I think it’s getting worse. The action scenes are so boring and clumsy. Story is not compelling. No humor. I think it’s really bad. Huge miss by Filoni.
I don't really see any continuity issues - everything that takes place seems reasonable about 10 years prior to the events of New Hope.
If anything, the series is held back by the fact that it is so closely tied to the first two trilogies - character look, action sequences, and dialogue has to remain somewhat consistent. There's an attempt to try to get these episodes to fit in seamlessly with films that were made 20 and 40 years ago, so of course it's going to suffer a bit creatively and visually.
But it still manages, rather impressively in my opinion, to provide a pretty fresh take on characters whom everyone has become very familiar with over the years. I agree that the new characters, including Reva, leave a lot to be desired but they're just vehicles to move the plot - they're not all that important to the story being told. Regardless, I'm looking forward to the finale.
I don't think it's nitpicking at all. There are big issues with this show. It's not a fresh take; it's a dismantling of known characters. If Kennedy and Disney don't like the original Star Wars, but like the brand, then they need to focus solely on new stuff instead of shredding all the known entities and stories.
Watched a lot of the animated stuff on Disney + during the pandemic and the new series.
I enjoy the show. I don't expect too much from it. Unlike others I think it adds more to ANH, so the next time I watch it I can see it from another perspective, which I think is cool. How often does that happen with 40+ year old movies.
They are in a no win situation with most of the star wars stuff because people are going to be hypercritical, particularly with characters from the original trilogy.I bet Ahsoka & Andor will do better with fans
I disagree. There is a lot they could have done with this show and character without pissing off a lot of fans, while at the same time not pandering to them as well. They just produced a real shit burger here.
So they set out to piss off and pander to their fans? I agree there is more they could have done with this show, but no matter what they did it was going to be met with a lot of criticism. Star Wars fans have known many of these characters for years and developed a connection to them and the original storyline.
Mando and rogue one characters/storyline did not have the same connection I don't think it is a coincidence that they were much better received by fans. The safe thing would be to keep expanding the SW universe I think the challenge lies in trying to weave it all together.
Watched a lot of the animated stuff on Disney + during the pandemic and the new series.
I enjoy the show. I don't expect too much from it. Unlike others I think it adds more to ANH, so the next time I watch it I can see it from another perspective, which I think is cool. How often does that happen with 40+ year old movies.
They are in a no win situation with most of the star wars stuff because people are going to be hypercritical, particularly with characters from the original trilogy.I bet Ahsoka & Andor will do better with fans
I disagree. There is a lot they could have done with this show and character without pissing off a lot of fans, while at the same time not pandering to them as well. They just produced a real shit burger here.
So they set out to piss off and pander to their fans? I agree there is more they could have done with this show, but no matter what they did it was going to be met with a lot of criticism. Star Wars fans have known many of these characters for years and developed a connection to them and the original storyline.
Mando and rogue one characters/storyline did not have the same connection I don't think it is a coincidence that they were much better received by fans. The safe thing would be to keep expanding the SW universe I think the challenge lies in trying to weave it all together.
Rogue One had a direct connection to the original story. It literally ends where A New Hope begins and a CGI Leia is in it.
Disney thinks having a strong connection to the original stories is pandering, which they don't want to do. They aren't interested in the original fans; they are too old and Disney assumes they will watch regardless. They aren't completely wrong in that regard. But, by spitting in the face of the original, they alienate those fans. It makes no sense and the story they came up with is drivel.
It didn't need to be a direct connection to the original/canon material. But, it should not have completely disconnected to the point of the story now making no sense either.
Rogue One had a direct connection to the original story. It literally ends where A New Hope begins and a CGI Leia is in it.
Disney thinks having a strong connection to the original stories is pandering, which they don't want to do. They aren't interested in the original fans; they are too old and Disney assumes they will watch regardless. They aren't completely wrong in that regard. But, by spitting in the face of the original, they alienate those fans. It makes no sense and the story they came up with is drivel.
It didn't need to be a direct connection to the original/canon material. But, it should not have completely disconnected to the point of the story now making no sense either.
Obviously Rogue One connected to the storyline, but the story itself was almost completely independent and just provided a backstory of how they got there. Which is basically what they are trying to do with Kenobi, but the story can't be independent as they are tasked with tying to the prequels and to the original trilogy. Plus they are using characters that people already know and have a connection with. They had a lot more freedom with Rogue One to do what they wanted without alienating fans.
