for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

SB QB rankings

MTN-G-man : 2/14/2021 10:25 pm
Wow! Disrespect!!!!
Link - ( New Window )
Brown_Hornet : 2/14/2021 10:44 pm : link credibility whatsoever.
22-25 268 3 - 0

People with neutral eyes  
MtDizzle : 2/14/2021 10:54 pm : link
who aren’t Giants fans looking for excuses can see what it is. Don’t act surprised.
Don’t care about these  
UConn4523 : 2/14/2021 11:09 pm : link
but I’d love to read the justification of Matt Ryan over Eli. Didn’t one of them shit the bed with it all on the line while the other rose to the occasion...twice?
The guy is an idiot  
Chip : 2/14/2021 11:24 pm : link
or a moron or both
Stopped reading the list at #5  
NYDCBlue : 2/15/2021 12:06 am : link
Dan Marino has never won a Superbowl.... So how can he be the fifth best Superbowl QB?
RE: The guy is an idiot  
Ivan15 : 2/15/2021 12:24 am : link
In comment 15152989 Chip said:
or a moron or both

bull crap  
uconngiant : 2/15/2021 1:22 am : link
what a turd list by a turd writer
Why call it a superbowl list?  
adamg : 2/15/2021 1:48 am : link
It's based on regular season accomplishments. Such nonsense.
Not to mention it's just not compelling writing  
adamg : 2/15/2021 2:19 am : link
Sports fans aren't stupid. They can tell the difference between saying Eli is a better super bowl QB than Peyton and Peyton is a better overall QB than Eli.
This is so biased  
Giant John : 2/15/2021 6:22 am : link
And written by an idiot.
If you read the article  
mfjmfj : 2/15/2021 8:45 am : link
the author clearly is ranking the careers of QBs who have been in SBs, not how they rank in SB performance. If the latter, Eli has to be top 5 and Phil top 10. As structured I have some quibbles, but no fundamental disagreement.
As others have noted  
jhibb : 2/15/2021 9:20 am : link
it's basically a ranking of regular season careers of QBs who have started in the Super Bowl. Not only does it not rank their Super Bowl play, but it seemingly barely takes it into account at all.

Other than the confusing (if not intentionally misleading) headline, another issue I have is the "In (or should be in) the Hall of Fame" tier name. Sorry, but even though Super Bowl accomplishments like 2 MVPs don't count in your rankings, they certainly do count for HoF consideration.
SFGFNCGiantsFan : 2/15/2021 9:47 am : link
Favre over Rodgers? I disagree.
Phil and Eli  
Since1965 : 2/15/2021 9:58 am : link
belong in the top 25.
I also contend that if Kelly played for the Giants  
Since1965 : 2/15/2021 10:00 am : link
and Simms for the Bills, Simms would be the one in the HOF. A run oriented offense verses a pass oriented offense.
Poor title to the article  
AnnapolisMike : 2/15/2021 10:05 am : link
I think Eli is ranked about 4-5 spots too low given the overall body of work. Eli was a classic pocket passer on a team with a terrible offensive line the last 3-4 years of his career.
Read the Article....  
John In CO : 2/15/2021 12:39 pm : link
Not that I would have been REALLY that upset if this ranking was strictly on SB performance for the reason that its just some idiots ranking, no more relevant than the drunk at the end of the bar; in other words, nothing really worth getting all riled up about, but we really should read the article before jumping to the rankings. For those who still dont want to do that, here is what he based his ranking on:

"I ranked all quarterbacks based on career achievements, with regular-season excellence, All-Pro/Pro Bowl appearances and seasons as top-five and top-10 players at the position carrying more weight than just Super Bowl success....."
RE: Why call it a superbowl list?  
SMitch-56 : 2/15/2021 7:15 pm : link
In comment 15153000 adamg said:
It's based on regular season accomplishments. Such nonsense.

This. ^^

It’s just his ranking of all time career qbs who happened to appear in a Super Bowl. Just garbage. It should be Super Bowl QB performances or else why bother...
Back to the Corner