- Jordan Raanan says the Giants have done extensive work on Georgia EDGE, Azeez Ojulari.
- Jordan Raanan spoke to a bunch of sources who unanimously said Chase, Pitts & Sewell are lock Top 10 Picks that won't be available to the Giants at #11.
- Jordan Raanan says the 2 pass rushers that peak the Giants interest the most at #11 are Azeez Ojulari & Kwity Paye.
- Jordan Raanan believe it makes all the sense in the world this year more than most to trade back into the late teens and draft a pass rusher in the 1st Round.
- If Patrick Surtain is there at #11, that is a name that intrigues the Giants, per Jordan Raanan
- Jordan Raanan said that he would be surprised if the Giants select Micah Parsons
Info copied from @letstalkbigblue on IG - (
New Window )
I think the skepticism is mainly over his ankle injury.
I wouldn't. That was a serious injury, he's not fully recovered, and I assume he had plates and screws inserted as part of the surgery to stabilize his ankle and joint. He also hasn't been able to train like he would have normally, and didn't run at his pro day IIRC. We need a clean player. A trade down would also give us much needed additional draft capital this year or next.
That being said, his athleticism and explosiveness once the ball is in his hands is something to behold
Then I guess we hope they cut Shepard. If NCAA would institute the policy that UCLA does with their players then there'd be no one left to draft.
I'm only tossing it aside like most college programs do. The Phillips concussion situation has been blown way out of proportion. Kid wants to play football, and fortunately people are still allowed to make their own decisions in this country. For now.
Kwity Paye might also be a solid pick, but I think he's a Kiwanuka clone, and career trajectory could be very similar. Not bad, but also not remarkable.
Quote:
don't just conveniently toss that factoid away because it doesn't suit.
Then I guess we hope they cut Shepard. If NCAA would institute the policy that UCLA does with their players then there'd be no one left to draft.
I'm only tossing it aside like most college programs do. The Phillips concussion situation has been blown way out of proportion. Kid wants to play football, and fortunately people are still allowed to make their own decisions in this country. For now.
Apples and oranges. BBI is really bad at logic, sometimes.
I asked myself why this could exactly be? I then had this interesting thought. What if the Giants are considering having Lemiuex who took snaps at OC last year as a rook, be our OC this year and move Gates to RG which is the position that could be used for pulling in an outside ZBS for Barkley?
Consider this: Lemeiux if you watched enough Skinner's review , it was pretty clear it's not only technique with him but foot speed. He has a lot of great qualities but I don't think he simply has the foot speed to play anywhere but OC. At OC his strengths are potentially maximized while covering some of his weaknesses. And Gates is our multi purpose OL, he can play practically anywhere on the OL and do it well. But here's the thing, RG may be where his skillset projects the best for this team.
So Gates at G and Shane at C maybe a much stronger combo than Gates at C and Lemeiux at G
Quote:
In comment 15217593 JonC said:
Quote:
don't just conveniently toss that factoid away because it doesn't suit.
Then I guess we hope they cut Shepard. If NCAA would institute the policy that UCLA does with their players then there'd be no one left to draft.
I'm only tossing it aside like most college programs do. The Phillips concussion situation has been blown way out of proportion. Kid wants to play football, and fortunately people are still allowed to make their own decisions in this country. For now.
Apples and oranges. BBI is really bad at logic, sometimes.
WOW. The number of people who continue to discount the concussion issue is just eye opening. I want no part of a guy with that kind of history, at #11 of RD 1. That is too big a risk. The draft is a crapshoot already do you want to add to the potential failure by having a guy who is one concussion away from being done with football? We can't take that risk.
If you're not going WR, then there's no value there, IMO. Move back and then and only then, choose based on perceived need.
Good year/bad year to be at 11
Good year/bad year to be at 11
Agreed. It would have been a *great* year to have Philadelphia play to win a game.
link - ( New Window )
"I understood that this game is all about versatility," Lemieux said on a Zoom interview today. "I think that me getting good at all three interior positions is going to benefit me well in the future. I don't really have a position. I just want to be ready whenever I get in, to be ready to play whatever coach asks me to.
"Versatility is the biggest factor in this game," he said. "Coaches want to be able to put you in multiple spots. I have really good mentors that told me that at training camp, no matter where you are, they are going to throw you in, and you have to be ready. I just want to be prepared before that happened. Even at pro day, somebody asked me to jump in at center and I was ready to do that. It just all works out and versatility is key."
Lemieux has some familiarity playing other positions. He played both tackles spots at West Valley High School in Yakima, Wash. In college, he practiced at right guard.
"I've been all over," Lemieux said. "I think I don't really have any place where I'm comfortable. I think I'm a natural offensive lineman where I can play any position I'm asked. I think that's just been a lot of work. Obviously, there's techniques and differences between each position. There's set differences if you're a guard, if you're a tackle, if you're at center. I think it's just the more reps, the more comfortable you are at a position. I've taken so many reps over my career, I'm comfortable at any position."
Shane practicing at OC - ( New Window )
I agree, that would be ideal, but it's kind of hard to finesse a trade down in that small a window. You would need one of only 4-5 teams to want to move up enough to give up a pick. If they have enough conviction on a guy like Ojulari, they have to be willing to pull the trigger at 11.
It's funny how guys create different handles and yet, they are easily seen to be the past account that was riddled with ignorance.
Word from Falcon hqtr is a couple fold...they are not opposed to taking a QB at #4 but haven't heard yet who they are most attached to. Did hear they are listening to offers to drop down with the idea of getting several defensive prospects on Day 1 & 2.
A lot of the media is guessing on them going with Pitts but haven't heard his name specifically yet.
Quote:
No, don't think so.
It's funny how guys create different handles and yet, they are easily seen to be the past account that was riddled with ignorance.
JerseyJoe'd
If he played that well after a position change, what could he be like staying put for a few years?
Going from OT to C is an unusual switch, especially at the NFL level. Can't think of another time it's happened off the top of my head.
From Zeirlein on Gates, which is kind of what I see with him. I believe his feet are better than you are giving him credit for. And they are certainly better than Lemiuex's.
Good foot quickness
Able to gain necessary ground in his first two kick-slides when he gets out of the blocks on time
Has extremely impressive mirror talent
Seamless ability to change direction without a stall
Catches inside moves and rides them into the line of scrimmage from left tackle spot
Adequate punch timing
Hands are strong and can lock into targets once he lands
Plays with balance as run blocker
Has move blocking ability
Adjusts to second-level movement
NFL.com Gates scouting report - ( New Window )
The Giants should take who ever is left from if they are there:
Smith
Slator
Surtain
A trade down would be appropriate if three QBs are taken and the three players above are taken. I will be upset if Smith and we pass and let the Eagles get him.
If he played that well after a position change, what could he be like staying put for a few years?
With his feet and skillset RG might be his best spot.
Lemeiux's best spot might ONLY be OC, his feet are clearly worse than Gates are.
That's an opinion I haven't seen before. I never considered that Gates going to C was a last resort kind of move. I thought he played really well last year. Couldn't imagine they're anything less than pleased with the results of that experiment.
Quote:
tells you he's pretty close to washing off the team, rather than a promotion to OG. C might be his best shot to stick, and even then he's replaceable. Don't overrate your own.
From Zeirlein on Gates, which is kind of what I see with him. I believe his feet are better than you are giving him credit for. And they are certainly better than Lemiuex's.
Good foot quickness
Able to gain necessary ground in his first two kick-slides when he gets out of the blocks on time
Has extremely impressive mirror talent
Seamless ability to change direction without a stall
Catches inside moves and rides them into the line of scrimmage from left tackle spot
Adequate punch timing
Hands are strong and can lock into targets once he lands
Plays with balance as run blocker
Has move blocking ability
Adjusts to second-level movement NFL.com Gates scouting report - ( New Window )
I'm going by what I see in the NFL. He's got the right attitude, hopefully he continues to improve. I just wouldn't make any decisions by handing Gates a job. Keep getting better, never stop.
RE: the edge rushers - I think as long as they have reasonable or comparable numbers (40, etc.) then I'd like to look at the first 2-3 seconds of every one of their plays. If they're going to be disruptive you should see it no later than that. and 3 is a bit late
Quote:
tells you he's pretty close to washing off the team, rather than a promotion to OG. C might be his best shot to stick, and even then he's replaceable. Don't overrate your own.
That's an opinion I haven't seen before. I never considered that Gates going to C was a last resort kind of move. I thought he played really well last year. Couldn't imagine they're anything less than pleased with the results of that experiment.
Tackles kick inside to guard, but rarely to center. I'm sure they're pleased, but not a player to rest on laurels with.
Rick, but arent concussions kind of ambiguous on concussions?
Quote:
tells you he's pretty close to washing off the team, rather than a promotion to OG. C might be his best shot to stick, and even then he's replaceable. Don't overrate your own.
That's an opinion I haven't seen before. I never considered that Gates going to C was a last resort kind of move. I thought he played really well last year. Couldn't imagine they're anything less than pleased with the results of that experiment.
Agreed. He was a VERY pleasant surprise. His mean streak was not misplaced, it was totally focused on the task he was given. The Staff appeared to like his tough, take no prisoners attitude, be it C or anywhere else he was placed. Kind of reminds me of a Seubert or Deihl..I doubt it was perform well at C or bye bye..He is one player I feel secure with on the OL (Thomas seemed to come on nicely)..