for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

If the season ended today, would you sign Daniel Jones

CMicks3110 : 10/6/2022 7:20 pm
and if so, what would be your offer?
Pages: 1 2 3 <<Prev | Show All |  Next>>
No  
Matt M. : 10/6/2022 9:24 pm : link
I think we know what we have in him. Can he be better with a better surrounding cast? It's possible, but he has shown nothing to think it's a given. Unless he agreed to a 2nd contract at the same rate as his rookie deal, which we know is not happening, then I wouldn't re-sign him and I definitely wouldn't tag him. Let another team overpay for the right to continue to see what they have in him.
RE: Stroud, Young, Levis, Hooker, Ward, Richardson etc.  
bw in dc : 10/6/2022 9:37 pm : link
In comment 15848945 widmerseyebrow said:
Quote:
Of course that list is going to fluctuate quite a bit, but who would rather have a 5th year of Jones than the 4th or 5th guy on that list?

And yes, all them clearly have more UPSIDE than Jones.

Of course "definitely better" than Jones has been in 3.5 years is always hard to predict with the draft, but by the same token Jones performance to date isn't hard to top. His numbers are on par with Trubisky, whom everyone agrees is a bust.


Good post.

This 2023 QB class is fascinating. There have been so many developments and we're only five weeks into the season. Van Dyke has the yips. Anthony Richardson looks very physically gifted but is raw plus. Levis had a tragically bad 4th quarter last week in a very winnable game at Ole Miss. Hooker may be the most underrated prospect in the draft. DJU seems to have found his game again at Clemson. McCall continues to be underrated. Hartman is a game and produces a lot of points. I think I'm the only guy outside of Kentucky who finds Malik Cunningham to be an interesting prospect. Will Rodgers is playing out of his mind.

Etc, etc, etc..
RE: Tough Spot  
speedywheels : 10/6/2022 9:39 pm : link
In comment 15848986 WillVAB said:
Quote:
Jones is hurt all the time and the ‘23 QBs are wildly overrated.


Hurt “all the time”?

Holy exaggeration, Batman!
RE: Stroud, Young, Levis, Hooker, Ward, Richardson etc.  
speedywheels : 10/6/2022 9:41 pm : link
In comment 15848945 widmerseyebrow said:
Quote:
Of course that list is going to fluctuate quite a bit, but who would rather have a 5th year of Jones than the 4th or 5th guy on that list?

And yes, all them clearly have more UPSIDE than Jones.

Of course "definitely better" than Jones has been in 3.5 years is always hard to predict with the draft, but by the same token Jones performance to date isn't hard to top. His numbers are on par with Trubisky, whom everyone agrees is a bust.


And the talent around Jones has been what exactly to make an informed opinion?

Yeah i thought so
RE: RE: Stroud, Young, Levis, Hooker, Ward, Richardson etc.  
Matt M. : 10/6/2022 9:44 pm : link
In comment 15849060 speedywheels said:
Quote:
In comment 15848945 widmerseyebrow said:


Quote:


Of course that list is going to fluctuate quite a bit, but who would rather have a 5th year of Jones than the 4th or 5th guy on that list?

And yes, all them clearly have more UPSIDE than Jones.

Of course "definitely better" than Jones has been in 3.5 years is always hard to predict with the draft, but by the same token Jones performance to date isn't hard to top. His numbers are on par with Trubisky, whom everyone agrees is a bust.



And the talent around Jones has been what exactly to make an informed opinion?

Yeah i thought so
I'd rather have the rookie. 4-5 years at a much hceaper price tag is better than 1-3 more at a grossly overpriced tag for similar output.
JFC  
bwitz : 10/6/2022 9:46 pm : link
Yes. The talent around Jones hasn’t been great. Neither has Jones! The two don’t have to be mutually exclusive!
The years 2030  
ajr2456 : 10/6/2022 9:51 pm : link
And people are still blaming the talent around Jones for an 10th straight sub 20 td passing year
And the 2031 QBs  
Jerry in_DC : 10/6/2022 9:55 pm : link
all have warts
RE: The years 2030  
Scooter185 : 10/6/2022 9:58 pm : link
In comment 15849070 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
And people are still blaming the talent around Jones for an 10th straight sub 20 td passing year


By 2030, Daniel Jones is going to be the answer to a question on Jeopardy.

