Jim Burt was the more popular of the 2 and both had some really memorable plays in the teams history but I have to say I think Howard may have been the better overall player. What do you guys think? I ask this as I am watching Giants v Washington week 14 1986.
Howard was a very good player too.
Pretty awesome both were on the same depth chart......
I always recall Howard pumping his arms in the air after the sack of Elway in the endzone.
Mark Collins
Eric Howard
Pepper Johnson
:amazing:
and grabbed reggie white in supplemental :)
Howard.
I think Howard was the more talented player, but had lots of injuries. So I will go with Burt.
Burt missed 35 games in 8 years as a Giant
Howard missed 22 games in 9 years as a Giant
Burt got the notoriety, Howard was a better player
Burt missed 35 games in 8 years as a Giant
Howard missed 22 games in 9 years as a Giant
Burt got the notoriety, Howard was a better player
Seemed like Howard missed more games. Didn’t Burt have back surgery? Even if correct and there’s no reason to doubt your facts, I felt Burt was a better player and his play seemed to motivate all who played alongside him. Oh and I liked Howard a lot.
My vote goes to Howard.
Burt and Howard each named to 1 Pro Bowl and each won two SBs.
Howard was very strong, benching 225 lbs 33 times.
Howard had 33 sacks and 1 safety while Burt had 20 sacks and 10 fumble recoveries.
Pretty even IMO between Howard and Burt but my vote (51%) goes to Howard because he had more sacks than Burt.
Giants were blessed with fantastic interior D Linemen for a generation. Mendenhall, Archer, Bill Neill, Burt, Howard, Keith Hamilton was fantastic as well.