at those numbers and that length contract I much would have preferred him over Leonard Williams for the next 2 yrs.
Glad you're not in charge then. He's played 16 games twice in the last 5 seasons and will be 32. And even in 16 games last season, his production was closer to Tomlinson's than LW's.
at those numbers and that length contract I much would have preferred him over Leonard Williams for the next 2 yrs.
That's an interesting thought, actually. The health variable is the obvious challenge, but IF you get 13-14 games for two years at 7-10 sacks/pressures/15+ TFL it's a real bargain contract...
I wonder if that hurts their chances of re-sgining Reddick?
at those numbers and that length contract I much would have preferred him over Leonard Williams for the next 2 yrs.
That's an interesting thought, actually. The health variable is the obvious challenge, but IF you get 13-14 games for two years at 7-10 sacks/pressures/15+ TFL it's a real bargain contract...
He hasn't had 7-10 sacks since 2018.
RE: I wonder if that hurts their chances of re-sgining Reddick?
They had roughly $11M in cap space before this so will be pretty tight now. But there were rumors that they were looking to cut/trade Chandler Jones so they could free up $15.5M by following thru on that.
at those numbers and that length contract I much would have preferred him over Leonard Williams for the next 2 yrs.
That's an interesting thought, actually. The health variable is the obvious challenge, but IF you get 13-14 games for two years at 7-10 sacks/pressures/15+ TFL it's a real bargain contract...
If the Giants had signed Watt to this contract, I'd be sick to my stomach.
What do you believe the Over/Under is on games played during the next 2 seasons? 18? 20?
at those numbers and that length contract I much would have preferred him over Leonard Williams for the next 2 yrs.
That's an interesting thought, actually. The health variable is the obvious challenge, but IF you get 13-14 games for two years at 7-10 sacks/pressures/15+ TFL it's a real bargain contract...
If the Giants had signed Watt to this contract, I'd be sick to my stomach.
What do you believe the Over/Under is on games played during the next 2 seasons? 18? 20?
20 seems right. Look, I'm not saying I would sign Watt, but I get the bet by Zona. They are in the most competitive division in the NFL and need more defense...
another team signs a player and we should have signed him for that. If we had signed him for that, i can imagine the very same posters blasting gettleman for over spending on an injury riddled player who has only had 1 great season in the last 5 years and clearly declining.
another team signs a player and we should have signed him for that. If we had signed him for that, i can imagine the very same posters blasting gettleman for over spending on an injury riddled player who has only had 1 great season in the last 5 years and clearly declining.
And yet others never disappoint in coming to the rescue of a General Manager that has put together a team that has a combined record of 15-33 over his past three years on the job...
at those numbers and that length contract I much would have preferred him over Leonard Williams for the next 2 yrs.
That's an interesting thought, actually. The health variable is the obvious challenge, but IF you get 13-14 games for two years at 7-10 sacks/pressures/15+ TFL it's a real bargain contract...
If the Giants had signed Watt to this contract, I'd be sick to my stomach.
What do you believe the Over/Under is on games played during the next 2 seasons? 18? 20?
20 seems right. Look, I'm not saying I would sign Watt, but I get the bet by Zona. They are in the most competitive division in the NFL and need more defense...
Then use that money to re-sign Reddick, or a young FA with upside.
For what it's worth, Cardinals DVOA was 10th for defense and 19th for its offense.
at those numbers and that length contract I much would have preferred him over Leonard Williams for the next 2 yrs.
you're kidding me?
He's not kidding you. and if we had signed a guy who can't stay healthy to a contract like that, he'd start a thread bitching and whining like a 4 year old.
another team signs a player and we should have signed him for that. If we had signed him for that, i can imagine the very same posters blasting gettleman for over spending on an injury riddled player who has only had 1 great season in the last 5 years and clearly declining.
And yet others never disappoint in coming to the rescue of a General Manager that has put together a team that has a combined record of 15-33 over his past three years on the job...
But hey, he's way better than Reese because reasons.
Link - ( New Window )
Glad you're not in charge then. He's played 16 games twice in the last 5 seasons and will be 32. And even in 16 games last season, his production was closer to Tomlinson's than LW's.
I'm not sure how he'll hold up and how effective he'll be - i am interested to see how they use him. He's going to need his snaps managed.
I actually agree 100%
Chance with watt over next two years plus a third round comp pick
Or Leonard Williams
That's an interesting thought, actually. The health variable is the obvious challenge, but IF you get 13-14 games for two years at 7-10 sacks/pressures/15+ TFL it's a real bargain contract...
Quote:
at those numbers and that length contract I much would have preferred him over Leonard Williams for the next 2 yrs.
That's an interesting thought, actually. The health variable is the obvious challenge, but IF you get 13-14 games for two years at 7-10 sacks/pressures/15+ TFL it's a real bargain contract...
He hasn't had 7-10 sacks since 2018.
