It may be that the addition of Toney, Golliday and and Rudolph will allow Jones to throw for more yards and touchdowns, but they say that a QB's best friend is a good running game. I am still in the camp that would have liked to see them add a better guard than Zach Fulton. Hope I am wrong.
winners and losers - (
New Window )
Quote:
In comment 15258487 chopperhatch said:
Quote:
In comment 15258304 BillT said:
Quote:
In comment 15258300 HomerJones45 said:
Quote:
then he is beyond anyone's help, he is what he is, and we are in the market for a qb before we waste everything else that has been assembled.
Heaven forbid the Jones crowd miss an opportunity to say the same thing over and over and over.
Its unreal. Hopefully he will play well boners like Homer, bw and Googs will STFU.
Actually they wont. They will compare his good numbers with any other QB drafted lower than he was drafted and start yapping about him being a reach.
Hahaha oh man you guys can't help yourselves. GT, BW, and Googs have not posted in this thread and yet here you are talking about them.
Maybe they're not the reason threads get derailed.
Maybe look again stupid.
Also, there is probably a good enough reason for them not to after getting preemptively called out.
i missed Googs post. Either way you bitch about them when they post and bitch about them when they don't
One major lesson of Super Bowl, even with an explosive offense like the Chiefs - if your OL can't get the job done...
Quote:
In comment 15258615 Scooter185 said:
Quote:
In comment 15258487 chopperhatch said:
Quote:
In comment 15258304 BillT said:
Quote:
In comment 15258300 HomerJones45 said:
Quote:
then he is beyond anyone's help, he is what he is, and we are in the market for a qb before we waste everything else that has been assembled.
Heaven forbid the Jones crowd miss an opportunity to say the same thing over and over and over.
Its unreal. Hopefully he will play well boners like Homer, bw and Googs will STFU.
Actually they wont. They will compare his good numbers with any other QB drafted lower than he was drafted and start yapping about him being a reach.
Hahaha oh man you guys can't help yourselves. GT, BW, and Googs have not posted in this thread and yet here you are talking about them.
Maybe they're not the reason threads get derailed.
Maybe look again stupid.
Also, there is probably a good enough reason for them not to after getting preemptively called out.
i missed Googs post. Either way you bitch about them when they post and bitch about them when they don't
Yeah, I asked what free agents Guards were still available. Quite a landmine.
Scooter - he’s just looking for some attention. The NFT thread guys must be ignoring him so he come he looking to take a few cheap shots.
Preemptively called out? Ha, more like stalking...
They might still have hope to sign for more dollars....but the musical chairs have stopped....and too many players are left without a chair.
Players will start signing with teams at vet. minimum soon...vet. guards missing years is not good for them
Quote:
In comment 15258391 Jimmy Googs said:
Poster said there are a ton of unsigned quality Guards...who?
Which is pretty typical of these kind of posts, no? “Ton of unsigned quality FA guards.” Sure because he said so and the Giants don’t realize that and the rest of the league doesn’t need quality FA guards. They’re just waiting for us to take our pick of them before they sign theirs. ???
See for yourselves, you imgrates!
If everyone doubts this coaching staff can develop that type of youth, why the hell do they think bringing in more mid round rookies is going to drastically improve the position group? They already doubt they can evaluate and develop the guys already here.
The conversation is getting mind numbing. Once FA was over and they didn't go OL in rounds 1 and 2, there was nothing worth reaching for to improve what you already have. Let the coaches coach. If you have doubts they can do that, great might as well tear it down again because if they can't get competent OL play out of the high drafted talent from 2020 in YEAR 2, you have the wrong staff.
If everyone doubts this coaching staff can develop that type of youth, why the hell do they think bringing in more mid round rookies is going to drastically improve the position group? They already doubt they can evaluate and develop the guys already here.
The conversation is getting mind numbing. Once FA was over and they didn't go OL in rounds 1 and 2, there was nothing worth reaching for to improve what you already have. Let the coaches coach. If you have doubts they can do that, great might as well tear it down again because if they can't get competent OL play out of the high drafted talent from 2020 in YEAR 2, you have the wrong staff.
