I mean who are the Maras and Tisches listening to? Who is giving them real insight as to strengths and weaknesses of the candidates? Is it conceivable Abrams and/or Petit or other DG cronies are involved? Who is the adult in the room? We know that ownership are not knowledgeable football people. So who is guiding this process? Can't fall back on Accorsi anymore. Parcells? What confidence can fans have that this is done right? What guardrails are there for ownership not to continue their own disastrous decision making of the past ten years?
Yes, it's up to them to make the final decision but the question was "Who is giving them real insight as to strengths and weaknesses of the candidates?"
Quote:
I think it's up to Mara and Tisch////
Yes, it's up to them to make the final decision but the question was "Who is giving them real insight as to strengths and weaknesses of the candidates?"
Thank you sphinx. Anak, of course it's up to Mara and Tisch for the decision on the hire, doh, but as far as BBI has heard or the beats are saying, has ownership enlisted a real football person to vet the candidates and the process?
Good News is they have gone outside the building. They can listen to these 9 people, see what they say is needed to turn this mess around, compare criticisms and concurrences, see where they differ from the candidates, where the candidates agree and disagree. Using the outside opinions, they can draw conclusions and see where the strongest opinions are.
It cannot be easy. But they have a very strong list of candidates and will have a better GM then they have had since Accorsi. I also would not be surprised if they have opinions from other owners they have great relationships with.
Do you expect something different from the Giants?
Pretty much all their former FO types have disqualified themselves. Is Parcells too long removed from the game? Who has the independence and the stature to be able to talk straight with John?
Agree
It cannot be easy. But they have a very strong list of candidates and will have a better GM then they have had since Accorsi. I also would not be surprised if they have opinions from other owners they have great relationships with.
It's an interesting point re other owners: Kraft/BB prolly out because of Judge, Rooneys/Halas's are mired in their own imminent transition issues, who does Mara see as his 'peers' to consult? Can't be an NFC East team owner.
Last time they were criticized for having Acorsi a part of their past success, be part of the process. This time there is concern they don’t have someone else they trust helping them make the decision.
It s all very confusing.
Do you expect something different from the Giants?
Last time they were criticized for having Acorsi a part of their past success, be part of the process. This time there is concern they don’t have someone else they trust helping them make the decision.
It s all very confusing.
This is, yet again, an enormous fork in the road: that's why I am wondering if there is an outside voice as the adult in the room with whom ownership can feel comfortable vetting their thought processes with.
Quote:
And ended up with Gettleman. Terrible. Let them make the choice.
Agree
The Maras have been around football all their lives. I'm sure they will solicit advice from others in the business before making the final decision, but it's not like they are fast food franchisors that own a football team.
But presumably as VP of Personnel he has contacts with others in his position.
I also bet Tim McDonald giving his 2 cents since he wants to make sure next GM isn't looking for performance but only looking for nice people.
Obviously, I want a John Wayne type to stride through the barroom swinging doors and say, "I'm in control here." ):
Fantasy.
Obviously, I want a John Wayne type to stride through the barroom swinging doors and say, "I'm in control here." ):
Fantasy.
Isn't that what Gettleman did? "I'm going to come in and kick butt..."
Quote:
This time there is concern they are interviewing too many.
Last time they were criticized for having Acorsi a part of their past success, be part of the process. This time there is concern they don’t have someone else they trust helping them make the decision.
It s all very confusing.
True what you say, but do you not have the same concern? Should we as fans give Mara/Tisch benefit of the doubt--this time? I don't.
I don’t. Seems like consensus is the bank of candidates is pretty strong
I'm sure Mara/Tisch are like any other owners who need to hire consultants/engineers/planners/etc. You have prospective employees interview/submit qualifications and the one who has the best plan or aligns best with their vision is more than likely to be hired. Fit is important, see Flores firing in Miami.
The best person for the job and the best fit don't always overlap.
From John's perspective, it makes sense, it's 'comfortable--aligning with what BH28 says above, if I understand him correctly, and Dave seems as if you buy into that, to a certain extent. I would think ownership should want a credible, new voice in the room.
Aren't familiarity and comfort--can those be seen as "fit"--what got the Giants in the doormat mess the franchise is in?
The best person for the job and the best fit don't always overlap.
If they truly start with a list of 9 qualified people, there is only so bad they can mess up. Worst case scenario they hire the least of 9 qualified people.
- Interviewing is interviewing - just like any other job. It's an imperfect process, always, bit you structure it in a way to get as much real info as possible. It's just like any interview in any other part of life. If you own or run a business, the candidate should be more of an expert than you. Doesn't matter if you're hiring for a GM, a cloud architect, someone to source ingredients for your restaurants, whatever. This is all normal stuff that any manager, exec, or business owner does constantly