Would you put Toney in the same class as Smith and/or Waddle.?
Would you rate Ohujari with Micah Parsons?
Do you think Robinson close to Patrick Surtain /Jaycee Horn?
That Vikes tidbit is interesting, where did you hear that? Wondering what the offer was? If it was competitive, be interesting how AVT vs Toney shakes down (I think he’s be the assumed pick there at 14)
I do not remember where it came from. May have been one of the other sites that people quote on BBI. May have been in the papers. I saw it, it did not surprise me since there were hints that other teams looking for a QB may have talked to the Giants about moving up. I am certain the Vikes were mentioned after the draft was over. Report did not specify the offer.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: these are really silly questions
The bottom line is that the Giants wanted Smith, and so didn’t a lot on here. The report came out when Philly snookered the Giants were pissed, and Toney ended up as the consulation prize. I understand how the draft works at doesn’t end at 11, but don’t tell me this was the Giants plan all along, because it wasn’t. They got Snookered, and time will tell how everything works out starting with the first Philly game.
Yet another pivot, nobody suggested this was the Giants plan all along, nor that they didn't want Smith at #11. However, he wasn't available at #11 so they had to adjust. Or are you now recommending they should have traded up in this series of weak observations?
Most importantly, you originally said above Toney wasn't even a thought for them and I asked why that was if in fact they picked him 9 slots later. You can answer or you can ignore, but the latter will just suggest to me you wish you didn't go down this path with such a post.
The bottom line is that the Giants wanted Smith, and so didn’t a lot on here. The report came out when Philly snookered the Giants were pissed, and Toney ended up as the consulation prize. I understand how the draft works at doesn’t end at 11, but don’t tell me this was the Giants plan all along, because it wasn’t. They got Snookered, and time will tell how everything works out starting with the first Philly game.
Yet another pivot, nobody suggested this was the Giants plan all along, nor that they didn't want Smith at #11. However, he wasn't available at #11 so they had to adjust. Or are you now recommending they should have traded up in this series of weak observations?
Most importantly, you originally said above Toney wasn't even a thought for them and I asked why that was if in fact they picked him 9 slots later. You can answer or you can ignore, but the latter will just suggest to me you wish you didn't go down this path with such a post.
I wasn’t for any WR in round 1, and have been all about fixing the O line since FA, and I still say the O line needs fixing, so I only would have traded up for Sewell.
I never hard Toney’s name mentioned once in all the mock drafts by all the experts around the league, or any BBI with all their mocks. Of course the thinking of who was going at 11, and not 20, but Philly snookered the Giants, and jumped ahead pissing off the Giants brain trust according to reports.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: these are really silly questions
The bottom line is that the Giants wanted Smith, and so didn’t a lot on here. The report came out when Philly snookered the Giants were pissed, and Toney ended up as the consulation prize. I understand how the draft works at doesn’t end at 11, but don’t tell me this was the Giants plan all along, because it wasn’t. They got Snookered, and time will tell how everything works out starting with the first Philly game.
Yet another pivot, nobody suggested this was the Giants plan all along, nor that they didn't want Smith at #11. However, he wasn't available at #11 so they had to adjust. Or are you now recommending they should have traded up in this series of weak observations?
Most importantly, you originally said above Toney wasn't even a thought for them and I asked why that was if in fact they picked him 9 slots later. You can answer or you can ignore, but the latter will just suggest to me you wish you didn't go down this path with such a post.
I wasn’t for any WR in round 1, and have been all about fixing the O line since FA, and I still say the O line needs fixing, so I only would have traded up for Sewell.
I never hard Toney’s name mentioned once in all the mock drafts by all the experts around the league, or any BBI with all their mocks. Of course the thinking of who was going at 11, and not 20, but Philly snookered the Giants, and jumped ahead pissing off the Giants brain trust according to reports.
I got the snookered view, now several times. No need to repeat unless you have a typing disorder.
So now the story has changed from Toney wasn't even a thought for the Giants to now you never heard his name mentioned by all the experts/mocks as a possibility at #20. And now its also you never wanted a WR for the Giants anyway.
How odd that every expert didn't create every scenario possibility of a trade down and who the Giants would/should pick at their new slot. Or that you don't have access to their tiered draft board that showed Toney was one of several players the Giants may have been considering at #20 or so.
Do you want to continue this nonsense or have you had enough? If you keep going at least it gives you a chance to say they were snookered again.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: these are really silly questions
I wasn’t for any WR in round 1, and have been all about fixing the O line since FA, and I still say the O line needs fixing, so I only would have traded up for Sewell.
I never hard Toney’s name mentioned once in all the mock drafts by all the experts around the league, or any BBI with all their mocks. Of course the thinking of who was going at 11, and not 20, but Philly snookered the Giants, and jumped ahead pissing off the Giants brain trust according to reports.
So what? The Giants may have been pissed, but they didn't panic. On the contrary, they turned a negative into a positive, setting themselves up nicely in the 2022 draft, and still getting another playmaker for their offense.
So, you never heard Toney's name mentioned at all. Again, so what? No one should be privy to the Giants' board except those who actually make the picks. Sure, it was no secret they liked Smith. Who wouldn't? But you can't always get what you want, and it's not liked they reached for Toney. He went just about where most pundits predicted he'd go. And if they were still butthurt about losing Smith, the picks they got for next year's draft should no doubt help ease that pain.
As for the O-Line, they invested heavily in it in last year's draft, and reports are they feel better about it going forward than most fans. So be it. Clearly, in this draft they were focused on strengthening their pass-rush and reinforcing their secondary. That part of their plan worked out nicely for them.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: these are really silly questions
The bottom line is that the Giants wanted Smith, and so didn’t a lot on here. The report came out when Philly snookered the Giants were pissed, and Toney ended up as the consulation prize. I understand how the draft works at doesn’t end at 11, but don’t tell me this was the Giants plan all along, because it wasn’t. They got Snookered, and time will tell how everything works out starting with the first Philly game.
Yet another pivot, nobody suggested this was the Giants plan all along, nor that they didn't want Smith at #11. However, he wasn't available at #11 so they had to adjust. Or are you now recommending they should have traded up in this series of weak observations?
Most importantly, you originally said above Toney wasn't even a thought for them and I asked why that was if in fact they picked him 9 slots later. You can answer or you can ignore, but the latter will just suggest to me you wish you didn't go down this path with such a post.
I wasn’t for any WR in round 1, and have been all about fixing the O line since FA, and I still say the O line needs fixing, so I only would have traded up for Sewell.
I never hard Toney’s name mentioned once in all the mock drafts by all the experts around the league, or any BBI with all their mocks. Of course the thinking of who was going at 11, and not 20, but Philly snookered the Giants, and jumped ahead pissing off the Giants brain trust according to reports.
There was a BBI poster who was hot on Toney and even asked Sy about him and to explain his report. I believe it was mittenedman. There may have been one or two others looking at round two after either Slater or ER in round one.
It is not being snookered no matter how much you claim it to be. Were they angry/upset he almost made it to them, yes. But there are many in the sport that think Toney and 2022 #1 and #4 from the Bears is far better than Smith alone...if the Bears suck, as expected, it will be a very good deal.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: these are really silly questions
The bottom line is that the Giants wanted Smith, and so didn’t a lot on here. The report came out when Philly snookered the Giants were pissed, and Toney ended up as the consulation prize. I understand how the draft works at doesn’t end at 11, but don’t tell me this was the Giants plan all along, because it wasn’t. They got Snookered, and time will tell how everything works out starting with the first Philly game.
