matt M. : 5/26/2020 1:22 pm : link
dedicated to his early life. But, I understand the Chrenow book and his memoirs really didn't delve very much into those times. Still, a good watch so far. Most importantly, my two boys were very interested and want to continue watching tonight. To that end, and 8pm start would have been better for kids to watch.
RE: Like others, I would also like to have seen more time  
US1 Giants : 5/26/2020 1:54 pm : link
In comment 14910990 Matt M. said:
Quote:
dedicated to his early life. But, I understand the Chrenow book and his memoirs really didn't delve very much into those times. Still, a good watch so far. Most importantly, my two boys were very interested and want to continue watching tonight. To that end, and 8pm start would have been better for kids to watch.


Last night's episode reruns tonight at 7PM before the 2nd eptsode airs at 9PM. They may doing that each night of the series.
I enjoyed last night's  
section125 : 5/27/2020 7:46 am : link
episode. Thought there was one mistake where they had Lee implying he knew Grant when his aide declared the Union Army was retreating from the Wilderness...Lee did not know Grant personally and at Appomattox told Grant he could not recall him from the Mexican War.

One thing I remembered reading and they showed at the very end was that the common soldier and the lower grade officers were happy and exhilarated when Grant kept pushing Lee as he did not retreat. For too long they felt they were better than the Army of Northern Virginia. Back to Antietam, the soldiers were angry that McClellan broke off and did not pursue Lee.

One thing I wish they had brought up in more detail was his use of telegraph for up to date battlefield info and that the Union had a cipher key.

Started reading Chernow's book and I am flabbergasted at how much he could dig up on Grant's family, and his early years, his time at West Point and the Dent family.
What do they say about General Order No. 11 in the mini-series?  
Milton : 5/27/2020 3:33 pm : link
Quote:
General Order No. 11 was a controversial order issued by Union Major-General Ulysses S. Grant on December 17, 1862 during the Vicksburg Campaign, that took place during the American Civil War. The order expelled all Jews from Grant's military district, comprising areas of Tennessee, Mississippi, and Kentucky. Grant issued the order in an effort to reduce Union military corruption, and stop an illicit trade of Southern cotton, which Grant thought was being run "mostly by Jews and other unprincipled traders." In the war zone, authorized by the Lincoln administration, the United States licensed traders through the Army, which created a market for unlicensed ones. Union military commanders in the South were responsible for administering the trade licenses and trying to control the black market in Southern cotton, as well as for conducting the war.

At Holly Springs, Mississippi, Grant's Union Army supply depot, Jewish persons were rounded up and forced to leave the city by foot. On December 20, 1862, three days after Grant's order, Confederate Major General Earl Van Dorn's Confederate Army raided Holly Springs, that prevented many Jewish persons from potential expulsion. Although delayed by Van Dorn's raid, Grant's order was fully implemented at Paducah, Kentucky. Thirty Jewish families were expelled and roughly treated from the city. Jewish community leaders protested, and there was an outcry by members of Congress and the press; President Abraham Lincoln countermanded the General Order on January 4, 1863. Grant claimed during his 1868 Presidential campaign that he had issued the order without prejudice against Jews as a way to address a problem that "certain Jews had caused".
RE: What do they say about General Order No. 11 in the mini-series?  
section125 : 5/27/2020 3:38 pm : link
In comment 14911955 Milton said:
Quote:


Quote:


General Order No. 11 was a controversial order issued by Union Major-General Ulysses S. Grant on December 17, 1862 during the Vicksburg Campaign, that took place during the American Civil War. The order expelled all Jews from Grant's military district, comprising areas of Tennessee, Mississippi, and Kentucky. Grant issued the order in an effort to reduce Union military corruption, and stop an illicit trade of Southern cotton, which Grant thought was being run "mostly by Jews and other unprincipled traders." In the war zone, authorized by the Lincoln administration, the United States licensed traders through the Army, which created a market for unlicensed ones. Union military commanders in the South were responsible for administering the trade licenses and trying to control the black market in Southern cotton, as well as for conducting the war.

At Holly Springs, Mississippi, Grant's Union Army supply depot, Jewish persons were rounded up and forced to leave the city by foot. On December 20, 1862, three days after Grant's order, Confederate Major General Earl Van Dorn's Confederate Army raided Holly Springs, that prevented many Jewish persons from potential expulsion. Although delayed by Van Dorn's raid, Grant's order was fully implemented at Paducah, Kentucky. Thirty Jewish families were expelled and roughly treated from the city. Jewish community leaders protested, and there was an outcry by members of Congress and the press; President Abraham Lincoln countermanded the General Order on January 4, 1863. Grant claimed during his 1868 Presidential campaign that he had issued the order without prejudice against Jews as a way to address a problem that "certain Jews had caused".



