for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Chris Simms top 40 QB rankings

nym172 : 5/23/2022 8:44 pm
Simms on his podcast today did numbers 26-30 and daniel jones wasnt on it. it seems like Daniel Jones might not make the top 40 QB list.


the next 25 guys are all named below.

he still hasnt ranked 1)zach wilson, 2)lawrence, 3)baker, 4)hurts, 5)feilds, 6)garroplo, 7)wentz who i can see 8)DJ ranking ahead of some of those guys. probably not ahead of 9)mac jones.

Its clear theres an 10)Allen, 11)Mahomes, 12)Brady, 13)Stafford, 14)Lamar, 15)Watson, 16)Burrow, 17)Carr, 18)Herbert, 19)Wilson, 20)Rodgers, 21)Murray top 12.
The top 12 is clear in my books.

22)Ryan, 23)Cousins, 24)Dak, 25)Tannehill next 4 in my book to round out a clear top 16.

if i missed one guy - DJ will not be on this list.

but i guess he can still be on the list - i thought he would have appeared 26-30. didnt appear 30-40 either. wonder where he will be.


I am more bullish....

This is without a doubt the biggest upgrade in OL talent around the league from last year to this year.


This is without a doubt the biggest upgrade in HC/OC/Playcaller around the league from last year to this year.

Plus he got rid of evan engram.....thats 10 TOs a year less for sure.

if he stays heathly with no injures for 17 games and can run well - he will be top 15 next year and we can get him for like a cheap contact 25-30 million a year.


Hurts and Fields suck, Jones is much better qb than both of them!  
Jack Stroud : 5/23/2022 8:52 pm : link
.
RE: Hurts and Fields suck, Jones is much better qb than both of them!  
nym172 : 5/23/2022 8:54 pm : link
In comment 15716831 Jack Stroud said:
Quote:
.


i think he does his podcasts every Mon/Wed. so we wil see Wed. I cant imagine he wont appear 20-25....but maybe he is off the list entirely. would not shock me.
Wentz...  
BMac : 5/23/2022 9:03 pm : link
...Garropolo? Bottom feeders.
you can question the top 12  
nym172 : 5/23/2022 9:06 pm : link
Murray in that class of top 12 - i dont know.
Watson as well due to him not playing with suspension and off field stuff.
Carr is good but not in that top 9 class.

I think the top 9 are also very clear.

Mahomes, Allen, Brady, Rodgers, Herbert, Burrow, Lamar, Wilson, Stafford - clear top 9 in some order.

I dont think anyone can crack that this year with these pre season rankings.

I’m confused by your starting your rankings at 10  
BSIMatt : 5/23/2022 11:21 pm : link
Instead of 1. Nobody mentioned it. I found it odd.

I have nothing else to add.

As you were.
RE: you can question the top 12  
Mike in NY : 5/23/2022 11:31 pm : link
In comment 15716846 nym172 said:
Quote:
Murray in that class of top 12 - i dont know.
Watson as well due to him not playing with suspension and off field stuff.
Carr is good but not in that top 9 class.

I think the top 9 are also very clear.

Mahomes, Allen, Brady, Rodgers, Herbert, Burrow, Lamar, Wilson, Stafford - clear top 9 in some order.

I dont think anyone can crack that this year with these pre season rankings.


Lamar is dominant in the regular season, but can he hang in the pocket against playoff caliber Defenses? Dynamic player with a doubt, but I think someone will overpay.
RE: RE: you can question the top 12  
speedywheels : 5/24/2022 1:57 am : link
In comment 15716941 Mike in NY said:
Quote:
In comment 15716846 nym172 said:


Quote:


Murray in that class of top 12 - i dont know.
Watson as well due to him not playing with suspension and off field stuff.
Carr is good but not in that top 9 class.

I think the top 9 are also very clear.

Mahomes, Allen, Brady, Rodgers, Herbert, Burrow, Lamar, Wilson, Stafford - clear top 9 in some order.

I dont think anyone can crack that this year with these pre season rankings.




Lamar is dominant in the regular season, but can he hang in the pocket against playoff caliber Defenses? Dynamic player with a doubt, but I think someone will overpay.


Based on his playoff record, it’s clear that Jackson can’t hang with the big boy defenses.

At least not yet, anyway.