Of course many BBI posters will throw their remotes at the TV and scream "Jason Garrett!" At the top of their lungs
Add me to the ‘Let him test the market’ camp.  
Big Blue Blogger : 10/6/2022 10:04 pm : link
I think a healthy Daniel Jones can win games. I believe he’s 7-4 in his last eleven decisions, for a team that’s 0-7 in other games over that stretch, with probably the worst roster in the league. (Week 5 2021 vs. Dallas is tricky; Giants tied the game on the play after Jones was knocked out, then got steamrolled. So by baseball rules, Glennon gets the loss, though the Giant defense was more responsible.)

We tend to think of Tyrod Taylor as the 2023 stopgap, and in a sense, he is. But maybe the combination of Jones and Taylor is worth retaining for another year, if the price for Jones reflects his mediocre performance and the high likelihood that his backup will have to play at some point. Fortunately, the team has at least thirteen more games to assess the resilts of the pairing.
RE: RE: RE: Well, let's prorate Jones's current numbers...  
bradshaw44 : 10/6/2022 10:12 pm : link
In comment 15848933 bw in dc said:
Quote:
In comment 15848926 bradshaw44 said:


Quote:




You left out rushing TDs. Did you leave that out as part of the excuse category?

And no, I’m not a Jones guy. But I would offer him a low end contract for two years and see if he bites. Like 18 mil per year area. Where we would be picking based on our record we won’t have a shot at the top guys.



That's a fair point, and I thought about it. And, no, rushing yards are not part of the basket of excuses.

But Jones is not enough of dynamic rushing threat like an LJax to move the needle for me to sign him.

If we could get a cheap deal as a back-up, then I'm more interested.


I think this is where we are headed. We make him a low/modest two year offer at season end. If he bites then we use him while we search or develop another QB. And if somehow the lights go on for him in that time then we dish the rookie for decent comp.
RE: It will come down to simple analysis  
christian : 10/6/2022 10:12 pm : link
In comment 15849000 djm said:
Quote:
Why can’t we get jones on a relatively cheap 1-2 year deal and draft a qb?


Carson Wentz went 9-8 with the Colts last year with OK productivity, and the Commandets traded two third round picks for the right to pay him 29M this year. It only takes one team dead set on being average, for Jones to get a big number.
RE: JFC  
giantstock : 10/6/2022 10:14 pm : link
In comment 15849063 bwitz said:
Quote:
Yes. The talent around Jones hasn’t been great. Neither has Jones! The two don’t have to be mutually exclusive!


What a stupid comment. More idiotic Quack Quack from you.

SO you're going to say the talent around him "hasn't been GREAT?" Just wow!!!! USing the word "Great" to minimize what they actually were. Can you be any more transparent?



His OLINe has SUCKED. Name one OL last year that has gone on and is doing well?

His Wide Receivers sucked. As did his TE. NO receivers or or TE's that have left are doing well. Engram is afloat and that's it.

And until this year there has been no real Barkley.

************And the coaching staff has sucked.

==========
A shitty coaching staff, a shitty OL, Shitty Wr's and Tight Ends, and a RB that has been hurt a ton so we've had to use backup RB's that are nothing for nay other team--

IF IF IF Jones was mediocre for argument's sake-- how do you think he's going to perform?????????????
=================
A young mediocre QB (for argument's sake) is Going to RISE above ShItty Coaching,
Shitty OL play,
SHITTY Wide Receivers and Tight Ends
And SHITTY backup RB's now all but out of the NFL????????
------------
Please stop the nonsense. But yeah your comment "The other surrounding player's weren't "GREAT>" LMAO at your attempt to minimize things.