Having all these young, and inexperienced OL at one time is a recipie for disaster, and that’s the Giants own fault for being this way. Should have gotten at least one decent veteran in FA, but chooses not to do so, which I think will come back, and haunt them all season. Good coaching can only take you so far, and this coaching staff hasn’t really proved they are a good coaching staff, or that there is enough talent on the O line anyways.
Quote:
Second year players, not including a guy in his second year at a new position, starting on that OL. That's incredibly young...if they don't progress then the team already has the wrong coaching staff in place and it doesn't matter who they bring in. They wouldn't have shot.
If everyone doubts this coaching staff can develop that type of youth, why the hell do they think bringing in more mid round rookies is going to drastically improve the position group? They already doubt they can evaluate and develop the guys already here.
The conversation is getting mind numbing. Once FA was over and they didn't go OL in rounds 1 and 2, there was nothing worth reaching for to improve what you already have. Let the coaches coach. If you have doubts they can do that, great might as well tear it down again because if they can't get competent OL play out of the high drafted talent from 2020 in YEAR 2, you have the wrong staff.
Having all these young, and inexperienced OL at one time is a recipie for disaster, and that’s the Giants own fault for being this way.
It could also be a recipe for continued long-term success as these players mature together and learn to play as a cohesive unit.
They signed Zach Fulton, who had a down year last year, but was highly regarded for several years previously. Signing Fulton after losing Zeitler was a wash, in my opinion. Who would you have liked to see them sign, and at what price?
Since there are some new faces on the coaching staff - the O-Line coach, specifically, and some new offensive assistants, naturally they haven't proven anything yet. How about showing some patience and seeing what develops when practice/preseason begins?
Quote:
In comment 15258942 bLiTz 2k said:
Quote:
Second year players, not including a guy in his second year at a new position, starting on that OL. That's incredibly young...if they don't progress then the team already has the wrong coaching staff in place and it doesn't matter who they bring in. They wouldn't have shot.
If everyone doubts this coaching staff can develop that type of youth, why the hell do they think bringing in more mid round rookies is going to drastically improve the position group? They already doubt they can evaluate and develop the guys already here.
The conversation is getting mind numbing. Once FA was over and they didn't go OL in rounds 1 and 2, there was nothing worth reaching for to improve what you already have. Let the coaches coach. If you have doubts they can do that, great might as well tear it down again because if they can't get competent OL play out of the high drafted talent from 2020 in YEAR 2, you have the wrong staff.
Having all these young, and inexperienced OL at one time is a recipie for disaster, and that’s the Giants own fault for being this way.
It could also be a recipe for continued long-term success as these players mature together and learn to play as a cohesive unit.
Quote:
Should have gotten at least one decent veteran in FA, but chooses not to do so, which I think will come back, and haunt them all season.
They signed Zach Fulton, who had a down year last year, but was highly regarded for several years previously. Signing Fulton after losing Zeitler was a wash, in my opinion. Who would you have liked to see them sign, and at what price?
Quote:
Good coaching can only take you so far, and this coaching staff hasn’t really proved they are a good coaching staff, or that there is enough talent on the O line anyways.
Since there are some new faces on the coaching staff - the O-Line coach, specifically, and some new offensive assistants, naturally they haven't proven anything yet. How about showing some patience and seeing what develops when practice/preseason begins?
Four year losing streak is patient enough. What do you want 5?
That's no answer. It's just more whining. Can you post anything constructive or are you just going to continue acting like a petulant child?
Quote:
Four year losing streak is patient enough. What do you want 5?
That's no answer. It's just more whining. Can you post anything constructive or are you just going to continue acting like a petulant child?
You just think everything is roses, and cheery in Giants land, and it is not. Complaining about losing 4 years in a row is telling it like it is. Call it what you want, but losing is losing.
Four year losing streak is patient enough. What do you want 5?
That's no answer. It's just more whining. Can you post anything constructive or are you just going to continue acting like a petulant child?
You just think everything is roses, and cheery in Giants land, and it is not. Complaining about losing 4 years in a row is telling it like it is. Call it what you want, but losing is losing.
Bullshit. I'm just as worried about the O-Line as you are, but I'm not going to act like a whiny little bitch about it. I'm going to be patient and see what develops. I'm also not going to whine about the past four years, because as a famous man once said, "The past is the past." Words to live by.
