$175 million in 2021. Can those on this board more informed on the subject, explain HOW the league can do this? I would think the NFLPA would be up in arms, Teams would be screwed with existing contracts already structured to include and INCREASE and even individual players being outspoken as there will be more player cuts and I believe, a move to younger and less talented players. It changes my assumptions about the Giants keeping Solder, Zeitler, Tate, Engram and a number of lower priced players. Their ability to keep BOTH Tomlinson and Williams went out the window, in my thinking. Am I missing something or misunderstanding the salary cap increase?
So the short answer to your question, is the NFLPA already agreed to this as a part of the last CBA and the amendment made before the start of this season.
It does unduly reward the teams that always seem $10s of millions under the CAP (Jags, Browns, Colts etc)
I'm assuming its all due to the Pandemic and lack of attendance at stadiums? I truly thought that the VAST Majority of NFL revenue came from areas other than their arenas, more precisely, television, apparel and other team branded sales. I figured 10 games a season wasn't a whole ton of money when compared to television rights.
The only question left was if it would be the floor of $175M or if it would be just a little lower than it was this season.
I'm surprised it went all the way to the floor, but it is understandable.
Which NFL team can afford to sign a FA to a big contract?
Will Leonard Williams or Dak Prescott balk when they get offers for less than they would've had last year?
Are you saying people are caught up in the Pi in the sky???
Quote:
and the league agreed not to drop it lower than 175 million.
I'm assuming its all due to the Pandemic and lack of attendance at stadiums? I truly thought that the VAST Majority of NFL revenue came from areas other than their arenas, more precisely, television, apparel and other team branded sales. I figured 10 games a season wasn't a whole ton of money when compared to television rights.
Yes it's due to that. It could have been a lot worse but the league agreed to spread it out over several years rather than lower it dramatically in one year. This is actually far worse for teams like Philly who are 70 million over the cap. Don't panic this was expected. Also with the league adding another game to the regular season revenue's should slowly climb back up over the next few years.
Quote:
and the league agreed not to drop it lower than 175 million.
I'm assuming its all due to the Pandemic and lack of attendance at stadiums? I truly thought that the VAST Majority of NFL revenue came from areas other than their arenas, more precisely, television, apparel and other team branded sales. I figured 10 games a season wasn't a whole ton of money when compared to television rights.
I mean a drop to 175M seems reasonable as its less than 15% drop.. you have to assume at least 15% of their revenue comes from ticket sales and stadium related sales..
Will Leonard Williams or Dak Prescott balk when they get offers for less than they would've had last year?
This....I think you'll see a lot of veteran players asking about revenue and then subsequently pushing for fan attendance, among other things.
I guess I've had my head in.....the sand. It just makes the offseason that much more complicated and to me, irritating as I can see contract negotiations dragging.
That is $80 mill per season on 8 home games(does not includes 2 pre-season games)
That is $80 mill per season on 8 home games(does not includes 2 pre-season games)
But don't some stadiums revenue get paid to the state or local government? I'd think there is a big chunk of that gone no?
That is $80 mill per season on 8 home games(does not includes 2 pre-season games)
But don't some stadiums revenue get paid to the state or local government? I'd think there is a big chunk of that gone no?
Williams will get his, but he would have gotten more if the cap didn't drop.
c'est la vie
Why does this make it tougher to sign both? It's all relative. Other teams have to deal with the big bad wolf just like the Giants do.
This likely doesn't changes anything other than guys are going to get a little less.
But, you might see many more 1 yr prove it deals
Many players aren't going to make what they think
Per a league source, the possibility that stadiums will be full for the 2021 season could prompt the league to not tie the hands of teams by dropping the salary cap by more than $23 million per team, from $198.2 million. Although the 2020 season will indeed result in lower revenue than usual, the potential of a return to something normal or close to it plus the coming TV deals may result in the league keeping the cap in the range of $195 million.
Time will tell what the league chooses to do. Although a projected cap typically is shared with all owners in December, the final decision isn’t made until late February or early March, through negotiations with the NFL Players Association.
Link - ( New Window )
Quote:
The negotiations that allowed the 2020 season to proceed included a commitment that the 2021 salary cap will be no lower than $175 million per team. The upcoming negotiations (and it’s negotiated every year) regarding the 2021 salary cap could result in a number significantly higher than $175 million.
Per a league source, the possibility that stadiums will be full for the 2021 season could prompt the league to not tie the hands of teams by dropping the salary cap by more than $23 million per team, from $198.2 million. Although the 2020 season will indeed result in lower revenue than usual, the potential of a return to something normal or close to it plus the coming TV deals may result in the league keeping the cap in the range of $195 million.
Time will tell what the league chooses to do. Although a projected cap typically is shared with all owners in December, the final decision isn’t made until late February or early March, through negotiations with the NFL Players Association.
Link - ( New Window )
Thanks.
Yes, this will totally reset the free agent market. The pandemic did something that no management strategy or collective bargaining agreement could have done.
A lot of guys headed to free agency may re-sign with their teams with only slight increases. LW may be happy to take what he was getting under the franchise tag. And who is going to sign a QB for $40 million that ties up 25% of the cap?
Golden Tate ($6.1M, $8.5M if after 6/1)
Kevin Zeitler ($12M)
Nate Solder ($6M, $10M if after 6/1)
David Mayo ($2.3M)
Evan Engram ($6M)
Levine Toilolo ($3M)
Cody Core ($2M)
Doing all of that would put us at about $42 under ($48.5M if Tate and Solder are post 6/1 designations).
Signing Peppers long term could also provide some relief.
The two most debated moves would probably be Zeitler and Engram. Personally, I would keep both of them with an eye on possibly trading one or both at the deadline depending on depth at the positions at the time.
Solder is also not as clear cut as it may appear. I think right now, he would be our starting RT. Even if Peart or a draft pick beats him out, are we going to find a swing tackle with his experience for less than $6M? Maybe, maybe not. Cam Fleming cost $3.5M.
A tagged player gets paid the average of the top 5 at their position. Those top 5 players won't be seeing an income drop, so the tag price stays high while the overall pool of money to sign free agents (and thus, average salaries) declines.
This will make resigning LW more difficult because we lose the leverage we would have had with the tag.
Maybe we will end up recouping that 3rd round pick as a comp pick when someone else signs him?
A tagged player gets paid the average of the top 5 at their position. Those top 5 players won't be seeing an income drop, so the tag price stays high while the overall pool of money to sign free agents (and thus, average salaries) declines.
This will make resigning LW more difficult because we lose the leverage we would have had with the tag.
Maybe we will end up recouping that 3rd round pick as a comp pick when someone else signs him?
This is why we should let LW go, or at least test the market.
I expect that teams are going to be doing mass restructuring on existing contracts. And there may be more quality players than ever let go. So if we stay patient, and don't dive head first into the opening few weeks of the FA period, we could get some real bargains later on. And find a solution(s) to fill the LW void.
Who the hell is Kenny Wiggins and how does he cost 1.075 million dollars next year?
Who the hell is Kenny Wiggins and how does he cost 1.075 million dollars next year?
Vet backup tackle they signed in November
So, not so easy to sign everyone under current conditions.
So, not so easy to sign everyone under current conditions.