Yet another pivot, nobody suggested this was the Giants plan all along, nor that they didn't want Smith at #11. However, he wasn't available at #11 so they had to adjust. Or are you now recommending they should have traded up in this series of weak observations?
Most importantly, you originally said above Toney wasn't even a thought for them and I asked why that was if in fact they picked him 9 slots later. You can answer or you can ignore, but the latter will just suggest to me you wish you didn't go down this path with such a post.
I wasn’t for any WR in round 1, and have been all about fixing the O line since FA, and I still say the O line needs fixing, so I only would have traded up for Sewell.
I never hard Toney’s name mentioned once in all the mock drafts by all the experts around the league, or any BBI with all their mocks. Of course the thinking of who was going at 11, and not 20, but Philly snookered the Giants, and jumped ahead pissing off the Giants brain trust according to reports.
There was a BBI poster who was hot on Toney and even asked Sy about him and to explain his report. I believe it was mittenedman. There may have been one or two others looking at round two after either Slater or ER in round one.
It is not being snookered no matter how much you claim it to be. Were they angry/upset he almost made it to them, yes. But there are many in the sport that think Toney and 2022 #1 and #4 from the Bears is far better than Smith alone...if the Bears suck, as expected, it will be a very good deal.
3-4 years from now we will find out, and yes they was snookered, but the Bears helped make an embarrassing situation looked better
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: these are really silly questions
3-4 years from now we will find out, and yes they was snookered, but the Bears helped make an embarrassing situation looked better
Again, we got the snookered viewpoint. And yes the Bears bailed out the Giants. Totally get your take there.
But simply still waiting from you to show that the Giants were indeed not considering Toney at all since he was an after-thought, and just basically picked his name out of a hat at #20. This is what you posted.
Surely, there is some NFL expert opinion you kind find, since you rely on them so much, to suggest the Giants pick of Toney was a shock since they and no other NFL team was even considering him at all as a potential pick somewhere in the first round. Hell, use anything you would like to support your original point.
Will check back to see what you have.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: these are really silly questions
3-4 years from now we will find out, and yes they was snookered, but the Bears helped make an embarrassing situation looked better
Again, we got the snookered viewpoint. And yes the Bears bailed out the Giants. Totally get your take there.
But simply still waiting from you to show that the Giants were indeed not considering Toney at all since he was an after-thought, and just basically picked his name out of a hat at #20. This is what you posted.
Surely, there is some NFL expert opinion you kind find, since you rely on them so much, to suggest the Giants pick of Toney was a shock since they and no other NFL team was even considering him at all as a potential pick somewhere in the first round. Hell, use anything you would like to support your original point.
Will check back to see what you have.
Toney was not a thought at 11, but then after the trade back to 20 they went back to the drawing board. I hope he turns out to be good, but the original point was that the Giants got snookered by Philly who really wanted Smith more than they did, and Toney was not part of their original plans from DG the Genius.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: these are really silly questions
Toney was not a thought at 11, but then after the trade back to 20 they went back to the drawing board. I hope he turns out to be good, but the original point was that the Giants got snookered by Philly who really wanted Smith more than they did, and Toney was not part of their original plans from DG the Genius.
No kidding the Giants went back to their draft board (not drawing board) after the trade...isn't that exactly what a team should do after moving back in the Draft? Toney at #11 was not worth as much as Toney at #20 and extra picks. That is why he wasn't considered as the straight up pick. But that wasn't what you said as you seem to want to pivot yet again to try and avoid your remark that he wasn't considered at all predraft.
Your original post said this,
Quote:
Plain, and simple the Giants got snookered on Smith by Philly, so time will tell, but I don’t think Toney was even in the Giants thoughts prior to the draft. Snookered, and snookered good.
You are looking to criticize and take pot shots (like using words such as snookered, drawing board, DG the genius) for whatever your reasons are which is fine. Fans can have those opinions.
But what not is fine is making up things like Toney wasn't being considered when he obviously was since he picked at #20. And when you were called out on it, you still haven't shown anything logical to back it up.
Toney was not a thought at 11, but then after the trade back to 20 they went back to the drawing board. I hope he turns out to be good, but the original point was that the Giants got snookered by Philly who really wanted Smith more than they did, and Toney was not part of their original plans from DG the Genius.
He probably was not a thought at #11. Just like AVT wasn't a though at #5. So the heck what.
How did Philly snooker the Giants? What act of deceit did they pull to fool the Giants into doing something that caused them to loose Smith.
Philly wanted Smith, the Cowboys wanted Horn or Surtain. They made a deal that benefited each other. That is not snookering the Giants. They did not do make the trade to simply screw with the Giants. They wanted Smith.
Toney was not a thought at 11, but then after the trade back to 20 they went back to the drawing board. I hope he turns out to be good, but the original point was that the Giants got snookered by Philly who really wanted Smith more than they did, and Toney was not part of their original plans from DG the Genius.
He probably was not a thought at #11. Just like AVT wasn't a though at #5. So the heck what.
How did Philly snooker the Giants? What act of deceit did they pull to fool the Giants into doing something that caused them to loose Smith.
Philly wanted Smith, the Cowboys wanted Horn or Surtain. They made a deal that benefited each other. That is not snookering the Giants. They did not do make the trade to simply screw with the Giants. They wanted Smith.
Snooker does not mean what you are saying..
Call it what you want, and I call it what I want. Either way they didn’t get Smith who they wanted.
Toney was not a thought at 11, but then after the trade back to 20 they went back to the drawing board. I hope he turns out to be good, but the original point was that the Giants got snookered by Philly who really wanted Smith more than they did, and Toney was not part of their original plans from DG the Genius.
He probably was not a thought at #11. Just like AVT wasn't a though at #5. So the heck what.
How did Philly snooker the Giants? What act of deceit did they pull to fool the Giants into doing something that caused them to loose Smith.
Philly wanted Smith, the Cowboys wanted Horn or Surtain. They made a deal that benefited each other. That is not snookering the Giants. They did not do make the trade to simply screw with the Giants. They wanted Smith.
Snooker does not mean what you are saying..
Call it what you want, and I call it what I want. Either way they didn’t get Smith who they wanted.
Post your info on the claim the Giants had no predraft interest on Toney. That’s the piece we want to see.
Toney was not a thought at 11, but then after the trade back to 20 they went back to the drawing board. I hope he turns out to be good, but the original point was that the Giants got snookered by Philly who really wanted Smith more than they did, and Toney was not part of their original plans from DG the Genius.
He probably was not a thought at #11. Just like AVT wasn't a though at #5. So the heck what.
How did Philly snooker the Giants? What act of deceit did they pull to fool the Giants into doing something that caused them to loose Smith.
Philly wanted Smith, the Cowboys wanted Horn or Surtain. They made a deal that benefited each other. That is not snookering the Giants. They did not do make the trade to simply screw with the Giants. They wanted Smith.
Snooker does not mean what you are saying..
Call it what you want, and I call it what I want. Either way they didn’t get Smith who they wanted.
