for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Camp Observations - Day 2

mittenedman : 8/26/2021 1:39 pm
You had to know, deep down, both Judge and Belichick had shit-eating grins, because it was hot. Adversity hot. And no breeze. Just a pounding sun with ultra high humidity and no where to hide. The only wind was created by Robert Kraft's helicopter gracing everyone's presence midway through.

*The Giants again were the first team on the field and well underway by the time the Pats were. The OLBs were setting the edge. The ILBs were practicing Tampa 2 deep drops. Blake Martinez is your Grade A MLB and really stood out - his drops are effortless. His ability to make these deep drops and play all 3 downs is the centerpiece to this D and what it can do.

*The DBs were drilling combo coverage. At the snap they'd play man coverage before passing the WR off to zone. In the joint drills with the Pats, it was 2 bunched WRs vs. 2 DBs. They are really focusing on the pick mesh point, and how to defend/exploit. This game within the game has been carrying the Pats to easy wins for years.

*Ray Johnson III was busting his tail during drills. This kid wants it.

*In the 11 on 11's, they continued to rotate. I saw RB Gary Brightwell, WR C.J. Board and WR Dante Pettis, CB Sam Beal and CB Rodarius Williams work extensively with the starters. Trent Harris continues to be a primary reserve. Solder again took reps at starting LT.

*I was happy to see the Giants D make things more difficult on Mac Jones, who looked like he had a pretty tough go of it. Logan Ryan picked him off to start a drive and he was erratic after that. Graham was throwing some heat and using a 4 Safety Package with Love and Peppers up and McKinney and Ryan deep that created problems.

Cam Newton opened things up with a nice drive for a TD - but James Bradberry also dropped an INT on the drive, jumping a slant.

*The Giants O just looks plain ordinary. And I'm not blaming Jones or the OL. From a schematic standpoint, it looks like they relentlessly attack the short areas of the field. It's dink and dunk city. I'm not sure I saw more than 1 or 2 deep shots in 2 days. How many points can you reasonably expect to score with this approach? To be fair, the Pats operate in much the same fashion. They badly need Golladay, Rudolph, Toney & Barkley back on the field because they aren't scaring anyone without.

*Just a peek into what I think makes Judge so special: the teams were separated into 2 groups - a thud KR drill and Giants OL vs. Pats DL on the other end. Obviously the trench battle is more exciting - but there was Joe, standing behind the KR's as they went through a seemingly mundane walkthrough.
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
RE: Dallas offense under Garrett went from train wreck to good  
cosmicj : 8/26/2021 6:53 pm : link
In comment 15341952 djm said:
Quote:
The minute he arrived. His offenses in Dallas were always good or better unless the QB was out for the year. He comes here and the offense sucks in year one and so many can’t wait to shit on Garrett becsuse why not. It’s easy.

Never mind how short handed last year’s offense was. Bad drive in august practice? Scream bloody murder about Garrett. Completely rational!

Dum- for once we agree. I find the s**t thrown at Garrett on BBI completely unconvincing. I think it’s more likely our offensive talent is even worse than we think.
Dum = djm  
cosmicj : 8/26/2021 6:54 pm : link
Damn autocorrect.
...  
SFGFNCGiantsFan : 8/26/2021 7:39 pm : link
The offense is going to look pedestrian without the big guns out there. Simple as that.
RE: ...  
trueblueinpw : 8/26/2021 8:31 pm : link
In comment 15342021 SFGFNCGiantsFan said:
Quote:
The offense is going to look pedestrian without the big guns out there. Simple as that.


In practice though? Do they run different plays in practice with the 2nd stringers? See I don’t think and that’s why it’s frustrating to hear that the practice offense is still dink and dunk. But, maybe they’re saving the motion and down field stuff for the week before Denver. Entirely possible and certainly what I’m hoping for.
The strength of this team is going to be in the run game  
Zeke's Alibi : 8/26/2021 8:39 pm : link
and the offense is going to flow of that. There's no real tackling in these things, just working on run fits and what not. And even then they are trying to keep guys off the ground in the trenches so nobody gets hurt correct? Saquon in a live game changes the calculus of what we are on offense. Doubly so now we can actually get him to second level without having to break 3 tackles. Couple tough defenses out the gate, but if they can't put up 24 plus on Falcons, then I'll start panicking.

If we were going to be a team that wings it 40 times a game, yeah I'd be worried. People need to relax.
Garrett's offenses in Dallas were considered outdated until Moore  
Eric on Li : 8/26/2021 8:48 pm : link
took over - that's why Moore took over. And that's when Dak in particular flourished.

and we all remember the reason he got fired right? That those teams always under achieved? Best OL's in football. Monster rushing numbers with Murray/Zeke. Romo and Dak throwing to Witten, Dez, Cooper, etc.

I actually thought Garrett was pretty creative in specific play calls last year. And I'm not saying he's incompetent or anything. I just think he has a specific scheme that didn't fit our personnel at all. He completely misused the 1 weapon the offense had (Engram). There was improvement over the course of the season but Jones never looked as comfortable in Garrett's offense as he did from day 1 in Pat Shurmur's. There was a downside in changing systems again so just have to hope for the best - but imo Garrett is a legitimate concern.
RE: ...  
Bill in UT : 8/26/2021 9:08 pm : link
In comment 15342021 SFGFNCGiantsFan said:
Quote:
The offense is going to look pedestrian without the big guns out there. Simple as that.


"Pedestrian" is a $5 word for "like shit", it's as simple as that
Garrett had a rough first season here  
BigBlueShock : 8/26/2021 9:10 pm : link
I’m not blaming it all on him, talent certainly played a part in what he was calling. I remember Judge being asked about the conservative offense at some point early in the season and his answer was basically that they intended to shorten the game and be in games with the ability to win in the 4th quarter. Was that a talent issue or a philosophy issue? Who knows, we will find out this season.

However, there were plenty of articles that were posted right here on BBI from people that know a lot about football, that have access to the All 22 film that raised huge concerns about Garrett’s offense. Duggan also had a couple in the Athletic. I’m not bothering to post any of these articles again because if you ignored them the first, second and third time they were posted it’s because you either didn’t WANT to know why the offense may have struggled or you just don’t believe it because Garrett ran the offense in Dallas (until 2012, when he was relieved of his duties but you still want to give him credit for the offense there 8 years later).

Either way, there was a talent issue for sure last season. There was also a major schematic issue. Plenty has been written about it. Look it up. As I said, I won’t post the same articles again since they simply fall on deaf ears. People are going to believe what they want. The talent needs to be better. And so does Garrett.
RE: Train wreck to good  
Prude : 8/26/2021 9:23 pm : link
In comment 15341953 djm said:
Quote:
Maybe not fair to say train wreck but he left that offense in better shape than he found it. And I’ll include 2010 wjen Dallas looked like the worst team in football before they replaced wade with Garrett.

Also find it odd that we only seem to notice the bad offensive practices while the good moments go largely ignored around here.


About that 2010 season:
Hi, What Are You Looking For?

SEARCH
BlackSportsOnline
BlackSportsOnline


BREAKING NEWS
Listen To Ex-Cowboys Jason Hatcher Tells Specific Story On How Jason Garrett Intentionally Sabotaged Wade Phillips To Steal His Job & How Romo Walked Around Thinking He Was Brett Favre (Video)

ByKevin Gray Jr
PublishedMarch 13, 2019
5.5k
VIEWS
Share
Tweet
Reddit
Subscribe
It’s no secret that Tony Romo and Jason Garrett are Cowboys lifers.

Despite the lack of consistent success Jason Garrett has had as Dallas Cowboys head coach he is beloved by the organization and Jerry Jones.

Tony Romo, despite only winning two playoff games, is the all-time leading passer in Cowboys history.

More recently, Romo has become the media darling in sports commentary with his clairvoyant color analysis for the NFL on CBS.

Apparently though, Romo and Garrett have at least one detractor and he let loose on both Tuesday.

Clarence Hill of the Fort-Worth Star-Telegram details one former Cowboy who could care less for Tony Romo and Jason Garrett.

Ex-Cowboys DE Jason Hatcher, who played 8 years with the Cowboys and Romo, went on 105.3 The Fan and ripped Romo as a bad leader, who didn’t have the ‘it’ factor, and would have rather played with Dak Prescott if he had the chance.

Saying,

“Romo was feeling like he was a Brett Favre and I’m like ‘dude, you ain’t do nothing. What have you done? You got your own space that you leave … don’t come in the locker room an interact with your teammates, but you call yourself a leader? Nah, partner. It don’t work like that.’

Hatcher then turned his attention to Jason Garrett accusing the then offensive coordinator of the Cowboys of sabotaging then HC Wade Phillips saying,

“Let me tell you something. I’m going to tell you the truth. I saw Jason Garrett sabotage this man.”

And,

“We ran three plays three freaking plays (before Wade was fired). I don’t care what the media say. We was flying around. We was out of pads in week 7 (in 2009). We was beating people’s heads in. Now we go into camp cupcake (in 2010) and do what Wade don’t want to do. We get in pads, we beat each other down. We tired, we not fresh. And then you go and call three or four plays (Garrett) till this man gets fired.”

[/quote]

Sound familiar?


[quote]
Link - ( New Window )
RE: Garrett had a rough first season here  
Ten Ton Hammer : 8/26/2021 10:02 pm : link
In comment 15342082 BigBlueShock said:
Quote:
I’m not blaming it all on him, talent certainly played a part in what he was calling. I remember Judge being asked about the conservative offense at some point early in the season and his answer was basically that they intended to shorten the game and be in games with the ability to win in the 4th quarter. Was that a talent issue or a philosophy issue? Who knows, we will find out this season.

However, there were plenty of articles that were posted right here on BBI from people that know a lot about football, that have access to the All 22 film that raised huge concerns about Garrett’s offense. Duggan also had a couple in the Athletic. I’m not bothering to post any of these articles again because if you ignored them the first, second and third time they were posted it’s because you either didn’t WANT to know why the offense may have struggled or you just don’t believe it because Garrett ran the offense in Dallas (until 2012, when he was relieved of his duties but you still want to give him credit for the offense there 8 years later).

Either way, there was a talent issue for sure last season. There was also a major schematic issue. Plenty has been written about it. Look it up. As I said, I won’t post the same articles again since they simply fall on deaf ears. People are going to believe what they want. The talent needs to be better. And so does Garrett.


The talent excuse only goes so far. The reason why we love Graham around here is for what he did with a unit that had clear and obvious weaknesses.

Good coaches can make the best out of what they have. There's almost never an excuse to be bottom-3 in the NFL bad at offense when this league has done everything it can do to make scoring easy.
RE: RE: Garrett had a rough first season here  
BigBlueShock : 8/26/2021 10:09 pm : link
In comment 15342111 Ten Ton Hammer said:
Quote:
In comment 15342082 BigBlueShock said:


Quote:


I’m not blaming it all on him, talent certainly played a part in what he was calling. I remember Judge being asked about the conservative offense at some point early in the season and his answer was basically that they intended to shorten the game and be in games with the ability to win in the 4th quarter. Was that a talent issue or a philosophy issue? Who knows, we will find out this season.

However, there were plenty of articles that were posted right here on BBI from people that know a lot about football, that have access to the All 22 film that raised huge concerns about Garrett’s offense. Duggan also had a couple in the Athletic. I’m not bothering to post any of these articles again because if you ignored them the first, second and third time they were posted it’s because you either didn’t WANT to know why the offense may have struggled or you just don’t believe it because Garrett ran the offense in Dallas (until 2012, when he was relieved of his duties but you still want to give him credit for the offense there 8 years later).

Either way, there was a talent issue for sure last season. There was also a major schematic issue. Plenty has been written about it. Look it up. As I said, I won’t post the same articles again since they simply fall on deaf ears. People are going to believe what they want. The talent needs to be better. And so does Garrett.



The talent excuse only goes so far. The reason why we love Graham around here is for what he did with a unit that had clear and obvious weaknesses.

Good coaches can make the best out of what they have. There's almost never an excuse to be bottom-3 in the NFL bad at offense when this league has done everything it can do to make scoring easy.

I agree completely.
Although I’m a fan of the  
Osi Osi Osi OyOyOy : 8/26/2021 10:27 pm : link
Passes to the flat this year, I don’t like hearing about a vanilla offense even if it was a scrimmage. I think Barkley could have a big year on short/intermediate stuff this year but it’s so hard to get a picture on this offense without our two huge investments in Golladay and Toney.

I don’t like how Peart is sounding. Thomas seems like there’s a chance he may have turned the corner but Peart seems like we’re hoping at this point. I hate how OL remains the question mark for the 12th? consecutive year.

Judge impresses me. But it’s clear that the media has it out for him. It will be very interesting to see if he can handle the media if the Giants start out poorly again. After all these years of bad starts, 0-2 or 1-4 would kill this team and make us a laughingstock. I hope he has the guys ready. The KR stuff is cool, and I like it , but Judge needs to prove himself this year. We have BBIers who have shat on players/coaches for years admiring the guy, and I like him too but it’s time for better results on the field.
Mittenedman  
Breeze_94 : 8/27/2021 1:24 am : link
Anything at all with Toney?

Did you at least see him on the sideline moving around? This has to be a very strange injury for them to hide it like this. I don't think it's anything to do with the lower extremities?

So strange and quite frustrating
Duggan’s description of Peart’s day was frightening  
shockeyisthebest8056 : 8/27/2021 2:04 am : link
Can't agree more  
Breaker : 8/27/2021 7:13 am : link
In comment 15341938 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
Engram was not on the field today.

The TEs were Smith, Stewart-Griffin, and Hausmann.

Right now, this offense is personnel wise the same as last year. Darius Slayton the only deep threat.

You guys act like Garrett doesn't know how to go vertical. His receivers in Dallas killed us and other teams all of the time with deep passing game. Same with the tight ends.


Same as last year. Golladay missed first two games last year with hamstring so who knows how this transpires early in season and what does it mean longer term. Is this a chronic issue?

Toney-enough said on this. Who knows if he will be any factor this year at all.

So the two players they invested the most resources on offense are out and question marks. How worse can this be?

Yes we get Barkley and Rudolph back but all the talking heads are so behind whats going on its ludicrous. All the weapons the Giants have added etc.... Think they would do some homework at some point.
Great  
AcidTest : 8/27/2021 9:31 am : link
stuff. Thanks.
RE: Garrett had a rough first season here  
Eric on Li : 8/27/2021 10:32 am : link
In comment 15342082 BigBlueShock said:
Quote:
I’m not blaming it all on him, talent certainly played a part in what he was calling. I remember Judge being asked about the conservative offense at some point early in the season and his answer was basically that they intended to shorten the game and be in games with the ability to win in the 4th quarter. Was that a talent issue or a philosophy issue? Who knows, we will find out this season.

However, there were plenty of articles that were posted right here on BBI from people that know a lot about football, that have access to the All 22 film that raised huge concerns about Garrett’s offense. Duggan also had a couple in the Athletic. I’m not bothering to post any of these articles again because if you ignored them the first, second and third time they were posted it’s because you either didn’t WANT to know why the offense may have struggled or you just don’t believe it because Garrett ran the offense in Dallas (until 2012, when he was relieved of his duties but you still want to give him credit for the offense there 8 years later).

Either way, there was a talent issue for sure last season. There was also a major schematic issue. Plenty has been written about it. Look it up. As I said, I won’t post the same articles again since they simply fall on deaf ears. People are going to believe what they want. The talent needs to be better. And so does Garrett.


completely agree. without going too far down a rabbit hole there was some stat that stood out to me that it took them like half of a season to attempt to throw a ball to Engram over 15 yards downfield (while throwing him multiple weekly short curl routes over the middle of the field like he was Witten). Once they started giving Engram (and Tate) opportunities downfield they delivered and the offense opened up. Thinking the Tampa/Philly/Cincy games right before Jones got hurt. And the "Jones didn't have time" excuse seems weak to me. The deep shot they took to Engram at the beginning of the Cincy game was a quick drop and the ball was out right away. They also had a bunch of good shots vs. Tampa despite the pass rush that Jones just missed on the throws.

also fair or not I think Garrett has to take some of the blame for the Columbo fiasco. He obviously wouldn't have been hired without Garrett's endorsement.
RE: Garrett had a rough first season here  
Zeke's Alibi : 8/27/2021 11:05 am : link
In comment 15342082 BigBlueShock said:
Quote:
I’m not blaming it all on him, talent certainly played a part in what he was calling. I remember Judge being asked about the conservative offense at some point early in the season and his answer was basically that they intended to shorten the game and be in games with the ability to win in the 4th quarter. Was that a talent issue or a philosophy issue? Who knows, we will find out this season.

However, there were plenty of articles that were posted right here on BBI from people that know a lot about football, that have access to the All 22 film that raised huge concerns about Garrett’s offense. Duggan also had a couple in the Athletic. I’m not bothering to post any of these articles again because if you ignored them the first, second and third time they were posted it’s because you either didn’t WANT to know why the offense may have struggled or you just don’t believe it because Garrett ran the offense in Dallas (until 2012, when he was relieved of his duties but you still want to give him credit for the offense there 8 years later).

Either way, there was a talent issue for sure last season. There was also a major schematic issue. Plenty has been written about it. Look it up. As I said, I won’t post the same articles again since they simply fall on deaf ears. People are going to believe what they want. The talent needs to be better. And so does Garrett.


The offense under Garrett was the exact same until they brought in Moore. He got relieved of play-calling duties because his face was getting lost in the play sheet (like most of these guys that insist on calling plays) and since he wasn't an elite offensive coordinator like Reid or Shanahan, he had to give it up. In fact, even under Moore the offense was generally the same, they just started using more motion.

You can't open things up deep when you can't pass protect and you don't have running backs that scare people. We barely faced any stacked boxes because defenses knew that the backs aren't doing ANYTHING at the second level.

Occasionally you see an exception when you go up against a DC that's going to do what he's going to do regardless (see Bowles with TB). Unfortunately, the wind was pretty significant in the first half and we couldn't connect and DJ and Slayton couldn't adjust on the couple shots downfield.

They are analyzing the offensive scheme without understanding any of the context. The scheme was what it was because the Giants offense was at a talent deficit, and couldn't even take advantage of the one thing they do well, because the backs fucking sucked.

Taking deep shots comes with more risk than just losing downs, turnovers are more likely (especially if you are forcing it) and it opens up your QB to hits and fumbles (not exactly DJ's strong suit).

If the playcalling doesn't look different this year, hop on Garrett all you want (I certainly will), because we have the backs and WRs now to actually run a more downfield offense. We have massively upgraded the backup RBs for what we want to do. It's why we signed Clement over Gallman and he's our third back at best. Gallman was starting most of lsat year splitting time with Morris who ran like he had lead in his pants.

The one legit beef with Garrett is the motioin thing, but now we have a more experienced line, a QB in his second year in the offense, and Kitchens in his ear I'm hoping we see more in that space.
RE: Although I’m a fan of the  
Angel Eyes : 8/27/2021 12:56 pm : link
In comment 15342133 Osi Osi Osi OyOyOy said:
Quote:
Passes to the flat this year, I don’t like hearing about a vanilla offense even if it was a scrimmage. I think Barkley could have a big year on short/intermediate stuff this year but it’s so hard to get a picture on this offense without our two huge investments in Golladay and Toney.

I don’t like how Peart is sounding. Thomas seems like there’s a chance he may have turned the corner but Peart seems like we’re hoping at this point. I hate how OL remains the question mark for the 12th? consecutive year.

Judge impresses me. But it’s clear that the media has it out for him. It will be very interesting to see if he can handle the media if the Giants start out poorly again. After all these years of bad starts, 0-2 or 1-4 would kill this team and make us a laughingstock. I hope he has the guys ready. The KR stuff is cool, and I like it , but Judge needs to prove himself this year. We have BBIers who have shat on players/coaches for years admiring the guy, and I like him too but it’s time for better results on the field.

I'll admit that the news about Peart makes me nervous. Week 1 (if he starts), he's likely to be going up against Von Miller, since Miller is primarily a strong-side edge rusher.
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
Back to the Corner