They had roughly $11M in cap space before this so will be pretty tight now. But there were rumors that they were looking to cut/trade Chandler Jones so they could free up $15.5M by following thru on that.
Quote:
at those numbers and that length contract I much would have preferred him over Leonard Williams for the next 2 yrs.
That's an interesting thought, actually. The health variable is the obvious challenge, but IF you get 13-14 games for two years at 7-10 sacks/pressures/15+ TFL it's a real bargain contract...
If the Giants had signed Watt to this contract, I'd be sick to my stomach.
What do you believe the Over/Under is on games played during the next 2 seasons? 18? 20?
you're kidding me?
That's insanity.
Funny some responses here. They acting like this is JJ from 2013. He ain't around anymore.
Reddick is gonna hit FA now unless the Cards release Chandler Jones.
-Steve Keim
Quote:
In comment 15164194 Josh in the City said:
Quote:
at those numbers and that length contract I much would have preferred him over Leonard Williams for the next 2 yrs.
That's an interesting thought, actually. The health variable is the obvious challenge, but IF you get 13-14 games for two years at 7-10 sacks/pressures/15+ TFL it's a real bargain contract...
If the Giants had signed Watt to this contract, I'd be sick to my stomach.
What do you believe the Over/Under is on games played during the next 2 seasons? 18? 20?
20 seems right. Look, I'm not saying I would sign Watt, but I get the bet by Zona. They are in the most competitive division in the NFL and need more defense...
Bingo!
And yet others never disappoint in coming to the rescue of a General Manager that has put together a team that has a combined record of 15-33 over his past three years on the job...
Quote:
In comment 15164219 bw in dc said:
Quote:
In comment 15164194 Josh in the City said:
Quote:
at those numbers and that length contract I much would have preferred him over Leonard Williams for the next 2 yrs.
That's an interesting thought, actually. The health variable is the obvious challenge, but IF you get 13-14 games for two years at 7-10 sacks/pressures/15+ TFL it's a real bargain contract...
If the Giants had signed Watt to this contract, I'd be sick to my stomach.
What do you believe the Over/Under is on games played during the next 2 seasons? 18? 20?
20 seems right. Look, I'm not saying I would sign Watt, but I get the bet by Zona. They are in the most competitive division in the NFL and need more defense...
Then use that money to re-sign Reddick, or a young FA with upside.
For what it's worth, Cardinals DVOA was 10th for defense and 19th for its offense.
Quote:
at those numbers and that length contract I much would have preferred him over Leonard Williams for the next 2 yrs.
you're kidding me?
I'm shocked. Paying top dollar to name-brand veterans is usually what seems to excite you.
Yup, I believe so
Quote:
at those numbers and that length contract I much would have preferred him over Leonard Williams for the next 2 yrs.
you're kidding me?
He's not kidding you. and if we had signed a guy who can't stay healthy to a contract like that, he'd start a thread bitching and whining like a 4 year old.
That one. They aren't wining shit w Murray. It's never about the money until it is
He seems to be a little upset at the Texans
Good human being but a serious hardo
Then use that money to re-sign Reddick, or a young FA with upside.
For what it's worth, Cardinals DVOA was 10th for defense and 19th for its offense.
Right, but now Stafford is in the NFCW and JimG will be back in the saddle for the 9ers.
Quote:
Then use that money to re-sign Reddick, or a young FA with upside.
For what it's worth, Cardinals DVOA was 10th for defense and 19th for its offense.
Right, but now Stafford is in the NFCW and JimG will be back in the saddle for the 9ers.
Not exactly Montana and Fouts.
Quote:
In comment 15164388 Toth029 said:
Quote:
Then use that money to re-sign Reddick, or a young FA with upside.
For what it's worth, Cardinals DVOA was 10th for defense and 19th for its offense.
Right, but now Stafford is in the NFCW and JimG will be back in the saddle for the 9ers.
Not exactly Montana and Fouts.
Stafford and JimG are considerably better and more talented the Goff and Mullens/Beathard.
Quote:
In comment 15164439 bw in dc said:
Quote:
In comment 15164388 Toth029 said:
Quote:
Then use that money to re-sign Reddick, or a young FA with upside.
For what it's worth, Cardinals DVOA was 10th for defense and 19th for its offense.
Right, but now Stafford is in the NFCW and JimG will be back in the saddle for the 9ers.
Not exactly Montana and Fouts.
Stafford and JimG are considerably better and more talented the Goff and Mullens/Beathard.
Mullens is the next star.
- GoTerps
Quote:
another team signs a player and we should have signed him for that. If we had signed him for that, i can imagine the very same posters blasting gettleman for over spending on an injury riddled player who has only had 1 great season in the last 5 years and clearly declining.
And yet others never disappoint in coming to the rescue of a General Manager that has put together a team that has a combined record of 15-33 over his past three years on the job...
But hey, he's way better than Reese because reasons.