Of Randle, RJ and Fournier? Fournier should move to the bench, put Grimes in the starting lineup. He can be a better version of what they started in Bullock last year.
Of Randle, RJ and Fournier? Fournier should move to the bench, put Grimes in the starting lineup. He can be a better version of what they started in Bullock last year.
From your lips to Thibs ears
RE: At what point does this guy figure out he has to break up the trio
Of Randle, RJ and Fournier? Fournier should move to the bench, put Grimes in the starting lineup. He can be a better version of what they started in Bullock last year.
its never going to happen, how many 10 point deficits did the team get into last year befoee he changed the starting lineup?
Thibs is to stubborn, the team was up 13 with 6 minutes left in the 2nd and he started making subs, for what?
Leon needs to make a trade, when fully healthy there is 12 guys that want and need minutes..
Rose needs to alleviate that, Team played its best with a 9 man rotation
I think it has to be Kemba.
I think ideally the rotation is Mitch, Randle, RJ, Grimes, real PG. Then off the bench you have Rose, Quickley, Reddish, Noel. Anyone else is fair game to be sent packing.
Leon needs to make a trade, when fully healthy there is 12 guys that want and need minutes..
Rose needs to alleviate that, Team played its best with a 9 man rotation
I think it has to be Kemba.
I think ideally the rotation is Mitch, Randle, RJ, Grimes, real PG. Then off the bench you have Rose, Quickley, Reddish, Noel. Anyone else is fair game to be sent packing.
Leon needs to make a trade, when fully healthy there is 12 guys that want and need minutes..
Rose needs to alleviate that, Team played its best with a 9 man rotation
I think it has to be Kemba.
I think ideally the rotation is Mitch, Randle, RJ, Grimes, real PG. Then off the bench you have Rose, Quickley, Reddish, Noel. Anyone else is fair game to be sent packing.
agreed, although i think eventually Reddiah will be the starter next to Rj..
anything from his embarrassing play in last season’s playoffs. This just may be what he is. Which is fine, but not a player to rely on to carry the team.
I'm always thankful when the Knicks go virtually a whole game
anything from his embarrassing play in last season’s playoffs. This just may be what he is. Which is fine, but not a player to rely on to carry the team.
Agreed. Plus he's a choker in the big moment. FTs at the end of games, game winning shots, etc. Can't trust him to rise to the moment.
The good news is that RJ seems like the exact opposite.
Randle said it was the Knicks not making him available
Fred Katz
@FredKatz
·
12m
RJ Barrett on if he feels like he can carry the Knicks at a high level: "I don’t feel like I’ve done anything so far…I’m hungry."
I'd do Barnes for Randle straight up tbh. Think we can get a first too though.
Dude... why...that’s a paltry return. Calm down.
He's a losing player. We're better off without him.
Disagree. How is he a losing player but everyone else here isn’t? Randle is the biggest (player) reason why this team has won games the last two seasons. Now he’s the reason why we’re not winning?
I guess we ignore the rebounding and other things Randle does. He holds the ball sometimes so he’s a cancer here. My god man.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Randle said it was the Knicks not making him available
Disagree. How is he a losing player but everyone else here isn’t? Randle is the biggest (player) reason why this team has won games the last two seasons. Now he’s the reason why we’re not winning?
I guess we ignore the rebounding and other things Randle does. He holds the ball sometimes so he’s a cancer here. My god man.
Not saying everyone here is a winning player. I'd say Fournier is a losing player too. But did you watch the playoffs last year? You're sticking with that guy?
and didnt control the entire offense i would agree with DJM, but he doesnt, he is in every action of the offense, ao when he is constantly turning it over, making bad shots then yeah he is a big reason why the team is losing gamea...
He is a great rebounder and when he is in control he is a good passer but he just turns it over to much..
If i am offered a way to get rid of his contract and get an asset i am ptobably doing it
And also did the same ISO bullshit he does at the end of every game, where he gets double teamed and has no idea how to handle it. Teams know this, and will ramp it up in the playoffs (as we saw last season). Plus, he’s becoming a bit of a malcontent.
