Bezos is competent and much more of a machiavellian, take over the world, win at all cost evil billionaire, as opposed to Snyders incompetent, so-egotistical-he-meddles-in-everything-and-knows-best billionaire.
He'd probably run a football team much better than Snyder.
It also should be noted, Amazon isn't where the money is,
Dan Snyder is the gift that keeps on giving if your a fan of the Giants, Eagles, or Cowboys. Since he bought the team the Redskins have been one of the worst run organizations in the NFL.
We talk about how badly the WFT is run, but they have 3 division titles since the last last time we won the East.
So really, who is the gift that keeps on giving? Snyder? Or Mara?
Dan Snyder is the gift that keeps on giving if your a fan of the Giants, Eagles, or Cowboys. Since he bought the team the Redskins have been one of the worst run organizations in the NFL.
We talk about how badly the WFT is run, but they have 3 division titles since the last last time we won the East.
So really, who is the gift that keeps on giving? Snyder? Or Mara?
You're kidding right? How many Super Bowls has Snyder won exactly? Comparing Mara and Snyder is not even close. Good lord some people just want to find a way to bash this team/owner
are the ONLY DC playoff appearances in the last 30 years, since they won the title. That is NOT good. Mara's teams have been in the playoffs 93(11 wins), 97(10 wins), 00(12 wins), 05 (11 wins), 06, 07$(10 wins), 08(12 wins), 11$, 16(11 wins).
Snyder is terrible. His teams have never won more than 10 games, and they've only done that twice.
You can make the case that Mara is a bad owner- as if 2 titles since 2007 makes this a reasonable proposition. But I think that comparing Snyder favorably with him is making an error in judgment.
AWS is. AWS controls over 50% of the web hosting universe.
This is true. One of the group projects in a business management class I'm taking was on Amazon and I was shocked at how much of its revenues come from AWS rather than e-commerce.
Until the richest man in the world makes his offer.....
Snyder may not be as wealthy as Bezos, but he is a billionaire. His personal valuation of the franchise likely far exceeds what anyone else would be willing to pay for it.
I wish he'd buy the knicks. I'm enjoying this season but I can't believe Dolan will keep his hands off long enough for the team to be consistently good again.
Until the richest man in the world makes his offer.....
Snyder may not be as wealthy as Bezos, but he is a billionaire. His personal valuation of the franchise likely far exceeds what anyone else would be willing to pay for it.
I agree with 81 Great Dane. The Maras (and Tischs) are wonderful people, they are not cheap, they want to win, but the league has evolved in ways that has left them in over their heads.
Bezos knows how to run an efficient organization. Amazon has been wildly successful in multiple arenas (failed in some, but so does every massive company). E-commerce, package logistics and delivery, web services & cloud technology, voice assistant and smart home devices, video streaming, audio streaming, grocery (Whole Foods), commercial AI & machine learning tools, publishing, and more... Anybody who can build an organization like that would be scary as an opposing owner... Much rather have him as my team's owner.
Turned it from a venerable objective newspaper into the equivalent of a social justice blog
In the time Bezos has owned the Post they’ve become profitable, expanded their newsroom to ~1000 staff, opened a number of international bureaus, and increased digital readership to 3 million.
I suspect you’re confusing how your politics are reported on and “destroyed” — as by all objective measures the Post is doing great under Bezos.
He's not wrong about the writers at the WaPo. You think you're getting this seasoned mind - yet, young babysitters who have vocal fry and their articles are laden with typos, and they are the ones telling you how to think?
Stop and take a look at who writes these articles and you'll get a good laugh. Unless, that's your cup of tea.
Lol @ awards. Isn't Washington DC who is literally notorious for doing the beltway strategy?
In few words - we use each other (same 5 or 6 people) as sources so nothing contradicts our "unbiased" information. Lol.
RE: RE: RE: Bezos has completely destroyed the WaPo
In the time Bezos has owned the Post they’ve become profitable, expanded their newsroom to ~1000 staff, opened a number of international bureaus, and increased digital readership to 3 million.
I suspect you’re confusing how your politics are reported on and “destroyed” — as by all objective measures the Post is doing great under Bezos.
He's not wrong about the writers at the WaPo. You think you're getting this seasoned mind - yet, young babysitters who have vocal fry and their articles are laden with typos, and they are the ones telling you how to think?
Stop and take a look at who writes these articles and you'll get a good laugh. Unless, that's your cup of tea.
Lol @ awards. Isn't Washington DC who is literally notorious for doing the beltway strategy?
In few words - we use each other (same 5 or 6 people) as sources so nothing contradicts our "unbiased" information. Lol.
That's truly one of the most unintelligible responses I've read on BBI in 20 years. The irony that it comes on an exchange criticizing the work of journalists is biting and entertaining.
I've read the last two sentences of your post a dozen times, and have no idea what point you are making or to which you are responding.
You read (and defend) crap journalists who use their own friends and use the same few writers (who only coincide with their own beliefs) as their only sources.
Always comical to when these "journalists" have to retract their articles and statements and then they get pissy when caught in the act.
He'd probably run a football team much better than Snyder.
Bezos taking over would make them an instant threat, and would be a disaster to the division.
We talk about how badly the WFT is run, but they have 3 division titles since the last last time we won the East.
So really, who is the gift that keeps on giving? Snyder? Or Mara?
Quote:
Dan Snyder is the gift that keeps on giving if your a fan of the Giants, Eagles, or Cowboys. Since he bought the team the Redskins have been one of the worst run organizations in the NFL.
We talk about how badly the WFT is run, but they have 3 division titles since the last last time we won the East.
So really, who is the gift that keeps on giving? Snyder? Or Mara?
You're kidding right? How many Super Bowls has Snyder won exactly? Comparing Mara and Snyder is not even close. Good lord some people just want to find a way to bash this team/owner
Snyder is terrible. His teams have never won more than 10 games, and they've only done that twice.
You can make the case that Mara is a bad owner- as if 2 titles since 2007 makes this a reasonable proposition. But I think that comparing Snyder favorably with him is making an error in judgment.
This is true. One of the group projects in a business management class I'm taking was on Amazon and I was shocked at how much of its revenues come from AWS rather than e-commerce.
Snyder may not be as wealthy as Bezos, but he is a billionaire. His personal valuation of the franchise likely far exceeds what anyone else would be willing to pay for it.
Quote:
Until the richest man in the world makes his offer.....
Snyder may not be as wealthy as Bezos, but he is a billionaire. His personal valuation of the franchise likely far exceeds what anyone else would be willing to pay for it.
no way he sells. It will pass onto his heirs
I agree with 81 Great Dane. The Maras (and Tischs) are wonderful people, they are not cheap, they want to win, but the league has evolved in ways that has left them in over their heads.
Bezos knows how to run an efficient organization. Amazon has been wildly successful in multiple arenas (failed in some, but so does every massive company). E-commerce, package logistics and delivery, web services & cloud technology, voice assistant and smart home devices, video streaming, audio streaming, grocery (Whole Foods), commercial AI & machine learning tools, publishing, and more... Anybody who can build an organization like that would be scary as an opposing owner... Much rather have him as my team's owner.
Quote:
Turned it from a venerable objective newspaper into the equivalent of a social justice blog
In the time Bezos has owned the Post they’ve become profitable, expanded their newsroom to ~1000 staff, opened a number of international bureaus, and increased digital readership to 3 million.
I suspect you’re confusing how your politics are reported on and “destroyed” — as by all objective measures the Post is doing great under Bezos.
He's not wrong about the writers at the WaPo. You think you're getting this seasoned mind - yet, young babysitters who have vocal fry and their articles are laden with typos, and they are the ones telling you how to think?
Stop and take a look at who writes these articles and you'll get a good laugh. Unless, that's your cup of tea.
Lol @ awards. Isn't Washington DC who is literally notorious for doing the beltway strategy?
In few words - we use each other (same 5 or 6 people) as sources so nothing contradicts our "unbiased" information. Lol.
I suspect you’re confusing how your politics are reported on and “destroyed” — as by all objective measures the Post is doing great under Bezos.
He's not wrong about the writers at the WaPo. You think you're getting this seasoned mind - yet, young babysitters who have vocal fry and their articles are laden with typos, and they are the ones telling you how to think?
Stop and take a look at who writes these articles and you'll get a good laugh. Unless, that's your cup of tea.
Lol @ awards. Isn't Washington DC who is literally notorious for doing the beltway strategy?
In few words - we use each other (same 5 or 6 people) as sources so nothing contradicts our "unbiased" information. Lol.
That's truly one of the most unintelligible responses I've read on BBI in 20 years. The irony that it comes on an exchange criticizing the work of journalists is biting and entertaining.
I've read the last two sentences of your post a dozen times, and have no idea what point you are making or to which you are responding.
Always comical to when these "journalists" have to retract their articles and statements and then they get pissy when caught in the act.
Your heroes, not mine.
Yeah. Agree with this. Then again, that isn't a very high set bar. Hate the Times. Hate them all. Haha.