I did some tallying and it looks like the Giants are 39-58-1 in November going back to Fassel and not counting Daboll’s 1–1 so far.
Fassel 10-18-1
Coughlin 17-30
McAdoo 5-3
Shurmur 2-4
Judge 5-3
I only went through this exercise after thinking about how terrible it feels like things always go for us in November and it’s pretty true. The last 2 head coaches who mattered for this franchise had terrible November records.
Just something to think about as we’re heading into a fucking buzzsaw on Thursday. And I’m usually pretty optimistic too. I was really looking forward to this game.
I'll take what you're drinking sir. Hope you're right.
If you want to get excited about Joe Judge and Ben McAdoo’s minuscule sample sizes that contributed to the overall numbers, be my guest.
The swoon that we're about to hit is not that. It's just regression to the mean and playing against better teams.
Quote:
That’s the way to Cherry pick stats!
If you want to get excited about Joe Judge and Ben McAdoo’s minuscule sample sizes that contributed to the overall numbers, be my guest.
Lol. Why not add in Parcells and Reeves and make sure you leave out Handley. Whatever it takes to fit your narrative.
I am too, just not sure we have the horses to have it matter
I hope you’re right but I can’t shake the feeling that the Cowboys are going to steam roll them
Quote:
In comment 15915833 GiantsRage2007 said:
Quote:
That’s the way to Cherry pick stats!
If you want to get excited about Joe Judge and Ben McAdoo’s minuscule sample sizes that contributed to the overall numbers, be my guest.
Lol. Why not add in Parcells and Reeves and make sure you leave out Handley. Whatever it takes to fit your narrative.
Maybe because the bulk of the Parcells era is before a time period that I can actually speak to? How’s that?
Sept, Oct. Dec. Let s not make more of this than what it
I'll take that if I was promised a Coughlin era '07 season next year lol
Quote:
In comment 15915843 Chris684 said:
Quote:
In comment 15915833 GiantsRage2007 said:
Quote:
That’s the way to Cherry pick stats!
If you want to get excited about Joe Judge and Ben McAdoo’s minuscule sample sizes that contributed to the overall numbers, be my guest.
Lol. Why not add in Parcells and Reeves and make sure you leave out Handley. Whatever it takes to fit your narrative.
Maybe because the bulk of the Parcells era is before a time period that I can actually speak to? How’s that?
Since you asked… Pretty dumb. Almost as dumb as referring to sample sizes or overall numbers.
Quote:
In comment 15915853 GiantsRage2007 said:
Quote:
In comment 15915843 Chris684 said:
Quote:
In comment 15915833 GiantsRage2007 said:
Quote:
That’s the way to Cherry pick stats!
If you want to get excited about Joe Judge and Ben McAdoo’s minuscule sample sizes that contributed to the overall numbers, be my guest.
Lol. Why not add in Parcells and Reeves and make sure you leave out Handley. Whatever it takes to fit your narrative.
Maybe because the bulk of the Parcells era is before a time period that I can actually speak to? How’s that?
Since you asked… Pretty dumb. Almost as dumb as referring to sample sizes or overall numbers.
Eat shit