for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

A little logic help on Jones and our QB situation..

1st and 10 : 9/29/2022 8:20 am
Put aside which camp you are on regarding Daniel Jones. This is the way I am thinking about his situation right now:

1) Giants are most likely going to draft in the 12-20 range. I base this on their schedule this year being easier than last and it seems like we have a competent HC.

2) With that draft range, we are out of the picture for any of the elite QB's in the draft. (I do not consider Levis an elite QB in next years draft).

3) Free Agency does not have many QB's to choose from next year. The best, by far, is Lamar. I have a hard time believing the Ravens will let him go without some sort of tag.

Now the Ravens have let star players go in the past (Ed Reed) so this is not out of the ordinary, but none of these star Ravens players have ever been the QB of the team.

4) Why would any FA come to us unless this OL improves? As well, who is he throwing to? We have no one to advertise a QB to.

My most likely scenario is that Jones will sign a 2-3 year contract, but he will have his suitors as well.

The main concern for me is that all the above are true, the Giants try to sign him and he signs elsewhere. At the end of the day, a team might look at him and say that he has not had a good OL, WR or steady coaching in his 4 years here, he can make the throws so why not chance a signing.

I want to ask all of you, if you do not want Jones, how do you look to address the QB position? Is my take wrong?
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Show All |  Next>>
Just my 2 cents  
jnoble : 9/29/2022 8:26 am : link
As of right now addressing WR/LB and remaining offensive line issues are more glaring than QB.
I think it is way too early to be convinced of #2 in your OP  
Jimmy Googs : 9/29/2022 8:30 am : link
I believe the Giants will try to address QB through one of the next two drafts.

And who will be in the list of top prospects at QB and where they will be picked has a lot of time to come into focus.

There also will be many options available to Schoen to navigate the draft to increase his chances in drafting one.

Let's wait and see how it plays out :-)
I think signing Tyrod to a 2-year deal  
Section331 : 9/29/2022 8:32 am : link
spells the end of Jones's time here. I think the plan all along was to draft a QB, and have TT play until the new guy is ready. Plans can always change, but when has a starting QB take a less than market deal to stay with the team that drafted him? I can't think of any.
100% agree  
AG5686 : 9/29/2022 8:33 am : link
I think Giant fans forget how difficult it is to get a top tier QB....there are so many FA/Draft Busts that can set a franchise back for years....
I am firmly in the keep DJ short term camp and try to firm up the other myriad holes left by Gettlfucker
We still don't know how the Giants  
Lines of Scrimmage : 9/29/2022 8:36 am : link
view the QB's coming out are viewed by the Giants. I think they measure that against Jones or any other FA factoring in costs.

I also hope JS/BD adjust their team building philosophy and hopefully being in the NFCE for a year they see things are a bit different here than in Buffalo and the state of that division at the time. This shift allows more flexibility in selecting a QB imv.

These posts always begin with something like:  
Producer : 9/29/2022 8:36 am : link
"Regardless of which camp you're in.... first a little logic..."

and end with:

"We should sign Daniel Jones to a 3 year contract."

That's not logical. It's fucking bananas. You want to commit 3 more years to a failed QB. He sucks. He hasn't ever achieved the basic stat line of a star QB. Teams move on from guys like that. We have to start looking for a QB that has elite ability.
There are other ways to acquire a QB aside  
cosmicj : 9/29/2022 8:37 am : link
From losing into a high 1st rounder.
Using this logic. why in the world  
Matt M. : 9/29/2022 8:38 am : link
would Jones want to re-sign, let alone for a short term deal?
RE: Using this logic. why in the world  
Producer : 9/29/2022 8:40 am : link
In comment 15837436 Matt M. said:
Quote:
would Jones want to re-sign, let alone for a short term deal?


