NFT: Calvine UFO photo leaked

I expected to see something that looked a little smoother for some odd reason. I know this sounds stupid, but it almost looks like an antique UFO, which makes me think it's manmade, but I don't know why I think that.

BTW, there is already a thread on this subject posted 2 days ago.

Every single one of them is grainy and or refutable or falsifiable. They “look” real. They “look” like ufos. But they aren’t real until they are real. Until we all look up and see shit that is absolutely impossible to deny, this shit is nothing more than fairy tale stuff.

That’s not me shitting all over ufo talk. I like this shit, but every pic is the same. Kinda looks real while proving nothing.

If they wanted us to know, we’d know.

In comment 15780432 djm said:

Quote:

Every single one of them is grainy and or refutable or falsifiable. They “look” real. They “look” like ufos. But they aren’t real until they are real. Until we all look up and see shit that is absolutely impossible to deny, this shit is nothing more than fairy tale stuff. That’s not me shitting all over ufo talk. I like this shit, but every pic is the same. Kinda looks real while proving nothing. If they wanted us to know, we’d know.

Yep. If there was something to know. Which there isn't.

In comment 15780449 Producer said:

Quote:

In comment 15780432 djm said: Quote: Every single one of them is grainy and or refutable or falsifiable. They “look” real. They “look” like ufos. But they aren’t real until they are real. Until we all look up and see shit that is absolutely impossible to deny, this shit is nothing more than fairy tale stuff. That’s not me shitting all over ufo talk. I like this shit, but every pic is the same. Kinda looks real while proving nothing. If they wanted us to know, we’d know. Yep. If there was something to know. Which there isn't.

JFC this planet is 4.5 billion years old and just in the last 40k years something has stirred? That's hubris that's hard to imagine even for you.

In comment 15780466 Joey in VA said:

Quote:

In comment 15780449 Producer said: Quote: In comment 15780432 djm said: Quote: Every single one of them is grainy and or refutable or falsifiable. They “look” real. They “look” like ufos. But they aren’t real until they are real. Until we all look up and see shit that is absolutely impossible to deny, this shit is nothing more than fairy tale stuff. That’s not me shitting all over ufo talk. I like this shit, but every pic is the same. Kinda looks real while proving nothing. If they wanted us to know, we’d know. Yep. If there was something to know. Which there isn't. JFC this planet is 4.5 billion years old and just in the last 40k years something has stirred? That's hubris that's hard to imagine even for you.

You'll have to clarify your statement. What has "stirred" in the last 40,000 years? It's not hubris to disbelieve in UFOs. We have billions of recording devices in the hands of billions of people, and we still only get grainy, hard to decipher, images.

In the sense of some object in the air that’s not identified (by the public) ok. But there’s a jet in that pic which means likely some experiment.

The science is just not likely for alien visitors. The distances are too great. And why us? We’re a speck on a speck on a speck.

I believe there’s almost certainly life out there, somewhere. Some of it may be “intelligent” by our limited definition. But coming here at all, much less undetected? Highly highly unlikely.

In comment 15780484 Daniel in MI said:

Quote:

In the sense of some object in the air that’s not identified (by the public) ok. But there’s a jet in that pic which means likely some experiment. The science is just not likely for alien visitors. The distances are too great. And why us? We’re a speck on a speck on a speck. I believe there’s almost certainly life out there, somewhere. Some of it may be “intelligent” by our limited definition. But coming here at all, much less undetected? Highly highly unlikely.

Fermi paradox. Unless visitors have wormhole/interdimensional tech which would put them about 100,000 years ahead of us in tech

the object could pass for the object reported in the Cash–Landrum incident in Texas during the 80's. Diamond shaped crash, with military helicopters (assumed) along with it. There was also reports of radiation sickness afterwards by the people involved. Maybe it is/was an experimental nuclear aircraft?

In comment 15780432 djm said:

Quote:

Every single one of them is grainy and or refutable or falsifiable. They “look” real. They “look” like ufos. But they aren’t real until they are real. Until we all look up and see shit that is absolutely impossible to deny, this shit is nothing more than fairy tale stuff.

It's pretty telling that this crappy photo is the "world's best ever."

Not saying it’s not. I have had my own sighting of a metallic orb in the north Myrtle beach area years ago and it was surrounded by military copters in broad daylight

Or that there aren’t UFOs or a possibility of them. I just don’t think any pics prove much of anything. My point is it won’t be a pic like these that flips us all upside down.

us the Loch Ness monster right?

In comment 15780934 djm said:

Quote:

Or that there aren’t UFOs or a possibility of them. I just don’t think any pics prove much of anything. My point is it won’t be a pic like these that flips us all upside down.

Prove? No.

Provide evidence that these objects do exist and the stigma around them should be reduced so they can be rationally discussed and studied scientifically? Yes

“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence …”

IF it is being claimed a given “UFO” photo is evidence of extraterrestrial life (or artificial life), I’m supposed to believe that they can travel tens, hundreds etc light years, but can’t evade being observed if they desire to remain hidden?