for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Safety Kyle Hamilton

TC : 1/6/2022 5:41 pm
ND Safety, Kyle Hamilton. Would you consider him with the Giants 1st pick? Crazy, I know, but I might. Not just the numbers but watching him play. The numbers? 6'4", 220, 4.4. Quick twitch, reads O's like a pro, hits like a truck. I'd hate to be the QB who has to complete passes with him in the defensive backfield. With he and McKinney? LIGHTS OUT!

Is there such a thing as a shut down safety?

Obligatory highlight video - ( New Window )
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
Nope.  
Matt M. : 1/6/2022 5:48 pm : link
I really like him as a player, but not even close to a strong need.
I could live with it.  
jamalduff123 : 1/6/2022 5:50 pm : link
Some people have him as the best prospect in the draft. There will be good O-linemen available at our 2nd 1st rounder.
RE: Nope.  
TC : 1/6/2022 5:53 pm : link
In comment 15533179 Matt M. said:
Quote:
I really like him as a player, but not even close to a strong need.

I can't disagree. But then there's the thing about BPA. Frankly I'd be surprised if the first 5 picks aren't some combination of OL, DL/ER & DB in this particular draft.
I'll add that if . . . .  
TC : 1/6/2022 5:57 pm : link
this kind of talent is still there at the Giants 2nd, 1st round pick, I'd be even more likely to.
Let Black Picasso paint  
giantBCP : 1/6/2022 6:07 pm : link
If we're seeing better return on our investment on the defensive side of the ball, then why not invest your resources there?
RE: Nope.  
Gatorade Dunk : 1/6/2022 6:09 pm : link
In comment 15533179 Matt M. said:
Quote:
I really like him as a player, but not even close to a strong need.

And we should definitely keep drafting for need.

It has been a major benefit to our roster for the past decade.
RE: Let Black Picasso paint  
Gatorade Dunk : 1/6/2022 6:10 pm : link
In comment 15533203 giantBCP said:
Quote:
If we're seeing better return on our investment on the defensive side of the ball, then why not invest your resources there?

Ok, @Mustanglover_, we get it. You can retreat to your cave now.
draft  
Hilary : 1/6/2022 6:10 pm : link
the giants can take Hamilton or Karlaftis at 5 and pick O line with the bears pick and in the second and third round
It depends how good he is  
Producer : 1/6/2022 6:11 pm : link
Are we talking Kenny Easley / Ronnie Lott good?
Those are  
OlyWABigBlue : 1/6/2022 6:18 pm : link
Kam Chancellor numbers but with a better timed speed.
No! The Giants OL has more glaring needs, fix that first then you can  
Jack Stroud : 1/6/2022 6:30 pm : link
shop around for other positions.
RE: Nope.  
prdave73 : 1/6/2022 6:36 pm : link
In comment 15533179 Matt M. said:
Quote:
I really like him as a player, but not even close to a strong need.



Agree 1000%
I’m surprised this question is even asked..
Like him as a player  
LoveFootball : 1/6/2022 6:39 pm : link
Hard pass.
If BPA I guess  
Ned In Atlanta : 1/6/2022 6:42 pm : link
But at some point it be great to field a halfway decent OL.
Absolutely.  
section125 : 1/6/2022 6:45 pm : link
I think Logan Ryan is beginning to lose it a touch and he is in his 30s. If Hamilton is there and he is the top guy then take him. I think this guy could be a game changer. If you think McKinney can cover ground, wait til you see Hamilton and at 6'4 214 lbs, he should be big enough to cover TEs.
Love Hamilton.  
SFGFNCGiantsFan : 1/6/2022 6:47 pm : link
But I really hope we go OL.
RE: RE: Let Black Picasso paint  
giantBCP : 1/6/2022 7:08 pm : link
In comment 15533209 Gatorade Dunk said:
Quote:
In comment 15533203 giantBCP said:


Quote:


If we're seeing better return on our investment on the defensive side of the ball, then why not invest your resources there?


Ok, @Mustanglover_, we get it. You can retreat to your cave now.


Surely you jest?
Would you pick Ed Reed if he was here?  
armstead98 : 1/6/2022 7:14 pm : link
Not saying Hamilton is Reed but it feels as if everyone is dismissing him outright because of the position.