You're totally right. He's too good for us.
RE: Just my 2 cents  
Dave : 9/29/2022 8:42 am : link
In comment 15837421 jnoble said:
Quote:
As of right now addressing WR/LB and remaining offensive line issues are more glaring than QB.


add my 2 cents to this thought
I'm in the same boat  
Larry from WV : 9/29/2022 8:47 am : link
We need WR MLB and interior line help. I don't expect Jones to get top dollar and I don't think we can get a better solution as low as we will likely be picking. An incentive-laden 3-year deal would be ideal.
I don’t know but Taylor as the solution for next year is nuts  
BillT : 9/29/2022 8:51 am : link
He’s a very average backup if that. Now, if tanking in year two of this regime is the plan then sure. Taylor is your guy. That makes this like a what? Four/five/six year rebuild.
So the argument continues to be  
Mike from Ohio : 9/29/2022 8:55 am : link
that unless you are in the top-5 you can't get a franchise QB. This continues despite the fact the Aaron Rodgers, Tom Brady, Josh Allen, Patrick Mahomes, Justin Herbert, and Lamar Jackson were all taken 6 or later (and aside from Herbert and Allen, all taken 10 or later).

The Giants have Taylor under contract for next year if there is nobody they like in the draft or free agency. We don't need someone slightly better than Taylor at a much higher price tag.

You brought in Daboll and Kafka to develop a QB. I am sure they can find someone with the skills they need to run a system designed for that player. And if he needs to sit and learn, you already have Taylor to start.

Jones will sign some sort of prove it deal somewhere. Nobody is bringing him to do anything other than compete with someone or be a backup.
RE: I don’t know but Taylor as the solution for next year is nuts  
Lines of Scrimmage : 9/29/2022 8:56 am : link
In comment 15837450 BillT said:
Quote:
He’s a very average backup if that. Now, if tanking in year two of this regime is the plan then sure. Taylor is your guy. That makes this like a what? Four/five/six year rebuild.


I don't think BD will have that luxury. Never seen a HC in this franchise have that type of time to get things going.

Taylor is the backup and possible starter for a few games in 2023 if they draft a QB next offseason. If that is not the plan then they will need a better solution imv which is part of the evaluation of Jones this year.
RE: 100% agree  
ajr2456 : 9/29/2022 8:59 am : link
In comment 15837428 AG5686 said:
Quote:
I think Giant fans forget how difficult it is to get a top tier QB....there are so many FA/Draft Busts that can set a franchise back for years....
I am firmly in the keep DJ short term camp and try to firm up the other myriad holes left by Gettlfucker


Not sure we forget, we’re living through it
RE: So the argument continues to be  
Larry from WV : 9/29/2022 9:04 am : link
I think the argument is more in line that you can't depend on finding any of those with your pick. If you do great, they beat out Jones and win the job, but otherwise, Jones is better than the alternatives while you try to find a long-term solution.

In comment 15837451 Mike from Ohio said:
Quote:
that unless you are in the top-5 you can't get a franchise QB. This continues despite the fact the Aaron Rodgers, Tom Brady, Josh Allen, Patrick Mahomes, Justin Herbert, and Lamar Jackson were all taken 6 or later (and aside from Herbert and Allen, all taken 10 or later).

The Giants have Taylor under contract for next year if there is nobody they like in the draft or free agency. We don't need someone slightly better than Taylor at a much higher price tag.

You brought in Daboll and Kafka to develop a QB. I am sure they can find someone with the skills they need to run a system designed for that player. And if he needs to sit and learn, you already have Taylor to start.

