If the defensive coach has a great OC he's bringing but I have read in multiple places how they have several other Offensive guys they are still considering. I have only seen Daboll. Who are the others?
I would agreed with you except that Schoen himself said that he would throw a wide net over the league in an effort to find the right head coach. No knock on the current favorites, but there must be other talented assistants who merit consideration and interviews. Just off my head, there are the Tampa Bay and Kansas City OC's.
What is a few hours to learn about a candidate you know little of and seeing how they view your team? Why is it bad for the interviewee when they can gain valuable experience? And if they do well, word travels. I can't, for the life of me, understand how ANYBODY is against interviewing more candidates.
What is a few hours to learn about a candidate you know little of and seeing how they view your team? Why is it bad for the interviewee when they can gain valuable experience? And if they do well, word travels. I can't, for the life of me, understand how ANYBODY is against interviewing more candidates.
No one’s against it, but Schoen knew the people he felt were the most qualified for what he was looking for and talked with them. I’m sure there are hidden gems somewhere who will make excellent HCs someday. Gems who people will no doubt scratch their heads one day and say, “why didn’t we ever consider him?”
If there were a group of candidates still out there who he felt were better than the one’s he interviewed, don’t you think he would have brought him/them in?
Of the 9 (?) HC vacancies, who has interviewed more people than we have? Just curious
What is a few hours to learn about a candidate you know little of and seeing how they view your team? Why is it bad for the interviewee when they can gain valuable experience? And if they do well, word travels. I can't, for the life of me, understand how ANYBODY is against interviewing more candidates.
x infinity.
I would have brought in Hackett, McDaniel, Ryans, Pederson, Woods, Dorsey, etc.
The broader the search and perspective, the better.
Who is out there that you would of liked to see them interview?
Who is out there that you would of liked to see them interview?
Exactly. NOT ODD at all
No one’s against it, but Schoen knew the people he felt were the most qualified for what he was looking for and talked with them. I’m sure there are hidden gems somewhere who will make excellent HCs someday. Gems who people will no doubt scratch their heads one day and say, “why didn’t we ever consider him?”
If there were a group of candidates still out there who he felt were better than the one’s he interviewed, don’t you think he would have brought him/them in?
Of the 9 (?) HC vacancies, who has interviewed more people than we have? Just curious
x infinity.
I would have brought in Hackett, McDaniel, Ryans, Pederson, Woods, Dorsey, etc.
The broader the search and perspective, the better.