RE: RE: It will come down to simple analysis  
giantstock : 10/6/2022 10:17 pm : link
In comment 15849088 christian said:
Quote:
In comment 15849000 djm said:


Quote:


Why can’t we get jones on a relatively cheap 1-2 year deal and draft a qb?



Carson Wentz went 9-8 with the Colts last year with OK productivity, and the Commandets traded two third round picks for the right to pay him 29M this year. It only takes one team dead set on being average, for Jones to get a big number.


Where do you think the Giants are going to be next year with or without Jones?
RE: RE: RE: RE: Well, let's prorate Jones's current numbers...  
giantstock : 10/6/2022 10:20 pm : link
In comment 15849087 bradshaw44 said:
Quote:
In comment 15848933 bw in dc said:


Quote:


In comment 15848926 bradshaw44 said:


Quote:






I think this is where we are headed. We make him a low/modest two year offer at season end. If he bites then we use him while we search or develop another QB. And if somehow the lights go on for him in that time then we dish the rookie for decent comp.


A year FT if he continues to trend higher as he has done the past 2 weeks. Giants aren't going anywhere next year.

The Green Bay game will again make it apparent that the Defense isn't very good and ofc the Offense has huge problems including or excluding Jones.
...  
christian : 10/6/2022 10:29 pm : link
In comment 15849094 giantstock said:
Quote:
Carson Wentz went 9-8 with the Colts last year with OK productivity, and the Commandets traded two third round picks for the right to pay him 29M this year. It only takes one team dead set on being average, for Jones to get a big number.

Where do you think the Giants are going to be next year with or without Jones?


I think the Giants will have an opportunity to upgrade the position in the draft.
RE: ...  
giantstock : 10/6/2022 10:34 pm : link
In comment 15849106 christian said:
Quote:
In comment 15849094 giantstock said:


Quote:


Carson Wentz went 9-8 with the Colts last year with OK productivity, and the Commandets traded two third round picks for the right to pay him 29M this year. It only takes one team dead set on being average, for Jones to get a big number.

Where do you think the Giants are going to be next year with or without Jones?



I think the Giants will have an opportunity to upgrade the position in the draft.


So if you were to guess - you expect a shitty 2023 NFL season in terms of record? Because SB is gone too, right?

And we'll get a top 10 pick in 2023 draft?

Or a late 1st round/ 2nd round pick in 2023?
The Giants are definitely going to sign him IMHO  
JerseyCityJoe : 10/6/2022 10:37 pm : link
He has shown enough to be given a nice though limited contract.
RE: RE: ...  
christian : 10/6/2022 10:53 pm : link
In comment 15849111 giantstock said:
Quote:
Where do you think the Giants are going to be next year with or without Jones?

I think the Giants will have an opportunity to upgrade the position in the draft.

So if you were to guess - you expect a shitty 2023 NFL season in terms of record? Because SB is gone too, right?

And we'll get a top 10 pick in 2023 draft?

Or a late 1st round/ 2nd round pick in 2023?


Nope. I think Barkley gets franchised. I think the Giants can pick a QB in the 2023 draft who can do what Jones is doing, for a lot less salary.
I think Schoen and Daboll  
joeinpa : 10/6/2022 11:10 pm : link
Like him a lot more than many here think.

But based on his play up til now probably not. But it would depend on whether they see a quarterback who they believe is s at least as good on a rookie contract.

RE: The Giants are definitely going to sign him IMHO  
ajr2456 : 10/6/2022 11:15 pm : link
In comment 15849114 JerseyCityJoe said:
Quote:
He has shown enough to be given a nice though limited contract.


Lol
RE: I think Schoen and Daboll  
Sean : 10/6/2022 11:22 pm : link
In comment 15849157 joeinpa said:
Quote:
Like him a lot more than many here think.

