for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

NFT: Jeopardy rules question

BestFeature : 8/4/2021 10:37 pm
I know a lot of people here are Jeopardy fans but I always had a question that I wonder if anyone knows the answer to. Questions are listed by amount in order of difficulty but the daily double can show up under any amount and can be any amount that the person wagers. I've always wondered if the level of difficulty is still consistent with the amount that the daily double was found in and if so if that informs the wager.

Anyone have any clue about this?
Yes..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 8/4/2021 10:49 pm : link
the Daily Double difficulty is representative of the dollar amount of the space it is in. You'll often see contestants make lower wagers on the Daily Doubles at the bottom of the board.

A little while back, one guy bet $10 in the category of Opera. I wasn't sure you could even bet that little.
I just found this...  
FatMan in Charlotte : 8/4/2021 10:52 pm : link
Quote:
A higher dollar amount on Jeopardy! means a contestant will have to answer a more challenging clue. For Daily Doubles specifically, the writers have a simple way of making them easier or harder. What’s their method? Adding or removing a single word.

“A too-easy clue can be made more difficult by simply removing a word,” Wisse shared on the show’s website. “Conversely, a too-difficult clue can be made easier by adding a word.”


And I also saw that the minimum wager is $5
RE: I just found this...  
Matt M. : 8/4/2021 11:01 pm : link
In comment 15322914 FatMan in Charlotte said:
Quote:


Quote:


A higher dollar amount on Jeopardy! means a contestant will have to answer a more challenging clue. For Daily Doubles specifically, the writers have a simple way of making them easier or harder. What’s their method? Adding or removing a single word.

“A too-easy clue can be made more difficult by simply removing a word,” Wisse shared on the show’s website. “Conversely, a too-difficult clue can be made easier by adding a word.”



And I also saw that the minimum wager is $5
I thought they could wager nothing.
I didn't know..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 8/4/2021 11:04 pm : link
the answer to that until I went to their website:

Quote:
Hidden on the game board are clues called Daily Doubles. The way it works is that whichever contestant happens to select the Daily Double may respond to the clue risking as little as $5.
Speaking of Jeopardy  
moespree : 8/4/2021 11:06 pm : link
Rumor tonight is they are in deep contract talks with the executive producer Mike Richards to become the new permanent host.
RE: RE: I just found this...  
Big Al : 8/4/2021 11:35 pm : link
In comment 15322923 Matt M. said:
Quote:
In comment 15322914 FatMan in Charlotte said:


Quote:




Quote:


A higher dollar amount on Jeopardy! means a contestant will have to answer a more challenging clue. For Daily Doubles specifically, the writers have a simple way of making them easier or harder. What’s their method? Adding or removing a single word.

“A too-easy clue can be made more difficult by simply removing a word,” Wisse shared on the show’s website. “Conversely, a too-difficult clue can be made easier by adding a word.”



And I also saw that the minimum wager is $5

I thought they could wager nothing.
That would make asking the question totally pointless rather than almost pointless for five dollars. You can wager 0 for Fianal Jeopardy.
By the way they did  
Big Al : 8/4/2021 11:48 pm : link
make a rule change a number of years back which affected Final Jeopardy wagering. In the past, a tie at the end of the game meant both moved forwards as co champions. The rule was changed to have a one question runoff to break the tie and move forward as sole champion.

In the past, the correct wager for the person in the lead was 0 when you were exactly double the second place contestant. This assured going forward. Now you need to bet yo avoid the runoff question (unless you really hated the category in Final Jeopardy and would rather take your chances with the possible one question runoff.

In the past, you could also bet exactly enough to let the second place contestant tie you if you were kind and let them win some money if you were confident you could take them in the next game.
is the OP in reality Cliff Clavin?  
Victor in CT : 8/5/2021 7:29 am : link
just kidding.
Cliff..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 8/5/2021 8:04 am : link
Clavin has never been in my kitchen. True fact
The Dream Board  
Big Al : 8/5/2021 8:13 am : link
"Civil Servants", "Stamps from Around The World", "Mothers and Sons", "Beer", "Bar Trivia", "Celibacy",
LOL FMiC and Big Al  
Victor in CT : 8/5/2021 8:40 am : link
never gets old. Cheers is never on TV anymore. Very sad.
Sort of related but rumors are swirling  
Metnut : 8/5/2021 9:19 am : link
that Mike Richards is going to be the permanent host of jeopardy going forward.
RE: Sort of related but rumors are swirling  
FatMan in Charlotte : 8/5/2021 9:25 am : link
In comment 15323107 Metnut said:
Quote:
that Mike Richards is going to be the permanent host of jeopardy going forward.