Quote:
Four year losing streak is patient enough. What do you want 5?
That's no answer. It's just more whining. Can you post anything constructive or are you just going to continue acting like a petulant child?
You just think everything is roses, and cheery in Giants land, and it is not. Complaining about losing 4 years in a row is telling it like it is. Call it what you want, but losing is losing.
Bullshit. I'm just as worried about the O-Line as you are, but I'm not going to act like a whiny little bitch about it. I'm going to be patient and see what develops. I'm also not going to whine about the past four years, because as a famous man once said, "The past is the past." Words to live by.
I don’t worry about what you say, so don’t worry about what I say. EVERYONE is entitled to their opinion, and that doesn’t make me a worse fan, or you a better fan, so thanks for all the kind words, but until the Giants go at least 9-8 it doesn’t change a thing.
A lot will depend on exactly what kind of off season/camp is allowed. These guys need reps together. We need them to be at least league average, which would be a big jump.
Bullshit. I'm just as worried about the O-Line as you are, but I'm not going to act like a whiny little bitch about it. I'm going to be patient and see what develops. I'm also not going to whine about the past four years, because as a famous man once said, "The past is the past." Words to live by.
I don’t worry about what you say, so don’t worry about what I say. EVERYONE is entitled to their opinion, and that doesn’t make me a worse fan, or you a better fan, so thanks for all the kind words, but until the Giants go at least 9-8 it doesn’t change a thing.
Once again, no answer, just deflection. I never said you were a bad fan. I said you were a whiny bitch. Sure, you're entitled to your opinion, but if you're going to express that opinion by polluting numerous threads with your incessant whining...if you're not going to offer anything constructive (other than your outlandish and unrealistic proposal to trade up for Penei Sewell) and just continue to piss and moan...if you're going to dismiss out of hand the moves the Giants have made to improve their offense, in general, and their O-Line, in particular, because they don't meet your lofty expectations...then you can expect the blowback to be just as incessant.
Quote:
Bullshit. I'm just as worried about the O-Line as you are, but I'm not going to act like a whiny little bitch about it. I'm going to be patient and see what develops. I'm also not going to whine about the past four years, because as a famous man once said, "The past is the past." Words to live by.
I don’t worry about what you say, so don’t worry about what I say. EVERYONE is entitled to their opinion, and that doesn’t make me a worse fan, or you a better fan, so thanks for all the kind words, but until the Giants go at least 9-8 it doesn’t change a thing.
Once again, no answer, just deflection. I never said you were a bad fan. I said you were a whiny bitch. Sure, you're entitled to your opinion, but if you're going to express that opinion by polluting numerous threads with your incessant whining...if you're not going to offer anything constructive (other than your outlandish and unrealistic proposal to trade up for Penei Sewell) and just continue to piss and moan...if you're going to dismiss out of hand the moves the Giants have made to improve their offense, in general, and their O-Line, in particular, because they don't meet your lofty expectations...then you can expect the blowback to be just as incessant.
Once again thanks for all the kind words.if you don’t think fixing the O line is constructive then just look at what KC has done by revamping their whole O line, because as they found out you can have all the weapons in the world, but without the O line you have nothing, and the Giants aren’t even close to having the weapons that KC does. Whining about losing? Wow!
Quote:
In comment 15259031 Old Blue said:
Quote:
Bullshit. I'm just as worried about the O-Line as you are, but I'm not going to act like a whiny little bitch about it. I'm going to be patient and see what develops. I'm also not going to whine about the past four years, because as a famous man once said, "The past is the past." Words to live by.
I don’t worry about what you say, so don’t worry about what I say. EVERYONE is entitled to their opinion, and that doesn’t make me a worse fan, or you a better fan, so thanks for all the kind words, but until the Giants go at least 9-8 it doesn’t change a thing.
Once again, no answer, just deflection. I never said you were a bad fan. I said you were a whiny bitch. Sure, you're entitled to your opinion, but if you're going to express that opinion by polluting numerous threads with your incessant whining...if you're not going to offer anything constructive (other than your outlandish and unrealistic proposal to trade up for Penei Sewell) and just continue to piss and moan...if you're going to dismiss out of hand the moves the Giants have made to improve their offense, in general, and their O-Line, in particular, because they don't meet your lofty expectations...then you can expect the blowback to be just as incessant.