Personally I am not as offended by a backstory providing context which may change my thoughts about A New Hope but I can see why others would be.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Always was a big Star Wars fan
Rogue One had a direct connection to the original story. It literally ends where A New Hope begins and a CGI Leia is in it.
Disney thinks having a strong connection to the original stories is pandering, which they don't want to do. They aren't interested in the original fans; they are too old and Disney assumes they will watch regardless. They aren't completely wrong in that regard. But, by spitting in the face of the original, they alienate those fans. It makes no sense and the story they came up with is drivel.
It didn't need to be a direct connection to the original/canon material. But, it should not have completely disconnected to the point of the story now making no sense either.
Obviously Rogue One connected to the storyline, but the story itself was almost completely independent and just provided a backstory of how they got there. Which is basically what they are trying to do with Kenobi, but the story can't be independent as they are tasked with tying to the prequels and to the original trilogy. Plus they are using characters that people already know and have a connection with. They had a lot more freedom with Rogue One to do what they wanted without alienating fans.
Personally I am not as offended by a backstory providing context which may change my thoughts about A New Hope but I can see why others would be.
It's not about changing thoughts. This completely changes A New Hope or makes its story invalid. The whole point is that story started on a leap of faith out of desperation. Rogue One tied to that. At the end, the Rebellion ultimately put everything they had into getting those plans. They were about to lose them.
Leia took a leap of faith and so did every other character basically, based on that message. This changes the whole narrative. There was plenty to do here with backstory that didn't involve completely ruining the Star Wars story.
Again, if they don't like the origin characters and story, then don't use them at all. Instead they shit all over them. For example, there is enough material out there where Ob-wan was not wallowing in self-pity and doubt, but training and preparing for Luke, and trying to still act like a Jedi without revealing himself. He didn't leave the planet, which is a major plot point. He didn't reveal if he was alive or dead. He disappeared for nearly 20 years.
is inconsistent with the events of New Hope. Sure, 10 year-old Leia is somewhat an annoying character because she's sassy and rebellious - but that's clearly by design because the 19 year old version of her is sassy and rebellious. You can argue that it was a poor creative choice to do that with her child version, but her character is the same.
Also, Leia's R2 message to Obi Wan still makes sense because she's not pleading for him to help her personally, but to help the rebellion. Obviously Obi Wan would be hesitant to leave Luke (again) and get involved with that - her calling back to his service as a general in the clone wars makes the better case than her calling back to the time he got a lot of innocent people killed while trying to rescue her from capture when she was 10.
And important to note that New Hope isn't for another 9 years in this timeline. It seems reasonable to expect that the events of this series are what spurs Obi Wan to sharpen his skills as a Jedi to be a better protector of Luke and to ultimately train him (we should have a better picture of whether that will be the case the final episode airs). Either way, 9 years is a long time.
I suppose you can nitpick at the line in New Hope where Vader tells Obi Wan when last they met he was the learner and now he's the master. We know now that the last time they met Vader was dragging Obi Wan across a fire as he was attempting to flee. But it doesn't change at all the main point of that line, which was to establish that Vader was once his pupil. It's nitpicking to expect purity between projects that are 40 years apart.
is inconsistent with the events of New Hope. Sure, 10 year-old Leia is somewhat an annoying character because she's sassy and rebellious - but that's clearly by design because the 19 year old version of her is sassy and rebellious. You can argue that it was a poor creative choice to do that with her child version, but her character is the same.
Also, Leia's R2 message to Obi Wan still makes sense because she's not pleading for him to help her personally, but to help the rebellion. Obviously Obi Wan would be hesitant to leave Luke (again) and get involved with that - her calling back to his service as a general in the clone wars makes the better case than her calling back to the time he got a lot of innocent people killed while trying to rescue her from capture when she was 10.
And important to note that New Hope isn't for another 9 years in this timeline. It seems reasonable to expect that the events of this series are what spurs Obi Wan to sharpen his skills as a Jedi to be a better protector of Luke and to ultimately train him (we should have a better picture of whether that will be the case the final episode airs). Either way, 9 years is a long time.
I suppose you can nitpick at the line in New Hope where Vader tells Obi Wan when last they met he was the learner and now he's the master. We know now that the last time they met Vader was dragging Obi Wan across a fire as he was attempting to flee. But it doesn't change at all the main point of that line, which was to establish that Vader was once his pupil. It's nitpicking to expect purity between projects that are 40 years apart.