I'm sorry, but I'm not a fan of Chris Simms as a judge of talent -  
Ira : 5/24/2022 1:59 am : link
regardless of where he might place Jones or any other qb on his list.
I consider Simms  
Osi Osi Osi OyOyOy : 5/24/2022 2:07 am : link
An above average evaluator but what bothers me is he has clearly liked the hype he gets for getting certain “unexpected” stuff right, so he reaches to try and prove he knows more than others. It’s kind of sad. He’s too smart to be so dumb. Hopefully he just says real stuff in the future instead of trying to prove some desperate point about how he knows more than others.
RE: I’m confused by your starting your rankings at 10  
crackerjack465 : 5/24/2022 10:15 am : link
In comment 15716931 BSIMatt said:
Quote:
Instead of 1. Nobody mentioned it. I found it odd.

I have nothing else to add.

As you were.


He wasn't ranking them. He was just creating a numbered list of 25 quarterbacks who he thinks would be somewhere in the top 25. He does not believe Trevor Lawrence is the #1 ranked qb.
RE: Hurts and Fields suck, Jones is much better qb than both of them!  
Doubledeuce22 : 5/24/2022 10:17 am : link
In comment 15716831 Jack Stroud said:
Quote:
.


This is a laughable statement.
RE: RE: Hurts and Fields suck, Jones is much better qb than both of them!  
Mike in NY : 5/24/2022 10:22 am : link
In comment 15717070 Doubledeuce22 said:
Quote:
In comment 15716831 Jack Stroud said:


Quote:


.



This is a laughable statement.


As bad as Daniel Jones was under Jason Garrett, Justin Fields was even worse. 7 TD/10 INT in 12 games (10 starts). Nearly 12% Sack percentage is insane. Fields actually had a lower TD% than Jones did last year. He even fumbled more than Jones did (12 versus 7).

On a separate note, I just realized my last post should have said "WITHOUT a doubt."
RE: RE: Hurts and Fields suck, Jones is much better qb than both of them!  
Mike from Ohio : 5/24/2022 10:24 am : link
In comment 15717070 Doubledeuce22 said:
Quote:
In comment 15716831 Jack Stroud said:


Quote:


.



This is a laughable statement.


Remember, Jones has been in the league for three years but it is unclear just how talented he is. Justin Fields started 12 games. The book is closed on him. We know what he is.

When you see statements like this you should know the person writing doesn't get all tangled up in thinking. They are just vomiting emotions onto a keyboard.
He's obviously on the list.  
Pego61 : 5/24/2022 12:54 pm : link
Simms isn't ranking him behind Drew Lock, Geno Smith and Tyrod Taylor.
RE: I consider Simms  
NINEster : 5/24/2022 1:03 pm : link
In comment 15716968 Osi Osi Osi OyOyOy said:
Quote:
An above average evaluator but what bothers me is he has clearly liked the hype he gets for getting certain “unexpected” stuff right, so he reaches to try and prove he knows more than others. It’s kind of sad. He’s too smart to be so dumb. Hopefully he just says real stuff in the future instead of trying to prove some desperate point about how he knows more than others.


I agree, he got lucky that one year with Allen and Lamar Jackson, and thought he was seeing every Montana/Brady in each draft.
RE: RE: RE: Hurts and Fields suck, Jones is much better qb than both of them!  
Producer : 5/24/2022 1:38 pm : link
In comment 15717078 Mike from Ohio said:
Quote:
In comment 15717070 Doubledeuce22 said:


Quote:


In comment 15716831 Jack Stroud said:


Quote:


.



This is a laughable statement.



Remember, Jones has been in the league for three years but it is unclear just how talented he is. Justin Fields started 12 games. The book is closed on him. We know what he is.

When you see statements like this you should know the person writing doesn't get all tangled up in thinking. They are just vomiting emotions onto a keyboard.


Precisely
I just re-read the OP  
NINEster : 5/24/2022 4:24 pm : link
I find it funny that he considers Daniel Jones possibly better than those veteran QBs, but Mac Jones, well, he's gonna be tough to beat, LOL.

The New England bias is sickening. Mac Jones has a lot to prove on whether he has a ceiling worth intimidating anyone over. That playoff ass kicking should've tempered things a bit, but clearly it hasn't.

Maybe it's still early, but then he shouldn't be rated as highly as he is.

Wilson, Lance, Fields are all worth the "risk" over Mac Jones, yet are treated like projects because of W/L ratio for two of them, and because the other only has 2 NFL starts.