I'd do Barnes for Randle straight up tbh. Think we can get a first too though.
Dude... why...that’s a paltry return. Calm down.
He's a losing player. We're better off without him.
Disagree. How is he a losing player but everyone else here isn’t? Randle is the biggest (player) reason why this team has won games the last two seasons. Now he’s the reason why we’re not winning?
I guess we ignore the rebounding and other things Randle does. He holds the ball sometimes so he’s a cancer here. My god man.
I'm assuming you have not watched many Knicks games this season.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Randle said it was the Knicks not making him available
Reddish probable
I know its a back to back and thats why they are doing it but it says something that the Knicks had 2 days off and Kemba still has to sit
is it Kemba? or is it just on both of them to figure it the f out?
What was the hang time on that? holy shit
Quote:
.
is it Kemba? or is it just on both of them to figure it the f out?
Kemba and Randle just don't share well it seems like. Too much alpha?
You let the starters keep going even if they are playing bad but the bench you have quick hooks even though they are playing well, makes no sense
jist stand out there..
From your lips to Thibs ears
its never going to happen, how many 10 point deficits did the team get into last year befoee he changed the starting lineup?
Thibs is to stubborn, the team was up 13 with 6 minutes left in the 2nd and he started making subs, for what?
he just cant play point guard, we saw at the end of the half when Clippers turned uo oressure Knicks had nothing..
Rose needs to alleviate that, Team played its best with a 9 man rotation
Rose needs to alleviate that, Team played its best with a 9 man rotation
I think it has to be Kemba.
Quote:
Leon needs to make a trade, when fully healthy there is 12 guys that want and need minutes..
Rose needs to alleviate that, Team played its best with a 9 man rotation
I think it has to be Kemba.
It has to be more than Kemba, you traded for a guy that wanted more minutes..
You have Grimes who deserves more minutes..
Fournier you gave a big ckntract..
To much of a logjam
Quote:
Leon needs to make a trade, when fully healthy there is 12 guys that want and need minutes..
Rose needs to alleviate that, Team played its best with a 9 man rotation
I think it has to be Kemba.
I think ideally the rotation is Mitch, Randle, RJ, Grimes, real PG. Then off the bench you have Rose, Quickley, Reddish, Noel. Anyone else is fair game to be sent packing.
Quote:
In comment 15569286 nygiants16 said:
Quote:
Leon needs to make a trade, when fully healthy there is 12 guys that want and need minutes..
Rose needs to alleviate that, Team played its best with a 9 man rotation
I think it has to be Kemba.
I think ideally the rotation is Mitch, Randle, RJ, Grimes, real PG. Then off the bench you have Rose, Quickley, Reddish, Noel. Anyone else is fair game to be sent packing.
Agreed. I'd keep Deuce as Rose insurance.
Quote:
In comment 15569286 nygiants16 said:
Quote:
Leon needs to make a trade, when fully healthy there is 12 guys that want and need minutes..
Rose needs to alleviate that, Team played its best with a 9 man rotation
I think it has to be Kemba.
I think ideally the rotation is Mitch, Randle, RJ, Grimes, real PG. Then off the bench you have Rose, Quickley, Reddish, Noel. Anyone else is fair game to be sent packing.
agreed, although i think eventually Reddiah will be the starter next to Rj..
Love Reddish, Tracy Mcgrady upaide
got mauled
He never gets pissed like that. Refs fucked up
and come on Thibs time for a sub, guys getting a little tired, lets go
Rj has been playing damn well but can we not kill his legs?
Rj has been playing damn well but can we not kill his legs?
I know what you're saying is probably right, but I just love watching RJ play with the bench.
Quote:
you got a back to back and up 10, lets make himhim play 40 minutes today and then 35 to 40 tomorrow..
Rj has been playing damn well but can we not kill his legs?
I know what you're saying is probably right, but I just love watching RJ play with the bench.