There's inconsistency between GLs own stories. It's not exactly like SW has ever had a rock solid canon. ObiWan's "from a certain point of view" was fixing a plot hole GL created. Tarkin saying "surely he's dead by now" was because originally the PT events happened much longer before EpIV.
is inconsistent with the events of New Hope. Sure, 10 year-old Leia is somewhat an annoying character because she's sassy and rebellious - but that's clearly by design because the 19 year old version of her is sassy and rebellious. You can argue that it was a poor creative choice to do that with her child version, but her character is the same.
Also, Leia's R2 message to Obi Wan still makes sense because she's not pleading for him to help her personally, but to help the rebellion. Obviously Obi Wan would be hesitant to leave Luke (again) and get involved with that - her calling back to his service as a general in the clone wars makes the better case than her calling back to the time he got a lot of innocent people killed while trying to rescue her from capture when she was 10.
And important to note that New Hope isn't for another 9 years in this timeline. It seems reasonable to expect that the events of this series are what spurs Obi Wan to sharpen his skills as a Jedi to be a better protector of Luke and to ultimately train him (we should have a better picture of whether that will be the case the final episode airs). Either way, 9 years is a long time.
I suppose you can nitpick at the line in New Hope where Vader tells Obi Wan when last they met he was the learner and now he's the master. We know now that the last time they met Vader was dragging Obi Wan across a fire as he was attempting to flee. But it doesn't change at all the main point of that line, which was to establish that Vader was once his pupil. It's nitpicking to expect purity between projects that are 40 years apart.
I actually think the casting and portrayal of Leia is good. The story is not.
is inconsistent with the events of New Hope. Sure, 10 year-old Leia is somewhat an annoying character because she's sassy and rebellious - but that's clearly by design because the 19 year old version of her is sassy and rebellious. You can argue that it was a poor creative choice to do that with her child version, but her character is the same.
Also, Leia's R2 message to Obi Wan still makes sense because she's not pleading for him to help her personally, but to help the rebellion. Obviously Obi Wan would be hesitant to leave Luke (again) and get involved with that - her calling back to his service as a general in the clone wars makes the better case than her calling back to the time he got a lot of innocent people killed while trying to rescue her from capture when she was 10.
And important to note that New Hope isn't for another 9 years in this timeline. It seems reasonable to expect that the events of this series are what spurs Obi Wan to sharpen his skills as a Jedi to be a better protector of Luke and to ultimately train him (we should have a better picture of whether that will be the case the final episode airs). Either way, 9 years is a long time.
I suppose you can nitpick at the line in New Hope where Vader tells Obi Wan when last they met he was the learner and now he's the master. We know now that the last time they met Vader was dragging Obi Wan across a fire as he was attempting to flee. But it doesn't change at all the main point of that line, which was to establish that Vader was once his pupil. It's nitpicking to expect purity between projects that are 40 years apart.
Obi-wan was training the entire time on Tatooine. That has been long established. It's one thing not to use the EU, but quite another to completely trash stuff like that. Yoda gave him training before he went into hiding. Plus, he was preparing materials for Luke to train. And he was helping creatures on Tatooine without revealing he was a Jedi. It created a big dilemma for him. He had to intervene without noticeably intervening, which actually required him to actively use the Force throughout.
RE: RE: Still not seeing why anyone thinks this show
is inconsistent with the events of New Hope. Sure, 10 year-old Leia is somewhat an annoying character because she's sassy and rebellious - but that's clearly by design because the 19 year old version of her is sassy and rebellious. You can argue that it was a poor creative choice to do that with her child version, but her character is the same.
Also, Leia's R2 message to Obi Wan still makes sense because she's not pleading for him to help her personally, but to help the rebellion. Obviously Obi Wan would be hesitant to leave Luke (again) and get involved with that - her calling back to his service as a general in the clone wars makes the better case than her calling back to the time he got a lot of innocent people killed while trying to rescue her from capture when she was 10.
And important to note that New Hope isn't for another 9 years in this timeline. It seems reasonable to expect that the events of this series are what spurs Obi Wan to sharpen his skills as a Jedi to be a better protector of Luke and to ultimately train him (we should have a better picture of whether that will be the case the final episode airs). Either way, 9 years is a long time.