They didn't. First I ever heard of it. Thanks for pointing it out.
RE: Just downloaed  
US1 Giants : 5/27/2020 4:17 pm : link
In comment 14910918 section125 said:
Quote:
Chernow's book for $1.99 from Barnes & Noble. Needed something to read.


Also available, Amazon Kindle Edition for $1.99
RE: What do they say about General Order No. 11 in the mini-series?  
Matt M. : 5/27/2020 4:25 pm : link
In comment 14911955 Milton said:
Quote:


Quote:


General Order No. 11 was a controversial order issued by Union Major-General Ulysses S. Grant on December 17, 1862 during the Vicksburg Campaign, that took place during the American Civil War. The order expelled all Jews from Grant's military district, comprising areas of Tennessee, Mississippi, and Kentucky. Grant issued the order in an effort to reduce Union military corruption, and stop an illicit trade of Southern cotton, which Grant thought was being run "mostly by Jews and other unprincipled traders." In the war zone, authorized by the Lincoln administration, the United States licensed traders through the Army, which created a market for unlicensed ones. Union military commanders in the South were responsible for administering the trade licenses and trying to control the black market in Southern cotton, as well as for conducting the war.

At Holly Springs, Mississippi, Grant's Union Army supply depot, Jewish persons were rounded up and forced to leave the city by foot. On December 20, 1862, three days after Grant's order, Confederate Major General Earl Van Dorn's Confederate Army raided Holly Springs, that prevented many Jewish persons from potential expulsion. Although delayed by Van Dorn's raid, Grant's order was fully implemented at Paducah, Kentucky. Thirty Jewish families were expelled and roughly treated from the city. Jewish community leaders protested, and there was an outcry by members of Congress and the press; President Abraham Lincoln countermanded the General Order on January 4, 1863. Grant claimed during his 1868 Presidential campaign that he had issued the order without prejudice against Jews as a way to address a problem that "certain Jews had caused".

Thank you for adding this. Thus far they have not referenced or mentioned it at all and I never knew about this.
Episode 2 was much better imv than the first  
LBH15 : 5/27/2020 5:28 pm : link
Enjoyed the concentrated discussions around Vicksburg campaign.

Looking forward to tonight.
RE: I enjoyed last night's  
LBH15 : 5/27/2020 5:31 pm : link
In comment 14911399 section125 said:
Quote:
episode. Thought there was one mistake where they had Lee implying he knew Grant when his aide declared the Union Army was retreating from the Wilderness...Lee did not know Grant personally and at Appomattox told Grant he could not recall him from the Mexican War.

One thing I remembered reading and they showed at the very end was that the common soldier and the lower grade officers were happy and exhilarated when Grant kept pushing Lee as he did not retreat. For too long they felt they were better than the Army of Northern Virginia. Back to Antietam, the soldiers were angry that McClellan broke off and did not pursue Lee.

One thing I wish they had brought up in more detail was his use of telegraph for up to date battlefield info and that the Union had a cipher key.

Started reading Chernow's book and I am flabbergasted at how much he could dig up on Grant's family, and his early years, his time at West Point and the Dent family.


I recall the book saying the Lee knew of Grant from the Mexican war but couldn’t recall what he looked like. Or something to that effect.
RE: Episode 2 was much better imv than the first  
Diver_Down : 5/27/2020 5:31 pm : link
In comment 14912085 LBH15 said:
Quote:
Enjoyed the concentrated discussions around Vicksburg campaign.

Looking forward to tonight.


Me, too, as I can see the 2nd episode at a reasonable hour. I'm getting too old to stay up till 11pm.
RE: LBH15  
LBH15 : 5/27/2020 5:41 pm : link
In comment 14910809 ColHowPepper said:
Quote:
What struck me most in reading Grant were how, literally out of nowhere and from rock bottom Grant rose to become Union's General of the Army and, then, just how extreme the measures he took during 'Reconstruction' in the attempt to preserve the achievements of the War for the Negro (used advisedly). Stunning.

The other: as a General, he was a master of logistics and brought 'modern' communication to the fields of battle.


It was a bit extraordinary how he moved up so quick. Lincoln’s desperation to find anybody competent helped that out I guess :-)

Grant and his organization of things once he started taking over was remarkable. It’s not like the war was centered in one spot of the country at the time, and his ability to stay ahead of the game and keep playing offense was huge. While the difference in # of men was a massive advantage, Grant showed his mastery of logistics as you stated which actually kept things efficient for the North. That war could have last years longer if not for him.
RE: RE: Episode 2 was much better imv than the first  
LBH15 : 5/27/2020 5:43 pm : link
In comment 14912091 Diver_Down said:
Quote:
In comment 14912085 LBH15 said:


Quote:


Enjoyed the concentrated discussions around Vicksburg campaign.