But based on his play up til now probably not. But it would depend on whether they see a quarterback who they believe is s at least as good on a rookie contract.

You kind of made my point in an another thread. You said the drop off from Dak to Cooper Rush was not significant. Imagine paying Dak all that money to come to the conclusion that the back up is pretty much the same? I agree with you and that’s my issue with keeping Jones. It’s economics.
RE: RE: Tough Spot  
WillVAB : 10/6/2022 11:55 pm : link
In comment 15849054 speedywheels said:
Quote:
In comment 15848986 WillVAB said:


Quote:


Jones is hurt all the time and the ‘23 QBs are wildly overrated.



Hurt “all the time”?

Holy exaggeration, Batman!


Yes, being hurt every year he’s been in the league qualifies as hurt all the time. I don’t see how this is even debatable.
.  
Banks : 10/7/2022 12:34 am : link
no. We only played 4 games and he's already hurt again. That doesn't even factor in that he has serious flaws. I like him and want him to do great, but I don't see that happening. Unfortunately for him he got drafted by an organization at a time when they couldn't do anything right surrounding him with no line, weapons, and a new offense every other year. Maybe he goes on to have an Alex Smith type career, but I wouldn't bet the contract he expects on it
RE: RE: RE: ...  
giantstock : 10/7/2022 2:21 am : link
In comment 15849135 christian said:
Quote:
In comment 15849111 giantstock said:


Quote:


Where do you think the Giants are going to be next year with or without Jones?

I think the Giants will have an opportunity to upgrade the position in the draft.

So if you were to guess - you expect a shitty 2023 NFL season in terms of record? Because SB is gone too, right?

And we'll get a top 10 pick in 2023 draft?

Or a late 1st round/ 2nd round pick in 2023?



Nope. I think Barkley gets franchised. I think the Giants can pick a QB in the 2023 draft who can do what Jones is doing, for a lot less salary.


What did you say "Nope" to?

Are you saying you think Giants cna get a 3rd round QB or later rounds that does hwat Jones is doing?

***And you think Sy is flat out wrong at this point when he says "He can do it."

And you think his quote when he says below is flat out wrong? It's okay if you do. Just asking.

"It can be very hard to accurately evaluate a performance like this one. Listen to any quarterback talk about Jones and they will tell you it is almost impossible to play a normal version of the position in that kind of environment. If anything, I actually put this game in the “positive pile” when thinking about where his status will reside in January."
The availability thing is a big part of it  
Lines of Scrimmage : 10/7/2022 7:32 am : link
JS/MK may also make some adjustments to how they build the team. Here they have two OT's one of which is establishing himself as a dominant LT. The other has the ability to be a dominant run blocking RT. They are having to move the ball differently then they expected. Improve the interior a bit the can have a upper tier OL across the board. This gives some flexibility in QB choice imv. Set your team to need more of a manager initially. Dak had a scenario like this. Build from there.

If they win 7 plus games doubt they have a chance to get one of the top guys they like. Round one he is gone. Later pick you consider a shorter contract. BD already said what he looks for. QB who can process and make decisions under pressure.

Last year most of the QBGC was calling for Willis at pick 5. The NFL did not agree. It's a real hard spot to get right. Most won't come close to realizing expectations. Make a mistake somebody else picks the next one imv.
RE: RE: RE: RE: ...  
ajr2456 : 10/7/2022 7:41 am : link
Quote:

***And you think Sy is flat out wrong at this point when he says "He can do it."

And you think his quote when he says below is flat out wrong? It's okay if you do. Just asking.

"It can be very hard to accurately evaluate a performance like this one. Listen to any quarterback talk about Jones and they will tell you it is almost impossible to play a normal version of the position in that kind of environment. If anything, I actually put this game in the “positive pile” when thinking about where his status will reside in January."


What about these Sy quotes?

Quote:
The ceiling being a guy who absolutely needs the team around him to be top notch. This is a tough kind of player to plan around when it comes to long term finances. Tannehill has the biggest cap number in the NFL ($38.6 million). And the team just drafted Malik Willis in round 3. They will be looking at a tough decision next offseason. Pay him the 5th-most among all QBs or take the $18 million cap hit to release him. In terms of dollars spent and production he creates, the value is poor. [quote]

[Watching from the birds eye, Jones simply did not see open targets or he was too hesitant to let it rip. I say that from the comfort of my chair, whereas he had multiple elite, enormous athletes bearing down on him trying to rip his head off behind a shaky offensive line. But at some point, and Brian Daboll has stated this as well, Jones will need to alter his mindset. There is too much hesitation in his game, and it almost cost the team. Sure, he is playing with a sub-par group of pass catchers, but he needs to be more aggressive.


Jones is not a starting QB you can win with. Why people can’t see that 4 years in and want to waste more years and more cap space on him is insane. If he played any other position on this team or had any minor character flaw the same people supporting him would be running him out of town.
...  
christian : 10/7/2022 8:48 am : link
We're only a quarter through the NFL, and a touch more through the college season. Where the Giants pick, and who the process avails as viable prospects is simply undetermined.

Schoen witnessed first hand how a team coming off a surprising playoff bid can move up in the draft and get the best player, so I wouldn't rule anything out.

I also wouldn't rule out trading for a veteran if Schoen determines the team is closer than the W/L show.

No  
Jimmy Googs : 10/7/2022 8:59 am : link
I evaluate the college ranks as best I can and pick a new horse...
No  
HomerJones45 : 10/7/2022 9:00 am : link
I'd take my chances on finding someone who can throw for more than 71 yards
RE: RE: Yes  
KDavies : 10/7/2022 10:23 am : link
In comment 15848913 widmerseyebrow said:
Quote:
In comment 15848876 Giants73 said:


Quote:


At best positioned for 5th best QB in draft.



The 5th best QB in the 2023 draft has more upside than Daniel Jones.


Dwayne Haskins and Josh Rosen say hi
No  
BlueVinnie : 10/7/2022 10:24 am : link
Although he has played better so far this year than last, there is nothing I see that makes me think he will ever become even an above average starter in this league. Absolutely nothing.
depends  
KDavies : 10/7/2022 10:28 am : link
I'm not franchising him. I can't believe someone suggested that., If he could be had for a reasonable deal (ie. 2 years and $35-40 million), then yes. I would also have no objection to taking a rookie QB as well as re-signing Jones to see if they can upgrade the position.
For the moron above  
ajr2456 : 10/7/2022 10:36 am : link
Quote:
I think it depends the price
ajr2456 : 11/23/2021 1:02 pm : link
.



RE: For the moron above  
ajr2456 : 10/7/2022 10:37 am : link
In comment 15849547 ajr2456 said:
Quote:


Quote:


I think it depends the price
ajr2456 : 11/23/2021 1:02 pm : link
.






Wrong thread
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: ...  
giantstock : 10/7/2022 11:26 am : link
In comment 15849313 ajr2456 said:
Quote:


Quote:



[quote]

[Watching from the birds eye, Jones simply did not see open targets or he was too hesitant to let it rip. I say that from the comfort of my chair, whereas he had multiple elite, enormous athletes bearing down on him trying to rip his head off behind a shaky offensive line. But at some point, and Brian Daboll has stated this as well, Jones will need to alter his mindset. There is too much hesitation in his game, and it almost cost the team. Sure, he is playing with a sub-par group of pass catchers, but he needs to be more aggressive.



Jones is not a starting QB you can win with. Why people can’t see that 4 years in and want to waste more years and more cap space on him is insane. If he played any other position on this team or had any minor character flaw the same people supporting him would be running him out of town.