I suppose you can nitpick at the line in New Hope where Vader tells Obi Wan when last they met he was the learner and now he's the master. We know now that the last time they met Vader was dragging Obi Wan across a fire as he was attempting to flee. But it doesn't change at all the main point of that line, which was to establish that Vader was once his pupil. It's nitpicking to expect purity between projects that are 40 years apart.
There's inconsistency between GLs own stories. It's not exactly like SW has ever had a rock solid canon. ObiWan's "from a certain point of view" was fixing a plot hole GL created. Tarkin saying "surely he's dead by now" was because originally the PT events happened much longer before EpIV.
A valid criticism of the prequels was that they also created plot holes or problems. This is because Lucas deviated from his original back story to pander to kids. It's a big reason the films were not wildly popular. For example, Anakin on Tatooine was not his original story.
where the only thing that mattered was "the Message", because that's all she cares about. Story, script, acting, characters, editing, set design, don't matter. Until Disney cleanes themselves of politics, and realizes their business is "entertainment", not fixing society's problems, they will continue to put out garbage.
You would think the fact that their corporate stock has fallen 36.3% over 6 months would tell them something. Nope, deaf ears.
If you think that this is the problem and not the actual poor acting, directing, and writing then I would say that you have a more of an agenda than Disney does.
The person said they had changed the character and this spoiled the original Star Wars story. I now have forgotten who that was.
I told that person that there would be a redemption arc that the character had to go through and in the end, it would make sense. After the finale, I think my prediction was spot on.
People are getting tied up in knots because Obi-wan entered this series as a weak broken man who had fallen away from his Jedi past. If he were a military guy, we would say he was suffering from PTSD and needed to find his reason to go on after the significant trauma of losing his entire way of life, having the Jedi order decimated and his best friend turn into a Sith Lord who betrayed them all. That would crush the spirit of almost anyone.
I think they did an excellent job of having Obi-wan learn that the galaxy didn’t need the Jedi to fight on- but they did need protection from the Empire. Through that journey, he found his reason to go on and rediscover who he was and what his purpose was.
At the end, we see the powerful Jedi Master again emerge- and I won’t spoil the rest for those who have not seen it. But the ending and dialogue brought the story full circle.
There were some silly moments- like Obi-wan getting chased by a Star Destroyer in a shuttle to a planet- but when he leaves the planet- the Star Destroyer is gone. Doesn’t make sense in light of what occurred on the planet, but it doesn’t break the story.
In fact, the finale probably sets the stage for what will come in Ashoka and other related stories from the time period. The rebellion is forming and now Obi-wan knows his role in the galaxy and his purpose.
have said something like “still not a master” bc Anakin never achieved that as a Jedi.
I thought it was better that for the first time, Obi-wan realized that this wasn’t Anakin anymore- and simply called him “Darth.” Seeing Vader’s temper tantrum afterwards showed that one stung, as Obi-wan was effectively saying he no longer cared and Vader’s taunts couldn’t hurt Obi-wan anymore.
RE: I had a discussion with someone in a different Obi-wan thread
The person said they had changed the character and this spoiled the original Star Wars story. I now have forgotten who that was.
I told that person that there would be a redemption arc that the character had to go through and in the end, it would make sense. After the finale, I think my prediction was spot on.
People are getting tied up in knots because Obi-wan entered this series as a weak broken man who had fallen away from his Jedi past. If he were a military guy, we would say he was suffering from PTSD and needed to find his reason to go on after the significant trauma of losing his entire way of life, having the Jedi order decimated and his best friend turn into a Sith Lord who betrayed them all. That would crush the spirit of almost anyone.
I think they did an excellent job of having Obi-wan learn that the galaxy didn’t need the Jedi to fight on- but they did need protection from the Empire. Through that journey, he found his reason to go on and rediscover who he was and what his purpose was.
At the end, we see the powerful Jedi Master again emerge- and I won’t spoil the rest for those who have not seen it. But the ending and dialogue brought the story full circle.
There were some silly moments- like Obi-wan getting chased by a Star Destroyer in a shuttle to a planet- but when he leaves the planet- the Star Destroyer is gone. Doesn’t make sense in light of what occurred on the planet, but it doesn’t break the story.
In fact, the finale probably sets the stage for what will come in Ashoka and other related stories from the time period. The rebellion is forming and now Obi-wan knows his role in the galaxy and his purpose.
