for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Can Joe Judge return this team to playing

BlueLou'sBack : 8/11/2020 9:35 am
"Giants football"?

In The Giants Insider's most recent podcast that is what Chris Bisignano insists is the single most repeated message from training camp to this point.

Reflecting on that, if it's even possible or desirable given the personnel makeup of this team, I had a look at Art Stapleton's recent ranked list of the 100 greatest Giants of all time. It's a great list as we all know, but what stood out to me above all else is that 7/10 of the top ranked Giants were defensive players...

Only Frank Gifford at 4 and Eli at 10 crack this group as offensive skills players, with OT Rosey Brown (you reading this, Andrew Thomas?) making the third and highest ranked offensive player on the list.

Here it is:

1) LT, LB
2) Em Tunnel, S
3) Rosy Brown, OT
4) Frank Gifford, HB, WR, DB
5) Mel Hein, C, LB
6) Harry Carson, LB
7) Michael Strahan, DE
8) Sam Huff, LB
9) Andy Robustelli, DE
10) Eli Manning, QB

Those players, and the next 90 on Stapleton's list, represent the core ID of "Giants' Football".

The current squad has exactly ONE player who's already among the top 100 ALL Time, and he's got a realistic chance to crack the top 10: Saquon Barkley. But no defender currently on this team would even inspire, in a coach's wildest fantasy, inclusion on this list linked below.

How in heck is JJ gonna get this team to play "Giants' Football"?

I'm thinking, yeah we'll suck pretty much in 2020 - if there's a season - but give me Micah Parsons in 2021 and maybe we'll be on the way...

And yeah, I realize Mel Hein could be counted as an offensive player, too... He's still a grunt in the trenches...
Top 100 All Time Giants - ( New Window )
Thank you for this thread  
Burtman : 8/11/2020 10:44 am : link
I think it conceptualizes how far the Giants have to go to become great better than any other thread I've seen. I tend to be polyannaish when it comes to the Giants but reading this makes me realize what we have vs what we need to be. And I'm not saying we need to be all stars at every position but we have only 1 potentially great Giant we can all agree on (SB). Everyone else is a proven no or not enough evidence to determine.
_________  
I am Ninja : 8/11/2020 10:46 am : link
I have no idea what is or isn't being said in camp, but I think Judge made pretty clear that his philosophy isn't strict adherence to one path or one 'type' of football. You evaluate your players and put them in position to apply the strengths of their game. Don't keep banging the square peg into the round hole just because that's what's needed to fit "your" system. That's classic Belichick. Maximize your resources and adapt your system around them. That's the key to sustained success.
I like that Judge is a HC in a HC's body  
djm : 8/11/2020 11:15 am : link
not that great play-callers like Andy Reid can't impact the NFL in a good way, but when a franchise sinks to the depths we have seen here, IMO you really need a program builder more than an Xs and Os guy to dig that team out of ground. This is even more applicable when you factor in how young this team is. These players need to walk first. They need nurturing and development, maybe not even just the players but everything associated with the Giants, from the fucking house plants to the QB and everything in between.

Judge looks the part, talks the part and acts the part. That's a start. Doesn't mean he is the goods, and in the past I couldn't give a shit how good the HC comes off in a PC, but Judge sure as hell looks like the right guy for this job. And the staff in general is pretty well rounded.
I mean  
djm : 8/11/2020 11:25 am : link
even the biggest doom and gloomer has to be slightly encouraged by some of the signs we've seen. Daniel Jones is pretty much well regarded by nearly everyone based on his rookie year, and he's done nothing this off-season to curtail that optimism. Teams go as far as their QB and HC. If Judge and Jones are the goods, we are the goods.

Even the naming combo of Judge n Jones has a nice ring to it. Like it was meant to be...

If you want to feel good about things, just allow yourself to imagine Daniel Jones developing into a full blown star this year. One can dream. Jones rarely fails to put the ball where he wants to and he can move. He's fearless and calm. A lot to like there.