Post your info on the claim the Giants had no predraft interest on Toney. That’s the piece we want to see.
So the Giants all along we’re going to trade out of 11 no matter who was there, and was going to take Toney, and that’s why all the brass was so pissed when Philly leaped frogged them, because Toney was the guy they wanted so bad?? We’ll see if the Jets got a better receiver then the Giants with their draft.
Toney was not a thought at 11, but then after the trade back to 20 they went back to the drawing board. I hope he turns out to be good, but the original point was that the Giants got snookered by Philly who really wanted Smith more than they did, and Toney was not part of their original plans from DG the Genius.
He probably was not a thought at #11. Just like AVT wasn't a though at #5. So the heck what.
How did Philly snooker the Giants? What act of deceit did they pull to fool the Giants into doing something that caused them to loose Smith.
Philly wanted Smith, the Cowboys wanted Horn or Surtain. They made a deal that benefited each other. That is not snookering the Giants. They did not do make the trade to simply screw with the Giants. They wanted Smith.
Snooker does not mean what you are saying..
Call it what you want, and I call it what I want. Either way they didn’t get Smith who they wanted.
Post your info on the claim the Giants had no predraft interest on Toney. That’s the piece we want to see.
So the Giants all along we’re going to trade out of 11 no matter who was there, and was going to take Toney, and that’s why all the brass was so pissed when Philly leaped frogged them, because Toney was the guy they wanted so bad?? We’ll see if the Jets got a better receiver then the Giants with their draft.
No, not at all. And we have already discussed that the Giants had other targets than Toney at 11. And Smith was who they wanted if he was available. No need to address it again.
You have already agreed the Draft didn’t end at #11. So the question you need to answer is how you know the Giants had no predraft interest whatsoever in Toney beyond #11. No interest suggests they didn’t scout him with any seriousness, did little to no diligence, and didn’t have him on their draft board.
That’s what you have to answer.
And the Jets and every other drafted WR has nothing to do
But I’ll play and lose a question to you, did we snooker the Jags and Packers who wanted Toney while also picking up a haul for the next draft?
Only that DG did not have this master plan going into the draft with what they ended up with like a lot of people think on here, and Toney was rated in the back end of the top ten of WR. I didn’t see the Giants jump ahead of anybody like the Jags, or the Packers to take Toney like Philly did to the Giants, so no even close to the same thing, or close to it.
But I’ll play and lose a question to you, did we snooker the Jags and Packers who wanted Toney while also picking up a haul for the next draft?
Let me blown your mind...the Jaguars snookered everyone by taking Lawrence overall #1. All the 31 others teams wanted him so badly they didn’t even set up a draft board, and just winged it when there pick came up.
Make that 30 teams because we know the Giants only wanted Smith. Old Blue is certain they didn’t have any interest in Toney so maybe the League Commissioner made that pick for the Giants at 20...not certain though.
But I’ll play and lose a question to you, did we snooker the Jags and Packers who wanted Toney while also picking up a haul for the next draft?
Only that DG did not have this master plan going into the draft with what they ended up with like a lot of people think on here, and Toney was rated in the back end of the top ten of WR. I didn’t see the Giants jump ahead of anybody like the Jags, or the Packers to take Toney like Philly did to the Giants, so no even close to the same thing, or close to it.
Yet another epiphany from Old Blue.
So now Toney is rated as the 6th-10th best WR. By all 31 other teams, your favorite draft experts or just you?
And the Giants didn’t need to jump ahead of the Jags or the Packers to take Toney, they were already ahead of them both at 20. But hey, maybe Gettleman had a list of all the teams that were going to pick him Toney and decided 20 got ahead of all of them so he did the deal with Chicago. Possible?
that their target went right before. Giants had every opportunity to trade up for Smith and chose to sit tight, likely due to the fact that they had the Chicago deal worked out ahead of time.
Philly paid to jump us, good for them. And good for us for making a ton out of situation that didn’t go exactly as planned (expect for the trade down, that was planned ahead of time).
Your take on Toney is ridiculous. 3-4 teams apparently wanted him in the 20s but somehow he’s ranked as closer to the 10th ranked WR?
You are pulling shit out of your ass and got called out for it. Own it.
that their target went right before. Giants had every opportunity to trade up for Smith and chose to sit tight, likely due to the fact that they had the Chicago deal worked out ahead of time.
Philly paid to jump us, good for them. And good for us for making a ton out of situation that didn’t go exactly as planned (expect for the trade down, that was planned ahead of time).
Your take on Toney is ridiculous. 3-4 teams apparently wanted him in the 20s but somehow he’s ranked as closer to the 10th ranked WR?
You are pulling shit out of your ass and got called out for it. Own it.
What does 3-4 teams wanting him in the 20’s got to do with where he was rated? Which publication had him rated in the top 6 of WR???
I didn’t think this could get better but it continues to.
Call it what you want, and I call it what I want. Either way they didn’t get Smith who they wanted.
Oh, they didn't get what they want as did 31 other teams in this draft. Only the Jaguars got the player they wanted.
And as for calling it what you want, only one of us is correct and the other is trolling. So this will be my last reply to you and you calling it what you want. Really hard to believe someone would spend all day looking to just throw shit out to argue.
that their target went right before. Giants had every opportunity to trade up for Smith and chose to sit tight, likely due to the fact that they had the Chicago deal worked out ahead of time.
Philly paid to jump us, good for them. And good for us for making a ton out of situation that didn’t go exactly as planned (expect for the trade down, that was planned ahead of time).
Your take on Toney is ridiculous. 3-4 teams apparently wanted him in the 20s but somehow he’s ranked as closer to the 10th ranked WR?
You are pulling shit out of your ass and got called out for it. Own it.
What does 3-4 teams wanting him in the 20’s got to do with where he was rated? Which publication had him rated in the top 6 of WR???
Ohh nothing, just reality vs made up mock drafts by people who barely watch the players.
Call it what you want, and I call it what I want. Either way they didn’t get Smith who they wanted.
Oh, they didn't get what they want as did 31 other teams in this draft. Only the Jaguars got the player they wanted.
And as for calling it what you want, only one of us is correct and the other is trolling. So this will be my last reply to you and you calling it what you want. Really hard to believe someone would spend all day looking to just throw shit out to argue.
Only the Jags got the player they wanted? I bet there are other teams that would disagree.
Trolling? The Giants have been a losing team now for 4 straight years now, and there are reasons for that. Bad FA signings like Solder, and bad drafts like Flowers, and possibly DJ, and Barkley who the jury is still out on. They certainly haven’t made the team any better in the win colum, and plus we can add some bad coaching hires, so things aren’t all coming up Blue roses in Giant land like so many make it out to be, and the minute something negative is said you are a bad fan. All the hoping, and praying in the world will not make this a winning team again, so everything they do isn’t always the right things, so there is nothing wrong with pumping the breaks on every move until we see how they turn out like this past draft, or this coaching staff for that matter.
Are you conceding that you had no business stating that the Giants had no predraft interest in Toney?
No, and only that there was no interest at 11, and he was only taken, because the top WR were gone to their way of thinking. I hope he works out, but I’ll be keeping an eye on the Jets to see who got the better player.
Are you conceding that you had no business stating that the Giants had no predraft interest in Toney?