That was me and I stand by it. If this was stand alone show/story with no connections to the story we already know, it was good. But, Obi-wan wasn't weak and wallowing for all that time. He never met Leia. He never met Vader again until ANH. Nobody discovered the true identity of Luke.
I will reiterate that if this was a stand alone story
it was pretty good. I also saw the true redemption being Reva, which I think was a bit overdone. But, overall, a decent story. I just would have enjoyed it more if I hadn't known more of what cam next and before.
RE: I think we're at the ''admit it, it sucks'' point...
We have one excellent movie (Empire), two great ones (ANH and Rogue 1) and one good one (ROTJ). And one good series - Mandalorian.
The other 7 movies, Boba Fett and Obi Wan are bad or worse.
Maybe the animated kids' shows are good, I don't know, I haven't watched them and don't see myself doing that. There's too much actual good TV to watch elsewhere.
That's precisely how I see it. I maintain to this day that watching The Phantom Menace was the worst experience I've ever had in a theater. I've seen worse movies I'm sure, but not ones that I expected more from or anticipated more.
I never dared watch the other two prequels in their entirety but I've seen various scenes. Maybe it's true that they're not as bad as PM but only by a matter of degrees. From what I saw they have no personality or charisma... their attempts to introduce any just come across as insultingly silly. If they were standalone films and not prequels to some of the most popular films in history, they'd be unanimously shit upon.
The 7th and 8th episodes whose titles I'm not going to bother to remember were an improvement over the prequels, but that's hardly an accomplishment worth celebrating. They certainly weren't as wooden and they had some decent moments, but they still didn't convey the spirit of the originals. I'm only assuming the same is true of the 9th -- why shouldn't I?
If anything, the series is held back by the fact that it is so closely tied to the first two trilogies - character look, action sequences, and dialogue has to remain somewhat consistent. There's an attempt to try to get these episodes to fit in seamlessly with films that were made 20 and 40 years ago, so of course it's going to suffer a bit creatively and visually.
But it still manages, rather impressively in my opinion, to provide a pretty fresh take on characters whom everyone has become very familiar with over the years. I agree that the new characters, including Reva, leave a lot to be desired but they're just vehicles to move the plot - they're not all that important to the story being told. Regardless, I'm looking forward to the finale.
Quote:
Watched a lot of the animated stuff on Disney + during the pandemic and the new series.
I enjoy the show. I don't expect too much from it. Unlike others I think it adds more to ANH, so the next time I watch it I can see it from another perspective, which I think is cool. How often does that happen with 40+ year old movies.
They are in a no win situation with most of the star wars stuff because people are going to be hypercritical, particularly with characters from the original trilogy.I bet Ahsoka & Andor will do better with fans
I disagree. There is a lot they could have done with this show and character without pissing off a lot of fans, while at the same time not pandering to them as well. They just produced a real shit burger here.
So they set out to piss off and pander to their fans? I agree there is more they could have done with this show, but no matter what they did it was going to be met with a lot of criticism. Star Wars fans have known many of these characters for years and developed a connection to them and the original storyline.
Mando and rogue one characters/storyline did not have the same connection I don't think it is a coincidence that they were much better received by fans. The safe thing would be to keep expanding the SW universe I think the challenge lies in trying to weave it all together.
Quote:
In comment 15735427 Chocco said:
Quote:
Watched a lot of the animated stuff on Disney + during the pandemic and the new series.
I enjoy the show. I don't expect too much from it. Unlike others I think it adds more to ANH, so the next time I watch it I can see it from another perspective, which I think is cool. How often does that happen with 40+ year old movies.
They are in a no win situation with most of the star wars stuff because people are going to be hypercritical, particularly with characters from the original trilogy.I bet Ahsoka & Andor will do better with fans
I disagree. There is a lot they could have done with this show and character without pissing off a lot of fans, while at the same time not pandering to them as well. They just produced a real shit burger here.
So they set out to piss off and pander to their fans? I agree there is more they could have done with this show, but no matter what they did it was going to be met with a lot of criticism. Star Wars fans have known many of these characters for years and developed a connection to them and the original storyline.
Mando and rogue one characters/storyline did not have the same connection I don't think it is a coincidence that they were much better received by fans. The safe thing would be to keep expanding the SW universe I think the challenge lies in trying to weave it all together.
