Should start an absolutely INSANE weekend with a lot of turnover and action.
As a Rangers' fan, I am very intrigued by all the rumors flying around the last couple of days. Very excited for the weekend. I think we are all cautious of Eichel, but I am leaning towards wanting it to happen.
Bruins will be able to officially announce their Hall resigning. Islanders finally have some cap space and will be making moves. Should be an AWESOME weekend for hockey fans.
After that.....
I think Rangers trade Chytil, Kravstov, Jones, and pick #15 for Jack Eichel before or during the draft.
After that.....
I think Rangers trade Chytil, Kravstov, Jones, and pick #15 for Jack Eichel before or during the draft.
According to Brooks' tweet from this morning, the Rangers haven't been granted access to Eichel's medicals as of now. I can't imagine any trade going down without a thorough review of those files. I would hope to keep Krav in any potential deal, and would probably prefer Nils/Schneider going instead since our D pipeline is stocked (though that's a tough one). As time goes on, I think the cost gets less and less as Eichel's no movement clause kicks in next summer, and he can have Buffalo in a bad spot then.
If we do stay put in the draft, I'm fine hanging where we are and taking C Fyodor Svechkov.
But apparently Drury runs a somewhat tight ship, so leaks might not get out.
Global Hockey - ( New Window )
@kevin_mcgran
·
1h
In addition to Edmonton, where a deal seems imminent (7x$5.5M or 8x$5.125M), the Panthers — who drafted Hyman — Rangers and the Bruins made credible offers ... Another team in rebuild-mode offered more, 6x$7M) ... Hyman’s preference: 1. Stay in Toronto ... 2. Play for a contender
Quote:
Kevin McGran
@kevin_mcgran
·
1h
In addition to Edmonton, where a deal seems imminent (7x$5.5M or 8x$5.125M), the Panthers — who drafted Hyman — Rangers and the Bruins made credible offers ... Another team in rebuild-mode offered more, 6x$7M) ... Hyman’s preference: 1. Stay in Toronto ... 2. Play for a contender
Probably before the Goodrow deal
I don't agree. If they're all effective two-way players that play the body, then I don't see why any of them need to go. They're all wings with scoring ability and size. There ought to be no rush to deal any of them. The key through the season and playoffs is still being able to score goals.
And I don't know how you arrived at the conclusion that Lunkqvist is a player we will regret dealing forever, having never suited up in the NHL - yet we "don't know enough about Kravstov".
@Gambo987
·
3m
Breaking Coyotes News - Coyotes on verge of acquiring Flyers defenseman Shayne Gostibehere. Gostibehere, 28, is an offensive defenseman with two years left on a 6-year, $27 million dollar contract he signed in 2017 with Philadelphia.
@PierreVLeBrun
·
2m
Hearing Detroit is acquiring goalie Alex Nedeljkovic from Carolina
@TSNHockey
@TheAthletic
Quote:
John Gambadoro
@Gambo987
·
3m
Breaking Coyotes News - Coyotes on verge of acquiring Flyers defenseman Shayne Gostibehere. Gostibehere, 28, is an offensive defenseman with two years left on a 6-year, $27 million dollar contract he signed in 2017 with Philadelphia.
Quote:
Pierre LeBrun
@PierreVLeBrun
·
2m
Hearing Detroit is acquiring goalie Alex Nedeljkovic from Carolina
@TSNHockey
@TheAthletic
Horrendous trade by Carolina
So Philly unloads an expensive, one-dimensional player they don't use and get a second round pick...
That makes more sense
Seravalli mentioned they're taking calls on him, Buch, and Strome. So maybe.
Link - ( New Window )
Good FA's always get paid more than they should in both $$ and term. It is what it is. If you watched the playoffs, you would have seen Goodrow is exactly what the team needs. We have the cap space, so we paid for it. Can't complain about it too much. I'd pay up for Goodrow's linemate too...he would be perfect on the RW of Bread and Strome's line.
The Rangers don't care about actual money, just cap money. 3.6AAV is NOT that bad at all. Once the salary cap goes up next year it will look much more in line. Also if they buy him out after 4 years it is not going to bury them like the Shatty/Girardi buyouts. Lastly, if he hit the market he was going to get 4+ easily. That is the price you pay.
Quote:
we just handed a 28-year-old 4th liner a 6-year contract with a partial NMC. He's going to be making $5M+ when he's 33 and 34 years old. Terrible.