Looking forward to tonight.



Me, too, as I can see the 2nd episode at a reasonable hour. I'm getting too old to stay up till 11pm.


Ha. I said the same thing after episode one...what’s wrong with an 8 pm ET start for crying out loud!
RE: RE: I enjoyed last night's  
section125 : 5/27/2020 6:31 pm : link
In comment 14912088 LBH15 said:
Quote:
In comment 14911399 section125 said:


Quote:


episode. Thought there was one mistake where they had Lee implying he knew Grant when his aide declared the Union Army was retreating from the Wilderness...Lee did not know Grant personally and at Appomattox told Grant he could not recall him from the Mexican War.

One thing I remembered reading and they showed at the very end was that the common soldier and the lower grade officers were happy and exhilarated when Grant kept pushing Lee as he did not retreat. For too long they felt they were better than the Army of Northern Virginia. Back to Antietam, the soldiers were angry that McClellan broke off and did not pursue Lee.

One thing I wish they had brought up in more detail was his use of telegraph for up to date battlefield info and that the Union had a cipher key.

Started reading Chernow's book and I am flabbergasted at how much he could dig up on Grant's family, and his early years, his time at West Point and the Dent family.



I recall the book saying the Lee knew of Grant from the Mexican war but couldn’t recall what he looked like. Or something to that effect.


Lee was chief of staff for Winfield Scott. Doubt he knew some brevet 2nd LT in the Quartermaster Corps in a 10 or 15 thousand man Army. From Grant's Memoirs, I could be wrong or "misremembering", he asked Lee if he remembered him and Lee said he did not. Of course, Lee was probably humbled and upset that he was beaten by this young general, 16 years his junior and may have said it for effect.
Folklore!
Probably right Section  
LBH15 : 5/27/2020 7:12 pm : link
After all, Lee was a southern gentleman!
RE: RE: RE: I enjoyed last night's  
Matt M. : 5/27/2020 7:47 pm : link
In comment 14912142 section125 said:
Quote:
In comment 14912088 LBH15 said:


Quote:


In comment 14911399 section125 said:


Quote:


episode. Thought there was one mistake where they had Lee implying he knew Grant when his aide declared the Union Army was retreating from the Wilderness...Lee did not know Grant personally and at Appomattox told Grant he could not recall him from the Mexican War.

One thing I remembered reading and they showed at the very end was that the common soldier and the lower grade officers were happy and exhilarated when Grant kept pushing Lee as he did not retreat. For too long they felt they were better than the Army of Northern Virginia. Back to Antietam, the soldiers were angry that McClellan broke off and did not pursue Lee.

One thing I wish they had brought up in more detail was his use of telegraph for up to date battlefield info and that the Union had a cipher key.

Started reading Chernow's book and I am flabbergasted at how much he could dig up on Grant's family, and his early years, his time at West Point and the Dent family.



I recall the book saying the Lee knew of Grant from the Mexican war but couldn’t recall what he looked like. Or something to that effect.



Lee was chief of staff for Winfield Scott. Doubt he knew some brevet 2nd LT in the Quartermaster Corps in a 10 or 15 thousand man Army. From Grant's Memoirs, I could be wrong or "misremembering", he asked Lee if he remembered him and Lee said he did not. Of course, Lee was probably humbled and upset that he was beaten by this young general, 16 years his junior and may have said it for effect.
Folklore!
Sounds reasonable. But in the clip of Lee speaking to his soldier saying the soldier obviously didn't know Grant, I don't think that meant Lee knew him personally. I think it was more a commentary on his study of his adversary and strategizing.
Anyone read his memoir?  
SFGFNCGiantsFan : 5/27/2020 7:51 pm : link
Absolutely fascinating.
When the time came  
Bill2 : 5/27/2020 9:50 pm : link
He brought the hammer down
RE: Anyone read his memoir?  
section125 : 5/27/2020 11:14 pm : link
In comment 14912202 SFGFNCGiantsFan said:
Quote:
Absolutely fascinating.


All 1706 pages...First chapter was not well written. Sort of balky. I was wondering how he was a West Point grad and President. But the writing got better and better each chapter.
I was wishing I had a map of the battles. Problem with e-books is the drawings and graphics are bad. Didn't have the internet where I was so it was hard to follow the battles and formations.
I found it a great book.
Speaking of Grant's Memoir...  
BamaBlue : 5/28/2020 7:19 am : link
it is an incredible legacy of Grant's life that very nearly didn't happen. He reluctantly wrote the memoir after a failed business left him in debt and he was in the final stages of throat cancer. Mark Twain was instrumental in talking Grant into the endeavor and getting Grant's memoir published. Here's a very interesting story about their relationship...