Jones will sign some sort of prove it deal somewhere. Nobody is bringing him to do anything other than compete with someone or be a backup.
Any 1st, 2nd or 3rd round QB in the upcoming draft  
Producer : 9/29/2022 9:04 am : link
is a better option than Danny Dimes.
I look at Hurts  
1st and 10 : 9/29/2022 9:05 am : link
And Philadelphia, and they have brought in Smith and brown over the last two years. All of a sudden Hurts has gone from an average QB to one that’s playing lights out this year so far. I begin to question “Who have the Giants Surrounded Daniel Jones With”? That’s where I get lost in the situation
RE: I look at Hurts  
Producer : 9/29/2022 9:08 am : link
In comment 15837461 1st and 10 said:
Quote:
And Philadelphia, and they have brought in Smith and brown over the last two years. All of a sudden Hurts has gone from an average QB to one that’s playing lights out this year so far. I begin to question “Who have the Giants Surrounded Daniel Jones With”? That’s where I get lost in the situation


Jones is incapable of feeding a playmaker. In 4 years he has failed to make a meaningful connection with any of his WRs. If he had AJ Brown, he would continue to check down, Brown would get upset, and fans would blame Brown.
Even  
cokeduplt : 9/29/2022 9:10 am : link
If they pick in the 12-20 range, there’s still the possibility of trading up.
In general I agree with  
mfjmfj : 9/29/2022 9:11 am : link
the OP, but think that his set up should lead to a conclusion of going with Tyrod and building the team. Not resigning DJ. Building the team could include a mid first QB or even a later round QB that might work out. I also see a path where we sign DJ to a new deal. That involves the team actually playing better, esp. the OL, getting real help at WR from KT and Wan'dale, and DJ continuing to be what he is - a mid range NFL starter who might be able to lead a good team all the way.
RE: So the argument continues to be  
Jimmy Googs : 9/29/2022 9:11 am : link
In comment 15837451 Mike from Ohio said:
Quote:
that unless you are in the top-5 you can't get a franchise QB. This continues despite the fact the Aaron Rodgers, Tom Brady, Josh Allen, Patrick Mahomes, Justin Herbert, and Lamar Jackson were all taken 6 or later (and aside from Herbert and Allen, all taken 10 or later).

The Giants have Taylor under contract for next year if there is nobody they like in the draft or free agency. We don't need someone slightly better than Taylor at a much higher price tag.

You brought in Daboll and Kafka to develop a QB. I am sure they can find someone with the skills they need to run a system designed for that player. And if he needs to sit and learn, you already have Taylor to start.

Jones will sign some sort of prove it deal somewhere. Nobody is bringing him to do anything other than compete with someone or be a backup.


Posters seem to forget that teams draft lots of different players in Rd 1, not just QBs.

Some morons even pick running backs :-)
There will be a QB available in the draft  
Jim in Forest Hills : 9/29/2022 9:13 am : link
That they like and they will draft him. Tyrod will start a few games and then the transition will occur. As for jones, go in peace long rifle.
RE: I look at Hurts  
Mike from Ohio : 9/29/2022 9:14 am : link
In comment 15837461 1st and 10 said:
Quote:
And Philadelphia, and they have brought in Smith and brown over the last two years. All of a sudden Hurts has gone from an average QB to one that’s playing lights out this year so far. I begin to question “Who have the Giants Surrounded Daniel Jones With”? That’s where I get lost in the situation


Hold on a second. Last year was Hurts' first year as a starter in the NFL. So in year one he "just an average guy" but here we are in year 4 with Jones and arguing "we don't really know if he is any good?"

Jalen Hurts is already a better player than Jones. He has more talent and he has developed faster. A good coaching staff can find a good QB outside the top-5 of the draft. It is starting to happen almost every year as the similarities between the college game and the NFL game lessen.

And guess what? Next year we can also draft a WR and/or sign one or two in free agency. That option was not open to the Giants this year because they signed a free agent and paid him more than he was worth.

This is not some sort of 5-6 year rebuild as someone laughably suggested above. It isn't 1985 anymore.
I think with Jones  
nygiants16 : 9/29/2022 9:15 am : link
i have seen an improvement each week..From week 1 to week 3 you can see some differences, he isnt looking down the second pressure starts, he has kept his eyes down the field, he has felt pressure much better and he has climbed the pocket much better..