No, and only that there was no interest at 11, and he was only taken, because the top WR were gone to their way of thinking. I hope he works out, but I’ll be keeping an eye on the Jets to see who got the better player.
That is not what you said. You said they had no predraft thoughts of Toney at all which now confirms you just made it up.
You keep on eye on that Jet WR, and we will keep on eye on any further fabrications from you.
Are you conceding that you had no business stating that the Giants had no predraft interest in Toney?
No, and only that there was no interest at 11, and he was only taken, because the top WR were gone to their way of thinking. I hope he works out, but I’ll be keeping an eye on the Jets to see who got the better player.
That is not what you said. You said they had no predraft thoughts of Toney at all which now confirms you just made it up.
You keep on eye on that Jet WR, and we will keep on eye on any further fabrications from you.
Once again thanks for the kind words, but you guys worry more about what I say then what I meant that there is nothing from the Giants on your side of the argument that the Giants had Toney pegged for their first round pick no matter who was on the board, so if there was where is the proof?
Are you conceding that you had no business stating that the Giants had no predraft interest in Toney?
No, and only that there was no interest at 11, and he was only taken, because the top WR were gone to their way of thinking. I hope he works out, but I’ll be keeping an eye on the Jets to see who got the better player.
That is not what you said. You said they had no predraft thoughts of Toney at all which now confirms you just made it up.
You keep on eye on that Jet WR, and we will keep on eye on any further fabrications from you.
Once again thanks for the kind words, but you guys worry more about what I say then what I meant that there is nothing from the Giants on your side of the argument that the Giants had Toney pegged for their first round pick no matter who was on the board, so if there was where is the proof?
This is about being kind or mean to you. You made up something, tried to pivot but ultimately decided to go full steam ahead with a fabrication.
And I have the ultimate proof of the Giants pegging Toney as their potential first round pick no matter who was still left on their board....he was chosen at #20.
When Philly made the jump there was Nothing the Giants could do, and even if Smith would have been gone Toney would not have been picked at 11. The #1 for next year that everyone is raving about does not do anything for them this year, and that is all that. Matters right now.
The draft isnt about "right now" it's about building a team. Why are so many incapable of grasping this simple concept?
An extra first and third bext year is HUGE in terms of roster building.
I know what I meant, but if it makes you feel better call it what you want.
I am agnostic to you crashing and burning over an entire day on a couple of these threads today.
As mentioned before, it’s fine to have your opinions on anything and everything relative to the Giants disappointing you. But there is no need to make things up. It doesn’t make your posts any more interesting.
I know what I meant, but if it makes you feel better call it what you want.
I am agnostic to you crashing and burning over an entire day on a couple of these threads today.
As mentioned before, it’s fine to have your opinions on anything and everything relative to the Giants disappointing you. But there is no need to make things up. It doesn’t make your posts any more interesting.
Crashing, and burning? Just because they took Toney at 20 doesn’t mean that was their plan all along, and unless DG comes out, and says something no one will know if it was nothing more than a wild scramble.
I know what I meant, but if it makes you feel better call it what you want.
I am agnostic to you crashing and burning over an entire day on a couple of these threads today.
As mentioned before, it’s fine to have your opinions on anything and everything relative to the Giants disappointing you. But there is no need to make things up. It doesn’t make your posts any more interesting.
Crashing, and burning? Just because they took Toney at 20 doesn’t mean that was their plan all along, and unless DG comes out, and says something no one will know if it was nothing more than a wild scramble.
This is now at least the third time I have posted to you this isn’t even a point anyone is debating. This is you pivoting yet again to try and save some face...albeit failing.
Further, good teams develop draft scenarios versus some static singular plan because unless you are picking #1, you don’t know what could happen in front of you. The Giants clearly were ready to pivot when their top target was taken. So they moved onto the next set of guys on their board they figured would be there at 20 and grabbed some extra picks to boot. Toney was absolutely one of those guys. Why?...because he was the pick.
how on earth did you end up all the way back at an argument no one is making?
I haven’t heard anyone from the Giants say that Toney was their #1 option if Smith, or Waddle was gone is all that I’m saying. I never seen so much defending of a 20th pick in the first round like he is going to put them over the top, or something.
how on earth did you end up all the way back at an argument no one is making?
I haven’t heard anyone from the Giants say that Toney was their #1 option if Smith, or Waddle was gone is all that I’m saying. I never seen so much defending of a 20th pick in the first round like he is going to put them over the top, or something.
Please point me to anything the Giants have told you before the draft as to who their #1, #2 or even #3 option even was?
This isn’t about a pick putting them over the top. It’s about you making things up.
no one is even defending the pick. It’s like you are simply choosing to not read what everyone is posting and instead are filling it all in yourself.
Toney was the Giants #4 ranked WR behind the big 3. He was in that next tier of players of which there were likely a handful, thus trading back meant they’d get one + the haul. The giants wanted a playmaker and they got one. It’s really as simple as that.
You added in so many unnecessary and inaccurate (not opinions, false claims) statement and made this into a thread about how fucked the Giants were and that they didn’t even have Toney on their radar. You were making shit up.
Toney was not a thought at 11, but then after the trade back to 20 they went back to the drawing board. I hope he turns out to be good, but the original point was that the Giants got snookered by Philly who really wanted Smith more than they did, and Toney was not part of their original plans from DG the Genius.
He probably was not a thought at #11. Just like AVT wasn't a though at #5. So the heck what.
How did Philly snooker the Giants? What act of deceit did they pull to fool the Giants into doing something that caused them to loose Smith.
Philly wanted Smith, the Cowboys wanted Horn or Surtain. They made a deal that benefited each other. That is not snookering the Giants. They did not do make the trade to simply screw with the Giants. They wanted Smith.
Snooker does not mean what you are saying..
Thank you.
The consistent and repetitive misuse of the word was irritating.
no one is even defending the pick. It’s like you are simply choosing to not read what everyone is posting and instead are filling it all in yourself.
Toney was the Giants #4 ranked WR behind the big 3. He was in that next tier of players of which there were likely a handful, thus trading back meant they’d get one + the haul. The giants wanted a playmaker and they got one. It’s really as simple as that.
You added in so many unnecessary and inaccurate (not opinions, false claims) statement and made this into a thread about how fucked the Giants were and that they didn’t even have Toney on their radar. You were making shit up.
Hey I hope Toney ends up being the best WR in the draft.
no one is even defending the pick. It’s like you are simply choosing to not read what everyone is posting and instead are filling it all in yourself.
Toney was the Giants #4 ranked WR behind the big 3. He was in that next tier of players of which there were likely a handful, thus trading back meant they’d get one + the haul. The giants wanted a playmaker and they got one. It’s really as simple as that.
You added in so many unnecessary and inaccurate (not opinions, false claims) statement and made this into a thread about how fucked the Giants were and that they didn’t even have Toney on their radar. You were making shit up.
Hey I hope Toney ends up being the best WR in the draft.
Hey, that would indeed be great, huh? Especially since he wasn’t even part of any of their predraft thoughts or not in the top 5 WRs of any of the sports publications you rely upon to make such strong posts.
