Net Wins Over losses; Net Point Differential
NFC East: -2 Wins; +24 Net Points
NFC North: -8 Wins; -144 Net Points
NFC South: 0 Wins; -4 Net Points
NFC West: +2 Wins; +161 Net Points
AFC East: -4 Wins; +32 Net Points
AFC North: +8 Wins; +50 Net Points
AFC South: -6 Wins; -132 Net Points
AFC West: +5 Wins; +4 Net Points
He didn't say the Giants are not still awful; he was merely making a point about the entire division as compared to other divisions...
Quote:
so...
He didn't say the Giants are not still awful; he was merely making a point about the entire division as compared to other divisions...
Thank goodness. We would have had to vilify him if he made such claims.
Yea, we suck.
Suck is what the Giants do well.
Maybe a new franchise name is in order, like the "New Jersey Sucks."
Why because the Eagles beat the Lions, Denver without their two starting Offensive Tackles, and the Saints without Winston, Kimara, Thomas, and their two starting offensive tackles?
The Eagles are a juggernaut now?
Quote:
so...
Yea, we suck.
Suck is what the Giants do well.
Maybe a new franchise name is in order, like the "New Jersey Sucks."
Call me a Cockeyed Optimist, but you can't disregard the FACT** that we are 2 offsides away from being 5-4. That lifts us from "sucks" all the way up to mediocre. And we haven't sniffed mediocre in a while, so it's a step...
** "Realists" might say that we wouldn't have beaten KC nonetheless - point of debate. The pic should have sealed it with the time remaining.
Buys time in the the pocket.
Will run for first downs on third down.
Not careless with the ball.
Jones is an excellent runner but does not protect himself well.He often leads with his head.
Hurts protects himself.
Quote:
so...
Yea, we suck.
Suck is what the Giants do well.
Maybe a new franchise name is in order, like the "New Jersey Sucks."
I'd love that name.
Quote:
so...
He didn't say the Giants are not still awful; he was merely making a point about the entire division as compared to other divisions...
i didn't say it either...
Quote:
In comment 15460458 Jimmy Googs said:
Quote:
so...
He didn't say the Giants are not still awful; he was merely making a point about the entire division as compared to other divisions...
Thank goodness. We would have had to vilify him if he made such claims.
Why vilify him if he did? Besides they wouldn't be claims...
Meadpwlands Midgets
Hackensack Horrors.
Quote:
Beating the Eagles 2x and WFT when looking at the 2nd half of the schedule might want to think again...
Why because the Eagles beat the Lions, Denver without their two starting Offensive Tackles, and the Saints without Winston, Kimara, Thomas, and their two starting offensive tackles?
The Eagles are a juggernaut now?
Do you think it takes a juggernaut to bring us down?
Quote:
In comment 15460485 GiantsRage2007 said:
Quote:
Beating the Eagles 2x and WFT when looking at the 2nd half of the schedule might want to think again...
Why because the Eagles beat the Lions, Denver without their two starting Offensive Tackles, and the Saints without Winston, Kimara, Thomas, and their two starting offensive tackles?
The Eagles are a juggernaut now?
Do you think it takes a juggernaut to bring us down?
That plus the Eagles kinda own us
Quote:
In comment 15460458 Jimmy Googs said:
Quote:
so...
Yea, we suck.
Suck is what the Giants do well.
Maybe a new franchise name is in order, like the "New Jersey Sucks."
Call me a Cockeyed Optimist, but you can't disregard the FACT** that we are 2 offsides away from being 5-4. That lifts us from "sucks" all the way up to mediocre. And we haven't sniffed mediocre in a while, so it's a step...
** "Realists" might say that we wouldn't have beaten KC nonetheless - point of debate. The pic should have sealed it with the time remaining.
pivo -- I like your perspective. The Dexter offsides that snatched defeat out of the jaws of victory still bothers me. A lot.