Disney thinks having a strong connection to the original stories is pandering, which they don't want to do. They aren't interested in the original fans; they are too old and Disney assumes they will watch regardless. They aren't completely wrong in that regard. But, by spitting in the face of the original, they alienate those fans. It makes no sense and the story they came up with is drivel.
It didn't need to be a direct connection to the original/canon material. But, it should not have completely disconnected to the point of the story now making no sense either.
Rogue One had a direct connection to the original story. It literally ends where A New Hope begins and a CGI Leia is in it.
Disney thinks having a strong connection to the original stories is pandering, which they don't want to do. They aren't interested in the original fans; they are too old and Disney assumes they will watch regardless. They aren't completely wrong in that regard. But, by spitting in the face of the original, they alienate those fans. It makes no sense and the story they came up with is drivel.
It didn't need to be a direct connection to the original/canon material. But, it should not have completely disconnected to the point of the story now making no sense either.
Obviously Rogue One connected to the storyline, but the story itself was almost completely independent and just provided a backstory of how they got there. Which is basically what they are trying to do with Kenobi, but the story can't be independent as they are tasked with tying to the prequels and to the original trilogy. Plus they are using characters that people already know and have a connection with. They had a lot more freedom with Rogue One to do what they wanted without alienating fans.
Personally I am not as offended by a backstory providing context which may change my thoughts about A New Hope but I can see why others would be.
Quote:
Rogue One had a direct connection to the original story. It literally ends where A New Hope begins and a CGI Leia is in it.
Disney thinks having a strong connection to the original stories is pandering, which they don't want to do. They aren't interested in the original fans; they are too old and Disney assumes they will watch regardless. They aren't completely wrong in that regard. But, by spitting in the face of the original, they alienate those fans. It makes no sense and the story they came up with is drivel.
It didn't need to be a direct connection to the original/canon material. But, it should not have completely disconnected to the point of the story now making no sense either.
Obviously Rogue One connected to the storyline, but the story itself was almost completely independent and just provided a backstory of how they got there. Which is basically what they are trying to do with Kenobi, but the story can't be independent as they are tasked with tying to the prequels and to the original trilogy. Plus they are using characters that people already know and have a connection with. They had a lot more freedom with Rogue One to do what they wanted without alienating fans.
Personally I am not as offended by a backstory providing context which may change my thoughts about A New Hope but I can see why others would be.
Leia took a leap of faith and so did every other character basically, based on that message. This changes the whole narrative. There was plenty to do here with backstory that didn't involve completely ruining the Star Wars story.
Again, if they don't like the origin characters and story, then don't use them at all. Instead they shit all over them. For example, there is enough material out there where Ob-wan was not wallowing in self-pity and doubt, but training and preparing for Luke, and trying to still act like a Jedi without revealing himself. He didn't leave the planet, which is a major plot point. He didn't reveal if he was alive or dead. He disappeared for nearly 20 years.
Also, Leia's R2 message to Obi Wan still makes sense because she's not pleading for him to help her personally, but to help the rebellion. Obviously Obi Wan would be hesitant to leave Luke (again) and get involved with that - her calling back to his service as a general in the clone wars makes the better case than her calling back to the time he got a lot of innocent people killed while trying to rescue her from capture when she was 10.
And important to note that New Hope isn't for another 9 years in this timeline. It seems reasonable to expect that the events of this series are what spurs Obi Wan to sharpen his skills as a Jedi to be a better protector of Luke and to ultimately train him (we should have a better picture of whether that will be the case the final episode airs). Either way, 9 years is a long time.
I suppose you can nitpick at the line in New Hope where Vader tells Obi Wan when last they met he was the learner and now he's the master. We know now that the last time they met Vader was dragging Obi Wan across a fire as he was attempting to flee. But it doesn't change at all the main point of that line, which was to establish that Vader was once his pupil. It's nitpicking to expect purity between projects that are 40 years apart.
Also, Leia's R2 message to Obi Wan still makes sense because she's not pleading for him to help her personally, but to help the rebellion. Obviously Obi Wan would be hesitant to leave Luke (again) and get involved with that - her calling back to his service as a general in the clone wars makes the better case than her calling back to the time he got a lot of innocent people killed while trying to rescue her from capture when she was 10.