I thought he was decent. One of the better guest hosts. I do wonder how personable he'll be, but there are worse options.
Milk toast corporate stooge is not what I was hoping for as next host  
Bold Ruler : Mod : 8/5/2021 9:33 am : link
Much more enjoyable and personable people available than the guy schmoozing his bosses at the network.
I'm disappointed that nobody answered the OP  
Bill L : 8/5/2021 9:37 am : link
in the form of a question.
RE: I'm disappointed that nobody answered the OP  
Big Al : 8/5/2021 9:42 am : link
In comment 15323130 Bill L said:
Quote:
in the form of a question.
Answering questions in the form of a question is as useless as running the bases after a home run but tradition.
RE: RE: I'm disappointed that nobody answered the OP  
Victor in CT : 8/5/2021 9:47 am : link
In comment 15323137 Big Al said:
Quote:
In comment 15323130 Bill L said:


Quote:


in the form of a question.

Answering questions in the form of a question is as useless as running the bases after a home run but tradition.


so it's useless now to have to touch all the bases in order to score? Come on Al.
RE: Yes..  
BestFeature : 8/5/2021 12:27 pm : link
In comment 15322912 FatMan in Charlotte said:
Quote:
the Daily Double difficulty is representative of the dollar amount of the space it is in. You'll often see contestants make lower wagers on the Daily Doubles at the bottom of the board.

A little while back, one guy bet $10 in the category of Opera. I wasn't sure you could even bet that little.


Thanks this has been bothering me for a while.
I can't believe how long Jeopardy has been around  
Ron from Ninerland : 8/5/2021 1:47 pm : link
Back in the 1960's there were dozens of game shows on daytime TV. Not only was Jeopardy the only one to survive but it even moved to prime time. I remember getting a Jeopardy board game for a birthday present in the mid-60's.

BTW, the rules and format for Jeopardy back then are exactly the same now.
RE: RE: RE: I just found this...  
TBird : 8/7/2021 9:19 pm : link
In comment 15322938 Big Al said:
Quote:
In comment 15322923 Matt M. said:


Quote:


In comment 15322914 FatMan in Charlotte said:


Quote:




Quote:


A higher dollar amount on Jeopardy! means a contestant will have to answer a more challenging clue. For Daily Doubles specifically, the writers have a simple way of making them easier or harder. What’s their method? Adding or removing a single word.

“A too-easy clue can be made more difficult by simply removing a word,” Wisse shared on the show’s website. “Conversely, a too-difficult clue can be made easier by adding a word.”



And I also saw that the minimum wager is $5

I thought they could wager nothing.

That would make asking the question totally pointless rather than almost pointless for five dollars. You can wager 0 for Fianal Jeopardy.


That would be true in 99.9% of the cases. Try this scenario: The leading contestant is $5 higher than twice the amount of the second place contestant and draws the Daily Double on the last question of Double Jeopardy. Betting $0 will ensure him a win with no risk. Since it is the Daily Double, only he/she can answer the question so no other contestant can cut in to the lead.
RE: RE: RE: RE: I just found this...  
Big Al : 8/7/2021 9:33 pm : link
In comment 15325516 TBird said:
Quote:
In comment 15322938 Big Al said:


Quote:


In comment 15322923 Matt M. said:


Quote:


In comment 15322914 FatMan in Charlotte said:


Quote:




Quote:


A higher dollar amount on Jeopardy! means a contestant will have to answer a more challenging clue. For Daily Doubles specifically, the writers have a simple way of making them easier or harder. What’s their method? Adding or removing a single word.

“A too-easy clue can be made more difficult by simply removing a word,” Wisse shared on the show’s website. “Conversely, a too-difficult clue can be made easier by adding a word.”



And I also saw that the minimum wager is $5

I thought they could wager nothing.

That would make asking the question totally pointless rather than almost pointless for five dollars. You can wager 0 for Fianal Jeopardy.



That would be true in 99.9% of the cases. Try this scenario: The leading contestant is $5 higher than twice the amount of the second place contestant and draws the Daily Double on the last question of Double Jeopardy. Betting $0 will ensure him a win with no risk. Since it is the Daily Double, only he/she can answer the question so no other contestant can cut in to the lead.
Agreed. That scenario did not occur to me.
If anyone just watched Jeopardy  
Big Al : 8/12/2021 7:47 pm : link
the woman in second place just made an extremely moronic bet in Final Jeopardy. In the end it did not matter, but how can smart people be so stupid?
I actually like  
Mike in NY : 8/12/2021 8:00 pm : link
Joe Buck hosting
Not really Jeopardy but RE running the bases being frivolous  
glowrider : 8/12/2021 8:15 pm : link
On opening day the Dodgers had a problem running the bases which turned a three run homer into a one run, one man at first, and an out. Runner at first thought homer was caught over the fence and sprinted back to avoid being doubled up, passing his teammate in the process.

And about two months ago the Pirates had a SOLO home run called back and turn to an out because the batter missed first base. Batter didn’t know if it was going out of the park or off the wall, so was watching the ball, but missed the bag as he was rounding first at full speed before trotting home. Coincidentally, against the Dodgers, who challenged and hr turned to an out.

Same thought process behind making the pitcher pitch out intentionally: someone may screw up to the benefit of the other team.
Back to the Corner