Once again thanks for all the kind words.if you don’t think fixing the O line is constructive then just look at what KC has done by revamping their whole O line, because as they found out you can have all the weapons in the world, but without the O line you have nothing, and the Giants aren’t even close to having the weapons that KC does. Whining about losing? Wow!
Old Blue - have you found anything yet to support your specific claim the Giants weren’t even considering Toney at all prior to draft?
And no need to post Giants got snookered as I read it 10 times already. Just post the info as to how Toney wasn’t ever a potential prospect they wanted at any spot in the draft.
Quote:
In comment 15259060 Klaatu said:
Quote:
In comment 15259031 Old Blue said:
Quote:
Bullshit. I'm just as worried about the O-Line as you are, but I'm not going to act like a whiny little bitch about it. I'm going to be patient and see what develops. I'm also not going to whine about the past four years, because as a famous man once said, "The past is the past." Words to live by.
I don’t worry about what you say, so don’t worry about what I say. EVERYONE is entitled to their opinion, and that doesn’t make me a worse fan, or you a better fan, so thanks for all the kind words, but until the Giants go at least 9-8 it doesn’t change a thing.
Once again, no answer, just deflection. I never said you were a bad fan. I said you were a whiny bitch. Sure, you're entitled to your opinion, but if you're going to express that opinion by polluting numerous threads with your incessant whining...if you're not going to offer anything constructive (other than your outlandish and unrealistic proposal to trade up for Penei Sewell) and just continue to piss and moan...if you're going to dismiss out of hand the moves the Giants have made to improve their offense, in general, and their O-Line, in particular, because they don't meet your lofty expectations...then you can expect the blowback to be just as incessant.
Once again thanks for all the kind words.if you don’t think fixing the O line is constructive then just look at what KC has done by revamping their whole O line, because as they found out you can have all the weapons in the world, but without the O line you have nothing, and the Giants aren’t even close to having the weapons that KC does. Whining about losing? Wow!
Old Blue - have you found anything yet to support your specific claim the Giants weren’t even considering Toney at all prior to draft?
And no need to post Giants got snookered as I read it 10 times already. Just post the info as to how Toney wasn’t ever a potential prospect they wanted at any spot in the draft.
Can you find anything that says the Giants were taking Toney ahead of Smith, or Waddle, and why were the Giants so pissed when Philly took Smith ahead of them? Seems I must of missed the report that the Giants were taking Toney, so who had that report out?
You said the Giants had no predraft interest in Toney. No interest at all.
You said the Giants had no predraft interest in Toney. No interest at all.
No interest at 11 like they had with Smith, or Waddle, and I still say the Jets got the better receiver at 34, and we will see on that.
Quote:
Smith and Waddle. At any draft slot. So why do you need such a report as it has nothing to do with your assertion.
You said the Giants had no predraft interest in Toney. No interest at all.
No interest at 11 like they had with Smith, or Waddle, and I still say the Jets got the better receiver at 34, and we will see on that.
No, that’s not what you said. You said the Giants no predraft interest at all in Toney.
We already have decent views that they rated the two Alabama guys higher but they were gone. They may have had interest in Toney at 11 to some degree but not enough to overcome the deal they were offered to move to 20 and draft Toney there.
Quote:
In comment 15259222 chick310 said:
Quote:
Smith and Waddle. At any draft slot. So why do you need such a report as it has nothing to do with your assertion.
You said the Giants had no predraft interest in Toney. No interest at all.
No interest at 11 like they had with Smith, or Waddle, and I still say the Jets got the better receiver at 34, and we will see on that.
No, that’s not what you said. You said the Giants no predraft interest at all in Toney.
We already have decent views that they rated the two Alabama guys higher but they were gone. They may have had interest in Toney at 11 to some degree but not enough to overcome the deal they were offered to move to 20 and draft Toney there.
You may be right, and I may be right, but nothing has come out saying that DG had his sights on Toney if Smith, and Waddle were gone.
Quote:
In comment 15259241 Old Blue said:
Quote:
In comment 15259222 chick310 said:
Quote:
Smith and Waddle. At any draft slot. So why do you need such a report as it has nothing to do with your assertion.
