for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Was Slayton showcased in game 1 for trade with Bears?

MartyNJ1969 : 8/13/2022 10:47 pm
Did anyone else find it Ironic that Slayton was targeted very early in the pats game with some very well scripted plays.

I would say Slayton and an 3rd rounder will land Roquan Smith. Bears need a WR desperately.

Also Roquan is on his fifth year option and has demanded a trade  
MartyNJ1969 : 8/13/2022 10:49 pm : link
and claims Bears are not acting in good faith.
I'd love Roquan, but how could we afford him?  
Anakim : 8/13/2022 10:51 pm : link
He wants a new contract and we're pretty tight against the cap. If anything, we'd trade Slayton to unload his salary.
That fifth year can be extended in a trade i believe. The Agents  
MartyNJ1969 : 8/13/2022 10:54 pm : link
know this.
Slayton is not that great  
eric2425ny : 8/13/2022 11:29 pm : link
I don’t see him helping the Bears much or them thinking he’s the solution. They’ll run an offense centered around the run with Montgomery and Herbert and hope Fields develops. Mooney is a very underrated receiver and many think Cole Kmet will emerge as a nice TE safety blanket for Fields.

I also think this new regime is looking to make their own imprint on the organization without spending a crazy amount of money this season. They want to build their own team and to do that they have to avoid extending bad contracts like KG to make room to trade for a player like Smith.
Maybe he was showcased but I doubt for Smith  
j_rud : 8/13/2022 11:38 pm : link
Hopefully for a comparable (flawed but adequate) corner. That secondary is potentially catastrophic.
Why the fuck wouod we give up a 3rd to pay someone big money  
robbieballs2003 : 8/13/2022 11:44 pm : link
?
RE: Maybe he was showcased but I doubt for Smith  
Milton : 8/13/2022 11:45 pm : link
In comment 15780305 j_rud said:
Quote:
Hopefully for a comparable (flawed but adequate) corner. That secondary is potentially catastrophic.
Baltimore makes the most sense.
Daboll said he tweaked something  
bLiTz 2k : 8/13/2022 11:46 pm : link
And they kept him out thereafter.
I think the Buffalo trade makes more sense...for both sides  
rasbutant : 8/14/2022 12:04 am : link
Slayton for Ford straight up.

Cody Ford is on the last year of his contract and rumor is he is on the bubble. Team trading for him would be responsible for ~1.5M. ~900k dead to Buffalo.

Trading Slayton saves the Giants ~2.5M


Benefit Giants 1M and Oline Depth they really need.
Benefit Buffalo WR depth they really need.

Really makes sense for both sides, before even factoring in the GM connection.


RE: I think the Buffalo trade makes more sense...for both sides  
eric2425ny : 8/14/2022 12:20 am : link
In comment 15780312 rasbutant said:
Quote:
Slayton for Ford straight up.

Cody Ford is on the last year of his contract and rumor is he is on the bubble. Team trading for him would be responsible for ~1.5M. ~900k dead to Buffalo.

Trading Slayton saves the Giants ~2.5M


Benefit Giants 1M and Oline Depth they really need.
Benefit Buffalo WR depth they really need.

Really makes sense for both sides, before even factoring in the GM connection.



Love it, sign me up.
RE: I think the Buffalo trade makes more sense...for both sides  
Breeze_94 : 8/14/2022 12:46 am : link
In comment 15780312 rasbutant said:
Quote:
Slayton for Ford straight up.

Cody Ford is on the last year of his contract and rumor is he is on the bubble. Team trading for him would be responsible for ~1.5M. ~900k dead to Buffalo.

Trading Slayton saves the Giants ~2.5M


Benefit Giants 1M and Oline Depth they really need.
Benefit Buffalo WR depth they really need.

Really makes sense for both sides, before even factoring in the GM connection.



Thats an interesting one.

Another one- Slayton for Josh Oliver, Tight end on the Ravens. Ravens TE room is deep...Oliver was a 3rd rounder in 2019 that would be an excellent fit for what Daboll wants at the position

The Ravens need receivers  
Milton : 8/14/2022 12:46 am : link
Especially those with speed to stretch the field and give their running game (including Jackson) more room to run. And the Ravens have a deep group at the CB/DB position that's played in Martindale's system.
RE: The Ravens need receivers  
Breeze_94 : 8/14/2022 2:25 am : link
In comment 15780319 Milton said:
Quote:
Especially those with speed to stretch the field and give their running game (including Jackson) more room to run. And the Ravens have a deep group at the CB/DB position that's played in Martindale's system.


Ravens are deep at safety, not corner. Giants need corners, not safeties...safety should be fine assuming Belton makes it back. Adams is pros pro who is fine as the depth guy.

Ravens might be worse off at corner than the Giants are. Humphrey is good but if he goes down they are in trouble (similar to Giants with Adoree)

Peters is the second starter but he is on PUP coming off an ACL. Kyle Fuller is projected as the slot guy. The backups after Peters & Humphrey on the outside are 2 4th round rookies & Daryl Worley (signed last week)
To some extent, every player  
section125 : 8/14/2022 7:24 am : link
is being showcased. There is little doubt Slayton is on the bubble for either trade or release. I would hope they get a draft pick for him, but I doubt it would be more than a 6 or 7.
As far as Baltimore, if they have a safety they would want to swap, would not be surprised if Schoen does that. THey are thin at safety too - X, Love and Adams are really the only sure safeties they have with Belton hurt.
Section 125  
SLIM_ : 8/14/2022 7:45 am : link
is right. Maybe - maybe you get a seventh for Slayton. For a team like Baltimore who probably picks low, a 6th.