If the Giants were to part ways with Daniel Jones, I'd love for him to come to SF and have Kyle work with him as premier backup. Far more intriguing guy to have on the roster over McCorkle.
RE: Hurts and Fields suck, Jones is much better qb than both of them!  
bw in dc : 5/24/2022 4:33 pm : link
In comment 15716831 Jack Stroud said:
Quote:
.


Jury is still out on Fields. They had below average talent on the offense last year. And it's going to be even worse this year. He's in for a big challenge.

I can't stand Hurts, but he creates more points than Jones by a significant factor. So, calling Jones "much better" doesn't make much sense.
So Am I reading this right ?  
Debaser : 5/24/2022 4:33 pm : link
D Jones is not even top 40 on the list and someone like G Minshew who coaches do not consider a starter and got benched for Mike Glennon in Jacksonville is ranked 37th and ahead of Jones?
RE: RE: Hurts and Fields suck, Jones is much better qb than both of them!  
Thegratefulhead : 5/24/2022 4:38 pm : link
In comment 15717483 bw in dc said:
Quote:
In comment 15716831 Jack Stroud said:


Quote:


.



Jury is still out on Fields. They had below average talent on the offense last year. And it's going to be even worse this year. He's in for a big challenge.

I can't stand Hurts, but he creates more points than Jones by a significant factor. So, calling Jones "much better" doesn't make much sense.
We shouldn't use talent around the QB as an excuse...ever. Evaluate his play with poor players. Fields was still bad and his offensive talent was not worse than what Jones has had to deal with. Jones is bad, Fields is bad so far. No excuses.
It’s becoming disgustingly obvious  
Debaser : 5/24/2022 5:52 pm : link
The giants and gettleman set this team back years with that pick.

Even just picking Darnold over sequon and then Picking a Quenton would have been better . But shurmur and gettleman
RE: RE: RE: Hurts and Fields suck, Jones is much better qb than both of them!  
bw in dc : 5/24/2022 6:12 pm : link
In comment 15717489 Thegratefulhead said:
Quote:
In comment 15717483 bw in dc said:


Quote:


In comment 15716831 Jack Stroud said:


Quote:


.



Jury is still out on Fields. They had below average talent on the offense last year. And it's going to be even worse this year. He's in for a big challenge.

I can't stand Hurts, but he creates more points than Jones by a significant factor. So, calling Jones "much better" doesn't make much sense.

We shouldn't use talent around the QB as an excuse...ever. Evaluate his play with poor players. Fields was still bad and his offensive talent was not worse than what Jones has had to deal with. Jones is bad, Fields is bad so far. No excuses.


I'm not using excuses. Just explaining the circumstances for Fields. I have said Jones has not been dealt the best hand scores and scores of times.

FWIW, check out the players who comprised the Bears O in 2021. It's worse than what Jones had in 2019.
RE: RE: RE: RE: Hurts and Fields suck, Jones is much better qb than both of them!  
Thegratefulhead : 5/24/2022 6:19 pm : link
In comment 15717532 bw in dc said:
Quote:
In comment 15717489 Thegratefulhead said:


Quote:


In comment 15717483 bw in dc said:


Quote:


In comment 15716831 Jack Stroud said:


Quote:


.



Jury is still out on Fields. They had below average talent on the offense last year. And it's going to be even worse this year. He's in for a big challenge.

I can't stand Hurts, but he creates more points than Jones by a significant factor. So, calling Jones "much better" doesn't make much sense.

We shouldn't use talent around the QB as an excuse...ever. Evaluate his play with poor players. Fields was still bad and his offensive talent was not worse than what Jones has had to deal with. Jones is bad, Fields is bad so far. No excuses.



I'm not using excuses. Just explaining the circumstances for Fields. I have said Jones has not been dealt the best hand scores and scores of times.

FWIW, check out the players who comprised the Bears O in 2021. It's worse than what Jones had in 2019.
No. Not in that I don't agree. It is not worth the time to dive subjectively about who had worse. Fields is crap until he proves otherwise, just like Jones.