I have also seen some great throws that shows he does have arm strength..

I could see the Giants giving him a 2 or 3 year deal, incentive laden while still looking to see if they find a franchise QB...Jones is capable to win with jist not sure if you win because of him..

Giants get him a number 1 this offseason and improve the rest of the team
RE: RE: I don’t know but Taylor as the solution for next year is nuts  
BillT : 9/29/2022 9:26 am : link
In comment 15837453 Lines of Scrimmage said:
Quote:

I don't think BD will have that luxury. Never seen a HC in this franchise have that type of time to get things going.

Taylor is the backup and possible starter for a few games in 2023 if they draft a QB next offseason. If that is not the plan then they will need a better solution imv which is part of the evaluation of Jones this year.

Exactly. I agree. But the premise here was that we are getting a new “franchise” QB next year or if we get a new QB he will be a 2nd tier type. Tough spot.
RE: RE: RE: I don’t know but Taylor as the solution for next year is nuts  
BillT : 9/29/2022 9:27 am : link
In comment 15837477 BillT said:
Quote:
In comment 15837453 Lines of Scrimmage said:


Quote:



I don't think BD will have that luxury. Never seen a HC in this franchise have that type of time to get things going.

Taylor is the backup and possible starter for a few games in 2023 if they draft a QB next offseason. If that is not the plan then they will need a better solution imv which is part of the evaluation of Jones this year.


Exactly. I agree. But the premise here was that we are getting a new “franchise” QB next year or if we get a new QB he will be a 2nd tier type. Tough spot.

aren’t getting
It's not going to happen  
Blue The Dog : 9/29/2022 9:28 am : link
If the Giants thought the level of QB play shown by Jones over the first 3 games was enough, they would have picked up his option.

He hasn't taken a big leap, and he's basically the same player he has been the first 3 years (you can argue he is better in the margins, but that's about it.) Nothing over these first 3 games will change the evaluation from rejecting a 1 year, cost controlled year, to giving him a multi year commitment
Why do so many ignore trading up?  
Sean : 9/29/2022 9:29 am : link
The Chiefs traded to for Mahomes.
The Texans traded up for Watson.
The Bills traded up for Allen.
The Niners traded to for Lance.
The Bears traded up for Fields.

Which teams who are in the market for a QB just sit on their hands and wait? I’d urge a lot here to get comfortable with the fact that the 2024 first round pick could likely be moved to trade up for QB.
RE: I look at Hurts  
TheBlueprintNC : 9/29/2022 9:30 am : link
In comment 15837461 1st and 10 said:
Quote:
And Philadelphia, and they have brought in Smith and brown over the last two years. All of a sudden Hurts has gone from an average QB to one that’s playing lights out this year so far. I begin to question “Who have the Giants Surrounded Daniel Jones With”? That’s where I get lost in the situation


Hurts also has a great OL and run game behind him not to mention a top TE. but yeah Dan suxx
RE: I look at Hurts  
TheBlueprintNC : 9/29/2022 9:31 am : link
In comment 15837461 1st and 10 said:
Quote:
And Philadelphia, and they have brought in Smith and brown over the last two years. All of a sudden Hurts has gone from an average QB to one that’s playing lights out this year so far. I begin to question “Who have the Giants Surrounded Daniel Jones With”? That’s where I get lost in the situation


Hurts also has a great OL and run game behind him not to mention a top TE. but yeah Dan suxx
Committing to Jones is committing to losing  
Jerry in_DC : 9/29/2022 9:33 am : link
You cannot win consistently or at a high level with a backup caliber QB like Jones.

Trying something new is not a guarantee of winning. But it gives you a chance.