That Vikes tidbit is interesting, where did you hear that? Wondering what the offer was? If it was competitive, be interesting how AVT vs Toney shakes down (I think he’s be the assumed pick there at 14)
I do not remember where it came from. May have been one of the other sites that people quote on BBI. May have been in the papers. I saw it, it did not surprise me since there were hints that other teams looking for a QB may have talked to the Giants about moving up. I am certain the Vikes were mentioned after the draft was over. Report did not specify the offer.
The bottom line is that the Giants wanted Smith, and so didn’t a lot on here. The report came out when Philly snookered the Giants were pissed, and Toney ended up as the consulation prize. I understand how the draft works at doesn’t end at 11, but don’t tell me this was the Giants plan all along, because it wasn’t. They got Snookered, and time will tell how everything works out starting with the first Philly game.
Yet another pivot, nobody suggested this was the Giants plan all along, nor that they didn't want Smith at #11. However, he wasn't available at #11 so they had to adjust. Or are you now recommending they should have traded up in this series of weak observations?
Most importantly, you originally said above Toney wasn't even a thought for them and I asked why that was if in fact they picked him 9 slots later. You can answer or you can ignore, but the latter will just suggest to me you wish you didn't go down this path with such a post.
Quote:
The bottom line is that the Giants wanted Smith, and so didn’t a lot on here. The report came out when Philly snookered the Giants were pissed, and Toney ended up as the consulation prize. I understand how the draft works at doesn’t end at 11, but don’t tell me this was the Giants plan all along, because it wasn’t. They got Snookered, and time will tell how everything works out starting with the first Philly game.
Yet another pivot, nobody suggested this was the Giants plan all along, nor that they didn't want Smith at #11. However, he wasn't available at #11 so they had to adjust. Or are you now recommending they should have traded up in this series of weak observations?
Most importantly, you originally said above Toney wasn't even a thought for them and I asked why that was if in fact they picked him 9 slots later. You can answer or you can ignore, but the latter will just suggest to me you wish you didn't go down this path with such a post.
I wasn’t for any WR in round 1, and have been all about fixing the O line since FA, and I still say the O line needs fixing, so I only would have traded up for Sewell.
I never hard Toney’s name mentioned once in all the mock drafts by all the experts around the league, or any BBI with all their mocks. Of course the thinking of who was going at 11, and not 20, but Philly snookered the Giants, and jumped ahead pissing off the Giants brain trust according to reports.
Quote:
In comment 15258944 Old Blue said:
Quote:
The bottom line is that the Giants wanted Smith, and so didn’t a lot on here. The report came out when Philly snookered the Giants were pissed, and Toney ended up as the consulation prize. I understand how the draft works at doesn’t end at 11, but don’t tell me this was the Giants plan all along, because it wasn’t. They got Snookered, and time will tell how everything works out starting with the first Philly game.
Yet another pivot, nobody suggested this was the Giants plan all along, nor that they didn't want Smith at #11. However, he wasn't available at #11 so they had to adjust. Or are you now recommending they should have traded up in this series of weak observations?
Most importantly, you originally said above Toney wasn't even a thought for them and I asked why that was if in fact they picked him 9 slots later. You can answer or you can ignore, but the latter will just suggest to me you wish you didn't go down this path with such a post.
I wasn’t for any WR in round 1, and have been all about fixing the O line since FA, and I still say the O line needs fixing, so I only would have traded up for Sewell.
I never hard Toney’s name mentioned once in all the mock drafts by all the experts around the league, or any BBI with all their mocks. Of course the thinking of who was going at 11, and not 20, but Philly snookered the Giants, and jumped ahead pissing off the Giants brain trust according to reports.
I got the snookered view, now several times. No need to repeat unless you have a typing disorder.
So now the story has changed from Toney wasn't even a thought for the Giants to now you never heard his name mentioned by all the experts/mocks as a possibility at #20. And now its also you never wanted a WR for the Giants anyway.
How odd that every expert didn't create every scenario possibility of a trade down and who the Giants would/should pick at their new slot. Or that you don't have access to their tiered draft board that showed Toney was one of several players the Giants may have been considering at #20 or so.
Do you want to continue this nonsense or have you had enough? If you keep going at least it gives you a chance to say they were snookered again.
I wasn’t for any WR in round 1, and have been all about fixing the O line since FA, and I still say the O line needs fixing, so I only would have traded up for Sewell.
I never hard Toney’s name mentioned once in all the mock drafts by all the experts around the league, or any BBI with all their mocks. Of course the thinking of who was going at 11, and not 20, but Philly snookered the Giants, and jumped ahead pissing off the Giants brain trust according to reports.
So what? The Giants may have been pissed, but they didn't panic. On the contrary, they turned a negative into a positive, setting themselves up nicely in the 2022 draft, and still getting another playmaker for their offense.
So, you never heard Toney's name mentioned at all. Again, so what? No one should be privy to the Giants' board except those who actually make the picks. Sure, it was no secret they liked Smith. Who wouldn't? But you can't always get what you want, and it's not liked they reached for Toney. He went just about where most pundits predicted he'd go. And if they were still butthurt about losing Smith, the picks they got for next year's draft should no doubt help ease that pain.
As for the O-Line, they invested heavily in it in last year's draft, and reports are they feel better about it going forward than most fans. So be it. Clearly, in this draft they were focused on strengthening their pass-rush and reinforcing their secondary. That part of their plan worked out nicely for them.
Quote:
In comment 15258944 Old Blue said:
Quote:
The bottom line is that the Giants wanted Smith, and so didn’t a lot on here. The report came out when Philly snookered the Giants were pissed, and Toney ended up as the consulation prize. I understand how the draft works at doesn’t end at 11, but don’t tell me this was the Giants plan all along, because it wasn’t. They got Snookered, and time will tell how everything works out starting with the first Philly game.
Yet another pivot, nobody suggested this was the Giants plan all along, nor that they didn't want Smith at #11. However, he wasn't available at #11 so they had to adjust. Or are you now recommending they should have traded up in this series of weak observations?
Most importantly, you originally said above Toney wasn't even a thought for them and I asked why that was if in fact they picked him 9 slots later. You can answer or you can ignore, but the latter will just suggest to me you wish you didn't go down this path with such a post.
I wasn’t for any WR in round 1, and have been all about fixing the O line since FA, and I still say the O line needs fixing, so I only would have traded up for Sewell.
I never hard Toney’s name mentioned once in all the mock drafts by all the experts around the league, or any BBI with all their mocks. Of course the thinking of who was going at 11, and not 20, but Philly snookered the Giants, and jumped ahead pissing off the Giants brain trust according to reports.
There was a BBI poster who was hot on Toney and even asked Sy about him and to explain his report. I believe it was mittenedman. There may have been one or two others looking at round two after either Slater or ER in round one.
It is not being snookered no matter how much you claim it to be. Were they angry/upset he almost made it to them, yes. But there are many in the sport that think Toney and 2022 #1 and #4 from the Bears is far better than Smith alone...if the Bears suck, as expected, it will be a very good deal.
Quote:
In comment 15258998 chick310 said:
Quote:
In comment 15258944 Old Blue said:
Quote:
The bottom line is that the Giants wanted Smith, and so didn’t a lot on here. The report came out when Philly snookered the Giants were pissed, and Toney ended up as the consulation prize. I understand how the draft works at doesn’t end at 11, but don’t tell me this was the Giants plan all along, because it wasn’t. They got Snookered, and time will tell how everything works out starting with the first Philly game.