I'd probably take Ed Reed if he was there at 5 so I want to hear just how good he really is, or isn't.
I don't care if he was touched by  
Bill in UT : 1/6/2022 7:23 pm : link
the hand of God. Safety is probably our strongest position. If we take him we're going to have one of our better players sitting on the bench. Go with a position of need.
The team is desperately in need of exceptional talent  
ij_reilly : 1/6/2022 7:23 pm : link
Isn't Kyle that kind of player?

I'm biased, I'm familiar with him and his family. Good folks. Kyle can handle NYC.
I'd have no problem taking him or Stingley...  
Capt. Don : 1/6/2022 7:28 pm : link
as long as the other pick is OL.
If he’s that good, absolutely.  
Section331 : 1/6/2022 7:35 pm : link
You don’t pass up the next Ed Reed because you have Logan Ryan (who I like).
Since  
DG_89 : 1/6/2022 7:46 pm : link
we'll end up with 2 top 10 picks it wouldn't bother me too much. When you look at the group, Peppers may not be re-signed, Ryan is long in the tooth and Love is best used as a sub-package/spot duty starter. McKinney is the only sure thing. We could draft him then go OL with the Bears pick. It's like so many think we won't address the line in the pre-draft wave of free agency
RE: Would you pick Ed Reed if he was here?  
Producer : 1/6/2022 7:51 pm : link
In comment 15533294 armstead98 said:
Quote:
Not saying Hamilton is Reed but it feels as if everyone is dismissing him outright because of the position.

I'd probably take Ed Reed if he was there at 5 so I want to hear just how good he really is, or isn't.


If he's Ed Reed or Ronnie Lott then you consider picking him at #5 or trade out of the slot because somebody will pay a lot to get him.
If he is that valuable then  
Giantimistic : 1/6/2022 7:58 pm : link
trade out.

We cannot walk out of this draft without a few high quality oline.

We must rebuild the oline. For those of you who want a new QB, maybe even drafting one this year or next, they have no chance and can be ruined or injured if we do not build an oline.

I like Toney, but the pick should have been an online and if we didn't like the value at that point we should have a traded down again.

 
ryanmkeane : 1/6/2022 7:58 pm : link
he’s a rare athlete and a very good player. I’d absolutely take him.
This roster is not in any kind of condition to rule out a position  
j_rud : 1/6/2022 8:03 pm : link
based on "need". What they need is a serious injection of game-changing talent. Hamilton looks to be a game changing talent and should absolutely be in the conversation.

For the record: it would be great if an OL was far and away the top graded player available when we pick. But if that isn't the case you go with the more talented player. People want to shout about need, well that's how you end up with the Ereck Flowers and Justin Pughs of the world.
 
ryanmkeane : 1/6/2022 8:07 pm : link
pairing Hamilton with McKinney would be game changing for this defense
RE: …  
Bill in UT : 1/6/2022 8:15 pm : link
In comment 15533349 ryanmkeane said:
Quote:
pairing Hamilton with McKinney would be game changing for this defense


With the pass rush we have, even they can't cover for 10 seconds
If Gettleman or Abrams is the GM  
Doubledeuce22 : 1/6/2022 8:27 pm : link
This will be the pick and my remote will go through the TV. Absolutely not. Both lines need to be fixed. The Giants don’t have the luxury of picking a safety/slot corner with a premium pick.
Every one knows we have  
cokeduplt : 1/6/2022 8:33 pm : link
To fix the online but we have two first round picks. If he’s a true can’t miss difference maker you pick him.
If Hamilton grades out at elite, say 8.9  
j_rud : 1/6/2022 8:40 pm : link
and Neal or another lineman top out at 7.8 or even 8 are you still taking the lineman? This roster has a couple really good players. Adding another potentially really good player at the expense of a potentially great player is going to give us more of the same.

And this isn't exactly an argument for Hamilton per se but for building the roster in general. There's not a single exceptional player on this roster right now. Not a one. That absolutely has to change regardless of what the biggest need is.
RE: Every one knows we have  
Doubledeuce22 : 1/6/2022 8:40 pm : link
In comment 15533383 cokeduplt said:
Quote:
To fix the online but we have two first round picks. If he’s a true can’t miss difference maker you pick him.