Mark Twain and U.S. Grant - ( New Window )
Background behind the book  
Bill2 : 5/28/2020 7:28 am : link
(From memory so may not be exact).

Grant was once again facing a complete bankruptcy and more importantly he had very painful throat and lung cancer.

He had nothing to leave his family.

One Sam Clemens ( Mark Twain) arranged for him to receive the largest advance and percentage yet received at the time for his memoirs.

Although he could have written a 300 page book and claimed the contract, Grant worked tirelessly without ghostwriters in terrible condition for many months beyond his life expectancy to honor his wife and family.

He died the day after he finished his 1700 page book.

He left his widow a millionaire.

He was a frequent failure. Except he finished what he started. Alwàys.
Sorry Bama  
Bill2 : 5/28/2020 7:29 am : link
I started before your post appeared.

To me, it was a post script that said a lot about the man
I went back and checked  
Bill2 : 5/28/2020 7:37 am : link
the outline as I wrote had a lot of truth essays but read Bama's link for accuracy
.  
Bill2 : 5/28/2020 7:39 am : link
Not truth essays..."truthiness" is what I wrote to convey a general truth with a Swiss cheese precise memory for details on the subject
RE: Background behind the book  
section125 : 5/28/2020 8:20 am : link
In comment 14912344 Bill2 said:
Quote:
(From memory so may not be exact).

Grant was once again facing a complete bankruptcy and more importantly he had very painful throat and lung cancer.

He had nothing to leave his family.

One Sam Clemens ( Mark Twain) arranged for him to receive the largest advance and percentage yet received at the time for his memoirs.

Although he could have written a 300 page book and claimed the contract, Grant worked tirelessly without ghostwriters in terrible condition for many months beyond his life expectancy to honor his wife and family.

He died the day after he finished his 1700 page book.

He left his widow a millionaire.

He was a frequent failure. Except he finished what he started. Alwàys.


Superstitious about turning back.

When I was in school in the 60s, he was always talked of with much derision. As a kid and not knowing anything, I always wondered how the guy that beat Bobby Lee was considered an inferior general. Vicksburg and the Western campaign were hardly spoken of as if they did not matter. Drunkard, butcher, uncouth, corrupt. Did not know he started the Justice Department. Did not know he initially crushed the KKK - these were not taught.
Amazing what revisionist history can do.
I grew up with a lot of  
TrueBlue56 : 5/28/2020 8:51 am : link
Misperceptions of grant. I was taught and always thought he was a heavy drinker and Lincoln did not trust him to lead the army until he was out of options when meade, halleck, hooker, McClellan and burnside failed. Really goes to show the power of the media and the agenda of those who wanted to spin their story.

I am really glad the history channel did this documentary, maybe it will enlighten some people like myself and pique their interest to learn more about Grant.
One of the historians toward the end of part 3  
Matt M. : 5/28/2020 1:51 pm : link
touched on Grant's legacy as being tainted by much of the history we've been taught in the 20th century was ironically written by southern scholars. That's what made this film so great.

It really painted Grant in a whole new light, especially his Presidency. I didn't know about his going after the Klan or starting the Justice Department.

It is also why I was completely on board with removing Confederate statues and the like.
Loved the series  
JohnF : 5/28/2020 2:54 pm : link
but I have a bone to pick over their explanation of why Grant's legacy faded. BBC code didn't work on a couple of the links, so you'll have to cut and paste them in your browser.

The program brought up "The Lost Cause","The Lost Cause: A New Southern History of the War of the Confederates" by Edward A. Pollard.
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moa/ADH2296.0001.001?rgn=subject;view=toc;q1=America+--+History

I've read the book (a bit dry, but not bad reading when you get to the troop movement parts). Pollard was the Editor of the Richmond Examiner, and a fierce critic of Jefferson Davis. Davis gets 100% more criticism in the book than Grant. Pollard is totally biased in the book for the South, and while he does blast Grant for being a butcher and no where near Lee (who he does deify), he actually gives Grant credit for his behavior during Lee's surrender, which is more than he ever did for Davis, who is the real villain in his book.
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moa/ADH2296.0001.001/722?rgn=subject;view=image;q1=America+--+History

Pollack's book, as despicable as it is in many parts, is a great resource into the attitude and details of the Confederacy, written from their point of view. Bill2, you might be interested in Chapter XXV, where Pollack devotes a whole chapter into how Davis and his administration totally miss managed the economy of the Confederacy by inflating the Confederate dollar. It's a fascinating read.

Lastly, even if every former Southerner despised Grant (not true), why would Pollack's book or the Lost Cause in general affect people in the North? Grant's legacy, IMO, was critically injured by the massive corruption in his administration, which really needed a whole two hours by itself to unravel. Here's the Wikipedia article on that in the link below:
Grant administration scandals - ( New Window )
Back to the Corner