Yet another pivot, nobody suggested this was the Giants plan all along, nor that they didn't want Smith at #11. However, he wasn't available at #11 so they had to adjust. Or are you now recommending they should have traded up in this series of weak observations?
Most importantly, you originally said above Toney wasn't even a thought for them and I asked why that was if in fact they picked him 9 slots later. You can answer or you can ignore, but the latter will just suggest to me you wish you didn't go down this path with such a post.
I wasn’t for any WR in round 1, and have been all about fixing the O line since FA, and I still say the O line needs fixing, so I only would have traded up for Sewell.
I never hard Toney’s name mentioned once in all the mock drafts by all the experts around the league, or any BBI with all their mocks. Of course the thinking of who was going at 11, and not 20, but Philly snookered the Giants, and jumped ahead pissing off the Giants brain trust according to reports.
There was a BBI poster who was hot on Toney and even asked Sy about him and to explain his report. I believe it was mittenedman. There may have been one or two others looking at round two after either Slater or ER in round one.
It is not being snookered no matter how much you claim it to be. Were they angry/upset he almost made it to them, yes. But there are many in the sport that think Toney and 2022 #1 and #4 from the Bears is far better than Smith alone...if the Bears suck, as expected, it will be a very good deal.
3-4 years from now we will find out, and yes they was snookered, but the Bears helped make an embarrassing situation looked better
3-4 years from now we will find out, and yes they was snookered, but the Bears helped make an embarrassing situation looked better
Again, we got the snookered viewpoint. And yes the Bears bailed out the Giants. Totally get your take there.
But simply still waiting from you to show that the Giants were indeed not considering Toney at all since he was an after-thought, and just basically picked his name out of a hat at #20. This is what you posted.
Surely, there is some NFL expert opinion you kind find, since you rely on them so much, to suggest the Giants pick of Toney was a shock since they and no other NFL team was even considering him at all as a potential pick somewhere in the first round. Hell, use anything you would like to support your original point.
Will check back to see what you have.
Quote:
3-4 years from now we will find out, and yes they was snookered, but the Bears helped make an embarrassing situation looked better
Again, we got the snookered viewpoint. And yes the Bears bailed out the Giants. Totally get your take there.
But simply still waiting from you to show that the Giants were indeed not considering Toney at all since he was an after-thought, and just basically picked his name out of a hat at #20. This is what you posted.
Surely, there is some NFL expert opinion you kind find, since you rely on them so much, to suggest the Giants pick of Toney was a shock since they and no other NFL team was even considering him at all as a potential pick somewhere in the first round. Hell, use anything you would like to support your original point.
Will check back to see what you have.
Toney was not a thought at 11, but then after the trade back to 20 they went back to the drawing board. I hope he turns out to be good, but the original point was that the Giants got snookered by Philly who really wanted Smith more than they did, and Toney was not part of their original plans from DG the Genius.
Toney was not a thought at 11, but then after the trade back to 20 they went back to the drawing board. I hope he turns out to be good, but the original point was that the Giants got snookered by Philly who really wanted Smith more than they did, and Toney was not part of their original plans from DG the Genius.
No kidding the Giants went back to their draft board (not drawing board) after the trade...isn't that exactly what a team should do after moving back in the Draft? Toney at #11 was not worth as much as Toney at #20 and extra picks. That is why he wasn't considered as the straight up pick. But that wasn't what you said as you seem to want to pivot yet again to try and avoid your remark that he wasn't considered at all predraft.
Your original post said this,
You are looking to criticize and take pot shots (like using words such as snookered, drawing board, DG the genius) for whatever your reasons are which is fine. Fans can have those opinions.
But what not is fine is making up things like Toney wasn't being considered when he obviously was since he picked at #20. And when you were called out on it, you still haven't shown anything logical to back it up.
And that makes you look silly.
Toney was not a thought at 11, but then after the trade back to 20 they went back to the drawing board. I hope he turns out to be good, but the original point was that the Giants got snookered by Philly who really wanted Smith more than they did, and Toney was not part of their original plans from DG the Genius.
He probably was not a thought at #11. Just like AVT wasn't a though at #5. So the heck what.
How did Philly snooker the Giants? What act of deceit did they pull to fool the Giants into doing something that caused them to loose Smith.
Philly wanted Smith, the Cowboys wanted Horn or Surtain. They made a deal that benefited each other. That is not snookering the Giants. They did not do make the trade to simply screw with the Giants. They wanted Smith.
Snooker does not mean what you are saying..
Quote:
Toney was not a thought at 11, but then after the trade back to 20 they went back to the drawing board. I hope he turns out to be good, but the original point was that the Giants got snookered by Philly who really wanted Smith more than they did, and Toney was not part of their original plans from DG the Genius.
He probably was not a thought at #11. Just like AVT wasn't a though at #5. So the heck what.
How did Philly snooker the Giants? What act of deceit did they pull to fool the Giants into doing something that caused them to loose Smith.
Philly wanted Smith, the Cowboys wanted Horn or Surtain. They made a deal that benefited each other. That is not snookering the Giants. They did not do make the trade to simply screw with the Giants. They wanted Smith.
Snooker does not mean what you are saying..
Call it what you want, and I call it what I want. Either way they didn’t get Smith who they wanted.
Quote:
In comment 15259093 Old Blue said:
Quote:
Toney was not a thought at 11, but then after the trade back to 20 they went back to the drawing board. I hope he turns out to be good, but the original point was that the Giants got snookered by Philly who really wanted Smith more than they did, and Toney was not part of their original plans from DG the Genius.
He probably was not a thought at #11. Just like AVT wasn't a though at #5. So the heck what.
How did Philly snooker the Giants? What act of deceit did they pull to fool the Giants into doing something that caused them to loose Smith.
Philly wanted Smith, the Cowboys wanted Horn or Surtain. They made a deal that benefited each other. That is not snookering the Giants. They did not do make the trade to simply screw with the Giants. They wanted Smith.
Snooker does not mean what you are saying..
Call it what you want, and I call it what I want. Either way they didn’t get Smith who they wanted.
Post your info on the claim the Giants had no predraft interest on Toney. That’s the piece we want to see.
Quote:
In comment 15259139 section125 said:
Quote:
In comment 15259093 Old Blue said:
Quote:
Toney was not a thought at 11, but then after the trade back to 20 they went back to the drawing board. I hope he turns out to be good, but the original point was that the Giants got snookered by Philly who really wanted Smith more than they did, and Toney was not part of their original plans from DG the Genius.
He probably was not a thought at #11. Just like AVT wasn't a though at #5. So the heck what.
How did Philly snooker the Giants? What act of deceit did they pull to fool the Giants into doing something that caused them to loose Smith.
Philly wanted Smith, the Cowboys wanted Horn or Surtain. They made a deal that benefited each other. That is not snookering the Giants. They did not do make the trade to simply screw with the Giants. They wanted Smith.
Snooker does not mean what you are saying..
Call it what you want, and I call it what I want. Either way they didn’t get Smith who they wanted.
Post your info on the claim the Giants had no predraft interest on Toney. That’s the piece we want to see.