Good FA's always get paid more than they should in both $$ and term. It is what it is. If you watched the playoffs, you would have seen Goodrow is exactly what the team needs. We have the cap space, so we paid for it. Can't complain about it too much. I'd pay up for Goodrow's linemate too...he would be perfect on the RW of Bread and Strome's line.
At that point we would just have to trade for Gourde from Seattle, get the band back together.
He is 28, he will be 34 when the deal is over. Not the ideal age range but you cant even be a free agent in the NHL until you have 7 years in, or are 27 years old. We are not aquiring someone already on the down swing.
We are paying him 3.6M, this number, while high for a 4th liner, is not going to bury us. Once the cap goes up it will look very pedestrian.
Six years is not ideal but we have shown we are not afraid to use buyouts, and a buyout after 4/5 years is going to minimally crippling.
I keep seeing it too and I pray this is how it plays out. I really want Hughes for his talent alone. I have this gut feeling that Owen Power is going to be a bust so I hope he goes top 3 as expected.
He is 28, he will be 34 when the deal is over. Not the ideal age range but you cant even be a free agent in the NHL until you have 7 years in, or are 27 years old. We are not aquiring someone already on the down swing.
We are paying him 3.6M, this number, while high for a 4th liner, is not going to bury us. Once the cap goes up it will look very pedestrian.
Six years is not ideal but we have shown we are not afraid to use buyouts, and a buyout after 4/5 years is going to minimally crippling.
No. It will not look pedestrian. We're discussing trading for a 2C with a cap hit of $10m and our 1C is a FA after this coming season and will be seeking around $10m per himself. Buch will need a deal. As will Fox. This is about asset allocation. We just paid a 4th line winger what ascending players get on their bridge deals. In two years, he's making $5M - when we're going to have to give Kakko and Laf new deals.
Paying any 4th liner that kind of money is dumb. Any way you want to parse it.
The Rangers are clearly aware of the pending contracts they will be giving out, it's not a surprise. We're at $20M in cap space now, and anticipating an ADA buyout, we'll be at about $24M in space. Our big RFA's this season are Buch, Chytil, and Shesty (don't count Hajek as big). Ton of smoke around Strome and his $4.5M deal being shipped out, so that gives us closer to $28.5M in space. More than enough to re-sign all pending RFA's with money left over. Buch may or may not be here simply because of the glut of top 6-9 wingers we have. It's independent of Goodrow (I'd more point to Kreider and his deal on the reason for moving Buch).
Interested to see where Drury drives this bus, this is a crucial offseason and his decision set needs to be on target.
I'm of the mind that Buch and Strome are dealt in some capacity, and 15OA before tomorrow's draft. Brooks' tweet regarding Eichel's medicals this morning has me thinking that maybe Drury has a surprise in store for the 2C spot, and our interest might not be as intense as it was a few months ago. All just names from HF but Lindholm, Dvorak, Larkin have been mentioned by some posters, of course it's just a message board, but we could have a curveball.
Would be sad to see Buch go, as his game really developed over the past few years and he became one of the better 200 foot players. I point to Kreider's extension as the main causation for this, his deal and then winning the lottery and adding Laf (could never have guessed that when extending Kreider), really caused a jam with top 6-9 wingers.
I'm of the mind that Buch and Strome are dealt in some capacity, and 15OA before tomorrow's draft. Brooks' tweet regarding Eichel's medicals this morning has me thinking that maybe Drury has a surprise in store for the 2C spot, and our interest might not be as intense as it was a few months ago. All just names from HF but Lindholm, Dvorak, Larkin have been mentioned by some posters, of course it's just a message board, but we could have a curveball.
Would be sad to see Buch go, as his game really developed over the past few years and he became one of the better 200 foot players. I point to Kreider's extension as the main causation for this, his deal and then winning the lottery and adding Laf (could never have guessed that when extending Kreider), really caused a jam with top 6-9 wingers.
Agree 100% on Buch. Drury, return for him better damn well match up with his value and promise.
Question: is Kreider a top 6-9 forward? LULZ Tongue in cheek, but only by half because half his games he plays like a bottom 6. ):<
At this point MLITB, I am pretty much soured on Eichel, too much smoke and obscurity. And the shared agent stuff just adds to the flashing yellow lights.