And important to note that New Hope isn't for another 9 years in this timeline. It seems reasonable to expect that the events of this series are what spurs Obi Wan to sharpen his skills as a Jedi to be a better protector of Luke and to ultimately train him (we should have a better picture of whether that will be the case the final episode airs). Either way, 9 years is a long time.
I suppose you can nitpick at the line in New Hope where Vader tells Obi Wan when last they met he was the learner and now he's the master. We know now that the last time they met Vader was dragging Obi Wan across a fire as he was attempting to flee. But it doesn't change at all the main point of that line, which was to establish that Vader was once his pupil. It's nitpicking to expect purity between projects that are 40 years apart.
There's inconsistency between GLs own stories. It's not exactly like SW has ever had a rock solid canon. ObiWan's "from a certain point of view" was fixing a plot hole GL created. Tarkin saying "surely he's dead by now" was because originally the PT events happened much longer before EpIV.
Also, Leia's R2 message to Obi Wan still makes sense because she's not pleading for him to help her personally, but to help the rebellion. Obviously Obi Wan would be hesitant to leave Luke (again) and get involved with that - her calling back to his service as a general in the clone wars makes the better case than her calling back to the time he got a lot of innocent people killed while trying to rescue her from capture when she was 10.
And important to note that New Hope isn't for another 9 years in this timeline. It seems reasonable to expect that the events of this series are what spurs Obi Wan to sharpen his skills as a Jedi to be a better protector of Luke and to ultimately train him (we should have a better picture of whether that will be the case the final episode airs). Either way, 9 years is a long time.
I suppose you can nitpick at the line in New Hope where Vader tells Obi Wan when last they met he was the learner and now he's the master. We know now that the last time they met Vader was dragging Obi Wan across a fire as he was attempting to flee. But it doesn't change at all the main point of that line, which was to establish that Vader was once his pupil. It's nitpicking to expect purity between projects that are 40 years apart.
Also, Leia's R2 message to Obi Wan still makes sense because she's not pleading for him to help her personally, but to help the rebellion. Obviously Obi Wan would be hesitant to leave Luke (again) and get involved with that - her calling back to his service as a general in the clone wars makes the better case than her calling back to the time he got a lot of innocent people killed while trying to rescue her from capture when she was 10.
And important to note that New Hope isn't for another 9 years in this timeline. It seems reasonable to expect that the events of this series are what spurs Obi Wan to sharpen his skills as a Jedi to be a better protector of Luke and to ultimately train him (we should have a better picture of whether that will be the case the final episode airs). Either way, 9 years is a long time.
I suppose you can nitpick at the line in New Hope where Vader tells Obi Wan when last they met he was the learner and now he's the master. We know now that the last time they met Vader was dragging Obi Wan across a fire as he was attempting to flee. But it doesn't change at all the main point of that line, which was to establish that Vader was once his pupil. It's nitpicking to expect purity between projects that are 40 years apart.
Quote:
is inconsistent with the events of New Hope. Sure, 10 year-old Leia is somewhat an annoying character because she's sassy and rebellious - but that's clearly by design because the 19 year old version of her is sassy and rebellious. You can argue that it was a poor creative choice to do that with her child version, but her character is the same.
Also, Leia's R2 message to Obi Wan still makes sense because she's not pleading for him to help her personally, but to help the rebellion. Obviously Obi Wan would be hesitant to leave Luke (again) and get involved with that - her calling back to his service as a general in the clone wars makes the better case than her calling back to the time he got a lot of innocent people killed while trying to rescue her from capture when she was 10.
And important to note that New Hope isn't for another 9 years in this timeline. It seems reasonable to expect that the events of this series are what spurs Obi Wan to sharpen his skills as a Jedi to be a better protector of Luke and to ultimately train him (we should have a better picture of whether that will be the case the final episode airs). Either way, 9 years is a long time.
I suppose you can nitpick at the line in New Hope where Vader tells Obi Wan when last they met he was the learner and now he's the master. We know now that the last time they met Vader was dragging Obi Wan across a fire as he was attempting to flee. But it doesn't change at all the main point of that line, which was to establish that Vader was once his pupil. It's nitpicking to expect purity between projects that are 40 years apart.
There's inconsistency between GLs own stories. It's not exactly like SW has ever had a rock solid canon. ObiWan's "from a certain point of view" was fixing a plot hole GL created. Tarkin saying "surely he's dead by now" was because originally the PT events happened much longer before EpIV.
It's a story hamstrung by a known future.
What the hell do you want from them?
Either enjoy it for what it is or just stop watching.
I think it's great. So I'll keep right on enjoying it.
All the hand wringing is just plain stupid.
You would think the fact that their corporate stock has fallen 36.3% over 6 months would tell them something. Nope, deaf ears.
If you think that this is the problem and not the actual poor acting, directing, and writing then I would say that you have a more of an agenda than Disney does.
I told that person that there would be a redemption arc that the character had to go through and in the end, it would make sense. After the finale, I think my prediction was spot on.
People are getting tied up in knots because Obi-wan entered this series as a weak broken man who had fallen away from his Jedi past. If he were a military guy, we would say he was suffering from PTSD and needed to find his reason to go on after the significant trauma of losing his entire way of life, having the Jedi order decimated and his best friend turn into a Sith Lord who betrayed them all. That would crush the spirit of almost anyone.
I think they did an excellent job of having Obi-wan learn that the galaxy didn’t need the Jedi to fight on- but they did need protection from the Empire. Through that journey, he found his reason to go on and rediscover who he was and what his purpose was.
At the end, we see the powerful Jedi Master again emerge- and I won’t spoil the rest for those who have not seen it. But the ending and dialogue brought the story full circle.
There were some silly moments- like Obi-wan getting chased by a Star Destroyer in a shuttle to a planet- but when he leaves the planet- the Star Destroyer is gone. Doesn’t make sense in light of what occurred on the planet, but it doesn’t break the story.
In fact, the finale probably sets the stage for what will come in Ashoka and other related stories from the time period. The rebellion is forming and now Obi-wan knows his role in the galaxy and his purpose.
I thought it was better that for the first time, Obi-wan realized that this wasn’t Anakin anymore- and simply called him “Darth.” Seeing Vader’s temper tantrum afterwards showed that one stung, as Obi-wan was effectively saying he no longer cared and Vader’s taunts couldn’t hurt Obi-wan anymore.
I told that person that there would be a redemption arc that the character had to go through and in the end, it would make sense. After the finale, I think my prediction was spot on.
People are getting tied up in knots because Obi-wan entered this series as a weak broken man who had fallen away from his Jedi past. If he were a military guy, we would say he was suffering from PTSD and needed to find his reason to go on after the significant trauma of losing his entire way of life, having the Jedi order decimated and his best friend turn into a Sith Lord who betrayed them all. That would crush the spirit of almost anyone.
I think they did an excellent job of having Obi-wan learn that the galaxy didn’t need the Jedi to fight on- but they did need protection from the Empire. Through that journey, he found his reason to go on and rediscover who he was and what his purpose was.
At the end, we see the powerful Jedi Master again emerge- and I won’t spoil the rest for those who have not seen it. But the ending and dialogue brought the story full circle.
There were some silly moments- like Obi-wan getting chased by a Star Destroyer in a shuttle to a planet- but when he leaves the planet- the Star Destroyer is gone. Doesn’t make sense in light of what occurred on the planet, but it doesn’t break the story.
In fact, the finale probably sets the stage for what will come in Ashoka and other related stories from the time period. The rebellion is forming and now Obi-wan knows his role in the galaxy and his purpose.
We have one excellent movie (Empire), two great ones (ANH and Rogue 1) and one good one (ROTJ). And one good series - Mandalorian.
The other 7 movies, Boba Fett and Obi Wan are bad or worse.
Maybe the animated kids' shows are good, I don't know, I haven't watched them and don't see myself doing that. There's too much actual good TV to watch elsewhere.
That's precisely how I see it. I maintain to this day that watching The Phantom Menace was the worst experience I've ever had in a theater. I've seen worse movies I'm sure, but not ones that I expected more from or anticipated more.
I never dared watch the other two prequels in their entirety but I've seen various scenes. Maybe it's true that they're not as bad as PM but only by a matter of degrees. From what I saw they have no personality or charisma... their attempts to introduce any just come across as insultingly silly. If they were standalone films and not prequels to some of the most popular films in history, they'd be unanimously shit upon.
The 7th and 8th episodes whose titles I'm not going to bother to remember were an improvement over the prequels, but that's hardly an accomplishment worth celebrating. They certainly weren't as wooden and they had some decent moments, but they still didn't convey the spirit of the originals. I'm only assuming the same is true of the 9th -- why shouldn't I?
what?