|
|
|
| Quote: |
| Mr. Davis, who now works for Aerospace Corporation, a defense contractor, said he gave a classified briefing to a Defense Department agency as recently as March about retrievals from “off-world vehicles not made on this earth.” Mr. Davis said he also gave classified briefings on retrievals of unexplained objects to staff members of the Senate Armed Services Committee on Oct. 21, 2019, and to staff members of the Senate Intelligence Committee two days later. Committee staff members did not respond to requests for comment on the issue. |
https://twitter.com/oliverdarcy/status/1286706428925837312?s=21 - ( New Window )
There was a lot to digest in that article and that is a pretty massive inaccuracy/correction.
"Off World Vehicles" is an extremely important distinction vs. UFOs. I think common sense tells us that UFOs exist due to the crazy amount of secret military programs/testing our country and others do, but "Off World Vehicles" is strong wording and indicates something else entirely.
I'm half way through "The close Encounters Man" Its a biography of J. Allen Hynek. Interesting stuff.
^This.
Ooops - that should read "One person believes they may have been retrieved, and believes if they were, they should be studied."
That isn't a correction to the article, it is a retraction.
Classic New York Times.
This article though is a bit more exciting with the context of the Wilson-Davis memos leak. The Davis who took those notes is the Eric Davis mentioned in the article. So its very interesting he would go on the record on something like this, he's previously said no comment about those memos.
Wilson-Davis Memo Leak - ( New Window )
Ooops - that should read "One person believes they may have been retrieved, and believes if they were, they should be studied."
That isn't a correction to the article, it is a retraction.
You're referencing Harry Reid. OP quote is not Harry Reid.
Quote:
Other world vehicles have been retrieved and been studied for decades!!!
Ooops - that should read "One person believes they may have been retrieved, and believes if they were, they should be studied."
That isn't a correction to the article, it is a retraction.
You're referencing Harry Reid. OP quote is not Harry Reid.
He took a quote from someone privy to the information and turned it from a hypothetical to a statement of fact. That goes far beyond misquoting. It changed the entire meaning from an opinion to first hand knowledge from a US Senator who would have been briefed and show the proof.
They don't have to be crashed for it to be recovered. It could be they are are observing what we do with the craft like a human throwing a cell phone into a monkey cage to see what happens
These are intriguing questions, i don't have the answers.
However, purely speculating, I think it is entirely possible that they could have crashed accidentally, it is also possible that something was "crashed" intentionally. Or we could have had a lucky hit on one and shot one down. Or maybe we just came across one someplace and found it.
I will say, if you haven't watch the Nimitz, go fast and tic tac encounters. There is SOMETHING on video, on radar, with multiple eye witness accounts and complete military validation with them saying "we do not know what this is" of a craft doing things that CANNOT BE DONE, with modern science as we know.
Crashes I could see being skeptical, but avoiding detection would probably just be a preference at best given the technological gap.
A fly can't comprehend how an F-22 works, but that doesn't mean F-22s don't crash or have malfunctions. Do we care what the flies think? And one might argue that the distances involved, the perils of space, and the time spent traveling (indefinitely?) could make anything susceptible to malfunction at some point no matter how advanced.
If the galactic odds align in millions of years something we shot out into space will clunk down in the middle of an alien subdivision and cause a WTF moment.
under the direction of President Harry Truman ,and in the interest of national security
A group of twelve top military scientific personnel were established
This group's primary objective
was to desensitize us to the truth
And to suppress the material evidence that our planet is being visited by a group of extraterrestrial biological entities called the grays
I will say, if you haven't watch the Nimitz, go fast and tic tac encounters. There is SOMETHING on video, on radar, with multiple eye witness accounts and complete military validation with them saying "we do not know what this is" of a craft doing things that CANNOT BE DONE, with modern science as we know.
Saying the don't "know" what it is doesn't mean they don't have a good idea what it could be, and the answer is likely to be something relatively mundane.
That Navy UFO Footage Has an Optical Explanation - ( New Window )
I've always found it curious that these beings also mostly seem to visit us at night.
Maybe not to be seen? Then why do they shine huge fucking lights?
Could it be that people just misidentify common things in the dark and it's not space men? Nah.
This is the second time I will cite a recently watched movie on this subject. I watched 'Proximity' 3 nights ago. Entertaining movie dealing with alien abduction. They do touch on a prominent religious figure a bit.
I can't remember when, but a few years ago the Vatican made a statement regarding the possibility of ET life.