for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Would we have won in 2007 if Shockey was healthy?

eric2425ny : 2/27/2021 10:00 pm
With all of the talk about playmakers, do we keep Engram, etc. I saw multiple TE related posts that referenced Shockey. I was a big Shockey fan, loved how he played the game when he was part of our team.

However, he also never seemed to fully click with Eli. His screaming for the ball all the time was like a warning to what was to come with OBJ years later.

Shockey statistically had a good year that season before he got hurt, but I felt like after he went down with the injury Eli was more relaxed and guys like Steve Smith and obviously Kevin Boss took on bigger roles and rose to the challenge.

I’m not sure we would have won that year if Shockey was available for the playoff run. Would like to hear what you guys think.
Yeah  
Route 9 : 2/27/2021 10:14 pm : link
and won 41-14 in the Super Bowl.
His absence...  
2ndroundKO : 2/27/2021 10:40 pm : link
Helped Eli, in my opinion. Like a big boulder off his shoulders. Plus, Boss filled in admirably.
Who the  
Bill in UT : 2/27/2021 11:18 pm : link
hell knows? Or wants to spend time wondering?
No  
Aaroninma : 2/27/2021 11:20 pm : link
Chemistry was a huge reason for that run. I loved Shockey, but he was bad for Chemistry

But he scores on that Biss 45yrder in the superbowl.....lol
RE: Who the  
eric2425ny : 2/27/2021 11:27 pm : link
In comment 15163316 Bill in UT said:
Quote:
hell knows? Or wants to spend time wondering?


It’s the offseason, pre draft and free agency. Why not talk about past seasons and what ifs?
RE: Who the  
Route 9 : 2/28/2021 12:48 am : link
In comment 15163316 Bill in UT said:
Quote:
hell knows? Or wants to spend time wondering?


Eh. Off season is a tad boring so, let us welcome more threads!
I know a lot of people  
MtDizzle : 2/28/2021 1:19 am : link
say we won the super bowl because he wasn’t around was an addition by subtraction for Eli but I refuse to believe that. We’ll never know, but at least he got a ring with us regardless so that brings me a nugget of joy.
Also  
Route 9 : 2/28/2021 1:34 am : link
I have no animosity towards Shockey either and the same goes with JPP. They found a better fit and both won a Super Bowl with other teams. Good for them.
RE: RE: Who the  
Bill in UT : 2/28/2021 1:47 am : link
In comment 15163329 Route 9 said:
Quote:
In comment 15163316 Bill in UT said:


Quote:


hell knows? Or wants to spend time wondering?



Eh. Off season is a tad boring so, let us welcome more threads!


Here's to more threads. Enjoy :)
What difference does it make?  
Giant John : 2/28/2021 4:35 am : link
It’s done, they call it history. Move on.
RE: His absence...  
jeffusedtobeonwebtv : 2/28/2021 6:31 am : link
In comment 15163290 2ndroundKO said:
Quote:
Helped Eli, in my opinion. Like a big boulder off his shoulders. Plus, Boss filled in admirably.


Tiki retiring and then Shockey being injured allowed Eli to be the leader that he needed to be for the team to win.
There was a poker game years ago...  
EricJ : 2/28/2021 6:52 am : link
with some alcohol. At that table was an ex-Giants offensive lineman. When asked at that time why Eli started to play better, he quickly responded it was due to removing Shockey from the equation.

Shockey apparently was a divisive force on the offense and would even say things like.. "nice throw asshole" to Eli in the huddle.
RE: There was a poker game years ago...  
mfsd : 2/28/2021 7:05 am : link
In comment 15163345 EricJ said:
Quote:
with some alcohol. At that table was an ex-Giants offensive lineman. When asked at that time why Eli started to play better, he quickly responded it was due to removing Shockey from the equation.

Shockey apparently was a divisive force on the offense and would even say things like.. "nice throw asshole" to Eli in the huddle.


Interesting, thanks for sharing that. I’ve always leaned to the side that Shockey going down definitely opened the door for Eli to become the leader he was in 2007.

My vote is we don’t win with Shockey still out there pitching a fit when he doesn’t get the ball enough
RE: RE: There was a poker game years ago...  
EricJ : 2/28/2021 7:28 am : link
In comment 15163346 mfsd said:
Quote:
.

My vote is we don’t win with Shockey still out there pitching a fit when he doesn’t get the ball enough


yeah I have this vision of Shockey throwing his hands up in the air because he was open and the ball did not get thrown to him.
Better question:  
Big Blue '56 : 2/28/2021 8:37 am : link
Would we have won in 2007 if Tiki was still with the team?
RE: Better question:  
jnoble : 2/28/2021 8:42 am : link
In comment 15163366 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
Would we have won in 2007 if Tiki was still with the team?


I think yes, 100%
RE: Better question:  
SFGFNCGiantsFan : 2/28/2021 9:01 am : link
In comment 15163366 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
Would we have won in 2007 if Tiki was still with the team?


