This account is legit. Even thought we're not currently compliant with Rooney rules.
@nflrums
#BREAKING
The New York Giants are expected to offer Brian Daboll their head coaching job per league source.
#TogetherBlue Twitter - ( New Window )
This is a tried and true Twitter practice by these anon accounts. They "break news" by reporting on what's rumored and most of us would guess would be the case. Then they pat themselves on the back for being first. If they miss, they just delete and move on to the next obvious prediction.
This is a tried and true Twitter practice by these anon accounts. They "break news" by reporting on what's rumored and most of us would guess would be the case. Then they pat themselves on the back for being first. If they miss, they just delete and move on to the next obvious prediction.
I'm not going to pretend to know who is behind it but I've been following that account for month. Look at the history of the tweets along with it's followers. It most certainly is legit.
This is a tried and true Twitter practice by these anon accounts. They "break news" by reporting on what's rumored and most of us would guess would be the case. Then they pat themselves on the back for being first. If they miss, they just delete and move on to the next obvious prediction.
I'm not going to pretend to know who is behind it but I've been following that account for month. Look at the history of the tweets along with it's followers. It most certainly is legit.
The same account follows 31k+ people. It's a tactic to pick up high follower numbers. All of these rando accounts always seem to miss the breaking news that comes out of nowhere. It's the incarceratedbob playbook.
RE: This being leaked before the Rooney Rule is satisfied is a bad look
I’m sure they will interview Flores in person still. Seems Quinn has other options.
Either Flores or Frazier will need an in person interview. Graham doesn't satisfy the requirement because he is an internal candidate.
And the purpose of the rule is to get minority candidates in front of decision makers and expand their personal networks. In that respect it is not obsolete.
and "expected" in unspecific and lacks meaningful details. Truth is, this is so lacking in terms of meaningful details that the probability of it actually happening is only marginally more likely to happen if whoever posted this actually did hear something verses if they made it up.
This is a tried and true Twitter practice by these anon accounts. They "break news" by reporting on what's rumored and most of us would guess would be the case. Then they pat themselves on the back for being first. If they miss, they just delete and move on to the next obvious prediction.
Correct, this is what guys like Incarcerated Bob have done for years. They have no sources but claim they do by listing the most likely candidates. Then if he is wrong he will just make a claim that whoever was hired “blew them away and stole the job”. With FA’s they list the most likely teams to sign them. Then they often list a “mystery team” that way if they are wrong they can still claim that they were right by claiming that the team that signed them was the mystery team.
RE: How are they not compliant with the Rooney Rules?
Would you prefer I didn't post it?
Is Josh the one who wanted a sticky once for his newborn?
They need to interview one external minority candidate in person for the HC job. They have not done that yet.
I'm not going to pretend to know who is behind it but I've been following that account for month. Look at the history of the tweets along with it's followers. It most certainly is legit.
Quote:
This is a tried and true Twitter practice by these anon accounts. They "break news" by reporting on what's rumored and most of us would guess would be the case. Then they pat themselves on the back for being first. If they miss, they just delete and move on to the next obvious prediction.
I'm not going to pretend to know who is behind it but I've been following that account for month. Look at the history of the tweets along with it's followers. It most certainly is legit.
The same account follows 31k+ people. It's a tactic to pick up high follower numbers. All of these rando accounts always seem to miss the breaking news that comes out of nowhere. It's the incarceratedbob playbook.
"Leaked" would imply this came from the Giants. There is no evidence to suggest that is came from the Giants.
Premature and would lead to league penalties if it was true. The Giants aren't that stupid.
yada yada
Hence why it's not legit. Why would the Giants risk breaking the Rooney Rule to make an offer a day or two before they've satisfied it?
The rule is fine and necessary in an insular, nepotism-driven community powered almost exclusively by networking connections.
Fans declaring every black interview a "rooney rule" is what's insulting.
I mean isn't it obvious? You just follow the account for a month, Chris.
Either Flores or Frazier will need an in person interview. Graham doesn't satisfy the requirement because he is an internal candidate.
And the purpose of the rule is to get minority candidates in front of decision makers and expand their personal networks. In that respect it is not obsolete.
This is the right take. The Twitter account is almost certainly bogus, the "report" is probably bullshit, and yet ultimately it will probably be true.
Didn't they meet with Frazier?
gtt350 = Chief Justice John Roberts.
No.
Because he is an internal candidate. Internal candidates do not apply to the RR.
Yep. They met with Frazier. So, the rule has been met.
Quote:
The GM meet with Frazier in person.. how does not comply with the Rooney rule ?
Yep. They met with Frazier. So, the rule has been met.
Virtual meetings do not count toward the Rooney Rule.
Quote:
In comment 15572520 g56blue10 said:
Quote:
The GM meet with Frazier in person.. how does not comply with the Rooney rule ?
Yep. They met with Frazier. So, the rule has been met.
Virtual meetings do not count toward the Rooney Rule.
And they didn’t meet in person.
https://www.giants.com/news/leslie-frazier-buffalo-bills-joe-schoen-brian-daboll-head-coach-candidates
The odds are that Daboll will be hired.
But they still haven't even interviewed Flores yet.
The odds are that Daboll will be hired.
But they still haven't even interviewed Flores yet.
Quote:
tweet is BS.
The odds are that Daboll will be hired.
But they still haven't even interviewed Flores yet.
I mean we all "expect it", but we sure as heck didn't expect Judge when he got hired, so who knows.
True. But there aren't anyother strong candidates, anyways.
Correct, this is what guys like Incarcerated Bob have done for years. They have no sources but claim they do by listing the most likely candidates. Then if he is wrong he will just make a claim that whoever was hired “blew them away and stole the job”. With FA’s they list the most likely teams to sign them. Then they often list a “mystery team” that way if they are wrong they can still claim that they were right by claiming that the team that signed them was the mystery team.
Graham interview?
Quote:
?
Graham interview?
As posted above, internal candidates don't count.
Quote:
In comment 15572442 BlueHurricane said:
Quote:
?
Graham interview?
As posted above, internal candidates don't count.
Doesn’t the Frazier interview count? Or does it have to be in person for the Rooney rule?