We had good news today in the Giants-Bears game, so hopefully things carry over into this game. The third and final game of this series starts in a little over an hour. It's the last chance for the Mets to exit this series the same way they entered it: in control of their destiny to win the division. The game will be on ESPN and is the game of the year up until this point for the Mets.
Lindor and McNeil are hitting 2nd and 3rd respectively. Pete's back at cleanup an Escobar is hitting behind him. McCann is catching and hitting 9th. Luis G is at 2B. Vogey's DHing again and hitting 6th. Wish Marte was here. The friggin Pirates may hav cost Marte the season if this keeps up. Bottom line: multiple players in the Mets' lineup need to step up tonight or their hopes for the division which they lead for almost all of this season are toast.
If the Braves win tonight, they can clinch the division tomorrow with a victory in Miami. Their magic number to win the division would be just one. Now if the Mets win the game tonight, their magic number would be 3 going into the last series of the season against the Nats at Citi. none of that matters though unless they win this game tonight. The other 5 MLB division raves have been decided. This one is at a tipping point tonight, one way or the other.
October 2nd, 2022 - Starting Lineups and pitchers - Mets at Braves - 7:08 pm EST start from Atlanta
.
.
.
#LFGM!
Articles below:
MMO Game Thread: Mets vs. Braves, 7:08 P.M.
Mets Morning News: Pocket aces not enough this time
No day off between games 4 and 5 in NLDS, so deGrom/Scherzer in some order for games 2 and 3, then the G3 starter would have just one day off so I doubt he could pitch in G5. G2 starter could start on 3 days rest
I would guess Scherzer would be the guy on 3 days rest, and if so he would start G1 of the WC
losing 5 out of 6 at home in those 2 series against WSH and CHI is what lost them the division.
Just over a week after trade deadline, Aug 11, Mets had a 7-game lead
From then:
- Went 25-22
- Lost 6 of last 9
- deGrom was human, losing 3 of last 4 starts
- Swept by Cubs at home
- Went just 15-10 against teams with a combined .404 Win%
[quote] which was the canha game. but after that things went pretty south pretty quickly. and if anything that would make the numbers from 8/22 on even worse because they were mostly against last place teams other than 2 against the NYY and the 3 against LAD/MIL (series they actually won).
losing 5 out of 6 at home in those 2 series against WSH and CHI is what lost them the division.
+1. Those 5 losses were the difference.
Quote:
Jake Ciely @allinkid
Just over a week after trade deadline, Aug 11, Mets had a 7-game lead
From then:
- Went 25-22
- Lost 6 of last 9
- deGrom was human, losing 3 of last 4 starts
- Swept by Cubs at home
- Went just 15-10 against teams with a combined .404 Win%
[/quote]
+1 This sums it up.
losing 5 out of 6 at home in those 2 series against WSH and CHI is what lost them the division.
Quote:
Jake Ciely @allinkid
Just over a week after trade deadline, Aug 11, Mets had a 7-game lead
From then:
- Went 25-22
- Lost 6 of last 9
- deGrom was human, losing 3 of last 4 starts
- Swept by Cubs at home
- Went just 15-10 against teams with a combined .404 Win%
Yep. It would be completely reasonable for them to have won 5 of 6 - those teams were what, a combined 60 games under 500 at the time? which means they STILL would have had a 2 game lead despite the ATL sweep.
Quote:
which was the canha game. but after that things went pretty south pretty quickly. and if anything that would make the numbers from 8/22 on even worse because they were mostly against last place teams other than 2 against the NYY and the 3 against LAD/MIL (series they actually won).
losing 5 out of 6 at home in those 2 series against WSH and CHI is what lost them the division.
Quote:
Jake Ciely @allinkid
Just over a week after trade deadline, Aug 11, Mets had a 7-game lead
From then:
- Went 25-22
- Lost 6 of last 9
- deGrom was human, losing 3 of last 4 starts
- Swept by Cubs at home
- Went just 15-10 against teams with a combined .404 Win%
Yep. It would be completely reasonable for them to have won 5 of 6 - those teams were what, a combined 60 games under 500 at the time? which means they STILL would have had a 2 game lead despite the ATL sweep.
+1. Yes, the Atlanta series would probably have been meaningless.
I'm sure it will be analyzed ad infinitum, but I woulld really like a good, clear, deep explanation of why and how they folded.
Mets win that double-header in Pittsburgh only to drop that game in Miami.
A big win in Oakland on September 29 - only to go down to the Marlins after an off-day.
The win against the Marlins last week and then the off-day before Friday's loss.
This pattern doesn't bode well for Friday.
This team seems to struggle carrying any momentum from series to series.
Don't worry, with Alderson finally gone (we hope), the front office should be miles better
Mets Choked - ( New Window )
Interesting article, thanks for posting dennis.
The only thing I disagree with is criticizing Buck for the lack of Diaz use, When, exactly was he supposed to use him? They never had a lead past the 4th inning. The one example the author gave was not using Diaz in the 7th inning instead of McGill. They were losing by two runs! So if Diaz comes in and doesn't give up any runs, who pitches the 8th? OK, Diaz had thrown some 5 and 6 out saves this year, so MAYBE he could have pitched the 8th. But if they managed to come back and take the lead, surely Diaz could not have thrown Diaz a 3rd inning. So who would save the game? Otto? Perhaps. Everyone else in the pen sucks...
Anyway, this summed up what I was trying to say last night about expectations, and the importance of context:
"If someone told you before the season, the Mets would have 98+ wins before the season with a chance to win the NL East late in the season, you would absolutely take it. Actually, that is only partially true.
If you were told the Mets led this division at one point by 10.5 games, had a three game lead entering September, went 2-6 at home against the Nationals, Cubs, and Marlins, and would be completely dominated by the Braves as they were swept with the division title on the line, absolutely no one in their right mind would take it. This right here is why we should not try to sugarcoat and excuse this collapse."
Quote:
"What really stood out with Showalter in this series is he looked like a manager who did not learn from his mistakes in his previous spots. This was him using Jack McDowell, Bobby Chouinard, and anyone but Zack Britton on loop. Really, he was terrible in this series." Mets Choked - ( New Window )
Interesting article, thanks for posting dennis.
The only thing I disagree with is criticizing Buck for the lack of Diaz use, When, exactly was he supposed to use him? They never had a lead past the 4th inning. The one example the author gave was not using Diaz in the 7th inning instead of McGill. They were losing by two runs! So if Diaz comes in and doesn't give up any runs, who pitches the 8th? OK, Diaz had thrown some 5 and 6 out saves this year, so MAYBE he could have pitched the 8th. But if they managed to come back and take the lead, surely Diaz could not have thrown Diaz a 3rd inning. So who would save the game? Otto? Perhaps. Everyone else in the pen sucks...
Anyway, this summed up what I was trying to say last night about expectations, and the importance of context:
"If someone told you before the season, the Mets would have 98+ wins before the season with a chance to win the NL East late in the season, you would absolutely take it. Actually, that is only partially true.
If you were told the Mets led this division at one point by 10.5 games, had a three game lead entering September, went 2-6 at home against the Nationals, Cubs, and Marlins, and would be completely dominated by the Braves as they were swept with the division title on the line, absolutely no one in their right mind would take it. This right here is why we should not try to sugarcoat and excuse this collapse."
Hi Speedy. I was actually thinking about what you wrote when I read it. I thought your points were well made.
The really odd part is losing with the pitchers that we had up there, two of them which are probably the two best starting pitchers in baseball. And they just happened to miss spots badly for the same three hitters, every fucking game? That doesn’t make sense, but that’s baseball I guess.
I’d like to say I’m surprised at the outcome, but I’m not. I don’t know what happened to the Mets, maybe they were just playing over their heads for the first four months. But they have some stuff to figure out.