I don't think so.
No, Giants would not have won  
Jimmy Googs : 2/28/2021 9:32 am : link
Eli would have kept targeting Shockey in the Super Bowl and the Patriots would have intercepted him 4 times and return 3 of them for touchdowns...
if folks really  
Enzo : 2/28/2021 10:02 am : link
think Shockey was so destructive that his presence would have prevented them from winning in 2007, that's a huge indictment of TC. Or anyone considered to be a leader of that team.
RE: if folks really  
Big Blue '56 : 2/28/2021 10:36 am : link
In comment 15163430 Enzo said:
Quote:
think Shockey was so destructive that his presence would have prevented them from winning in 2007, that's a huge indictment of TC. Or anyone considered to be a leader of that team.


Though, I believe he was the only one to ever unnerve Eli..
Absolutely not.  
FStubbs : 2/28/2021 10:44 am : link
It's no accident we were unsure about Eli, and then Shockey goes down and Eli immediately turned into a franchise QB.

That story about Shockey in the huddle is believable, we saw his antics on the field.

And we wouldn't have won it with Barber either.
I say no. shockey’s relationship with Eli  
Section331 : 2/28/2021 10:51 am : link
was borderline toxic. He would walk into the huddle bitching on every pass play where he didn’t get the ball. For as talented as he was, and he is the most talented TE the Giants have had, I think he did more to hold the offense back.
RE: I say no. shockey’s relationship with Eli  
EricJ : 2/28/2021 10:59 am : link
In comment 15163451 Section331 said:
Quote:
was borderline toxic. He would walk into the huddle bitching on every pass play where he didn’t get the ball. For as talented as he was, and he is the most talented TE the Giants have had, I think he did more to hold the offense back.


This is why character and chemistry are so important and in many instances are more important than pure talent. Thank you Kevin Boss...
Also,  
Big Blue '56 : 2/28/2021 11:18 am : link
the SB winning Plax catch? Shockey would have dropped it.
To those saying “what’s the point”  
knowledgetimmons : 2/28/2021 8:37 pm : link
I think this is an interesting topic. It’s not hard to think in terms of individual players with the hyper focus on such in today’s sports world. Reality is that it’s definitely a group effort all of the time.

Shockley was a weapon for sure, but his Miami hype was just that... plenty of TE in the nfl accomplished what he did with far less distraction.
Shockey was a douche  
Optimus-NY : 3/1/2021 6:39 am : link
The picture boy for addition by subtraction, with Tiki a close 2nd.
no.  
Victor in CT : 3/1/2021 8:55 am : link
..........
I felt at the time  
Dr. D : 3/1/2021 9:16 am : link
That his injury was probably a good thing for the team for the reasons we all know. Eli could relax and look for the best option and no longer have to try to keep the whiny bitch happy.

I don't think we win it all with him.
I'm not saying I was happy he got hurt  
Dr. D : 3/1/2021 9:28 am : link
that would be mean, but I don't recall ever having such optimism about the positive impact of a players injury on any of my teams, like I did with Shockey in '07.

The moral of the story: be a good teammate; don't be a douche.
I will add, Shockey had more to do with that  
Section331 : 3/1/2021 9:38 am : link
awful playoff loss in SF than anyone. Throwing ice at SF fans, barking on the field, and dropping big passes, including an easy TD. He completely melted down. He was anything but a money player.
RE: I will add, Shockey had more to do with that  
Victor in CT : 3/1/2021 9:47 am : link
In comment 15163993 Section331 said:
Quote:
awful playoff loss in SF than anyone. Throwing ice at SF fans, barking on the field, and dropping big passes, including an easy TD. He completely melted down. He was anything but a money player.


EXACTLY!
i have a hard time saying Shockey and Eli never clicked  
djm : 3/1/2021 3:36 pm : link
since Shockey never did any better without Eli and Eli never did any better throwing to any other TEs in his career.

Shockey was animated. He was also productive.

That said, I wouldn't have changed a thing from that december-january-february 07-8 run. Boss played well and guys like Steve Smith played well. Also, that backup WR who played specials made a pretty big play or two in super bowl 42. Who knows what happens if Shockey plays. But he wasn't a cancer or anything like it. He won a ring with the Giants that he earned and he caught a TD in the Saints super bowl win a few years later.
RE: RE: I will add, Shockey had more to do with that  
djm : 3/1/2021 3:38 pm : link
In comment 15164004 Victor in CT said:
Quote:
In comment 15163993 Section331 said:


Quote:


awful playoff loss in SF than anyone. Throwing ice at SF fans, barking on the field, and dropping big passes, including an easy TD. He completely melted down. He was anything but a money player.



EXACTLY!


this is a weird way of looking at things. Which is a nice way to put it. The guy who caught a bunch of passes for a bunch of yards was the guy responsible for the loss and NOT the defense? Not the HC? Not the DC? Not the lack of a 2nd WR worth a thing?

Stop.