With Jones there is no chance. And that's why teams never ever commit to keeping QBs as bad a Jones.
RE: RE: I look at Hurts  
ajr2456 : 9/29/2022 9:33 am : link
In comment 15837471 Mike from Ohio said:
Quote:
In comment 15837461 1st and 10 said:


Quote:


And Philadelphia, and they have brought in Smith and brown over the last two years. All of a sudden Hurts has gone from an average QB to one that’s playing lights out this year so far. I begin to question “Who have the Giants Surrounded Daniel Jones With”? That’s where I get lost in the situation



Hold on a second. Last year was Hurts' first year as a starter in the NFL. So in year one he "just an average guy" but here we are in year 4 with Jones and arguing "we don't really know if he is any good?"

Jalen Hurts is already a better player than Jones. He has more talent and he has developed faster. A good coaching staff can find a good QB outside the top-5 of the draft. It is starting to happen almost every year as the similarities between the college game and the NFL game lessen.

And guess what? Next year we can also draft a WR and/or sign one or two in free agency. That option was not open to the Giants this year because they signed a free agent and paid him more than he was worth.

This is not some sort of 5-6 year rebuild as someone laughably suggested above. It isn't 1985 anymore.


All of this
RE: So the argument continues to be  
Snablats : 9/29/2022 9:42 am : link
In comment 15837451 Mike from Ohio said:
Quote:
that unless you are in the top-5 you can't get a franchise QB. This continues despite the fact the Aaron Rodgers, Tom Brady, Josh Allen, Patrick Mahomes, Justin Herbert, and Lamar Jackson were all taken 6 or later (and aside from Herbert and Allen, all taken 10 or later).

The Giants have Taylor under contract for next year if there is nobody they like in the draft or free agency. We don't need someone slightly better than Taylor at a much higher price tag.

You brought in Daboll and Kafka to develop a QB. I am sure they can find someone with the skills they need to run a system designed for that player. And if he needs to sit and learn, you already have Taylor to start.

Jones will sign some sort of prove it deal somewhere. Nobody is bringing him to do anything other than compete with someone or be a backup.

Great, now name every QB taken 6 or later that didnt become a franchise QB? It will be a very long list

A plan of "I am sure they can find someone" isnt a plan
Daniel s talent was on full display  
joeinpa : 9/29/2022 9:47 am : link
Monday. He was the Giants best player on the field. He elevated a bunch of JV s, Sy s words not mine, to a fourth quarter league.

Yet we still have distractors , spinning this performance as more evidence that he stinks. Lesson learned for me, I ve stopped paying attention to them.

But if Schoen and Daboll determine a rookie is available that gives them at least as much as Daniel does, it will be no brainer to move on


New GM & Coach  
GiantsRage2007 : 9/29/2022 9:51 am : link
Will want to live or die with their choice at qb.

We’re moving on from Jones.

Book it

RE: RE: So the argument continues to be  
Mike from Ohio : 9/29/2022 9:51 am : link
In comment 15837486 Snablats said:
Quote:
In comment 15837451 Mike from Ohio said:


Quote:


that unless you are in the top-5 you can't get a franchise QB. This continues despite the fact the Aaron Rodgers, Tom Brady, Josh Allen, Patrick Mahomes, Justin Herbert, and Lamar Jackson were all taken 6 or later (and aside from Herbert and Allen, all taken 10 or later).

The Giants have Taylor under contract for next year if there is nobody they like in the draft or free agency. We don't need someone slightly better than Taylor at a much higher price tag.

You brought in Daboll and Kafka to develop a QB. I am sure they can find someone with the skills they need to run a system designed for that player. And if he needs to sit and learn, you already have Taylor to start.

Jones will sign some sort of prove it deal somewhere. Nobody is bringing him to do anything other than compete with someone or be a backup.


Great, now name every QB taken 6 or later that didnt become a franchise QB? It will be a very long list

A plan of "I am sure they can find someone" isnt a plan


Now name every QB taken in the top 5 that didn't become a franchise QB. How about Darnold, Mayfield, Trubisky and Goff just to name some from the last few years?

