I do not trust that Garrett recognizes that WR's can routes other than 3 yard curls. Not to mention, while the Giants Defense is good, it is not as good as like the 2000 Ravens, 1985 Bears, etc. It is hard these days to hold competent teams below 17 points. Even the Bengals without Joe Burrow managed to score 17 on us last year. Don't be disillusioned by the fact that we scored less than 17 points 7 times last year. It was not because we faced great defenses. It was because our O was barely college caliber.
If the Giants manage to score 30 points against that defense this board will explode.
Then I guess you won’t have to worry about BBI exploding.
No, I'm more expecting more bellyaching about the offense even if we win tbh.
I'm very interested how much Saquon will be able to shoulder and how well the line run blocks. I'm expecting a pretty run heavy approach, the Broncos defense is going to be lights out against the pass this year, but they are susceptible against the run.
D plays better than score indicates as they're put in bad situations on a few occasions. I'd love to feel differently but until the O proves something...
D plays better than score indicates as they're put in bad situations on a few occasions. I'd love to feel differently but until the O proves something...
picked the Broncos (some as a best bet), the difference being Teddy baby will "manage" the game expertly and not turn it over, and "Danny Dimes" will of course turn it over every other play. Denver is pretty damn solid everywhere but QB. We could win but Denver should 21-13.
Team rushes for 150+ yards.
Full expect Jones to pop one or two big runs.
would attack Miller/Chub with the zone read early and often to slow them down a bit.
I do not trust that Garrett recognizes that WR's can routes other than 3 yard curls. Not to mention, while the Giants Defense is good, it is not as good as like the 2000 Ravens, 1985 Bears, etc. It is hard these days to hold competent teams below 17 points. Even the Bengals without Joe Burrow managed to score 17 on us last year. Don't be disillusioned by the fact that we scored less than 17 points 7 times last year. It was not because we faced great defenses. It was because our O was barely college caliber.
You do realize that it is 2021 not 2020, right?
What happened last year has nothing to what happens this year. They changed over 40% of the players on the team. Offensive line has new players on 3 of the 5 positions that started the season last year...
for 120 yards, adds 4 receptions, for 30 yards and scores two TD's early. Giants jump out to a quick 17 point lead. The defense plays well and Gmen pound the rock in the second half with the backup RB's
I do not trust that Garrett recognizes that WR's can routes other than 3 yard curls. Not to mention, while the Giants Defense is good, it is not as good as like the 2000 Ravens, 1985 Bears, etc. It is hard these days to hold competent teams below 17 points. Even the Bengals without Joe Burrow managed to score 17 on us last year. Don't be disillusioned by the fact that we scored less than 17 points 7 times last year. It was not because we faced great defenses. It was because our O was barely college caliber.
You do realize that it is 2021 not 2020, right?
What happened last year has nothing to what happens this year. They changed over 40% of the players on the team. Offensive line has new players on 3 of the 5 positions that started the season last year...
2 of our top 3 healthyish WR have no chemistry with our QB because of off-season injuries and we got rid of our best OL from last year. That usually does not equate to improvement.
DJ turns it over on the potential game winning drive.
The best offensive lineman is still at center. Zeitler was not that good, merely average.
We do no know how much chemistry Jones has with his receivers, nor TE Rudolph and that could be crucial. But I think they will muddle it out - but he has Slayton and Shepard who he is well familiar with...
Wish placing bets on this forum was legal.
Wish placing bets on this forum was legal.
You gonna be man or woman up and place your bet or are you going to be a fearful person? Come on give us some of your thoughts.
Let's see what your big guess is.
Giabts 30 Broncos 17
Giants 17
Hoping I’ve got these scores reversed!
Giabts 30 Broncos 17
If the Giants manage to score 30 points against that defense this board will explode.
Giants - 19 (4 FGs)
Broncos - 17
Quote:
Have to come out fast, i think they will:
Giabts 30 Broncos 17
If the Giants manage to score 30 points against that defense this board will explode.
Then I guess you won’t have to worry about BBI exploding.
I think we'd be due a parade for that. I'll bring the confetti and you are responsible for the Chocolate Cherry Almond Snack Bars.
Giants - 19 (4 FGs)
Broncos - 17
I agree with this. Giants play well, but offense struggles, defense gets the job done in Q4 to seal the win
Quote:
In comment 15359235 nygiants16 said:
Quote:
Have to come out fast, i think they will:
Giabts 30 Broncos 17
If the Giants manage to score 30 points against that defense this board will explode.
Then I guess you won’t have to worry about BBI exploding.
No, I'm more expecting more bellyaching about the offense even if we win tbh.
I'm very interested how much Saquon will be able to shoulder and how well the line run blocks. I'm expecting a pretty run heavy approach, the Broncos defense is going to be lights out against the pass this year, but they are susceptible against the run.
Broncos 20
Giants 10
Seems a bit excessive for DEN. 17-10 would be my guess
Oh dear Lord I hope not.
I think Giants win 23-17
Giants 23. Denver 16
Defense with 3 sacks, 2 turnovers. Rudolph and Saquon with TD’s. Daniel Jones 0 turnovers.
Yep
Full expect Jones to pop one or two big runs.
would attack Miller/Chub with the zone read early and often to slow them down a bit.
Golladay and Rudolph woth TDs in close.
Toney with more rush yards then reciving yards.
So I will say 21-17 Broncos, hope I am wrong.
Barkley rotates in with Booker, but does break 1 long run, ends up with 90 yds
Shep 1 TD catch, Rudolph 1 TD catch
You do realize that it is 2021 not 2020, right?
What happened last year has nothing to what happens this year. They changed over 40% of the players on the team. Offensive line has new players on 3 of the 5 positions that started the season last year...
Giants 24 Denver 7
Quote:
I do not trust that Garrett recognizes that WR's can routes other than 3 yard curls. Not to mention, while the Giants Defense is good, it is not as good as like the 2000 Ravens, 1985 Bears, etc. It is hard these days to hold competent teams below 17 points. Even the Bengals without Joe Burrow managed to score 17 on us last year. Don't be disillusioned by the fact that we scored less than 17 points 7 times last year. It was not because we faced great defenses. It was because our O was barely college caliber.
You do realize that it is 2021 not 2020, right?
What happened last year has nothing to what happens this year. They changed over 40% of the players on the team. Offensive line has new players on 3 of the 5 positions that started the season last year...
2 of our top 3 healthyish WR have no chemistry with our QB because of off-season injuries and we got rid of our best OL from last year. That usually does not equate to improvement.
17 BBIers are predicting a Giants win; 12 are predicting a Giants loss.
Interestingly, for those who are predicting a Giants win, the median margin of victory is 6 points.
And for those who are predicting a Giants loss, the median margin of defeat is 6.5 points.
17 BBIers are predicting a Giants win; 12 are predicting a Giants loss.
Interestingly, for those who are predicting a Giants win, the median margin of victory is 6 points.
And for those who are predicting a Giants loss, the median margin of defeat is 6.5 points.
This is as of 5:46 postings.
The best offensive lineman is still at center. Zeitler was not that good, merely average.
We do no know how much chemistry Jones has with his receivers, nor TE Rudolph and that could be crucial. But I think they will muddle it out - but he has Slayton and Shepard who he is well familiar with...