Your view imo is the not what he is saying. He didn't say signing Tannehill was a mistake as an isoalted sttaement which you are implyimng. The 1st two sentences are oppsoite of what you are saying:

-----------------------
"The ceiling being a guy who absolutely needs the team around him to be top notch. This is a tough kind of player to plan around when it comes to long term finances."
-----------------------

First off do you have the link for his full comments? No problem if you don't. But you are providing me his comments form either Carolina or Tennesse is my guess? I could be wrong.

1-- He is saying you can win if surrounding talent is top notch.

2-- He is saying for long-term success don't pay him an obscene long-term contract like Tennessee did to Tanehill.
=======================

None of this is saying that Jones is not a starting QB.
RE: depends  
giantstock : 10/7/2022 11:32 am : link
In comment 15849533 KDavies said:
Quote:
I'm not franchising him. I can't believe someone suggested that., If he could be had for a reasonable deal (ie. 2 years and $35-40 million), then yes. I would also have no objection to taking a rookie QB as well as re-signing Jones to see if they can upgrade the position.


At this moment I am not. But if he has a pretty good year why not for 1 year if you can't get the QB you want in the draft? Where do you think this team is going in 2023?

The QB is the most important position in football. If you are unsure of the evaluation and feel you need another year to evaluate - then whats the big deal for 1 year if you don't think you can get better?

If the Giants draft a QB and paly him right away in 2023, you think the Giants are a playoff team in 2023? SO where do you think we're going in 2023?

RE: RE: RE: Yes  
widmerseyebrow : 10/7/2022 11:32 am : link
In comment 15849522 KDavies said:
Quote:
Dwayne Haskins and Josh Rosen say hi


By this logic you would never draft a quarterback. Hell, by this logic we would never have drafted Jones in the first place! Who had more "warts" than he did as a top 6 QB pick?

I'll be interested to see how Levis, Hooker, and Ward stack up against Rosen in his draft year. Haskins was not a good prospect.
“Where do you think this team is going next year?”  
ajr2456 : 10/7/2022 11:38 am : link
They’re 3-1 right now and not many people expected that. Even if they end up only winning 6 games this year they in all likely hood will be better next year. They’d be even better with an upgrade at QB.
RE: RE: RE: RE: Yes  
KDavies : 10/7/2022 11:40 am : link
In comment 15849658 widmerseyebrow said:
Quote:
In comment 15849522 KDavies said:


Quote:


Dwayne Haskins and Josh Rosen say hi



By this logic you would never draft a quarterback. Hell, by this logic we would never have drafted Jones in the first place! Who had more "warts" than he did as a top 6 QB pick?

I'll be interested to see how Levis, Hooker, and Ward stack up against Rosen in his draft year. Haskins was not a good prospect.


My comment was in response to someone saying that the 5th QB in this draft has more upside than Jones. Rosen was the 4th QB selected and Haskins the 3rd (I think). My point was only that the 5th QB could be a complete bust with less upside than Jones. Not that the Giants should be scared to select a QB in case he is a bust.

Ultimately, Schoen and Daboll were in Buffalo when Josh Allen was selected and developed. I have faith in them to make the correct decision, until they prove otherwise
RE: “Where do you think this team is going next year?”  
giantstock : 10/7/2022 11:46 am : link
In comment 15849673 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
They’re 3-1 right now and not many people expected that. Even if they end up only winning 6 games this year they in all likely hood will be better next year. They’d be even better with an upgrade at QB.


More than likely they won't be better if their schedule gets tougher.

The vegas line was 7.5 for Giants this year. Do you think they have a shot for 8 or 9 this year?

So the Giants  
ajr2456 : 10/7/2022 11:49 am : link
More thank likely won’t be better a whole year from now?

What are the powerball numbers?
RE: So the Giants  
giantstock : 10/7/2022 11:51 am : link
In comment 15849693 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
More thank likely won’t be better a whole year from now?

What are the powerball numbers?