Nobody is a can’t miss player. See: Saquon Barkley. You don’t take a safety this high in the draft unless the team is ready to win now. The Giants already have 2 good safeties.
RE: RE: Every one knows we have  
cokeduplt : 1/6/2022 8:42 pm : link
In comment 15533395 Doubledeuce22 said:
Quote:
In comment 15533383 cokeduplt said:


Quote:


To fix the online but we have two first round picks. If he’s a true can’t miss difference maker you pick him.



Nobody is a can’t miss player. See: Saquon Barkley. You don’t take a safety this high in the draft unless the team is ready to win now. The Giants already have 2 good safeties.



There are plenty of can’t misses in history. Drafting Oline for the sake of it is how you end up with Ereck Flowers. I’m not advocating for Hamilton but it
Shouldn’t be dismissed.
RE: RE: RE: Every one knows we have  
Doubledeuce22 : 1/6/2022 8:52 pm : link
In comment 15533399 cokeduplt said:
Quote:
In comment 15533395 Doubledeuce22 said:


Quote:


In comment 15533383 cokeduplt said:


Quote:


To fix the online but we have two first round picks. If he’s a true can’t miss difference maker you pick him.



Nobody is a can’t miss player. See: Saquon Barkley. You don’t take a safety this high in the draft unless the team is ready to win now. The Giants already have 2 good safeties.




There are plenty of can’t misses in history. Drafting Oline for the sake of it is how you end up with Ereck Flowers. I’m not advocating for Hamilton but it
Shouldn’t be dismissed.


Nobody is a can’t miss. They all have to go make themselves. Go look at the Ed Reed draft. HOF safety drafted in the late teens by the Ravens. Bryant McKinney was drafted high in the 1st round. I would rather the Giants have the pro bowl OT than the HOF safety because safety is the least important position in todays NFL defense and a HOF safety adds exactly zero wins to this team right now. Safety is a position that you add that puts you over the top. Not one that you build around anymore.
 
ryanmkeane : 1/6/2022 9:04 pm : link
I can’t believe some of us here are still saying things like just take OL or just take DL.

We gotta take the best players. Period.
RE: …  
Doubledeuce22 : 1/6/2022 9:07 pm : link
In comment 15533433 ryanmkeane said:
Quote:
I can’t believe some of us here are still saying things like just take OL or just take DL.

We gotta take the best players. Period.


BPA does not always apply. Do you think if the BPA was a RB that they should take a RB? We all saw how that has worked out. BPA does not always apply especially when both lines are broken. You cannot be competing this league with a horrible OL, pass rush, and QB.
RE: RE: …  
cokeduplt : 1/6/2022 9:11 pm : link
In comment 15533435 Doubledeuce22 said:
Quote:
In comment 15533433 ryanmkeane said:


Quote:


I can’t believe some of us here are still saying things like just take OL or just take DL.

We gotta take the best players. Period.



BPA does not always apply. Do you think if the BPA was a RB that they should take a RB? We all saw how that has worked out. BPA does not always apply especially when both lines are broken. You cannot be competing this league with a horrible OL, pass rush, and QB.



Ok I’d rather have Ronnie Lott than Ereck Flowers. Your logic is horribly flawed.
RE: …  
cokeduplt : 1/6/2022 9:12 pm : link
In comment 15533433 ryanmkeane said:
Quote:
I can’t believe some of us here are still saying things like just take OL or just take DL.

We gotta take the best players. Period.


Especially since we’re no where close to competing.
Kids upside is Ed Reed  
Metnut : 1/6/2022 9:16 pm : link
If you take him and a stud OL, you’ve vastly improved the team with those picks. You can always trade McKinney for another OL or an Edge, or draft pick, or keep them both and try to move Ryan to clear some cap room.