We want the D to look like a pro unit, even if it isn't very good, and we want the OL and offense to establish itself as one to be feared.

Need to come out of this season knowing that Thomas is our stable LT. Jones is a legit playmaking QB and the O is virtually set across the board. Win a few tough games this year. Go into Dallas and beat them. Go at least 3-3 in the east with wins against Dallas and Philly.
If you take any list of Giants’ greats and remove all of the pre  
Ivan15 : 8/11/2020 12:13 pm : link
Super Bowl players, the list looks a whole lot different.
RE: If you take any list of Giants’ greats and remove all of the pre  
BlueLou'sBack : 8/11/2020 2:03 pm : link
In comment 14947682 Ivan15 said:
Quote:
Super Bowl players, the list looks a whole lot different.


Not counting QBs, or maybe even counting them, I don't see what you're saying.

The top 100 Giants of the SB era...

(QBs parsed)

1) Taylor LB
2) Carson LB
3) Strahan DE
QB) Eli
4) Tiki RB
QB) Phil
5) Martin DE
(???? Joe Morrison, sorry I can't include Joe mediocre on MY list)
6) Jesse Armstead LB
7) Amani Toomer WR
8) Chris Snee OG
9) Bavaro TE
QB) Tarkenton
10) Banks LB

And then the next 5, all trench players with one of them an offensive skills guy in Shockey:

11) Tuck DE
12) Van Pelt LB
13) Osi DE
14) Oates OC
15) Shockey TE

So I'm not sure what your point really was, unless you want to highlight one SB team alone, the 2011 team led by Eli and WRs and the Jacobs & Bradshaw tandem.

And even that team only got cooking when the DL all started playing healthy together and JPP beasted.

This team doesn't come close to having the defensive horsepower yet.

RE: RE: If you take any list of Giants’ greats and remove all of the pre  
uther99 : 8/11/2020 7:04 pm : link
In comment 14947765 BlueLou'sBack said:
Quote:
In comment 14947682 Ivan15 said:


Quote:


Super Bowl players, the list looks a whole lot different.



Not counting QBs, or maybe even counting them, I don't see what you're saying.

The top 100 Giants of the SB era...

(QBs parsed)

1) Taylor LB
2) Carson LB
3) Strahan DE
QB) Eli
4) Tiki RB
QB) Phil
5) Martin DE
(???? Joe Morrison, sorry I can't include Joe mediocre on MY list)
6) Jesse Armstead LB
7) Amani Toomer WR
8) Chris Snee OG
9) Bavaro TE
QB) Tarkenton
10) Banks LB

And then the next 5, all trench players with one of them an offensive skills guy in Shockey:

11) Tuck DE
12) Van Pelt LB
13) Osi DE
14) Oates OC
15) Shockey TE

So I'm not sure what your point really was, unless you want to highlight one SB team alone, the 2011 team led by Eli and WRs and the Jacobs & Bradshaw tandem.

And even that team only got cooking when the DL all started playing healthy together and JPP beasted.

This team doesn't come close to having the defensive horsepower yet.


9 out of 15 are offensive players. I don't see what you are getting at
9/15???  
BlueLou'sBack : 8/11/2020 11:22 pm : link
How did you come up with that?

I am talking about offensive skills players, but leaving out QBs because there's a very heavy bias for the position.

Offensive skills players without QBs:

Tiki Barber
Amani Toomer
Joe Morrison (who's a joke on this list in the top 100 IMO.)
Mark Bavaro
Jeremy Shockey

Bavaro and Shockey were tight ends, who performed considerable trench blocking duties as well as "skills" play.

Oates and Snee were linemen, trench players. My point from the beginning was that the Giants have traditionally relied on strength at the LOS (in particular the D front 7).

Linebackers and DEs form a disproportionate number of the Giants top players, historically. OL are on the list more often than WRs...

That's unusual for all football, and it's been an historic pattern of the Giants.
Back to the Corner