Bad drafting is bad drafting. The point is that a top-5 pick is no guarantee of getting a franchise QB, nor is picking outside the top-5 a guarantee of missing on one.

Your posts are all emotion and zero logic.
Snablats  
Sean : 9/29/2022 9:52 am : link
Where are the points? Where are the TD’s?

For how many people rave over his rookie season, the majority of those stats came against the likes of an awful Bucs defense, the Jets & Washington.

The best win of the Giants season in 2020 was with Colt McCoy.

Jones led the Giants to a 4-7 record before getting hurt in 2021 in what was a “prove it” year.

It drives me nuts, but I’m the “Jones hater”. I just can’t understand the logic of having such low standards at QB. And wanting to run it back with Jones! I don’t get it.

What will the drop off be? There has been and is no production. Jones is an awful red zone QB, this team never scores TD’s in the red zone.

And Hurts was producing even when he was considered “average”. This supposedly loaded Eagles roster everyone loves talking about which went 4-11-1 in 2020 and then made the playoffs in 2021 when Hurts took over.

Again, I get criticized for being a “hater” but I honestly think we have bigger Daniel Jones fans than Giant fans on BBI. Raise your standards.
RE: Daniel s talent was on full display  
stoneman : 9/29/2022 9:52 am : link
In comment 15837488 joeinpa said:
Quote:
Monday. He was the Giants best player on the field. He elevated a bunch of JV s, Sy s words not mine, to a fourth quarter league.

Yet we still have distractors , spinning this performance as more evidence that he stinks. Lesson learned for me, I ve stopped paying attention to them.

But if Schoen and Daboll determine a rookie is available that gives them at least as much as Daniel does, it will be no brainer to move on



+1 - we all know the DJ detractor club - they are easy to spot and ignore.
RE: RE: So the argument continues to be  
Jimmy Googs : 9/29/2022 9:53 am : link
In comment 15837486 Snablats said:
Quote:
In comment 15837451 Mike from Ohio said:


Quote:


that unless you are in the top-5 you can't get a franchise QB. This continues despite the fact the Aaron Rodgers, Tom Brady, Josh Allen, Patrick Mahomes, Justin Herbert, and Lamar Jackson were all taken 6 or later (and aside from Herbert and Allen, all taken 10 or later).

The Giants have Taylor under contract for next year if there is nobody they like in the draft or free agency. We don't need someone slightly better than Taylor at a much higher price tag.

You brought in Daboll and Kafka to develop a QB. I am sure they can find someone with the skills they need to run a system designed for that player. And if he needs to sit and learn, you already have Taylor to start.

Jones will sign some sort of prove it deal somewhere. Nobody is bringing him to do anything other than compete with someone or be a backup.


Great, now name every QB taken 6 or later that didnt become a franchise QB? It will be a very long list

A plan of "I am sure they can find someone" isnt a plan


And not trying to get better at the QB is only a losing plan.

This thread title asks for logic, so please just read if you don't qualify...
RE: RE: So the argument continues to be  
David_Upstate : 9/29/2022 9:53 am : link
In comment 15837486 Snablats said:
Quote:
In comment 15837451 Mike from Ohio said:


Quote:


that unless you are in the top-5 you can't get a franchise QB. This continues despite the fact the Aaron Rodgers, Tom Brady, Josh Allen, Patrick Mahomes, Justin Herbert, and Lamar Jackson were all taken 6 or later (and aside from Herbert and Allen, all taken 10 or later).

The Giants have Taylor under contract for next year if there is nobody they like in the draft or free agency. We don't need someone slightly better than Taylor at a much higher price tag.

You brought in Daboll and Kafka to develop a QB. I am sure they can find someone with the skills they need to run a system designed for that player. And if he needs to sit and learn, you already have Taylor to start.

Jones will sign some sort of prove it deal somewhere. Nobody is bringing him to do anything other than compete with someone or be a backup.