I do to, its why Thibs needs to stagger minutes better
easily
Yup and will probably have some tired legs tomorrow
Agreed. Plus he's a choker in the big moment. FTs at the end of games, game winning shots, etc. Can't trust him to rise to the moment.
The good news is that RJ seems like the exact opposite.
He's such a pussy.
No killer instinct.
Trade him for whatever you can get.
I'd do Barnes for Randle straight up tbh. Think we can get a first too though.
@FredKatz
·
12m
RJ Barrett on if he feels like he can carry the Knicks at a high level: "I don’t feel like I’ve done anything so far…I’m hungry."
Randle needs to be gone by then.
Quote:
not him skipping on the media
He's such a pussy.
No killer instinct.
Trade him for whatever you can get.
I'd do Barnes for Randle straight up tbh. Think we can get a first too though.
Dude... why...that’s a paltry return. Calm down.
Can i join the Rj bandwagon? if i am not allowed i understand
Can i join the Rj bandwagon? if i am not allowed i understand
Welcome aboard brother.
Quote:
In comment 15569535 nygiants16 said:
Quote:
not him skipping on the media
He's such a pussy.
No killer instinct.
Trade him for whatever you can get.
I'd do Barnes for Randle straight up tbh. Think we can get a first too though.
Dude... why...that’s a paltry return. Calm down.
He's a losing player. We're better off without him.
Ok. Sure...
Agreed. It was bizarre. He could have easily had 40.
And he ended up 28/14/6 1 block and 1 TO.
I think he missed 5 shots basically at the rim after he got tired in 4th. Just couldn’t finish like he had been all game.
Quote:
In comment 15569542 adamg said:
Quote:
In comment 15569535 nygiants16 said:
Quote:
not him skipping on the media
He's such a pussy.
No killer instinct.
Trade him for whatever you can get.
I'd do Barnes for Randle straight up tbh. Think we can get a first too though.
Dude... why...that’s a paltry return. Calm down.
He's a losing player. We're better off without him.
Disagree. How is he a losing player but everyone else here isn’t? Randle is the biggest (player) reason why this team has won games the last two seasons. Now he’s the reason why we’re not winning?
I guess we ignore the rebounding and other things Randle does. He holds the ball sometimes so he’s a cancer here. My god man.
Disagree. How is he a losing player but everyone else here isn’t? Randle is the biggest (player) reason why this team has won games the last two seasons. Now he’s the reason why we’re not winning?
I guess we ignore the rebounding and other things Randle does. He holds the ball sometimes so he’s a cancer here. My god man.
Not saying everyone here is a winning player. I'd say Fournier is a losing player too. But did you watch the playoffs last year? You're sticking with that guy?
He is a great rebounder and when he is in control he is a good passer but he just turns it over to much..
If i am offered a way to get rid of his contract and get an asset i am ptobably doing it
And also did the same ISO bullshit he does at the end of every game, where he gets double teamed and has no idea how to handle it. Teams know this, and will ramp it up in the playoffs (as we saw last season). Plus, he’s becoming a bit of a malcontent.
I fucking hate that son of a bitch
Quote:
In comment 15569571 djm said:
Quote:
In comment 15569542 adamg said:
Quote:
In comment 15569535 nygiants16 said:
Quote:
not him skipping on the media
He's such a pussy.
No killer instinct.
Trade him for whatever you can get.
I'd do Barnes for Randle straight up tbh. Think we can get a first too though.
Dude... why...that’s a paltry return. Calm down.
He's a losing player. We're better off without him.
Disagree. How is he a losing player but everyone else here isn’t? Randle is the biggest (player) reason why this team has won games the last two seasons. Now he’s the reason why we’re not winning?
I guess we ignore the rebounding and other things Randle does. He holds the ball sometimes so he’s a cancer here. My god man.
I'm assuming you have not watched many Knicks games this season.
I'm assuming you have not watched many Knicks games this season.
Seriously, it's like he stopped watching the Knicks since right before the playoffs last year.
Randle for Lebron straight up
He needs to bench him.