Just to restate prior posts, I know a few people in the industry, but none are connected to any 1 team.
On that, I am hearing very strong indications that Doug is out of as the HC of the Eagles.
Take it for what its worth, but one of the main reasons is he has lost the locker room, including burning a bridge with both Wentz and Hurts.
Both sources do not know if the owner is on board with letting Pederson go.
Both sources do not know if the owner is on board with letting Pederson go.
My problem with this is that someone told Pedersen to tank that game. He did not do it himself, because if he did he would have been gone right after the game.
Maybe he wants to be out of there, so he made the comments to force their hand. The FO and owner cannot come out and say blame us.
Quote:
is the Washington game. He lost the locker room and his comments after about the other QB (and not Hurts) giving the team the best chance to win was one of the main issues as no one was buying it (players). Eagles GM feels Pederson has lost the lock room because of this and that is the main reason for not bringing him back.
Both sources do not know if the owner is on board with letting Pederson go.
My problem with this is that someone told Pedersen to tank that game. He did not do it himself, because if he did he would have been gone right after the game.
Maybe he wants to be out of there, so he made the comments to force their hand. The FO and owner cannot come out and say blame us.
I have the same issue, so I don't know what to believe when it comes to info on him staying or going. At the minimum, that whole organization greatly underestimated the repercussions of that last game.
I think one of the other issues in letting him go (this is my opinion) is they are getting into a very big pool of teams that need HC so their search will be competitive.
As well, the Eagles are not really set up to win within the next few years due to cap and roster issues. It is not a very appealing destination in my view.
I have the same issue, so I don't know what to believe when it comes to info on him staying or going. At the minimum, that whole organization greatly underestimated the repercussions of that last game.
I think one of the other issues in letting him go (this is my opinion) is they are getting into a very big pool of teams that need HC so their search will be competitive.
As well, the Eagles are not really set up to win within the next few years due to cap and roster issues. It is not a very appealing destination in my view.
Thanks for the info. If Pedersen was told to tank, he can never open his mouth to say what happened because he would then never get an NFL job again. So he has to take one for the team in silence.
I think you are right - get rid of him, strip the team and total rebuild.
That's possible, but Eric B likely has his pick of jobs and I don't know how a team with major QB issues, an aging roster, and negative cap space is appealing, especially considering HC's are getting even shorter leashes now than they used to (lots of recent examples of guys canned after 2 years).
Jets and Jags are both more enticing to me. Bring in several top FAs you want with their ample cap space plus a rookie QB likely gets him extra leeway for the inevitable growing pains.
Losing Malcolm Jenkins wrecked that locker room.
Anyway, suck it Eagles. I hope your franchise crashes and burns!
I don't think we'll ever really know what happened or who ordered the code red....
I don't think we'll ever really know what happened or who ordered the code red....
DID YOU ORDER THE CODE RED!?!?!
But Pederson went out there and tanked and made it very obvious to the whole world "I am tanking!"
Not taking the field goal to tie it up at 17. And then in the next series, pulling Hurts for a 3rd stringer who is a free agent at the end of the year. That screams "tank". And then the backlash in the media the next day including a masterful speech from Joe Judge.
Doug Pederson went overboard with his efforts to lose and I wouldn't be shocked if Philly threw him overboard.
Come on man. Sudfeld has been there 4 years. He’s played in games. They know exactly what Sudfeld is. He’s not some rookie with intriguing upside that they wanted to get a look at.
He’s had Sudfeld for 3 years. He resigned him earlier this year. I think he knows what he has in him.
Your wondering that? Of course it did
If they wanted, for some reason, to evaluate Sudfled, they should have just started him.
Quote:
to end up the new coach of the Eagles and Pedersen ends up in Houston!
That's possible, but Eric B likely has his pick of jobs and I don't know how a team with major QB issues, an aging roster, and negative cap space is appealing, especially considering HC's are getting even shorter leashes now than they used to (lots of recent examples of guys canned after 2 years).
Jets and Jags are both more enticing to me. Bring in several top FAs you want with their ample cap space plus a rookie QB likely gets him extra leeway for the inevitable growing pains.
From some of what I am reading that premise isn't actually true. I think Philly, back where Andy Reid coached would be a dream job for Eric B (speculation on my part). I don't he is getting the Jets job and the Jags job is out. He could be in play with the Chargers but, I don't think so there either.
The idea that Lurie said Tank very well could be true- which is why so many were inactive BUT, I wonder if Pedersen is pissed at the Hurts push (Wentz is his guy) and he basically said ok, you want to tank, let's tank. Seriously, the issue isn't losing it was the way they chose to do it.
You sit a ton of guys and play with a makeshift lineup. The game goes and now your makeshift lineup is playing well enough to win. At this point, considering you already set your team up to be at a disadvantage, you then go and do even more stuff to make sure you don't win. To the guys you threw on the field from the start, what does that say about them and what does that say about you as a HC and your integrity. Again, once the game started you shouldn't be doing stuff to sabotage the guys you had on the field. Leading up to the game do what you want, in game you play to win regardless.
This seems like a using Pederson as a fall guy and a chance to reboot.
Quote:
that Pederson just didn't give a shit about what was (technically to the Eagels) a meaningless game and wanted to see Sudfeld in game action with an eye toward next year.
He’s had Sudfeld for 3 years. He resigned him earlier this year. I think he knows what he has in him.
If they really wanted to see Sudfield, they would have announced their plans way before the game started (as they do in preseason games). This was a tank pure and simple.
Quote:
could have easily tanked the game on his own in an attempt to be fired.
I don't think we'll ever really know what happened or who ordered the code red....
DID YOU ORDER THE CODE RED!?!?!
You can’t handle them truth!
I’ve suspected all along the Eagles senior leadership, whether Lurie or Roseman or both, ordered the tank. I also suspect they’ll scapegoat Pederson for it
If it came from the HC or GM or owner or a combo of them all, they are now faced with a broken locker room and someone needs to take the hit. My bet is Pederson.
You can lose in this league with good coaching, but you cannot win without very good coaching.
Perennial playoff contenders, I don't agree with the people who want him to stay on because they view him as an incompetent.
He will "ask for his team to commit fully"
And they will be like, "Dude.."
Quote:
In comment 15118253 FatMan in Charlotte said:
Quote:
could have easily tanked the game on his own in an attempt to be fired.
I don't think we'll ever really know what happened or who ordered the code red....
DID YOU ORDER THE CODE RED!?!?!
You can’t handle them truth!
I’ve suspected all along the Eagles senior leadership, whether Lurie or Roseman or both, ordered the tank. I also suspect they’ll scapegoat Pederson for it
I object!
I strenuously object!!
Can't imagine its anything related to tanking the game or giving his 3rd string QB a look. Those are meaning whatever points including how some players didn't like it.
Lurie is probably not happy about how his head coach explained the handling of the Wentz situation and allowing that relationship to suffer, potentially reducing or at least affecting their options going forward.
Just a hunch.
In my opinion the most likely scenario is that Pederson acted on his own thinking what he was doing was best for the eagles in the long run and that everyone would back him up. The owner the GM and the locker room but he badly miscalculated.
As mentioned, it is not a foregone conclusion that Pederson was asked to tank. Its just as likely he decided to do it himself. He is a smug ego-maniac, I can see him thinking he will outsmart everyone. One of his big downfalls is he doesn't seem to have a feel for the players. He views them as pieces rather than people, which of course pisses them off and he loses them.
I hope he stays because its better for us, but I think he's gone.
You're probably right in that he was told something along the lines of "Organizationally, it's in our best interest to have the 6th vs 9th pick."
How he went about getting that done could still put the org. in a bad light and get him fired.
Your Boss to you: "Please see to it that Bob Jones doesn't attend next months board meeting."
You at a latter date to your boss: "That Bob Jones thing is all taken care of, I shot his plane down with a ground to air missile. He won't be at the Board meeting."
Boss: "I was thinking more like making sure he wasn't included on the invites or planning/booking processes..."
No idea if he gets fired or not but a directive from the top probably didn't include "make sure while pulling off this request we come off looking like total idiots, loose the locker room and the relationships with our current QBs"
Everything is cellularized. No one has said, 'He must be fired.' There's been no vote. Nothing's on paper. There's no one to blame.
Quote:
In comment 15118254 Jim in Tampa said:
Quote:
that Pederson just didn't give a shit about what was (technically to the Eagels) a meaningless game and wanted to see Sudfeld in game action with an eye toward next year.
He’s had Sudfeld for 3 years. He resigned him earlier this year. I think he knows what he has in him.
If they really wanted to see Sudfield, they would have announced their plans way before the game started (as they do in preseason games). This was a tank pure and simple.
Michaels or Collinsworth mentioned during the game telecast that Pederson told them he wanted to get Sudfeld into the game.
Quote:
could have easily tanked the game on his own in an attempt to be fired.
Ha ha, classic episode. “Attention Steinbrenner! Head office moron. This is George Costanza!”
More likely is the strange decision to fight with and declare the highly compensated Wentz inactive so he couldn't swap out the clearly struggling rookie with Wentz.