Great, now name every QB taken 6 or later that didnt become a franchise QB? It will be a very long list

A plan of "I am sure they can find someone" isnt a plan


List gets even longer if you add 1 - 6 too
Mayfield, Darnold, Trubisky, Goff, Wentz, Winston, Mariota, Bortles

BTW I don't care if we keep Jones or not whatever gets us back to Superbowl wins

I want to win games  
Essex : 9/29/2022 9:56 am : link
but if we win 7-9 games this year we are going to be in the absolute definition of "QB Hell" in that Jones is not the answer and we won't have a chance at an elite QB in this draft given the amount of wins we are going to get. Maybe we can get a FA QB but the trick in this NFL is that there are only 6-7 QBs that you can pay for that you can still win with while paying for them.

Besides the one year with Wentz, the Eagles have not paid for a QB since Bradford in 2015. That is how they are able to build a roster. Gettleman's biggest crime was not missing on Jones as much as failing to build around him with that excecss capital.
RE: RE: Daniel s talent was on full display  
Mike from Ohio : 9/29/2022 9:57 am : link
In comment 15837494 stoneman said:
Quote:
In comment 15837488 joeinpa said:


Quote:


Monday. He was the Giants best player on the field. He elevated a bunch of JV s, Sy s words not mine, to a fourth quarter league.

Yet we still have distractors , spinning this performance as more evidence that he stinks. Lesson learned for me, I ve stopped paying attention to them.

But if Schoen and Daboll determine a rookie is available that gives them at least as much as Daniel does, it will be no brainer to move on





+1 - we all know the DJ detractor club - they are easy to spot and ignore.


Jones played well on Monday. Pretty much everyone has said that. He has also played good games over his career. The point is that they are few and far between. He is consistently inconsistent game to game. Yes his supporting cast sucks. Nobody said it doesn't or that doesn't matter. But if you say you can't evaluate a player because the folks around him suck, will you explain why that does not apply to Kenny Golladay?

It can be true that Jones played well Monday, occasionally plays good games, and that he is not an NFL-level starting QB. Everyone who believes that doesn't hate Daniel Jones personally.
No quarterback will be successful playing behind this o line  
kelly : 9/29/2022 9:58 am : link
And throwing to these wide receivers.

You have to fix the o line and receivers which will take two years.

So it really doesn't matter who the QB is for the next two years.

Jones won't physically survive the next two years here. He should move on for his own health and I think he will. I don't think he will want to sign with the Giants and the Giants aren't going to franchise him.

Jones may not be the solution but he is not the problem. Anyone who thinks changing the QB will fix our offense is out to lunch.

Eli could not be successful because our o line stunk. We wasted his final years.

Failing to build the o line has been an epic disaster. might as well trade Barkley now he will be shot by the time our line is fixed. Let him enjoy success elsewhere. He worked hard to get back and is running hard.

Draft, free agent, TT, doesn't matter. Until we fix the o line and get receivers it doesn't matter who the QB is. And starting a rookie behind this offense will just ruin him.

Fix the o line. Get receivers. And then go get your QB whether through the draft or a FA.

I like Jones. But he is best served by leaving. And the Giants are best served by fixing the o line, getting receivers, and then getting their QB.

We are at least 2-3 years away from being a good team. The Mara's screwed this team up with 10 years of complete and utter incompetence. Disgraceful.

RE: Daniel s talent was on full display  
Producer : 9/29/2022 9:59 am : link
In comment 15837488 joeinpa said:
Quote:
Monday. He was the Giants best player on the field. He elevated a bunch of JV s, Sy s words not mine, to a fourth quarter league.

Yet we still have distractors , spinning this performance as more evidence that he stinks. Lesson learned for me, I ve stopped paying attention to them.