RE: I will add, Shockey had more to do with that  
Enzo : 3/1/2021 3:49 pm : link
In comment 15163993 Section331 said:
Quote:
awful playoff loss in SF than anyone. Throwing ice at SF fans, barking on the field, and dropping big passes, including an easy TD. He completely melted down. He was anything but a money player.

I blame the defense and Johnny Lynn and Fassel. Shockey helped the offense score 38 points. Should have been enough.

Of course Fassel and the D were major contributors to the loss,  
Big Blue '56 : 3/1/2021 4:01 pm : link
who in their right minds would dispute that? BUT there’s almost always ONE moment in every game that could be pointed to as the ULTIMATE GAME-CHANGER and Shockey’s wide open end zone drop of a perfect KC pass is THAT VERY MOMENT..
RE: Of course Fassel and the D were major contributors to the loss,  
Enzo : 3/1/2021 4:12 pm : link
In comment 15164382 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
who in their right minds would dispute that? BUT there’s almost always ONE moment in every game that could be pointed to as the ULTIMATE GAME-CHANGER and Shockey’s wide open end zone drop of a perfect KC pass is THAT VERY MOMENT..

The ultimate game changer? It's cute how you're trying to make it sound so important....but that's just lazy and reductive nonsense. His drop had nothing to do with the tons of other things that went wrong in the remaining TWENTY MINUTES of game time that followed.

Eli was not wonderful dealing with me-first players  
glowrider : 3/1/2021 4:18 pm : link
Eli played “middle class football,” which is to say, humble, team first, spread it around, take what’s there and did I mention team first? Imagine showing up to work one day and your biggest pain in the ass is gone...you’d feel lighter than air.

Both Manning brothers emphasize how much “team” meant to them, that their favorite times were airplane rides after wins, knocking back beers on the bus (Eli had a beer guy in every city I believe O’Hara said), working hard with your teammates at practice, socializing together, etc. but not really the games, which are a fraction of the time spent together.

Peyton was a lead dog who nobody would dare cross. He was a co-equal branch of the Colts’ Government. Eli was more of a go along to get along guy, and I think that didn’t always serve him well with teammates who thought they were bigger than the team (me-first).

I have sometimes wondered how Eli would’ve handled things if he had a Coach who wasn’t also a father-figure.
RE: RE: Of course Fassel and the D were major contributors to the loss,  
Big Blue '56 : 3/1/2021 4:31 pm : link
In comment 15164389 Enzo said:
Quote:
In comment 15164382 Big Blue '56 said:


Quote:


who in their right minds would dispute that? BUT there’s almost always ONE moment in every game that could be pointed to as the ULTIMATE GAME-CHANGER and Shockey’s wide open end zone drop of a perfect KC pass is THAT VERY MOMENT..


The ultimate game changer? It's cute how you're trying to make it sound so important....but that's just lazy and reductive nonsense. His drop had nothing to do with the tons of other things that went wrong in the remaining TWENTY MINUTES of game time that followed.


The ultimate game-changer in my mind.. I would appreciate you not categorizing my opinion as lazy or nonsensical. Many more people agree with this “nonsense” than don’t. But it’s okay to say the huge Engram drop at the beginning of the season was huge, a game-changer even though there were many other reasons for the loss that made his drop more glaring.
RE: RE: Of course Fassel and the D were major contributors to the loss,  
Optimus-NY : 3/2/2021 7:29 am : link
In comment 15164389 Enzo said:
Quote:
In comment 15164382 Big Blue '56 said:


Quote:


who in their right minds would dispute that? BUT there’s almost always ONE moment in every game that could be pointed to as the ULTIMATE GAME-CHANGER and Shockey’s wide open end zone drop of a perfect KC pass is THAT VERY MOMENT..


The ultimate game changer? It's cute how you're trying to make it sound so important....but that's just lazy and reductive nonsense. His drop had nothing to do with the tons of other things that went wrong in the remaining TWENTY MINUTES of game time that followed.



I agree with Bruce, as I'm sure many others do. Don't be disrespectful. Shockey was a man-child, so stop defending him.
RE: Of course Fassel and the D were major contributors to the loss,  
Section331 : 3/2/2021 5:14 pm : link
In comment 15164382 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
who in their right minds would dispute that? BUT there’s almost always ONE moment in every game that could be pointed to as the ULTIMATE GAME-CHANGER and Shockey’s wide open end zone drop of a perfect KC pass is THAT VERY MOMENT..


Not to mention, Shockey had 7 catches on 14 targets, so 7 of KC's 9 incompletions were to Shockey. Even the aforementioned "lack of a 2nd WR" Ron Dixon had 5 catches on 6 targets.

Shockey was the ultimate wild card, capable of a huge play at any moment, but broke off routes and wasn't very dependable. I used to watch him go back to the huddle after most pass plays, and EVERY TIME he would be visibly bitching if the ball didn't come his way. I have to think everyone on the offense was relieved when he was gone;.
Back to the Corner