I haven’t posted in quite a while, but was talking about today’s disaster with friends and we were discussing whether this is the absolute low point in a lifetime of watching this team. Obviously it depends on when you were born/became a fan.
I started in the late 70s/early 80s. Despite the putricity of those teams pre-Parcels (and some of the crap teams of the mid-90s), this really feels like the absolute low point for me in terms of lack of talent on a given roster, cluelessness of the front office, and just hopelessness on the horizon. Of course I was only 8/9 years old in late 70s so it could also be perspective. I’d be curious to hear what the old-timers think of this rancid festering heap of shit in comparison to the early 70s teams.
We were pathetic, no offense at all and just not competitive
But as a fan, the feeling is similar.
I wasn't around for the 70s, but honestly, Jones is about on the same tier as Kent Graham to me. Can start games, but is basically a fungible QB who is easily replaced by someone better.
Scored 41 pts against the Redskins and lost by 32 pts
Exactly...It just feels worse because it's current.
2003 was the worst team and it was a surprise given where the franchise was from 2000-2002. And it helped usher in meaningful franchise altering changes. But this stretch, essentially an entire decade, has been absolutely demoralizing as you can imagine. I’ve never experienced bleak until this period. And what is even more depressing is there are no current indications that things will be any better in 2022 and beyond. That’s terrifying.
Yes. Worst Giants team ever.
I've been a fan since 1979. I've heard the stories from my older brother about the wilderness years part I.
As an adult, I understand then game and league more than when I was young. And I cannot comprehend why the organization does that it does year after year.
Never had a sense of hopelessness with this team until now.
Close.
Quote:
So no, not the worst of my lifetime — yet. There were some truly awful teams in the 70s with hardly any talent. Jones is far, FAR better than some of those QBs. When they have their guys on the field, at least there's hope.
But as a fan, the feeling is similar.
I wasn't around for the 70s, but honestly, Jones is about on the same tier as Kent Graham to me. Can start games, but is basically a fungible QB who is easily replaced by someone better.
I get you don’t like Jones, but Kent Graham. Come on, get some objectivity. I was accused earlier tonight of writing an obtuse post, I think you just did as well.
Quote:
In comment 15418347 81_Great_Dane said:
Quote:
So no, not the worst of my lifetime — yet. There were some truly awful teams in the 70s with hardly any talent. Jones is far, FAR better than some of those QBs. When they have their guys on the field, at least there's hope.
But as a fan, the feeling is similar.
I wasn't around for the 70s, but honestly, Jones is about on the same tier as Kent Graham to me. Can start games, but is basically a fungible QB who is easily replaced by someone better.
I get you don’t like Jones, but Kent Graham. Come on, get some objectivity. I was accused earlier tonight of writing an obtuse post, I think you just did as well.
No, I'm serious. On the football field, you tell me what Jones does that shows he's any better overall than Graham.
In fact, Graham actually beat a 13-0 Broncos team at one point. He had toughness, and, if everything was going well, he could win a game. Same as Jones.
Overall, Graham was a barely adequate starter and that's what Jones is right now. I think you're insulting Graham or simply don't remember the guy if you're saying it's obtuse to compare him to Jones.
This team would take 2-3 weeks to score 41 points, though yes, they haven't been bad enough to give up 72 yet.
Became a Giants fan in the late 60s.
Quote:
In comment 15418371 FStubbs said:
Quote:
In comment 15418347 81_Great_Dane said:
Quote:
So no, not the worst of my lifetime — yet. There were some truly awful teams in the 70s with hardly any talent. Jones is far, FAR better than some of those QBs. When they have their guys on the field, at least there's hope.
But as a fan, the feeling is similar.
I wasn't around for the 70s, but honestly, Jones is about on the same tier as Kent Graham to me. Can start games, but is basically a fungible QB who is easily replaced by someone better.
I get you don’t like Jones, but Kent Graham. Come on, get some objectivity. I was accused earlier tonight of writing an obtuse post, I think you just did as well.
No, I'm serious. On the football field, you tell me what Jones does that shows he's any better overall than Graham.
In fact, Graham actually beat a 13-0 Broncos team at one point. He had toughness, and, if everything was going well, he could win a game. Same as Jones.
Overall, Graham was a barely adequate starter and that's what Jones is right now. I think you're insulting Graham or simply don't remember the guy if you're saying it's obtuse to compare him to Jones.
LOL GTFO, holy shit some of these asshole responses. Graham??
2. Lack of a pass rush
3. Significant injuries to starters
It's the formula for losing in the NFL. Each of these 3 creates a scenario where it's near impossible to win. Even having a mediocre QB (e.g. Kent Graham, Danny Kannell) can be overcome if these 3 areas don't occur.
I've been watching the Giants since 1973...and no this is not the worst roster I've ever seen, but the injuries to a thin Oline and no real edge rushers is killing this team.
Quote:
In comment 15418505 joeinpa said:
Quote:
In comment 15418371 FStubbs said:
Quote:
In comment 15418347 81_Great_Dane said:
Quote:
So no, not the worst of my lifetime — yet. There were some truly awful teams in the 70s with hardly any talent. Jones is far, FAR better than some of those QBs. When they have their guys on the field, at least there's hope.
But as a fan, the feeling is similar.
I wasn't around for the 70s, but honestly, Jones is about on the same tier as Kent Graham to me. Can start games, but is basically a fungible QB who is easily replaced by someone better.
I get you don’t like Jones, but Kent Graham. Come on, get some objectivity. I was accused earlier tonight of writing an obtuse post, I think you just did as well.
No, I'm serious. On the football field, you tell me what Jones does that shows he's any better overall than Graham.
In fact, Graham actually beat a 13-0 Broncos team at one point. He had toughness, and, if everything was going well, he could win a game. Same as Jones.
Overall, Graham was a barely adequate starter and that's what Jones is right now. I think you're insulting Graham or simply don't remember the guy if you're saying it's obtuse to compare him to Jones.
LOL GTFO, holy shit some of these asshole responses. Graham??
GTFO? Make me, loser.
Go back and watch some film.
1996 at least had a good defense with Strahan, Armstead and Sehorn. But man that offense stunk.
Sometimes the game is over at halftime (like today).
Home games - we haven't had many wins. The last game I went one which was a win was 2018 versus WSH (DJ's second game). I don't attend all - but go to most.
Right now we are cellar dwellers and have to find our way out.
I said today at the game a black cloud is over this org right now.
The second-half 2003 team was the worst stretch of football I've seen, and it's not close.
NYG were outscored 219-78. Only one game within one score (19-13 L to TB). We lost to an ATL team that featured a QB (Kurt Kittner) who went 9-of-23 for 65 yards. The Joe Horn Saints game (45-7) is also in there. DAL K Billy Cundiff had 11 field goals against the Giants that year. Everything sucked.
2017 team is a close second. Third's up for debate.
Compare for a minute to the 2003 Giants, a very bad team. The core of that team had gone to the Super Bowl in 2000 and the playoffs a year before. We'd seen those guys make plays and win games as Giants.
Look at the names of guys who had been around for a few years: Strahan, Hamilton, Barrow, Collins, Tiki, Toomer, Hilliard, Petigout (and more).
Even the 2017 Giants had guys who had played well and won games just the year before. Who's the most accomplished Giant on this team? Williams? Barkley? Jones?
If I saw Strahan / Toomer / Hilliard / Hamilton losing games, at least I'd feel bad for them. Aside from just putting on the blue jersey, there is no reason to care about any of these guys.
But as a fan, the feeling is similar.
This.
Saved me all the typing.
2. Lack of a pass rush
3. Significant injuries to starters
It's the formula for losing in the NFL. Each of these 3 creates a scenario where it's near impossible to win. Even having a mediocre QB (e.g. Kent Graham, Danny Kannell) can be overcome if these 3 areas don't occur.
I've been watching the Giants since 1973...and no this is not the worst roster I've ever seen, but the injuries to a thin Oline and no real edge rushers is killing this team.
Well said. Dead on. BTW, I've been watching the Giants since 1956.
An off-season of defensive adds, plus what, on paper, appeared to be a re-tooling of the offensive weapons + Barkley’s return … it all had me realistic but optimistic. I was hoping for a .500-ish season.
Even after two heart-breaking losses and an 0-3 start, I thought the team was on the fence and close to leading the division.
Today, I’ve pretty much resigned myself to watching for improvements, not getting Jones killed, and curiously looking out for what may be inevitable firings.
This is far from the worst team of my Giants-rooting lifetime. It is, however, the most baffling - starting with Patrick Graham and his toreador defense.
Very disappointing.
And they scored 40 points the next week and lost to the Browns 49-40. The offense was entertaining. Earl Morrall threw a 98 yard TD pass to Homer Jones, but they couldn't stop anyone Gave up 501 points in 14 games. Absolutely no pass rush. Lots of injuries too.Earl Morrall broke his wrist, Gary Wood steps in. He gets hurt, so they sign Tom Kennedy off the sandlots of Brooklyn. And of course they traded the number one pick plus other for Tarkenton. So they could not rebuild the defense. Wouldn't matter though as they were inept at drafting.
The 1970s had WRs lining up in 3 point stances LOL and it was harder to score points, the rules have softened now and we can’t crack more than 21 points consistently.
At least in 95, for example, even when 5-11, they hung in there with some of the best. They barely lost to SF, Green Bay, and Dallas. That team lost a lot of close games. In 96, they beat Dallas.
This team is so unwatchable.
Quote:
and lost a game to the Redskins 72-41. Their one victory, 13-10, also came against the Redskins. That was the worst Giants team of my lifetime.
And they scored 40 points the next week and lost to the Browns 49-40. The offense was entertaining. Earl Morrall threw a 98 yard TD pass to Homer Jones, but they couldn't stop anyone Gave up 501 points in 14 games. Absolutely no pass rush. Lots of injuries too.Earl Morrall broke his wrist, Gary Wood steps in. He gets hurt, so they sign Tom Kennedy off the sandlots of Brooklyn. And of course they traded the number one pick plus other for Tarkenton. So they could not rebuild the defense. Wouldn't matter though as they were inept at drafting.
They had 3 non losing seasons out of the 5 Tarkenton was here. He made them a lot better than they actually were. But they passed on a true rebuild and on taking Bob Griese.
"How the fuck did we lose to these goons? And we made Daniel Jones player of the week on top of everything!"
What is perplexing to me is that John Mara seems to be falling into that same trap as his father did. Making hap hazard moves that keeps setting the franchise back. Building or rebuilding ass backward doesn't work. Are these some of the worst teams in my lifetime. Not yet. But they are bad, real bad. And if Mara doesn't get his shit together it is quickly moving in that direction and not far behind.
The 2017 team would definitely beat the 2021 team.
That's without OBJ, Sterling Shepard, and even .... Brandon Marshall LOL
My head hurts just thinking of the awful football in the trenches between the two teams. Does one year's offensive line make the other years defensive line look good? Or the other way around?
I think the 2013 team had the worst line out of any of the Giants teams, I thought. Good God. Will Beatty at LT?
That 38-0 game against the Panthers I've never seen a QB sacked as fast as Eli was that day. The Greg Hardy game.
After the first game of the season, I was already camping, heading to the beach, enjoying the outdoor beauty of upstate rather than yelling at my TV for 3 hours.
I refuse to watch garbage product.
The Giants are garbage product and have been for years.