RE: So Am I reading this right ?  
nym172 : 5/24/2022 6:36 pm : link
In comment 15717484 Debaser said:
Quote:
D Jones is not even top 40 on the list and someone like G Minshew who coaches do not consider a starter and got benched for Mike Glennon in Jacksonville is ranked 37th and ahead of Jones?


either hes in the list tomorrow 20-25 or hes not on the top 40. i for sure through wed see him 26-30. maybe hes off the list entirely.
Somewhere between 25 and 40 is right  
Jerry in_DC : 5/24/2022 8:59 pm : link
It bunches up in that range. Plus nobody really cares what the ranking is because all of them should be backups.

Some of the young guys will be a lot better than Jones. Some won't. But you just don't know until they get more time.
I love that someone here is making excuses for Jones after  
Producer : 5/24/2022 10:27 pm : link
3 full seasons..

but Fields is a bum after 12 games.

We continue to grade Jones on a curve. And the rest of the league, esp the NFCE, must love it.
RE: I love that someone here is making excuses for Jones after  
Scooter185 : 5/24/2022 10:32 pm : link
In comment 15717733 Producer said:
Quote:
3 full seasons..

but Fields is a bum after 12 games.

We continue to grade Jones on a curve. And the rest of the league, esp the NFCE, must love it.


Had Jones been drafted by another NFCE team we'd all be laughing at them
Who cares what Simms thinks?  
SGMen : 5/25/2022 6:59 am : link
We will know around six games in whether Jones is our guy for the future or not.

How can you evaluate a QB who has been in so many systems; with such a poor OL; without playmakers; without a healthy Barkley or run game so much of the time?

Remember, you take away his fumbles from his rookie year and he was very good. His injuries have hurt him but so has the lack of OL play and lack of healthy "go to" guys.

If we stay healthy through camp and the team gets the new offense quickly we will be able to properly judge his talent.
RE: Who cares what Simms thinks?  
Producer : 5/25/2022 11:29 am : link
In comment 15717849 SGMen said:
Quote:
We will know around six games in whether Jones is our guy for the future or not.

How can you evaluate a QB who has been in so many systems; with such a poor OL; without playmakers; without a healthy Barkley or run game so much of the time?

Remember, you take away his fumbles from his rookie year and he was very good. His injuries have hurt him but so has the lack of OL play and lack of healthy "go to" guys.

If we stay healthy through camp and the team gets the new offense quickly we will be able to properly judge his talent.


We don't need 6 more games.
RE: RE: I love that someone here is making excuses for Jones after  
bw in dc : 5/25/2022 2:46 pm : link
In comment 15717741 Scooter185 said:
Quote:


Had Jones been drafted by another NFCE team we'd all be laughing at them


Such a good point.

If Jones was playing this way the last three years for the Eagles - which means you have to suspend reality because the Eagles probably wouldn't be dumb enough to let it get this far - BBI would be mocking the situation and thanking the Eagles for their daftness.

21  
Debaser : 5/25/2022 4:51 pm : link
To be honest I am kind of impressed with what Chris Simms saw in D Jones. I guess he is not as bad as I thought.
link  
nym172 : 5/25/2022 7:37 pm : link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlcSHmXmjLE
On second thought  
Debaser : 5/26/2022 4:44 am : link
Could he just be backing up his Dad on this? I mean they both have that same take about “he’s the best player on the team”.

Like wait a minutes. He’s the best player on a team tat can’t win more than 6!games per season for years now ? That’s like being the best student at summer school.
Having Daniel Jones as the 21st best QB  
gersh : 5/26/2022 7:49 am : link
is credible. He says very difficult to evaluate. He gives a ceiling of Derek Carr/Kirk Cousins. Also credible.

The problem, as we know, is it’s tough to win a championship without an elite QB. Paying a mediocre QB top QB money is not a formula for success.

Sad that a big part of me is hoping we have a bad season and get a rookie QB who will be one of those elite guys. But it’s all a crap shoot so I’ll just root for wins and hope for the best.
RE: link  
Eric on Li : 5/26/2022 10:07 am : link
In comment 15718401 nym172 said:
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlcSHmXmjLE


that was one of the better analysis of jones ive seen. thank you for posting.
Ok Chris Carter laughing at Jones  
Carl in CT : 5/26/2022 12:02 pm : link
Yea Haskins was a better pick (right).
You were worried about Jones not making Simm’a top 40  
BSIMatt : 5/31/2022 12:29 pm : link
At all, and he ended up ranking 21st. You should sleep better at night knowing Jones fits comfortably in the top 21.
Back to the Corner