needs to ask LaFleur in the post game why he didnt have Rodgers fair catch that punt and attempt a free kick to win it. It would have been from 67 but absolutely doable. That was the perfect spot to take advantage of that rule
Cant have different rules in the end zone and on the field.
It’s insane that it’s different in the end zone
It is not different. You have to complete the play when catching the ball. That would be incomplete in the middle of the field.
If you catch the ball at the one, take a step, reach over the goal line and drop it it’s a touchdown. The balls past the goal line as soon as the feet hit in it should be a touchdown.
If you catch the ball at the one, take a step, reach over the goal line and drop it it’s a touchdown. The balls past the goal line as soon as the feet hit in it should be a touchdown.
You're the one who wants a different rule for completing the process of a catch depending, apparently, on whether the tip of the ball has crossed the plane of the goal when it touches the receiver's hands.
Such a rule would not be an improvement and would raise a host of issues for implementation that you're not even thinking of.
Sorry I like him.
Dumb "bangers and mash" jokes aside, think Sanchez may be better.
Quote:
They bearly call the game and Romo talks thru almost every play with some nonsence story. Holy fuck..
Sorry I like him.
You should be
;-)
FUCK man, sorry, that sucks.
Quote:
That had Hurts over 40 yards because they kneeled three times
FUCK man, sorry, that sucks.
Brutal one
Jones throws that pick going into half it's a 50 page thread.
The MUTE button.
Got a huge earful from his coach.
They won't win anything significant with him.
Needs to do his homework though, or else that money can go away.
He's had a lot of those this year.
Giants should have done the make room the punt play late against the bears lol; it reminded me of that . Instead they handed off to Barkley
I'll admit I wanted him that year.
Is the kicker hurt?
Man, can he spin a football.
#500.
It’s insane that it’s different in the end zone
The ground not being able to cause a fumble applies to runners not pass receivers.
Quote:
Cant have different rules in the end zone and on the field.
It’s insane that it’s different in the end zone
It is not different. You have to complete the play when catching the ball. That would be incomplete in the middle of the field.
Never in doubt. Belichick is .500 without Brady. A JAG.
Quote:
In comment 15842742 Ike#88 said:
Quote:
Cant have different rules in the end zone and on the field.
It’s insane that it’s different in the end zone
It is not different. You have to complete the play when catching the ball. That would be incomplete in the middle of the field.
If you catch the ball at the one, take a step, reach over the goal line and drop it it’s a touchdown. The balls past the goal line as soon as the feet hit in it should be a touchdown.
If you catch the ball at the one, take a step, reach over the goal line and drop it it’s a touchdown. The balls past the goal line as soon as the feet hit in it should be a touchdown.
You're the one who wants a different rule for completing the process of a catch depending, apparently, on whether the tip of the ball has crossed the plane of the goal when it touches the receiver's hands.
Such a rule would not be an improvement and would raise a host of issues for implementation that you're not even thinking of.