This is a question for those with more X and O knowledge than me.
Considering that our WR's are one of the worst in the league, would moving to a formation of 3 TE's, 1 WR, Barkley provide any advantage over our current setup?
I know we don't have many good pass catchers at TE, but they are good at blocking and supporting the run. Maybe signing the big TE form the PS (the 6'6 guy??) would help in giving a big target.
The idea here is to support the run more as our OL is a good running OL group.
As for WanDale Robinson, I have no idea what scheme will suit his talents best, especially since we hardly have seen him play during the exhibition season and through a quarter of the regular season.
Also, he's just one player, and an unproven one at that, so I don't think the Giants are re-thinking offensive play formations in keeping with how to maximize WanDale's skill set. So far, he hasn't proven he deserves that sort of attention.
You also had tight ends blocking down field on Jones‘s touchdown run
Trust the coaching staff to put the team in a position to have success despite a bad pass blocking line and despite a very depleted wide receivers group.
Having said their, our WR room, or more like WR broom closet James Richie led aerial assault is beyond pathetic, so its worthwhile to go to multiple TE and/or RB sets to get the least worst talent out there.
And Wandale is a slot and not ideal for a 1 WR formation, I would prefer a big X receiver not named Golladay.
One twist I would do is use Ezeudu as a TE, another on the line, and one in motion (to give an "unbalanced" line look). So the line would be Thomas, G, C, G, Neal, Ezeudu, TE.