Without all the crazy O-line injuries, I think our record would be better. But the biggest downside to all these injuries is not IMO the lousy record, but rather being put in a position where the Giants cannot fairly assess whether or not Daniel Jones is the long term answer.
End of the day they lost those games and if the team was good they wouldn’t have even been in the situation that those offsides mattered.
Even the 48-yard missed field goal by WFT that they got to re-kick a bit closer. Yes, it was a disappointing result, but NFL kickers will make the 48 yard FG way more often than not anyway so...
Call me a Cockeyed Optimist, but you can't disregard the FACT** that we are 2 offsides away from being 5-4. That lifts us from "sucks" all the way up to mediocre. And we haven't sniffed mediocre in a while, so it's a step...
** "Realists" might say that we wouldn't have beaten KC nonetheless - point of debate. The pic should have sealed it with the time remaining.
Hi pivo,
Just one thing that people don't seem to understand/remember, Mahomes only threw that INT because it was a free play. So the INT wouldn't exist anyway.
But the Giants should've found a way to win at least 2 of the 3 games vs KC, WTF and ATL.
Quote:
Call me a Cockeyed Optimist, but you can't disregard the FACT** that we are 2 offsides away from being 5-4. That lifts us from "sucks" all the way up to mediocre. And we haven't sniffed mediocre in a while, so it's a step...
** "Realists" might say that we wouldn't have beaten KC nonetheless - point of debate. The pic should have sealed it with the time remaining.
Hi pivo,
Just one thing that people don't seem to understand/remember, Mahomes only threw that INT because it was a free play. So the INT wouldn't exist anyway.
But the Giants should've found a way to win at least 2 of the 3 games vs KC, WTF and ATL.
I don't know if that is true. He clearly had a window, Holmes an excelent recovery play. I can't say Mahommes would not have thrown it if he didn't know he had a free play.
I checked and found the typo in the original post. The NFC West is plus 7.
I checked and found the typo in the original post. The NFC West is plus 7.
Thanks Big Al for correction.
Quote:
Call me a Cockeyed Optimist, but you can't disregard the FACT** that we are 2 offsides away from being 5-4. That lifts us from "sucks" all the way up to mediocre. And we haven't sniffed mediocre in a while, so it's a step...
** "Realists" might say that we wouldn't have beaten KC nonetheless - point of debate. The pic should have sealed it with the time remaining.
Hi pivo,
Just one thing that people don't seem to understand/remember, Mahomes only threw that INT because it was a free play. So the INT wouldn't exist anyway.
But the Giants should've found a way to win at least 2 of the 3 games vs KC, WTF and ATL.
Mahomes head down was heading to the bench, he thought he had thrown an interception.
Quote:
In comment 15460536 pivo said:
Quote:
Call me a Cockeyed Optimist, but you can't disregard the FACT** that we are 2 offsides away from being 5-4. That lifts us from "sucks" all the way up to mediocre. And we haven't sniffed mediocre in a while, so it's a step...
** "Realists" might say that we wouldn't have beaten KC nonetheless - point of debate. The pic should have sealed it with the time remaining.
Hi pivo,
Just one thing that people don't seem to understand/remember, Mahomes only threw that INT because it was a free play. So the INT wouldn't exist anyway.
But the Giants should've found a way to win at least 2 of the 3 games vs KC, WTF and ATL.
Mahomes head down was heading to the bench, he thought he had thrown an interception.
Hi Joe,
Had to rewatch it to be sure my mind wasn't misremembering it, but after seeing the broadcast angle, and both All-22 angles, Mahomes is pointing at the flag half a second after he threw the pass.
He never "head down was heading to the bench", now I cannot be completely sure if he knew about the offsides cause his eyes weren't looking directly at it, but normally QB's of his caliber have a pretty good sense of when they have a free play and that pass looks realy reckless.
Regardless, even if the INT stands it's not game over like the WFT game. There was 4:22 on the clock and KC had 2 timeouts.
The record will show that is one more than last year...