A good GM and coach can make it work. I doubt Hamilton will be available with our pick anyway, I think he’s going to the Jets.
Take the best players.  
ajr2456 : 1/6/2022 9:17 pm : link
This team needs talent
Double  
ryanmkeane : 1/6/2022 9:18 pm : link
picking in the top 10 of the draft - you need those players to be pro bowl fixtures. Picking based on need can lead to disaster, or can lead to taking a guy who is just OK instead of a player who can be an all pro. If the value lines up - absolutely - take the tackle or the guard or whatever. But if not, you take the best player.

But if you have Kyle Hamilton as a top 4 player in the draft and Evan Neal as the 10th best player, you take Hamilton every time. And then with the other pick, take the best player again. If we go defense, defense with our first two picks, is anyone going to be mad? No. We need great talent on this team. If Hamilton and Stingley are considered superior talents, you take both of them.
There’s nothing wrong with  
ajr2456 : 1/6/2022 9:26 pm : link
Taking Hamilton and Dean with a second round OT and signing Laken Tomlinson if he hits the market. There’s multiple ways to improve the OL.
RE: Take the best players.  
cokeduplt : 1/6/2022 9:27 pm : link
In comment 15533454 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
This team needs talent


This is the bottom line
RE: RE: RE: …  
Doubledeuce22 : 1/6/2022 9:39 pm : link
In comment 15533445 cokeduplt said:
Quote:
In comment 15533435 Doubledeuce22 said:


Quote:


In comment 15533433 ryanmkeane said:


Quote:


I can’t believe some of us here are still saying things like just take OL or just take DL.

We gotta take the best players. Period.



BPA does not always apply. Do you think if the BPA was a RB that they should take a RB? We all saw how that has worked out. BPA does not always apply especially when both lines are broken. You cannot be competing this league with a horrible OL, pass rush, and QB.




Ok I’d rather have Ronnie Lott than Ereck Flowers. Your logic is horribly flawed.


You’re not guaranteed Ronnie Lott at all. I’d rather whiff trying on an OL than I would whiff on a meaningless safety/slot corner. This team does not have the luxury of drafting a safety not after spending a 2nd round pick and investing money in another one. It’s a gross misuse of draft capital and a decision that a horrible GM like Dave Gettleman would do. You want the same trash results? That’s what it would be.
i would definitely take him if he's the best player  
markky : 1/6/2022 9:40 pm : link
we need talent. we're not going to compete next year. maybe even not the year after that. if we just draft for need we'll guarantee that we're not building a championship team.
RE: RE: Take the best players.  
Doubledeuce22 : 1/6/2022 9:41 pm : link
In comment 15533467 cokeduplt said:
Quote:
In comment 15533454 ajr2456 said:


Quote:


This team needs talent



This is the bottom line


Wrong. Absolutely wrong. If a QB was the BPA do you think the Jags would take him? Nope. If KC somehow had the 1st pick and a QB was the BPA are they taking a QB? Nope. Just look at the Saquon Barkley pick. It’s evidence enough to use a combination of BPA and need at the same time.
Double  
ryanmkeane : 1/6/2022 9:48 pm : link
clearly there is some nuance needed - such as - if you have Patrick Mahomes you aren’t taking a QB.

The point is - if your team sucks - you need to draft the best football players.

If the Giants went to the SB twice in a row and lost each time because they didn’t have a pass rush then yeah, you might consider the edge rusher over another position.

The entire team besides the left tackle and the safety cannot be considered part of the long term plan. Draft the best fucking players and be done with it.
And yeah  
ryanmkeane : 1/6/2022 9:50 pm : link
the new GM might think Kenny Pickett is a top 5 player in the draft. If so, take him. Great.

However, if he’s mid tier and you’ve got an all world athlete on defense sitting there for you, you take him instead.
RE: RE: RE: Take the best players.  
cokeduplt : 1/6/2022 9:51 pm : link
In comment 15533492 Doubledeuce22 said:
Quote:
In comment 15533467 cokeduplt said:


Quote:


In comment 15533454 ajr2456 said:


Quote:


This team needs talent



This is the bottom line



Wrong. Absolutely wrong. If a QB was the BPA do you think the Jags would take him? Nope. If KC somehow had the 1st pick and a QB was the BPA are they taking a QB? Nope. Just look at the Saquon Barkley pick. It’s evidence enough to use a combination of BPA and need at the same time.



Then u trade down in those scenarios QB is different
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner