for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Asshat rumor regarding Evan Engram and Kyle Pitts

NYG27 : 4/20/2021 1:30 pm
I have a good college buddy of mine whose got into NFL scouting and in the past I posted information of his when he worked on Jeff Fisher's staff on the Rams.

Now that's out of the way, my buddy now does scouting for an AFC team. He mentioned the Giants have reached out on several fronts, some have been in concerns to a trade down from #11. In addition, they have also talked about a possible Evan Engram trade if the Giants draft Kyle Pitts. He stated they're discussing terms but looking like Engram would go for a 2022 conditional draft pick that would be a 3rd or 4th round pick based on performance.

Part that I found interesting....I told him I didn't think Pitts would fall to the Giants pick at 11 but he said from what he's hearing from his team, they're expecting the Giants to move up.

Take all this with a grain of salt, just wanted to share what I heard this afternoon from my buddy.

Pages: 1 2 3 <<Prev | Show All |
No need for TE if Smith/Waddle available  
Bruner4329 : 4/21/2021 10:19 am : link
Listen if we draft either Smith or Waddle to go along with Golladay, this opens up the passing game tremendously. Even with EE, Rudolph and Smith our TEs can have a huge impact. No way they can be covered the whole game. A guy like EE can cause havoc if he can just catch the ball.
RE: has anyone actually  
Thegratefulhead : 4/21/2021 10:40 am : link
In comment 15227407 ryanmkeane said:
Quote:
literally thrown their remote during the draft? Last time I was legit pissed off at a pick was JPP, but I was at a bar so couldn't toss a remote. Looks like NYG were right about that pick. I was pretty disappointed with Apple and Pugh pick as well
Daniel Jones. I admit it was wrong now. When Allen was there, I thought it was a gift to us by the draft gods that we never seem to get.

I threw it, I really did.
I posted this on another thread....  
Britt in VA : 4/21/2021 11:00 am : link
but for those saying Pitts doesn't make it out of the Top 5... since there is a lot of talk about positional value on this site, I think it's important to note that no TE has been taken in the Top 5 since 1972. The highest a TE has gone since then is Vernon Davis at 6, in 2006.
RE: I posted this on another thread....  
Thegratefulhead : 4/21/2021 11:06 am : link
In comment 15228057 Britt in VA said:
Quote:
but for those saying Pitts doesn't make it out of the Top 5... since there is a lot of talk about positional value on this site, I think it's important to note that no TE has been taken in the Top 5 since 1972. The highest a TE has gone since then is Vernon Davis at 6, in 2006.
Teams don't view him as just a TE. They are drafting because of the pressure he puts on a defense. We talk about force multipliers here. Pitts is one because the defense to account for him with more than one man.
RE: I posted this on another thread....  
chick310 : 4/21/2021 11:11 am : link
In comment 15228057 Britt in VA said:
Quote:
but for those saying Pitts doesn't make it out of the Top 5... since there is a lot of talk about positional value on this site, I think it's important to note that no TE has been taken in the Top 5 since 1972. The highest a TE has gone since then is Vernon Davis at 6, in 2006.


Not following comment on positional value and TEs. Would you expect them to go often in the Top 5?
RE: RE: I posted this on another thread....  
Britt in VA : 4/21/2021 11:31 am : link
In comment 15228078 chick310 said:
Quote:
In comment 15228057 Britt in VA said:


Quote:


but for those saying Pitts doesn't make it out of the Top 5... since there is a lot of talk about positional value on this site, I think it's important to note that no TE has been taken in the Top 5 since 1972. The highest a TE has gone since then is Vernon Davis at 6, in 2006.



Not following comment on positional value and TEs. Would you expect them to go often in the Top 5?


No, I'm talking about a lot of the talking points over the past three years discussing who is and isn't worthy of a top 5 pick.

For instance, the criticism of the Barkley as the 2nd overall pick because using positional value you should never take a running back that high (despite the fact that the RB position is taken in the top 5 a lot more than other positions, 28 time since 1980 in fact).

Guards are another position that are not considered worthy of a top 5 pick.

I'm saying, add TE's to that list. They just don't historically go in the top 5.
“Pitts is more than just a TE”  
Sean : 4/21/2021 11:34 am : link
Well, that should also apply to Barkley when discussing his position.
RE: “Pitts is more than just a TE”  
Britt in VA : 4/21/2021 11:40 am : link
In comment 15228113 Sean said:
Quote:
Well, that should also apply to Barkley when discussing his position.


+1
RE: “Pitts is more than just a TE”  
Big Blue '56 : 4/21/2021 12:35 pm : link
In comment 15228113 Sean said:
Quote:
Well, that should also apply to Barkley when discussing his position.


+2
Barkley?  
Thegratefulhead : 4/21/2021 12:45 pm : link
You people want to have the same damn fight again? Why? We haven't done it enough yet? Trolls not interested in conversation. The want to fight with the same people over the same thing over and over and over.
What is ridiculous  
mpinmaine : 4/21/2021 10:39 pm : link
is so many posters stating things as fact. None of us know what the Giants will do.

unreal some of you guys...
RE: my sons best friend has been working for NFL teams for almost 20 years  
gameday555 : 4/21/2021 11:13 pm : link
In comment 15227101 dd in Mass said:
Quote:
Every once in a while, I get some info. But you never really know if teams are just sending up smoke signals.

Anyway, back a couple of months ago. My son was visiting me in FL. They were on the phone and he said that the Giants have actively shopped Engram to see if there was any interest and what could they get for him.

Supposedly a New York team, so that's either the Jets or the Bills and the Chargers were offering a 4th or 5th. But the Giants felt he was worth more than that.

Could be one of the reason that Judge has been so complimentary of EE to pump up his value.


From what I heard, the giants were interested in acquiring Mike Williams partially in exchange for Engram. Chargers mulled it but declined. You've got good intel I can see :)
Yes, trade for Pitts!!!  
unemployedgm : 4/25/2021 1:34 am : link
Listing to Gettlemen press conference, and I think this actual possibility, and yes we are super star away on offense from competing in NFC. Surrouding Jones with two physical dominating receivers would take his game to a level we couldn't imagine. Brady has Evans and Gronk, Mahomes has Hill and Kelce, Payton had Reggie, and Marvin, and Eli had Nicks and Cruz. Danny needs Kenny and Kyle. When you get a player like Barkley,Julio, Chase Young, Von Miller, or Jalan Ramsey you and all you have to do is give up draft future capital, or 2nd rd pick, I think you do. Those players add wins. Pitts would make us a superbowl contender!!
Here's facts:
1) Gettlemen in love with Pitts, he was the only player in press that he talked about. Sound the same way he talked about Jones.
2) Gettlemen built Carolina the same way with Benjamin, and Funchess. I.e Golladay and Pitts.
3) Mara talked about how the NFL is becoming a passing league, Pitts, Shap, Slayton,and Golladay would give a top receiving core.
Pages: 1 2 3 <<Prev | Show All |
Back to the Corner