So the Giants all along we’re going to trade out of 11 no matter who was there, and was going to take Toney, and that’s why all the brass was so pissed when Philly leaped frogged them, because Toney was the guy they wanted so bad?? We’ll see if the Jets got a better receiver then the Giants with their draft.
But I’ll play and lose a question to you, did we snooker the Jags and Packers who wanted Toney while also picking up a haul for the next draft?
Quote:
In comment 15259159 Old Blue said:
Quote:
In comment 15259139 section125 said:
Quote:
In comment 15259093 Old Blue said:
Quote:
Toney was not a thought at 11, but then after the trade back to 20 they went back to the drawing board. I hope he turns out to be good, but the original point was that the Giants got snookered by Philly who really wanted Smith more than they did, and Toney was not part of their original plans from DG the Genius.
He probably was not a thought at #11. Just like AVT wasn't a though at #5. So the heck what.
How did Philly snooker the Giants? What act of deceit did they pull to fool the Giants into doing something that caused them to loose Smith.
Philly wanted Smith, the Cowboys wanted Horn or Surtain. They made a deal that benefited each other. That is not snookering the Giants. They did not do make the trade to simply screw with the Giants. They wanted Smith.
Snooker does not mean what you are saying..
Call it what you want, and I call it what I want. Either way they didn’t get Smith who they wanted.
Post your info on the claim the Giants had no predraft interest on Toney. That’s the piece we want to see.
So the Giants all along we’re going to trade out of 11 no matter who was there, and was going to take Toney, and that’s why all the brass was so pissed when Philly leaped frogged them, because Toney was the guy they wanted so bad?? We’ll see if the Jets got a better receiver then the Giants with their draft.
No, not at all. And we have already discussed that the Giants had other targets than Toney at 11. And Smith was who they wanted if he was available. No need to address it again.
You have already agreed the Draft didn’t end at #11. So the question you need to answer is how you know the Giants had no predraft interest whatsoever in Toney beyond #11. No interest suggests they didn’t scout him with any seriousness, did little to no diligence, and didn’t have him on their draft board.
That’s what you have to answer.
But I’ll play and lose a question to you, did we snooker the Jags and Packers who wanted Toney while also picking up a haul for the next draft?
Only that DG did not have this master plan going into the draft with what they ended up with like a lot of people think on here, and Toney was rated in the back end of the top ten of WR. I didn’t see the Giants jump ahead of anybody like the Jags, or the Packers to take Toney like Philly did to the Giants, so no even close to the same thing, or close to it.
But I’ll play and lose a question to you, did we snooker the Jags and Packers who wanted Toney while also picking up a haul for the next draft?
Let me blown your mind...the Jaguars snookered everyone by taking Lawrence overall #1. All the 31 others teams wanted him so badly they didn’t even set up a draft board, and just winged it when there pick came up.
Make that 30 teams because we know the Giants only wanted Smith. Old Blue is certain they didn’t have any interest in Toney so maybe the League Commissioner made that pick for the Giants at 20...not certain though.
Quote:
what you are even trying to say.
But I’ll play and lose a question to you, did we snooker the Jags and Packers who wanted Toney while also picking up a haul for the next draft?
Only that DG did not have this master plan going into the draft with what they ended up with like a lot of people think on here, and Toney was rated in the back end of the top ten of WR. I didn’t see the Giants jump ahead of anybody like the Jags, or the Packers to take Toney like Philly did to the Giants, so no even close to the same thing, or close to it.
Yet another epiphany from Old Blue.
So now Toney is rated as the 6th-10th best WR. By all 31 other teams, your favorite draft experts or just you?
And the Giants didn’t need to jump ahead of the Jags or the Packers to take Toney, they were already ahead of them both at 20. But hey, maybe Gettleman had a list of all the teams that were going to pick him Toney and decided 20 got ahead of all of them so he did the deal with Chicago. Possible?
Philly paid to jump us, good for them. And good for us for making a ton out of situation that didn’t go exactly as planned (expect for the trade down, that was planned ahead of time).
Your take on Toney is ridiculous. 3-4 teams apparently wanted him in the 20s but somehow he’s ranked as closer to the 10th ranked WR?
You are pulling shit out of your ass and got called out for it. Own it.
Philly paid to jump us, good for them. And good for us for making a ton out of situation that didn’t go exactly as planned (expect for the trade down, that was planned ahead of time).
Your take on Toney is ridiculous. 3-4 teams apparently wanted him in the 20s but somehow he’s ranked as closer to the 10th ranked WR?
You are pulling shit out of your ass and got called out for it. Own it.
What does 3-4 teams wanting him in the 20’s got to do with where he was rated? Which publication had him rated in the top 6 of WR???
Which publication is the right one in your opinion?
Call it what you want, and I call it what I want. Either way they didn’t get Smith who they wanted.
Oh, they didn't get what they want as did 31 other teams in this draft. Only the Jaguars got the player they wanted.
And as for calling it what you want, only one of us is correct and the other is trolling. So this will be my last reply to you and you calling it what you want. Really hard to believe someone would spend all day looking to just throw shit out to argue.
Quote:
that their target went right before. Giants had every opportunity to trade up for Smith and chose to sit tight, likely due to the fact that they had the Chicago deal worked out ahead of time.
Philly paid to jump us, good for them. And good for us for making a ton out of situation that didn’t go exactly as planned (expect for the trade down, that was planned ahead of time).
Your take on Toney is ridiculous. 3-4 teams apparently wanted him in the 20s but somehow he’s ranked as closer to the 10th ranked WR?
You are pulling shit out of your ass and got called out for it. Own it.
What does 3-4 teams wanting him in the 20’s got to do with where he was rated? Which publication had him rated in the top 6 of WR???
Ohh nothing, just reality vs made up mock drafts by people who barely watch the players.
You keep outdoing yourself, it’s impressive.
Quote:
Call it what you want, and I call it what I want. Either way they didn’t get Smith who they wanted.
Oh, they didn't get what they want as did 31 other teams in this draft. Only the Jaguars got the player they wanted.
And as for calling it what you want, only one of us is correct and the other is trolling. So this will be my last reply to you and you calling it what you want. Really hard to believe someone would spend all day looking to just throw shit out to argue.
Only the Jags got the player they wanted? I bet there are other teams that would disagree.
Trolling? The Giants have been a losing team now for 4 straight years now, and there are reasons for that. Bad FA signings like Solder, and bad drafts like Flowers, and possibly DJ, and Barkley who the jury is still out on. They certainly haven’t made the team any better in the win colum, and plus we can add some bad coaching hires, so things aren’t all coming up Blue roses in Giant land like so many make it out to be, and the minute something negative is said you are a bad fan. All the hoping, and praying in the world will not make this a winning team again, so everything they do isn’t always the right things, so there is nothing wrong with pumping the breaks on every move until we see how they turn out like this past draft, or this coaching staff for that matter.
You can critique the Giants all you want but what you are doing on this thread isn’t that. You are making stuff up, plain and simple.
No, and only that there was no interest at 11, and he was only taken, because the top WR were gone to their way of thinking. I hope he works out, but I’ll be keeping an eye on the Jets to see who got the better player.
Quote:
Are you conceding that you had no business stating that the Giants had no predraft interest in Toney?
