for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Timing: the one thing that does bother me about the Garrett

Essex : 11/23/2021 2:48 pm
firing. You know its clear Judge was not happy with Garrett for sometime. I always found it weird how he would respond "no, not now" when asked about "coaching changes." He had two weeks to make this move, he really needed last night to see what we all have seen for 26 games. Now, we only have six days to get ready for the Eagles on a short week. Seems like with everything else around here the decision (although ultimately correct) was bungled on the timing of it.
Had the same thought  
cosmicj : 11/23/2021 2:50 pm : link
the timing counts as a mistake by Judge.
There is a lot of coaching experience in the room  
cjac : 11/23/2021 2:50 pm : link
i'm not worried about it.


I also couldnt go through one more game of Garrett, i like everything about this move. These 2 didnt really mesh from day one.
Maybe  
Andrew in Austin : 11/23/2021 2:51 pm : link
Mara told him to give Garrett one more game with all his "best" players back and healthy before he moved on?
they should have done it earlier  
Eric on Li : 11/23/2021 2:52 pm : link
i think they waited because they thought maybe Thomas/Barkley was the reason why the offense looked broken. But it's not. The scheme has been broken the whole time.
RE: Maybe  
Essex : 11/23/2021 2:53 pm : link
In comment 15464872 Andrew in Austin said:
Quote:
Mara told him to give Garrett one more game with all his "best" players back and healthy before he moved on?

Maybe, that is logical I guess. But, if the guy is literally on the edge of being fired, why not do it when you have two full weeks to acclimate your team to the change instead of a short work week.
RE: Had the same thought  
Mike in ramapo college : 11/23/2021 2:53 pm : link
In comment 15464869 cosmicj said:
Quote:
the timing counts as a mistake by Judge.


The timing is odd. The bye week is used to self evaluate and make changes. My uneducated guess is JJ has wanted to make this move, but was strongly encouraged to wait and see if anything changed after the bye week adjustments.
I think Judge wanted to be fair  
Lines of Scrimmage : 11/23/2021 2:53 pm : link
and get some of the players on the field for JG. I wouldn't be surprised if he had talked with Mara about this for some time.
Mara foisted Garrett on Judge  
Go Terps : 11/23/2021 2:53 pm : link
Judge had enough of it and reacted emotionally, because the logical time to fire Garrett was before the bye. Garrett was never Judge's guy.

Same as Jones was never Judge's quarterback, same as Gettleman was never Judge's GM, and so on.

This is the result of shitty, inept ownership that sets up a misaligned GM/coach relationship and then interferes in their jobs.

The problems don't leave with Garrett. This organization is a catastrophe.

RE: RE: Had the same thought  
Enzo : 11/23/2021 2:55 pm : link
In comment 15464876 Mike in ramapo college said:
Quote:
In comment 15464869 cosmicj said:


Quote:


the timing counts as a mistake by Judge.



The timing is odd. The bye week is used to self evaluate and make changes. My uneducated guess is JJ has wanted to make this move, but was strongly encouraged to wait and see if anything changed after the bye week adjustments.

Maybe. Or perhaps the front office and coaching staff is simply full of bumbling fools who are making this up as they go along.
RE: Mara foisted Garrett on Judge  
Essex : 11/23/2021 2:55 pm : link
In comment 15464879 Go Terps said:
Quote:
Judge had enough of it and reacted emotionally, because the logical time to fire Garrett was before the bye. Garrett was never Judge's guy.

Same as Jones was never Judge's quarterback, same as Gettleman was never Judge's GM, and so on.

This is the result of shitty, inept ownership that sets up a misaligned GM/coach relationship and then interferes in their jobs.

The problems don't leave with Garrett. This organization is a catastrophe.

The difference is that Judge has never really embraced Garrett publicly despite given many, many chances to do so. Judge has wholeheartedly embraced Jones from his ability to his work ethic. Judge is a guy who is very careful with everything he says and he clearly has some affection for Jones and never did for Garrett.
Perfect Timing IMO  
SirLoinOfBeef : 11/23/2021 2:59 pm : link
Now it gives them an excuse to suck against the Eagles. New OC, short week, etc., etc., etc....

Gonna get even worse. Players know the ship be sinking. But they're not the ones going anywhere- DG made sure of that with restructures. Time for on-field business decisions.
I suspect  
jvm52106 : 11/23/2021 3:02 pm : link
if the issue was ownership and management wanted Garrett then waiting for a FULL Offensive lineup (or as many as possible) and then for the offense to sputter, was needed to show things were not working.

Perhaps Judge isn't on the Jones train as some of us thought and with that Garrett as well.
RE: I suspect  
Essex : 11/23/2021 3:05 pm : link
In comment 15464903 jvm52106 said:
Quote:
if the issue was ownership and management wanted Garrett then waiting for a FULL Offensive lineup (or as many as possible) and then for the offense to sputter, was needed to show things were not working.

Perhaps Judge isn't on the Jones train as some of us thought and with that Garrett as well.

He was never on the Garrett train, though. He would never give him a vote of confidence. Every time the offense sputtered he would be asked about changes, and Judge would say "no, not now."
No one should assume this fixes everything  
LG in NYC : 11/23/2021 3:05 pm : link
or even most of the problems with this team.

But it is a big step in the right direction. I am now at least excited to watch Giants games for the next few weeks to see the differences in offensive approach.
The timing is submoronic.  
shockeyisthebest8056 : 11/23/2021 3:06 pm : link
But better late than never, I guess.
Do you know what Judge should have done...  
bw in dc : 11/23/2021 3:08 pm : link
weeks ago? Or even months ago...