You said the Giants had no predraft interest in Toney. No interest at all.
No interest at 11 like they had with Smith, or Waddle, and I still say the Jets got the better receiver at 34, and we will see on that.
No, that’s not what you said. You said the Giants no predraft interest at all in Toney.
We already have decent views that they rated the two Alabama guys higher but they were gone. They may have had interest in Toney at 11 to some degree but not enough to overcome the deal they were offered to move to 20 and draft Toney there.
You may be right, and I may be right, but nothing has come out saying that DG had his sights on Toney if Smith, and Waddle were gone.
Of course something has come out absolutely saying Toney was in their sights...he was the pick at 20.
Did you think they chose him for the hell of it?
Quote:
In comment 15259249 chick310 said:
Quote:
In comment 15259241 Old Blue said:
Quote:
In comment 15259222 chick310 said:
Quote:
Smith and Waddle. At any draft slot. So why do you need such a report as it has nothing to do with your assertion.
You said the Giants had no predraft interest in Toney. No interest at all.
No interest at 11 like they had with Smith, or Waddle, and I still say the Jets got the better receiver at 34, and we will see on that.
No, that’s not what you said. You said the Giants no predraft interest at all in Toney.
We already have decent views that they rated the two Alabama guys higher but they were gone. They may have had interest in Toney at 11 to some degree but not enough to overcome the deal they were offered to move to 20 and draft Toney there.
You may be right, and I may be right, but nothing has come out saying that DG had his sights on Toney if Smith, and Waddle were gone.
Of course something has come out absolutely saying Toney was in their sights...he was the pick at 20.
Did you think they chose him for the hell of it?
You can’t tell with DG’s thinking.
Peart looked substantially bigger in the right places....very impressive.
I suspect similar results for the other rookies....
OL in college with school, practice etc...end up having trouble keeping weight on....
an NFL off-season...on site or not....all they do is workout gaining good weight, usually.
David Diehl seems to think that Peart has the goods to be solid for the OL. David Diehl knows what he's talking about.
Sounds good to me.
Link - ( New Window )
Quote:
In comment 15258990 Old Blue said:
Quote:
Four year losing streak is patient enough. What do you want 5?
That's no answer. It's just more whining. Can you post anything constructive or are you just going to continue acting like a petulant child?
You just think everything is roses, and cheery in Giants land, and it is not. Complaining about losing 4 years in a row is telling it like it is. Call it what you want, but losing is losing.
Can you tell me what the actual f*ck 2018 or '19 has to do with 2021? Different HC, different OL coaches, different players on OL (including a high 1st rd pick, a high 2nd rd pick, a high 3rd rd pick), different decision makers involved in drafting (inclg JJ), different skill players, different every f*cking thing, just about.
The negativity and whining is freaking ridiculous.
Quote:
Four year losing streak is patient enough. What do you want 5?
That's no answer. It's just more whining. Can you post anything constructive or are you just going to continue acting like a petulant child?
You just think everything is roses, and cheery in Giants land, and it is not. Complaining about losing 4 years in a row is telling it like it is. Call it what you want, but losing is losing.
Bullshit. I'm just as worried about the O-Line as you are, but I'm not going to act like a whiny little bitch about it. I'm going to be patient and see what develops. I'm also not going to whine about the past four years, because as a famous man once said, "The past is the past." Words to live by.
Quote:
In comment 15258999 Klaatu said:
Quote:
In comment 15258990 Old Blue said:
Quote:
Four year losing streak is patient enough. What do you want 5?
That's no answer. It's just more whining. Can you post anything constructive or are you just going to continue acting like a petulant child?
You just think everything is roses, and cheery in Giants land, and it is not. Complaining about losing 4 years in a row is telling it like it is. Call it what you want, but losing is losing.
Can you tell me what the actual f*ck 2018 or '19 has to do with 2021? Different HC, different OL coaches, different players on OL (including a high 1st rd pick, a high 2nd rd pick, a high 3rd rd pick), different decision makers involved in drafting (inclg JJ), different skill players, different every f*cking thing, just about.
The negativity and whining is freaking ridiculous.
You have an interesting bedside manner Dr.