No, and only that there was no interest at 11, and he was only taken, because the top WR were gone to their way of thinking. I hope he works out, but I’ll be keeping an eye on the Jets to see who got the better player.
That is not what you said. You said they had no predraft thoughts of Toney at all which now confirms you just made it up.
You keep on eye on that Jet WR, and we will keep on eye on any further fabrications from you.
Quote:
In comment 15259296 chick310 said:
Quote:
Are you conceding that you had no business stating that the Giants had no predraft interest in Toney?
No, and only that there was no interest at 11, and he was only taken, because the top WR were gone to their way of thinking. I hope he works out, but I’ll be keeping an eye on the Jets to see who got the better player.
That is not what you said. You said they had no predraft thoughts of Toney at all which now confirms you just made it up.
You keep on eye on that Jet WR, and we will keep on eye on any further fabrications from you.
Once again thanks for the kind words, but you guys worry more about what I say then what I meant that there is nothing from the Giants on your side of the argument that the Giants had Toney pegged for their first round pick no matter who was on the board, so if there was where is the proof?
Quote:
In comment 15259304 Old Blue said:
Quote:
In comment 15259296 chick310 said:
Quote:
Are you conceding that you had no business stating that the Giants had no predraft interest in Toney?
No, and only that there was no interest at 11, and he was only taken, because the top WR were gone to their way of thinking. I hope he works out, but I’ll be keeping an eye on the Jets to see who got the better player.
That is not what you said. You said they had no predraft thoughts of Toney at all which now confirms you just made it up.
You keep on eye on that Jet WR, and we will keep on eye on any further fabrications from you.
Once again thanks for the kind words, but you guys worry more about what I say then what I meant that there is nothing from the Giants on your side of the argument that the Giants had Toney pegged for their first round pick no matter who was on the board, so if there was where is the proof?
This is about being kind or mean to you. You made up something, tried to pivot but ultimately decided to go full steam ahead with a fabrication.
And I have the ultimate proof of the Giants pegging Toney as their potential first round pick no matter who was still left on their board....he was chosen at #20.
I know what I meant, but if it makes you feel better call it what you want.
When Philly made the jump there was Nothing the Giants could do, and even if Smith would have been gone Toney would not have been picked at 11. The #1 for next year that everyone is raving about does not do anything for them this year, and that is all that. Matters right now.
The draft isnt about "right now" it's about building a team. Why are so many incapable of grasping this simple concept?
An extra first and third bext year is HUGE in terms of roster building.
Quote:
not is
I know what I meant, but if it makes you feel better call it what you want.
I am agnostic to you crashing and burning over an entire day on a couple of these threads today.
As mentioned before, it’s fine to have your opinions on anything and everything relative to the Giants disappointing you. But there is no need to make things up. It doesn’t make your posts any more interesting.
Quote:
In comment 15259327 chick310 said:
Quote:
not is
I know what I meant, but if it makes you feel better call it what you want.
I am agnostic to you crashing and burning over an entire day on a couple of these threads today.
As mentioned before, it’s fine to have your opinions on anything and everything relative to the Giants disappointing you. But there is no need to make things up. It doesn’t make your posts any more interesting.
Crashing, and burning? Just because they took Toney at 20 doesn’t mean that was their plan all along, and unless DG comes out, and says something no one will know if it was nothing more than a wild scramble.
Quote:
In comment 15259334 Old Blue said:
Quote:
In comment 15259327 chick310 said:
Quote:
not is
I know what I meant, but if it makes you feel better call it what you want.
I am agnostic to you crashing and burning over an entire day on a couple of these threads today.
As mentioned before, it’s fine to have your opinions on anything and everything relative to the Giants disappointing you. But there is no need to make things up. It doesn’t make your posts any more interesting.
Crashing, and burning? Just because they took Toney at 20 doesn’t mean that was their plan all along, and unless DG comes out, and says something no one will know if it was nothing more than a wild scramble.
This is now at least the third time I have posted to you this isn’t even a point anyone is debating. This is you pivoting yet again to try and save some face...albeit failing.
Further, good teams develop draft scenarios versus some static singular plan because unless you are picking #1, you don’t know what could happen in front of you. The Giants clearly were ready to pivot when their top target was taken. So they moved onto the next set of guys on their board they figured would be there at 20 and grabbed some extra picks to boot. Toney was absolutely one of those guys. Why?...because he was the pick.
That’s the definition of draft planning.
I haven’t heard anyone from the Giants say that Toney was their #1 option if Smith, or Waddle was gone is all that I’m saying. I never seen so much defending of a 20th pick in the first round like he is going to put them over the top, or something.
Quote:
how on earth did you end up all the way back at an argument no one is making?
I haven’t heard anyone from the Giants say that Toney was their #1 option if Smith, or Waddle was gone is all that I’m saying. I never seen so much defending of a 20th pick in the first round like he is going to put them over the top, or something.
Please point me to anything the Giants have told you before the draft as to who their #1, #2 or even #3 option even was?
This isn’t about a pick putting them over the top. It’s about you making things up.
Toney was the Giants #4 ranked WR behind the big 3. He was in that next tier of players of which there were likely a handful, thus trading back meant they’d get one + the haul. The giants wanted a playmaker and they got one. It’s really as simple as that.
You added in so many unnecessary and inaccurate (not opinions, false claims) statement and made this into a thread about how fucked the Giants were and that they didn’t even have Toney on their radar. You were making shit up.
Quote:
Toney was not a thought at 11, but then after the trade back to 20 they went back to the drawing board. I hope he turns out to be good, but the original point was that the Giants got snookered by Philly who really wanted Smith more than they did, and Toney was not part of their original plans from DG the Genius.
He probably was not a thought at #11. Just like AVT wasn't a though at #5. So the heck what.
How did Philly snooker the Giants? What act of deceit did they pull to fool the Giants into doing something that caused them to loose Smith.
Philly wanted Smith, the Cowboys wanted Horn or Surtain. They made a deal that benefited each other. That is not snookering the Giants. They did not do make the trade to simply screw with the Giants. They wanted Smith.
Snooker does not mean what you are saying..
Thank you.
The consistent and repetitive misuse of the word was irritating.
Toney was the Giants #4 ranked WR behind the big 3. He was in that next tier of players of which there were likely a handful, thus trading back meant they’d get one + the haul. The giants wanted a playmaker and they got one. It’s really as simple as that.
You added in so many unnecessary and inaccurate (not opinions, false claims) statement and made this into a thread about how fucked the Giants were and that they didn’t even have Toney on their radar. You were making shit up.
Hey I hope Toney ends up being the best WR in the draft.
Quote:
no one is even defending the pick. It’s like you are simply choosing to not read what everyone is posting and instead are filling it all in yourself.
Toney was the Giants #4 ranked WR behind the big 3. He was in that next tier of players of which there were likely a handful, thus trading back meant they’d get one + the haul. The giants wanted a playmaker and they got one. It’s really as simple as that.
You added in so many unnecessary and inaccurate (not opinions, false claims) statement and made this into a thread about how fucked the Giants were and that they didn’t even have Toney on their radar. You were making shit up.
Hey I hope Toney ends up being the best WR in the draft.
Hey, that would indeed be great, huh? Especially since he wasn’t even part of any of their predraft thoughts or not in the top 5 WRs of any of the sports publications you rely upon to make such strong posts.