Do you think the Giants have a shot to win 8 or 9 games this year?
I'd be interested in keeping him as the backup QB  
JonC : 10/7/2022 11:51 am : link
I forget if there's a team option on Taylor for 2023.
We already have Taylor signed as our backup next year  
BigBlue7 : 10/7/2022 11:53 am : link
so nope!

And I think he's an amazing teammate, gritty competitor and super good dude

But I am not paying him to be my starting QB
RE: I'd be interested in keeping him as the backup QB  
giantstock : 10/7/2022 11:56 am : link
In comment 15849699 JonC said:
Quote:
I forget if there's a team option on Taylor for 2023.


I am not arguing - so you don't agree with Sy when he said about Jones "He can do it."
===========

And you dont' agree with the comments below in regards to positive pile "when thinking about where his status will reside in January."?

https://www.bigblueinteractive.com/2022/09/28/game-review-dallas-cowboys-23-new-york-giants-16/


"Listen to any quarterback talk about Jones and they will tell you it is almost impossible to play a normal version of the position in that kind of environment. If anything, I actually put this game in the “positive pile” when thinking about where his status will reside in January."
RE: RE: RE: RE: Yes  
bw in dc : 10/7/2022 12:03 pm : link
In comment 15849658 widmerseyebrow said:
Quote:
In comment 15849522 KDavies said:


Quote:


Dwayne Haskins and Josh Rosen say hi



By this logic you would never draft a quarterback. Hell, by this logic we would never have drafted Jones in the first place! Who had more "warts" than he did as a top 6 QB pick?


Indeed.

A lot of posters are taking this absurd position that you can't replace Jones unless there is a sure thing replacement.

And since you can ever guarantee that, especially with college prospects, Jones is essentially the QB unless we replace him with a known commodity super-star like a Rodgers, Allen, etc.



RE: RE: So the Giants  
ajr2456 : 10/7/2022 12:10 pm : link
In comment 15849697 giantstock said:
Quote:
In comment 15849693 ajr2456 said:


Quote:


More thank likely won’t be better a whole year from now?

What are the powerball numbers?



Do you think the Giants have a shot to win 8 or 9 games this year?


No I do not. But that has nothing to do with 2023.
RE: RE: I'd be interested in keeping him as the backup QB  
ajr2456 : 10/7/2022 12:11 pm : link
In comment 15849707 giantstock said:
Quote:
In comment 15849699 JonC said:


Quote:


I forget if there's a team option on Taylor for 2023.



I am not arguing - so you don't agree with Sy when he said about Jones "He can do it."
===========

And you dont' agree with the comments below in regards to positive pile "when thinking about where his status will reside in January."?

https://www.bigblueinteractive.com/2022/09/28/game-review-dallas-cowboys-23-new-york-giants-16/


"Listen to any quarterback talk about Jones and they will tell you it is almost impossible to play a normal version of the position in that kind of environment. If anything, I actually put this game in the “positive pile” when thinking about where his status will reside in January."


You keep asking the Sy question but ignored my question about Sy’s other comments this year. Why’s that?
RE: RE: RE: I'd be interested in keeping him as the backup QB  
giantstock : 10/7/2022 12:15 pm : link
In comment 15849726 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
In comment 15849707 giantstock said:


Quote:


In comment 15849699 JonC said:


Quote:


I forget if there's a team option on Taylor for 2023.



I am not arguing - so you don't agree with Sy when he said about Jones "He can do it."
===========

And you dont' agree with the comments below in regards to positive pile "when thinking about where his status will reside in January."?

https://www.bigblueinteractive.com/2022/09/28/game-review-dallas-cowboys-23-new-york-giants-16/


"Listen to any quarterback talk about Jones and they will tell you it is almost impossible to play a normal version of the position in that kind of environment. If anything, I actually put this game in the “positive pile” when thinking about where his status will reside in January."



You keep asking the Sy question but ignored my question about Sy’s other comments this year. Why’s that?


I did. Read my post at 11:26 am.

I didn't notice you sent to me before.
Pages: 1 2 3 <<Prev | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner