Art Stapleton
@art_stapleton
I’m told #NYGiants plan to sign CB Ross Cockrell provided he clears camp-entry COVID-19 testing, per source.
Cockrell visited today.
So there’s at least one veteran corner set to come aboard after DeAndre Baker was formally charged + Sam Beal opted out.
8/8/20, 7:28 PM
How can he? You have said NUMEROUS times that you can't see a season taking place.
@DDuggan21
Makes sense. Competent NFL veteran, can play slot or outside, likely comes cheap
Bobby Skinner
@BobbySkinner_
Giants sign CB Ross Cockrell
2019 opponent stats:
14 games played
37/67 55.2% 450 yds 1 TD 2 INT
Those are decent numbers for a guy who played 2/3 of the snaps.
@DDuggan21
Makes sense. Competent NFL veteran, can play slot or outside, likely comes cheap
Bobby Skinner
@BobbySkinner_
Giants sign CB Ross Cockrell
2019 opponent stats:
14 games played
37/67 55.2% 450 yds 1 TD 2 INT
Those are decent numbers for a guy who played 2/3 of the snaps.
And if im not mistaken (I could be off by a season) this was coming off of a horrific injury which put him on the shelf for a year. Im happy with this, liked him when he was here before.
I still wouldn't be shocked to see them add another CB at some point. Balentine and Holmes are both intriguing prospects but it remains to be seen if they are ready for every down roles.
Daniel Jones & Ross Cockrell both are Duke Blue Devils.
Daniel Jones & Ross Cockrell are both New York Giants now.
2 years removed from a broken leg....should also help.
He could be a decent system fit as well.
Ditto.
The coronavirus is here to stay, even with a vaccine. I have yet to read or hear from any scientist, medical personnel , government official, how we learn to live with it, as we do with other contagions, other than the stifling mitigation’s still in place.
Do we ever do what Sweden did? The latest CDC shows maybe it is behind them, dear God, I hope so, but we shall see.
While Sweden s death rate surpassed ours, and their recovery rate was slower than ours during the lock down, it might be behind them now.
This is a legitimate question, maybe borne of ignorance, but legit nevertheless.
Please don’t make it political. I for one am willing to move forward, respect others, but make my own personal choices.
I assuming it is waiting game until the vaccine....as
Heard immunity while protecting the infirm..is only way we move forward. More cases less deaths....is what we need.....as we are well passed eradicating it.
A WR and an OL who have zero chance to make the team ... I wonder if the plan is to bring in numbers that would have some knowledge of the playbook if needed in an emergency later in the season ... fills 2 positions of guys who opted out.
I am sure things will work out....i wish it wasn't so political, but I guess we are in that season.
Why do you feel Cockrell can't play on the outside?
I think everybody should read this. There is a blurb about how the Pats use their guys that I think Graham may implore with us.
Link - ( New Window )
Quote:
I don’t think he has the athletic ability to play an outside CB. I think he’s ok at the slot and certainly an upgrade over Haley if he’s healthy. The plan was to bring in Holmes to play the slot and it’s questionable if he has the size to play the outside. So, unless Love or somebody else can play the outside CB, I think there’s still a problem.
Why do you feel Cockrell can't play on the outside?
I think everybody should read this. There is a blurb about how the Pats use their guys that I think Graham may implore with us. Link - ( New Window )
And what athletic ability is he lacking that he cannot play on the outside?
At his Duke pro day, Cockrell ran a 4.40 40-yard dash at 6-feet tall and 190 pounds. He also logged an explosive 39-inch vertical jump and 12 bench press reps at 225 pounds. Entering the 2017 season, Cockrell had never allowed a touchdown in primary coverage, according to PFF.[/quote]
[quote]
He is however 100% an upgrade over what they got out of both Baker outside and Haley in the slot last year. He makes the team better and in that respect it is a good signing since it's also likely very low cost. He will allow Holmes and Balentine to progress as their own pace and the defense/team to not suffer in the process if they need more time.
Ryan is a better player with extra versatility and may have been more of a multi-year piece (similar to the Golden Tate signing) but there's also some reason to be concerned his play may be falling off a little so I can understand if their evaluation of him doesn't line up with the price tag he's looking for having come off a pro bowl season.
Ryan was certainly more dynamic if you look at his big play production and he's got 1 extra layer of versatility having played safety before.
4 ints / 18 passes defensed
4 FF
4.5 sacks
4 TFL's
8 QB hits (which would have been as many as anyone on our roster except LW, MG, and Carter).
That amount of turnovers and negative offensive plays probably stacks up with any defensive player in football last year.
Whether the pro bowl alternate/top 100 stuff is more name recognition that goes along with those big plays, or legitimate I don't know. If his tackling and coverage took a step back on the other 99% of snaps he played as PFF says I can understand the hesitation at signing him over the risk that perhaps the big play production was a little flukey.
Quote:
is Ryan better? When I look up how they have played the last few years I can make the argument that Cockrell has been better.
Ryan was certainly more dynamic if you look at his big play production and he's got 1 extra layer of versatility having played safety before.
4 ints / 18 passes defensed
4 FF
4.5 sacks
4 TFL's
8 QB hits (which would have been as many as anyone on our roster except LW, MG, and Carter).
That amount of turnovers and negative offensive plays probably stacks up with any defensive player in football last year.
Whether the pro bowl alternate/top 100 stuff is more name recognition that goes along with those big plays, or legitimate I don't know. If his tackling and coverage took a step back on the other 99% of snaps he played as PFF says I can understand the hesitation at signing him over the risk that perhaps the big play production was a little flukey.
Correct. He has a big advantage in big plays but also gave up the most passing yards of any DB and was targeted the most. Great DBs don't get targeted a ton. He had like 20 kissed tackles last year as well.
6th most in FF behind just TJ Watt, Barrett, Chandler Jones, Mack, and Ryan Anderson.
13th best in INT (league leaders had 6)
3rd most passes defensed behind Gilmore and Carlton Davis
most QB hits + sacks among DBs
if you add that all up it amounts to 38 negative plays which like I said is probably highest among all DB's and maybe even all defensive players.
but there were 1000+ other snaps he played that are a huge part of his evaluation we can't evaluate as easily.
I would have understood NYG either way and would have been happy to sign either player (even both) on team friendly contracts.
Obviously it's not Logan Ryan, but it's a vet who has been around and should be able to step in and not be a disaster if we need him.
If he winds up on the field a lot, that's not a good sign. But, in a pinch, we could do worse.
Cockrell is a very serviceable player, solid depth at worst, who should not cost very much money and is not a long term contract.. Even if he has to be starting on the outside, he is better than some schlub who would be the weak link of the defense, no matter how the scheme tries to hide him.