But if Schoen and Daboll determine a rookie is available that gives them at least as much as Daniel does, it will be no brainer to move on



The QB is supposed to be the best player on the field. So Jones looked to you like the best player on a bad team. So what? He continued to hold the ball too long, stand line a statue in the pocket trying to figure out what was going on, then run around frantically, and we only scored 16 points. We don't need him to be the best player on the Giants, we beed him to be the 10th best player at his position. And other than a few diehards on here, everybody knows he's not.
RE: Any 1st, 2nd or 3rd round QB in the upcoming draft  
Hammer : 9/29/2022 9:59 am : link
In comment 15837460 Producer said:
Quote:
is a better option than Danny Dimes.


This is absolutely ridiculous, and puts all of your comments about Jones into stark perspective.
The haters may be disappointed  
joe48 : 9/29/2022 10:01 am : link
Jones could be the best option and that will be decided by the GM. The anybody but DJ choir will have to eat crow. Will be pretty funny since they have expended so energy trying to run him out of NY.
Hey Producer schmuck  
Dave on the UWS : 9/29/2022 10:01 am : link
Riddle me this Batman. Daboll prefers a QB with the physical stature that Jones has , just for example. name me ONE of the guys coming out for the 23 draft who have that physical size.
Ive looked at them, I’ll wait.
I think because he checks so many boxes for them (not you obviously), they will do everything possible to make it work with Jones.
You can have your opinion and wish list, but listen to the HC. He’s pretty definitive avoir what he sees and what he wants.
RE: The haters may be disappointed  
Sean : 9/29/2022 10:04 am : link
In comment 15837504 joe48 said:
Quote:
Jones could be the best option and that will be decided by the GM. The anybody but DJ choir will have to eat crow. Will be pretty funny since they have expended so energy trying to run him out of NY.

You think it’s funny. I just want to see the Giants win.

joeinpa: all the same things I’ve said about Jones you said about Eli. I remember you being so critical of Eli and he had a history of success. I just don’t get it. It’s been 4 years.
RE: RE: RE: So the argument continues to be  
PatersonPlank : 9/29/2022 10:06 am : link
In comment 15837496 David_Upstate said:
Quote:
In comment 15837486 Snablats said:


Quote:


In comment 15837451 Mike from Ohio said:


Quote:


that unless you are in the top-5 you can't get a franchise QB. This continues despite the fact the Aaron Rodgers, Tom Brady, Josh Allen, Patrick Mahomes, Justin Herbert, and Lamar Jackson were all taken 6 or later (and aside from Herbert and Allen, all taken 10 or later).

The Giants have Taylor under contract for next year if there is nobody they like in the draft or free agency. We don't need someone slightly better than Taylor at a much higher price tag.

You brought in Daboll and Kafka to develop a QB. I am sure they can find someone with the skills they need to run a system designed for that player. And if he needs to sit and learn, you already have Taylor to start.

Jones will sign some sort of prove it deal somewhere. Nobody is bringing him to do anything other than compete with someone or be a backup.


Great, now name every QB taken 6 or later that didnt become a franchise QB? It will be a very long list

A plan of "I am sure they can find someone" isnt a plan



List gets even longer if you add 1 - 6 too
Mayfield, Darnold, Trubisky, Goff, Wentz, Winston, Mariota, Bortles

BTW I don't care if we keep Jones or not whatever gets us back to Superbowl wins


Here you go, every QB taken in Rd 1 since the 2010 draft. Complete crapshoot. Out of 36, I count 22 QB's that I would want Jones over, and 2 that I'm calling a tie (Tannehil and Baker), and 12 that I'd want over Jones.

Ponder, Bradford, Tebow, Cam, Locker, Gabbert, Brandon Weeden, Ryan Tannehill, RG3, Luck, EJ Manual, Bridgewater, Manziel, Bortles, Mariotta, Winston, PAxton Lynch, Wentz, Goff, Watson, Mahomes, Trubisky, Jackson, Rosen, Josh Allen, Darnold, Baker, Haskins, Jones, Murray, Jordan Love, Herbert, Tua, Burrow, Lawrence
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner