for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Pass Rush: How Does an NFL Team Play Winning Football

M.S. : 9/17/2021 7:25 am

on a consistent basis with a non-existent pass rush?

These nightmare years for the Giants have been punctuated by such poor play in so many areas, but the lack of a pass rush really stands out.

The Giants need to clear out some dead wood and use their 2022 draft capital to find all-around players who can rush the passer.

A few potential candidates:

Zach Harrison (Ohio State)
Kayvon Thibodeaux (Oregon)
George Karlaftis (Purdue)
Aidan Hutchinson (Michigan)
The NFL figured out Graham's soft zone after the Seattle game  
penkap75 : 9/17/2021 7:30 am : link
Dropping over paid DBs into a soft zone and hoping for a coverage sack doesn't work anymore.
pass rush is not in a vacuum.  
Victor in CT : 9/17/2021 7:30 am : link
maybe scrap that soft zone that is on film for all to see now and play some pressure coverage? Especially against a shit QB? They have a ton talent in the 2ndary. Use it.
I'm not convinced we can't rush.  
robbieballs2003 : 9/17/2021 7:34 am : link
This has been going on for 2 years now. Even last game one player said the game plan was to squeeze the pocket. It is a controlled pass rush designed to not let the QB scramble and force bad throws. Don't know why this is the approach. QBs have been comfortable sitting in these pockets the last two year like Murray, Mayfield, Bridgewater, and Heinicke.
RE: I'm not convinced we can't rush.  
M.S. : 9/17/2021 7:43 am : link
In comment 15373049 robbieballs2003 said:
Quote:
This has been going on for 2 years now. Even last game one player said the game plan was to squeeze the pocket. It is a controlled pass rush designed to not let the QB scramble and force bad throws. Don't know why this is the approach. QBs have been comfortable sitting in these pockets the last two year like Murray, Mayfield, Bridgewater, and Heinicke.

Very comfortable. The Giants pass rush keeps opposing QBs on schedule, on target, on time, all of the time.
Even when you watch Ojulari's sack  
robbieballs2003 : 9/17/2021 7:45 am : link
He is straight in the chest of the OT squeezing him until he gets the OT close enough before actually using a move to finish the sack. It is clear to me it is squeeze, squeeze, squeeze, and when you are close make a move
RE: I'm not convinced we can't rush.  
Matt M. : 9/17/2021 7:46 am : link
In comment 15373049 robbieballs2003 said:
Quote:
This has been going on for 2 years now. Even last game one player said the game plan was to squeeze the pocket. It is a controlled pass rush designed to not let the QB scramble and force bad throws. Don't know why this is the approach. QBs have been comfortable sitting in these pockets the last two year like Murray, Mayfield, Bridgewater, and Heinicke.
That was the plan last week. I cna't imagine that was the plan this week in Heinicke's first start.

What kills me, is for how many years now, have we seen teams throw caution to the wind and just blitz, stunt, and twist like crazy until our OC, OL, and QB prove they can stop it. Us? We play a soft zone and rush no more than 4 consistently. Last night,, the plan should have been to have somebody in his face almost every down and let our high priced CBs and talented Ss make plays. That zone should be thrown in once in a while and disguised to fool a young QB. It should not be what he sees every down to allow his receivers find the big holes and sit in them for mostly easy throws.
Wheres Leonard Williams  
ajr2456 : 9/17/2021 7:53 am : link
Been?
RE: Wheres Leonard Williams  
M.S. : 9/17/2021 7:56 am : link
In comment 15373093 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
Been?

Been counting his money?
question about the soft zone  
Dinger : 9/17/2021 7:56 am : link
wasnt this what graham was using at the start of last season and realized we didn't have the talent for it so we went away from it. Seeing Bradberry 20 yards off the LoS is scary.
RE: RE: I'm not convinced we can't rush.  
robbieballs2003 : 9/17/2021 7:57 am : link
In comment 15373077 Matt M. said:
Quote:
In comment 15373049 robbieballs2003 said:


Quote:


This has been going on for 2 years now. Even last game one player said the game plan was to squeeze the pocket. It is a controlled pass rush designed to not let the QB scramble and force bad throws. Don't know why this is the approach. QBs have been comfortable sitting in these pockets the last two year like Murray, Mayfield, Bridgewater, and Heinicke.

That was the plan last week. I cna't imagine that was the plan this week in Heinicke's first start.

What kills me, is for how many years now, have we seen teams throw caution to the wind and just blitz, stunt, and twist like crazy until our OC, OL, and QB prove they can stop it. Us? We play a soft zone and rush no more than 4 consistently. Last night,, the plan should have been to have somebody in his face almost every down and let our high priced CBs and talented Ss make plays. That zone should be thrown in once in a while and disguised to fool a young QB. It should not be what he sees every down to allow his receivers find the big holes and sit in them for mostly easy throws.


Watch the game again and focus on the rush.
Ernie Accorsi famously said you can never have enough pass rushers  
jeffusedtobeonwebtv : 9/17/2021 7:58 am : link
Gettleman and Judge say let Graham game plan it. Hasn't worked out too well.
RE: question about the soft zone  
robbieballs2003 : 9/17/2021 7:59 am : link
In comment 15373101 Dinger said:
Quote:
wasnt this what graham was using at the start of last season and realized we didn't have the talent for it so we went away from it. Seeing Bradberry 20 yards off the LoS is scary.


Opposite. We started going to a more zone based team last year after teams were picking on our second corner.
I get  
Daniel in MI : 9/17/2021 8:10 am : link
The idea of the soft zone: make the opponent make 12+ plays to score, nothing big, nothing over the top. Expect you can force them to make a mistake, commit a penalty, have an incomplete, end the drive.

But if you have no pass rush at all, and give up 3-5 every run, then they can happily dink and dunk you to death, trying an occasional deep shot.

Someone has to make a play up front. No one has.

Think they miss Tomlinson  
bc4life : 9/17/2021 8:26 am : link
Understand completely why he wasn't re-signed. He was one key to the DL's success last year.

Lot of football to be played. I didn't think this would be a championship team but I thought the defense would build on what they did last year.

Teams can get better as the season wears on - let's see what happens. If not
.....  
CoughlinHandsonHips : 9/17/2021 9:41 am : link
Reese failed at the end, but his "you never can have too many pass rushers" mantra won the giants superbowls.

Drafting Kiwi with Osi, Strahan, and Tuck in front of him.

Drafting JPP with Osi and Tuck in front of him.

It feels like the FO (even in Reese's later years) just tore up that philosophy.

No they load the secondary with fat contracts, and make Bridgewater and Heinicke look like Tom Brady with no pressure whats so ever.
I suppose we could change our secondary coverage  
M.S. : 9/17/2021 10:56 am : link

and stop with the 10-yard cushions.

But does that really accomplish anything without a legitimate pass rush?
RE: I get  
Angel Eyes : 9/18/2021 9:25 am : link
In comment 15373139 Daniel in MI said:
Quote:
The idea of the soft zone: make the opponent make 12+ plays to score, nothing big, nothing over the top. Expect you can force them to make a mistake, commit a penalty, have an incomplete, end the drive.

But if you have no pass rush at all, and give up 3-5 every run, then they can happily dink and dunk you to death, trying an occasional deep shot.

Someone has to make a play up front. No one has.

Of course the soft zone only works if the players have enough stamina.
I would not mind one bit if they drafted EDGE with both 1st rd picks  
Jim in Forest Hills : 9/18/2021 11:36 am : link
Thibodeaux and Karlaftis. Bring em on.
RE: .....  
Angel Eyes : 9/18/2021 3:04 pm : link
In comment 15373527 CoughlinHandsonHips said:
Quote:
Reese failed at the end, but his "you never can have too many pass rushers" mantra won the giants superbowls.

Drafting Kiwi with Osi, Strahan, and Tuck in front of him.

Drafting JPP with Osi and Tuck in front of him.

It feels like the FO (even in Reese's later years) just tore up that philosophy.

No they load the secondary with fat contracts, and make Bridgewater and Heinicke look like Tom Brady with no pressure whats so ever.

So how did that philosophy get torn up for the Giants? It's been a running line throughout Giants' history (and for an organization that cleaves to its past as much as the Giants), we've never done well without a pass rush at the edges, be it Lawrence Taylor, George Martin, and Leonard Marshall in the 80s, or Strahan, Hammer, Osi, Tuck, Kiwanuka, and JPP in the 00s.

Gettleman seems to extol it "Run the ball, stop the run, rush the passer", but he doesn't put his money where his mouth is given that he hasn't made much of an effort to improve the pass rush, particularly the edges.
RE: The NFL figured out Graham's soft zone after the Seattle game  
Zeke's Alibi : 9/18/2021 3:10 pm : link
In comment 15373041 penkap75 said:
Quote:
Dropping over paid DBs into a soft zone and hoping for a coverage sack doesn't work anymore.


Seattle was the perfect matchup schemetically and personnel for the defense Graham wants to call. They want to run and throw the ball down the field. I'm starting to think it's fools gold and until I see Graham put together a gameplan for these offenses that want to put together long drives with high completion percentage, I'm lost on him being an answer.
I think part of the problem defensively is that Graham  
Zeke's Alibi : 9/18/2021 3:14 pm : link
doesn't trust his damn secondary to cover. Like yeah we could use an explosive pass rusher, but then you literally have more pieces on defense than almost everyone. Is that what Graham needs to be good? Lots of guys can do that. I'd laugh though if we went out and got one and we still played soft zone and man. Graham would go from average DC to Mike Nolan territory.

We can't force coverage sacks if we give up so much underneath. Azeez is a good coverage sack guy to have and we generate plenty of interior pressure. Graham needs to tighten it up and let the chips fall where they may.
RE: I think part of the problem defensively is that Graham  
Angel Eyes : 9/18/2021 3:33 pm : link
In comment 15375575 Zeke's Alibi said:
Quote:
doesn't trust his damn secondary to cover. Like yeah we could use an explosive pass rusher, but then you literally have more pieces on defense than almost everyone. Is that what Graham needs to be good? Lots of guys can do that. I'd laugh though if we went out and got one and we still played soft zone and man. Graham would go from average DC to Mike Nolan territory.

We can't force coverage sacks if we give up so much underneath. Azeez is a good coverage sack guy to have and we generate plenty of interior pressure. Graham needs to tighten it up and let the chips fall where they may.

Why doesn't he trust the secondary, isn't that what we've poured funds into (Bradberry and Jackson)? How come he barely plays man defense, considering that's why we got Jackson?
I honestly have no idea and Adoree actually played a pretty good game  
Zeke's Alibi : 9/18/2021 3:44 pm : link
Even when we do play man we have safeties like 20 yards off the ball. It's so frustrating to watch.
RE: I would not mind one bit if they drafted EDGE with both 1st rd picks  
Angel Eyes : 9/18/2021 11:50 pm : link
In comment 15375384 Jim in Forest Hills said:
Quote:
Thibodeaux and Karlaftis. Bring em on.

I'd love to see that in action; Thibodeaux at right end and Karlaftis at left.
Id rather  
Giantfootball025 : 9/19/2021 12:29 am : link
1 DE and 1 OT Neal maybe. Build both lines, that hows you win.
RE: Id rather  
Angel Eyes : 9/19/2021 9:59 am : link
In comment 15375879 Giantfootball025 said:
Quote:
1 DE and 1 OT Neal maybe. Build both lines, that hows you win.

True. Two pass rushers would be a nice pipe dream though.

Also, do our pass rushers have any more moves than bull rush? Bull rush can be effective (it's how Michael Strahan made his bones), but surely there's other ways of getting past an offensive lineman (Ojulari apparently has a good rip move but I've yet to see it used).
Back to the Corner