Slayton was absolute dog crap last year. He was very promising as a rookie. I thought he was hurt year 2 but learned to run better routes but was terrrible last year.

There is a reason why he is on the bubble here.
If we trade Slayton  
Biteymax22 : 8/14/2022 9:22 am : link
It won’t be for a MLB, specifically one that has a cost to him additional to Slayton.

It will be draft picks, a CB or OL depth.
Slayton is a jag  
JonC : 8/14/2022 9:23 am : link
Let's not overrate his trade value.

Ford is interesting because the Giants were reportedly very high on him in the draft. Maybe there is a path here with Slayton.
Trading with the Bears for Smith sounds like the Leonard Williams deal  
Ivan15 : 8/14/2022 9:35 am : link
All over again.
Won’t we need Slayton after  
Jimmy Googs : 8/14/2022 9:40 am : link
they bench Golladay?
i dont understand how some Giants fans think  
blueblood : 8/14/2022 9:47 am : link
If YOU think Slayton sucks and is on the bubble, isnt worth 2.5 million and could get cut. Dont you think EVERY NFL team thinks the same thing ? Why should I trade away assets, and pay his salary for the season when you might just release him and I could sign him for LESS money ??

Why do we always think our trash is EVERY other teams treasure..
the bears  
Mook80 : 8/14/2022 9:50 am : link
might need a good WR but they certainly dont need JAG like Slayton.
I'm  
AcidTest : 8/14/2022 9:58 am : link
fine trading Slayton for Ford. Both are likely JAGs. Trading Slayton saves $2.5M but that isn't a lot, and the Giants might keep him because of his deep speed.

My guess is that Slayton's value on the open market is no higher than a seventh round draft pick. He had a very high drop rate last year, and will be a FA after this season. Any team trading for him would be banking on him returning to the form he had as a rookie. That was a long time ago.
the ravens have made the most sense since the reager rumor was  
Eric on Li : 8/14/2022 10:16 am : link
floated around the draft. slayton is a lot of things and most of them aren't positive, but one that is is better than reager.

they have the deepest stable of DBs in the NFL, i suspect 1 of them is incoming here by cutdown day.
Probably  
BigBlueinDE : 8/14/2022 11:26 am : link
not.
This article suggests Slayton to the Cowboys ...  
Manny in CA : 8/14/2022 11:35 am : link

https://heavy.com/sports/new-york-giants/giants-darius-slayton-cowboys-trade-target/

I know, may at BBI thirst for Slayton to be pushed out-the-door, but what does that leave us ? Toney is closest deep threat receiver on the roster (and he looks like he'll have injury prone career).

Maybe the Giants have just resigned themselves to a dink-and-doink passing offense that's easy for Dan Jones to execute. I get that too.

RE: I think the Buffalo trade makes more sense...for both sides  
bw in dc : 8/14/2022 11:59 am : link
In comment 15780312 rasbutant said:
Quote:
Slayton for Ford straight up.

Cody Ford is on the last year of his contract and rumor is he is on the bubble. Team trading for him would be responsible for ~1.5M. ~900k dead to Buffalo.

Trading Slayton saves the Giants ~2.5M


Benefit Giants 1M and Oline Depth they really need.
Benefit Buffalo WR depth they really need.

Really makes sense for both sides, before even factoring in the GM connection.



I'd do that in a second. But I would be a bit surprised if Buffalo did that despite the connections. And I think it's tough to give up OL depth.

And I like Buffalo's receiving corp with Diggs, Davis, Crowder, Know, Howard, etc.
showcased?  
pjcas18 : 8/14/2022 12:13 pm : link
that 1 catch for 17 yards had to leave the Bears dazzled. Maybe they'll trade a couple 1sts.

I used to think Slayton had potential to become a valuable WR, but that was 3 years ago after a surprise rookie season, now I think he's dime a dozen.

RE: showcased?  
MartyNJ1969 : 8/14/2022 8:37 pm : link
In comment 15780526 pjcas18 said:
Quote:
that 1 catch for 17 yards had to leave the Bears dazzled. Maybe they'll trade a couple 1sts.

I used to think Slayton had potential to become a valuable WR, but that was 3 years ago after a surprise rookie season, now I think he's dime a dozen.


Slayton has talent and was misused by judge and Jason Garrett
LOL  
It's a New Day : 8/14/2022 8:49 pm : link
With all of the game footage of Slayton does anyone believe any GM in football would be like, "coach did you see the plays Slayton made in preseason? We should go get him!"
Jones' ineptitude is probably related ...  
Manny in CA : 8/14/2022 9:07 pm : link

To the failure of the receivers, including Slayton's problems.
A lot of the level of performance is also related to the natural rhythm of good offensive coordination.

Back to the Corner