[/quote]𝗝𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶 𝗣𝗶𝗲𝗿𝗰𝗲
@jessi_pierce
Gary Bettman & #NHL to make a formal announcement on Return to Play for 2019-20 today at 3:30 CT on NBCSN and NHL Network[/quote]
I believe the 24-team "playoff/play-in" was approved. some details remained though, such as draft, seedings for the top 4 in each conference, logistics like location, testing/symptom handling, etc.
below is the proposed "playoff/play-in"
I believe this is what was approved.
Yes. I think they're looking at 4 sites for the teams to play all the games.
Yep. Both two cities and four cities have been reported. Perhaps we find out today.
I'm of the opinion that this is a good plan when you factor in all the various circumstances at play. Obviously it's flawed, but any return-to-play plan was inevitably going to be flawed.
It won't be the same. At all. But it'll be something.
the play-in round will be best of 5 (teams 24 - 17), then I think once they get it down to the traditional 16 team playoff they were hoping for best of 7 the rest of the way.
A lot of speculation, maybe today's pc clears up some of that.
But on the other hand, how much practice will these teams be able to get in before this tournament starts, and what will the level of play look like after such a long lay off and (i would assume) a brief practice time?
This feels more like an exhibition for fans than a resumption of the 2019-2020 season. It's almost feels like a season reset with only the worst teams in the league not participating.
Sports. Bring them back. Now. I don't care about formats and if the players have to play naked.
This is BORING. Sports. Bring them back. Now.
Plus the layoff from March to June is less than that of many teams from April to August/September or the same with some from June to August/September.
The thing I'd be concerned with is symptoms and how players handle them. No hockey player is going to take themselves out of a playoff lineup in my opinion.
from what I read there will be no fans.
But if they don't play at all I think they'll lose something like $2B dollars this year and it will effect future salary caps, and the players will bear the brunt of the losses.
So, IOW they're playing for them selves IMO.
@4EverBlueshirts
·
2h
Rumor: Rangers willing to part with high draft pick to move Andersson for Puljujarvi #NYR #PlayLikeANewYorker
Or, are those smug penis-head physicians giving more contradictory explanations on what to do this week?
Pierre LeBrun
@PierreVLeBrun
·
1h
Again, let me repeat myself, the format is just the first step. So many more hurdles to overcome, more negotiations needed between NHL/NHLPA over hub cities, testing, protocols... the format is just Step 1. No guarantee yet the 2019-20 season is completed despite best intentions
Quote:
Forever Blueshirts
@4EverBlueshirts
·
2h
Rumor: Rangers willing to part with high draft pick to move Andersson for Puljujarvi #NYR #PlayLikeANewYorker
We have two 3rd rounders this year. I wonder if one would be enough. I don't think I would do Lias + a 1st even though we have 2 first rounders and NYR doesn't have a second round pick.
Neutral empty sites are going to be weird, and we'll all look back at this being a wacky year, but it's still not going to be easy to win a cup and the cup winner will have brought a pretty cool experience to their fans in this tough time.
That being said, I really like the format from a viewer/fan standpoint
Quote:
I thought the Rangers would need to add to this trade vs just Lias. We'll see if it happens.
Quote:
Forever Blueshirts
@4EverBlueshirts
·
2h
Rumor: Rangers willing to part with high draft pick to move Andersson for Puljujarvi #NYR #PlayLikeANewYorker
We have two 3rd rounders this year. I wonder if one would be enough. I don't think I would do Lias + a 1st even though we have 2 first rounders and NYR doesn't have a second round pick.
No way im giving up a 1st + Lias for just Puljujarvi
I posted a chart a while ago about draft picks and success odds.
not enough difference between pick 29 and pick 45 for me to miss out on a player I like.
I do think both players have NHL futures, but Puljujarvi has one thing you can't teach. Size.
If not move on to other priorities for now.
Not sure why they didn't just re-do a 10 game reg season schedule with the just the 24 teams, then start the playoffs as usual......16 teams.
I wouldn't but the Rangers seem to like him. Also, I wonder if they want a young Fin to help make Kakko more comfortable. I never like these "player needs a babysitter" scenarios, but I can only imagine what it's like for a 19 year old in a foreign country and not many people speak your language.
I think the Rangers are maybe second guessing their approach with young players maybe after both Andersson and Kravtsov had rough starts in the US.
Not sure why they didn't just re-do a 10 game reg season schedule with the just the 24 teams, then start the playoffs as usual......16 teams.
no, I think they have a round robin like tournament that I believe impacts their seeding. I'm looking forward to hearing about how.
I get Carolina nixing this because with 20 teams theyd have received a bye.... why was Tampa against it?
Would have though Pittsburgh and Edmonton as 5 seeds would have pushed for the 20 teams as so many of us have... i guess being good league citizens
I just question the idea of trading Andersson right now. His trade value couldn't possibly be lower. Why not hang on to him and at least hope he rebuilds some value?
I get Carolina nixing this because with 20 teams theyd have received a bye.... why was Tampa against it?
Would have though Pittsburgh and Edmonton as 5 seeds would have pushed for the 20 teams as so many of us have... i guess being good league citizens
From the Lightning player rep, Alex Killorn:
...“The only problem I have with that format is that the top teams that have a bye,” he said. “I don’t know how competitive the games will be going forward where the teams at the bottom will be playing playoff games right away and [would be] potentially more prepared for the real playoffs.”
I just question the idea of trading Andersson right now. His trade value couldn't possibly be lower. Why not hang on to him and at least hope he rebuilds some value?
Only reason I can think of is because they started his ELC in year 1, this year is year 2, so after next season he becomes an RFA.
Possible his value won't get higher than his draft pedigree (#7 overall?)
To me either would be fairer than the 20 team proposal.
formal training camp to open no earlier than 1st half of July.
Individual and optional workouts now.
No dates for games, but they expect the season to go into early fall.
The first and second round length (5 or 7 games) still TBD.
Conference championship and SCF will be 7 games.
Frankly I'm fine with all these decisions so far. The initial play in is really a regular season substitute so having the 5 minute OT and shootout works and is fair.
Including maybe biggest impact is Jake Guentzel I think playoffs were a long shot for him initially, but now it's likely.
Not sure why they just don't wait until after the qualifying round for the lottery.
Currently the lottery is planned for 6/26 with placeholders for the 8 teams knocked out in the qualifying round.
Seems like they made it more complex than necessary.
And obviously Igor.
Too bad they got a bad break. Too bad.
I think you misheard. Regular season OT is for the round-robin games for the top 4. The play-in and subsequent games are all playoff OT. And no round other than the play-in has been set at 5 games yet, it's TBD.
@eliteprospects
·
3m
The NHL Draft Lottery will occur on Friday, June 26th. Teams will be included in a lottery draw for the No. 1, 2, and 3 selections.
This is Phase 1 of the NHL Draft Lottery. Potential exists for a Phase 2 NHL Draft Lottery depending on results of play-in draft and Phase 1.