for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

NJ.com Giants 7 Round Mock Draft

bwitz : 2/7/2023 10:41 am
I won’t spoil it. Enjoy.
Link - ( New Window )
Schmitz in round 2 would make the draft  
bigblue12 : 2/7/2023 10:42 am : link
But I’m not sure he lasts
No CB until the 4th  
BillT : 2/7/2023 10:45 am : link
And one that won’t be there at 128 to boot. Two OLs but only one WR. A draft without direction or priorities.
Lot of Buzzword names on that mock  
The Dude : 2/7/2023 10:57 am : link
And i do have a feeling they go for a CB if one of those big ones fall to them.

WR seems deeper than CB.
RE: No CB until the 4th  
Kmed6000 : 2/7/2023 10:58 am : link
In comment 16026323 BillT said:
Quote:
And one that won’t be there at 128 to boot. Two OLs but only one WR. A draft without direction or priorities.


LOL. In this mock, we draft a WR, C, RB, ILB in the first 3 rounds, how is this lacking direction or priorities? All of those positions are big time needs.
A WR  
noro9 : 2/7/2023 11:12 am : link
With hamstring issues. Cool.
Two WR’s are taken  
bwitz : 2/7/2023 11:13 am : link
One with the first and one with the very last pick.
RE: No CB until the 4th  
dschwarz in westchester : 2/7/2023 11:16 am : link
In comment 16026323 BillT said:
Quote:
And one that won’t be there at 128 to boot. Two OLs but only one WR. A draft without direction or priorities.


I know very, very little about college football so I won't comment on the specific picks at all.

The Giants NEED (in no particular order):
-A Starting WR who actually scares defenses
-A Second Starting CB
-Two Starting ILBs
-2-3 interior offensive linemen
-A RB (if Barkley leaves)
-Depth EVERYWHERE

Realistically the Giants will need to use some of their capspace to address areas of need, so the question is which of those needs are best solved in FA and which are best solved with the draft.... you can't just assume they'll use a high draft pick on every area of need as they don't have enough high draft picks to do that (and drafting exclusively for need is pretty much guaranteed to result in missing out on good players).
You would assume some f the needs the Giants have  
johnnyb : 2/7/2023 11:25 am : link
will be addressed in free agency. A seven round mock is fun to read but our priorities may change after free agency.
Injury prone WR  
UGADawgs7 : 2/7/2023 11:33 am : link
Someone told me that Schoen said somewhere last year that he doesn’t like to take injury prone players which is why Wandale was taken and not Pickens. Smith-Njigba is extremely injury prone. If there is truth to that Schoen won’t take those risks, they won’t take him.
Like the Schmitz pick  
jeff57 : 2/7/2023 11:36 am : link
Not much else.
I like the WR pick and the ILB pick from Texas  
PatersonPlank : 2/7/2023 11:39 am : link
the rest of them they can keep
Darius Rush will probably be drafted Day 2  
Rick in Dallas : 2/7/2023 11:51 am : link
He will never see round 7
RE: RE: No CB until the 4th  
BillT : 2/7/2023 11:54 am : link
In comment 16026347 Kmed6000 said:
Quote:
In comment 16026323 BillT said:


Quote:


And one that won’t be there at 128 to boot. Two OLs but only one WR. A draft without direction or priorities.



LOL. In this mock, we draft a WR, C, RB, ILB in the first 3 rounds, how is this lacking direction or priorities? All of those positions are big time needs.

Needs and priorities are different things. There is hardly any position that doesn’t have a need. But what Schoen showed last year was that he picked a position as a priority. Last year OL. What? Six FA and three draft picks. I believe he will have different priorities this year. My guess, WR definitely and maybe CB. Two priorities as neither of these positions require as many players to fix as the OL. Getting four different positions in the top four picks shows no commitment to definitively fix any position as a a priority. I think he’ll be more focused than that. Two WR and a CB in the first two days.
I love reading mock draft threads  
Sec_149 : 2/7/2023 12:06 pm : link
Every time a mock draft thread reads up. I think we should start a drinking game. How many experts are going to say "this guy won't last that long". Yet every year someone falls, for whatever reason.
I think they need 2 WR, 1 CB and 1 IOL in the first 4 picks  
sb from NYT Forum : 2/7/2023 12:19 pm : link
The WR corp is absolute garbage, and needs to be built up. It's very hard to find quality outside of Day 2, IMO.

Meanwhile, quality RB prospects are fairly easy to come by outside of Day 2, so using a Day 2 pick on one seems wasteful.

I also think ILB will be a UFA focus.

RE: I think they need 2 WR, 1 CB and 1 IOL in the first 4 picks  
BillT : 2/7/2023 12:26 pm : link
In comment 16026464 sb from NYT Forum said:
Quote:
The WR corp is absolute garbage, and needs to be built up. It's very hard to find quality outside of Day 2, IMO.

Meanwhile, quality RB prospects are fairly easy to come by outside of Day 2, so using a Day 2 pick on one seems wasteful.

I also think ILB will be a UFA focus.

I think this is spot on. I’d probably go with DL over IOL but why quibble. Make sure you fix a position and our WR are the least talented group on the team if not in the league. They should be committed to rebuilding it.
That hamstring pull must have been real serious to limit  
Rich_Houston_1971 : 2/7/2023 12:56 pm : link
him for a whole season. This guy will drop out of first rd.
A previous thread had FA C Ethan Pocic  
HopePhil and Optimistic : 2/7/2023 1:37 pm : link
Estimated at less than $8 mil AAV, and per PFF was 5th best run blocker and 6th best pass blocker.

If you can sign a proven veteran for such a reasonable price, why use a second rounder on a rookie that may need time to develop, and take the risk he might not ever be better than Pocic?

Positional value would suggest using that pick on CB, WR or Edge since we are probably not considering OT or QB.
Another blow lunch mess.  
Red Dog : 2/7/2023 1:41 pm : link
.
After a quick read I don't hate the positions addressed or  
chick310 : 2/7/2023 1:43 pm : link
the timing of them within the rounds.

But the players selected give me some pause.
RE: Injury prone WR  
Simms11 : 2/7/2023 1:53 pm : link
In comment 16026400 UGADawgs7 said:
Quote:
Someone told me that Schoen said somewhere last year that he doesn’t like to take injury prone players which is why Wandale was taken and not Pickens. Smith-Njigba is extremely injury prone. If there is truth to that Schoen won’t take those risks, they won’t take him.


Sy picked him in a recent Mock Draft. The injury did not deter him, however Sy might change his mind between now and the actual draft, I’m sure.
A bit underwhelmed  
Highlander : 2/7/2023 2:01 pm : link
with this particular mock draft. I don't like the first round pick. Yes we need a WR on day 1 or 2 of the draft. This is an injury prone WR. After Toney, Robinson, Shepard, and Golladay I want a reliable WR who can stay healthy. My second issue, is the failure to address the lack of drpth on the defensive line. No interior defensive lineman was selected. Third, waited too long to draft a CB. Idealky, WR and CB are Day 1 or 2 selections. I do like how the interior offensive line was addressed.
RE: I think they need 2 WR, 1 CB and 1 IOL in the first 4 picks  
MotownGIANTS : 2/7/2023 3:15 pm : link
In comment 16026464 sb from NYT Forum said:
Quote:
The WR corp is absolute garbage, and needs to be built up. It's very hard to find quality outside of Day 2, IMO.

Meanwhile, quality RB prospects are fairly easy to come by outside of Day 2, so using a Day 2 pick on one seems wasteful.

I also think ILB will be a UFA focus.


Exactly!!! ... I would say BPA on IOL or OLB (Azeez lower legs issues are a concern the pass rush changes dramatically when he goes down). But the 1st 3 of the 4 should be a WR/CB combo more than likely, I hope for 2 WRs/1 CB as well. CB in rd 1 unless a player (WR) they think highly of drops.
RE: A WR  
islander1 : 2/7/2023 3:20 pm : link
In comment 16026364 noro9 said:
Quote:
With hamstring issues. Cool.


Glad I wasn't the only one who winced reading this.
A mock draft in Feb is about as dumb as it gets  
Rudy5757 : 2/7/2023 3:22 pm : link
We dont even know if we need a QB yet...lol
RE: A mock draft in Feb is about as dumb as it gets  
MotownGIANTS : 2/7/2023 3:26 pm : link
In comment 16026720 Rudy5757 said:
Quote:
We dont even know if we need a QB yet...lol


I get it not re-signed yet .... but it will happen question is who blinks 1st ...
That looks like one of my mocks on the PFN simulator.  
81_Great_Dane : 2/7/2023 4:13 pm : link
That's bad — I don't know anything about these guys. I'm just foolin' around.
RE: A mock draft in Feb is about as dumb as it gets  
sb from NYT Forum : 2/7/2023 4:20 pm : link
In comment 16026720 Rudy5757 said:
Quote:
We dont even know if we need a QB yet...lol


Jeez louise, it's entertainment...
RE: RE: No CB until the 4th  
RCPhoenix : 2/7/2023 4:53 pm : link
In comment 16026347 Kmed6000 said:
Quote:
In comment 16026323 BillT said:


Quote:


And one that won’t be there at 128 to boot. Two OLs but only one WR. A draft without direction or priorities.



LOL. In this mock, we draft a WR, C, RB, ILB in the first 3 rounds, how is this lacking direction or priorities? All of those positions are big time needs.


RB is not a big time need even if Barkley leaves.

The WR pick feels like a forced pick for need over value if the other two WRs are gone. Yes, Smith-Njigba was great in 2021 but he basically missed the entire 2022 season b/c of a hamstring. That's a major red flag.
Don't like it  
kelly : 2/7/2023 5:33 pm : link
After Toney don't want a receiver with hamstring issues. Also we need a defensive tackle.

We need a linebacker that is good against the run first and foremost.

Also need another TE
strong choices  
Alan W : 2/7/2023 5:35 pm : link
Well done, sir.
RE: Don't like it  
Angel Eyes : 2/7/2023 5:45 pm : link
In comment 16026857 kelly said:
Quote:
After Toney don't want a receiver with hamstring issues. Also we need a defensive tackle.

We need a linebacker that is good against the run first and foremost.

Also need another TE

In that case, what kind of defensive tackle, a NT or a 3-tech? A 5-tech who could play DE?
RE: RE: RE: No CB until the 4th  
bwitz : 2/7/2023 5:50 pm : link
In comment 16026822 RCPhoenix said:
Quote:
In comment 16026347 Kmed6000 said:


Quote:


In comment 16026323 BillT said:


Quote:


And one that won’t be there at 128 to boot. Two OLs but only one WR. A draft without direction or priorities.



LOL. In this mock, we draft a WR, C, RB, ILB in the first 3 rounds, how is this lacking direction or priorities? All of those positions are big time needs.



RB is not a big time need even if Barkley leaves.

The WR pick feels like a forced pick for need over value if the other two WRs are gone. Yes, Smith-Njigba was great in 2021 but he basically missed the entire 2022 season b/c of a hamstring. That's a major red flag.


RB isn’t a need if Barkley leaves? That isn’t accurate at all.
A wr with hamstring problems? Come on man, we have been down  
Jack Stroud : 2/7/2023 7:28 pm : link
that road! A rb in RD 3 with so many holes to fill? Terrible.
My dream  
Jint Fan in Buc Land : 2/7/2023 8:45 pm : link
Literally exactly how I hope the first 5 picks goes
RE: A wr with hamstring problems? Come on man, we have been down  
bwitz : 2/7/2023 9:55 pm : link
In comment 16026992 Jack Stroud said:
Quote:
that road! A rb in RD 3 with so many holes to fill? Terrible.


Yeah. It’s too bad there isn’t 78 more days left for them and others to re-evaluate.
I'm ok with a RB on day 2,  
barens : 2/7/2023 10:37 pm : link
but Tucker? Yikes. Deep draft at this position, I would have to think there's better value, whether at RB or elsewhere.
Back to the Corner