Call his ex-coaching colleague in New England - Dante Scarnecchia - and give him a blank check to fix the OL. And I am pretty confident that DS has the skills to get this incompetent group close to being competent and functional. That was a better solution.

Like I said on another thread, I wish Kitchens the best of luck taking this house of cards "built" by Gettleman and trying to break the goal lime more than 1-2X per game.

RE: RE: Maybe  
Justlurking : 11/23/2021 3:15 pm : link
In comment 15464875 Essex said:
Quote:
In comment 15464872 Andrew in Austin said:


Quote:


Mara told him to give Garrett one more game with all his "best" players back and healthy before he moved on?


Maybe, that is logical I guess. But, if the guy is literally on the edge of being fired, why not do it when you have two full weeks to acclimate your team to the change instead of a short work week.


Agreed. Made no sense. Should’ve fired going into the bye.
It's not odd  
Josh in the City : 11/23/2021 3:18 pm : link
b/c it would have been very difficult to fire Garrett following the win before the bye. But I heard rumblings that Kitchens was MUCH more involved in the game planning the past few weeks so Judge was probably getting him ready to take over if/when needed. We'll see if the results are any different.
RE: It's not odd  
Essex : 11/23/2021 3:27 pm : link
In comment 15464954 Josh in the City said:
Quote:
b/c it would have been very difficult to fire Garrett following the win before the bye. But I heard rumblings that Kitchens was MUCH more involved in the game planning the past few weeks so Judge was probably getting him ready to take over if/when needed. We'll see if the results are any different.

Really? That is the silliest thing I have ever heard. This isn't a PR contest, if you think it is the best for your team you do it. Plus, it was not like the Giants went gangbusters against Oakland. They scored one offensive touchdown IIRC. Who says you can't make a coordinator change off a win, especially going into the buy. And, if Kitchens was involved in the planning of last night's gameplan, heaven help us all.
it seems like the writing was on the wall, and that  
japanhead : 11/23/2021 3:27 pm : link
garrett's comments about the marginal state of the OL and DL forced the issue. i understand not firing garrett after a win, even though jones only threw for like 100 yards v the raiders.

my issue is that if it's true that judge never wanted him in the first place, and allowed mara to force him in as his OC, that strikes me as gutless and reflects poorly on judge.

if true then judge effectively wasted a year and a half running an offense with an OC he never wanted in the first place.

what is the reasoning here? he didn't have the balls to say thanks but no thanks to mara because he was a new hire?

Pure speculation on my part  
Biteymax22 : 11/23/2021 3:39 pm : link
But I have to wonder if Judge and Garrett discussed some changes in strategy, personnel etc… that he wanted made during the bye week and Garrett made none of the adjustments when game time hit.
timing is always odd with this franchise.  
Dinger : 11/23/2021 3:40 pm : link
We wait too long to hire GMs we wait too long to hire HC's and we wait to long to fire OCs. Whatever.
RE: RE: It's not odd  
Josh in the City : 11/23/2021 4:19 pm : link
In comment 15464970 Essex said:
Quote:
In comment 15464954 Josh in the City said:


Quote:


b/c it would have been very difficult to fire Garrett following the win before the bye. But I heard rumblings that Kitchens was MUCH more involved in the game planning the past few weeks so Judge was probably getting him ready to take over if/when needed. We'll see if the results are any different.


Really? That is the silliest thing I have ever heard. This isn't a PR contest, if you think it is the best for your team you do it. Plus, it was not like the Giants went gangbusters against Oakland. They scored one offensive touchdown IIRC. Who says you can't make a coordinator change off a win, especially going into the buy. And, if Kitchens was involved in the planning of last night's gameplan, heaven help us all.

If you think that's the silliest thing you've ever heard then you have no idea what you're talking about.
RE: RE: RE: It's not odd  
Essex : 11/23/2021 4:20 pm : link
In comment 15465124 Josh in the City said:
Quote:
In comment 15464970 Essex said:


Quote:


In comment 15464954 Josh in the City said:


Quote:


b/c it would have been very difficult to fire Garrett following the win before the bye. But I heard rumblings that Kitchens was MUCH more involved in the game planning the past few weeks so Judge was probably getting him ready to take over if/when needed. We'll see if the results are any different.


Really? That is the silliest thing I have ever heard. This isn't a PR contest, if you think it is the best for your team you do it. Plus, it was not like the Giants went gangbusters against Oakland. They scored one offensive touchdown IIRC. Who says you can't make a coordinator change off a win, especially going into the buy. And, if Kitchens was involved in the planning of last night's gameplan, heaven help us all.


If you think that's the silliest thing you've ever heard then you have no idea what you're talking about.

you always know everything.
Think back to  
mittenedman : 11/23/2021 4:29 pm : link
how Garrett spouted off last week about the OL. It was very uncharacteristic. I'll bet something's been going on behind the scenes for a while now.
the only thing I can think to justify Garrett's firing is  
kdog77 : 11/23/2021 8:32 pm : link
the players telling Judge they are at disadvantage when Garret called plays because the D already knew what's coming. The 4th down roll-out in the beginning of the 3rd quarter was so obvious that even Eli commented that Bucs must have known that was the call. Never mind the personnel or execution, if the D knows the routes and protections then the Offense has no chance.
Back to the Corner