for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Pelissero: Jones’ agents leaving Indianapolis tomorrow

Vin_Cuccs : 3/4/2023 11:04 pm
Via Tom Pelissero of NFL Network on Twitter:

Quote:
After several days of meetings at the combine, #Giants officials and Daniel Jones’ agents from Athletes First are expected to leave Indianapolis on Sunday with no contract resolution in sight, per sources.

Clock continuing to tick towards Tuesday’s franchise tag deadline.


If this has been posted, I will gladly delete.
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
the combine is over and  
Del Shofner : 3/4/2023 11:05 pm : link
they have plane tickets

of course they're leaving

doesn't seem like news to me
With video conferencing  
JoeyBigBlue : 3/4/2023 11:09 pm : link
They don’t have to be in the same place to get a deal done.
Giants should our transition tag on him  
Metnut : 3/4/2023 11:15 pm : link
if we won’t agree to NYG last and best offer.
The comment included without an agreement in sight.  
jvm52106 : 3/4/2023 11:18 pm : link
Doesn't mean anything without direct knowledge but could very well be true.

I do think if we tag Jones, the likely outcome at this point, Barkley is gone.

The Giants hold all of the cards here.
That’s a good thing  
AcesUp : 3/5/2023 12:07 am : link
By some reports, it looked like the giants viewed the tag deadline as a hard deadline. It definitely shouldn’t be looked at like that, they should be willing to let Barkley walk before making a bad decision on the QB deal.
RE: The comment included without an agreement in sight.  
Ivan15 : 3/5/2023 12:14 am : link
In comment 16051360 jvm52106 said:
Quote:
Doesn't mean anything without direct knowledge but could very well be true.

I do think if we tag Jones, the likely outcome at this point, Barkley is gone.

The Giants hold all of the cards here.
_______________
Giants only hold one card. It’s an ace but that’s all they have. If they use the tag, Jones can force them to let Barkley go and paralyze them in free agency. Jones still controls the deck.
RE: Giants should our transition tag on him  
Ivan15 : 3/5/2023 12:17 am : link
In comment 16051358 Metnut said:
Quote:
if we won’t agree to NYG last and best offer.
______________
Huh? “If we won’t agree”? Are you Jones’ agent?
I wouldn't assume Barkley is gone  
BigBlueNH : 3/5/2023 12:28 am : link
if he hits FA. How many teams are out there that have the cap space and are willing to commit $15M or so of it to a RB with an injury history and a fair number of miles? Maybe some, but I wouldn't be surprised if he tested FA and came back and took the Giants' offer.
RE: I wouldn't assume Barkley is gone  
UConn4523 : 3/5/2023 12:54 am : link
In comment 16051376 BigBlueNH said:
Quote:
if he hits FA. How many teams are out there that have the cap space and are willing to commit $15M or so of it to a RB with an injury history and a fair number of miles? Maybe some, but I wouldn't be surprised if he tested FA and came back and took the Giants' offer.


Take a look at the skill position FAs, it’s barren. Barkley will be getting paid as a FA.
RE: I wouldn't assume Barkley is gone  
djm : 3/5/2023 12:59 am : link
In comment 16051376 BigBlueNH said:
Quote:
if he hits FA. How many teams are out there that have the cap space and are willing to commit $15M or so of it to a RB with an injury history and a fair number of miles? Maybe some, but I wouldn't be surprised if he tested FA and came back and took the Giants' offer.


He WILL definitely receive big offers. You’re fooling yourself.

How many teams want a stud RB under 27 with HOF potential?? Plenty.

Its the RB. Not the fucking punter.
RE: RE: I wouldn't assume Barkley is gone  
Ned In Atlanta : 3/5/2023 1:21 am : link
In comment 16051377 UConn4523 said:
Quote:
In comment 16051376 BigBlueNH said:


Quote:


if he hits FA. How many teams are out there that have the cap space and are willing to commit $15M or so of it to a RB with an injury history and a fair number of miles? Maybe some, but I wouldn't be surprised if he tested FA and came back and took the Giants' offer.



Take a look at the skill position FAs, it’s barren. Barkley will be getting paid as a FA.


Let another team make that short sighted mistake.
RE: RE: The comment included without an agreement in sight.  
JohnB : 3/5/2023 2:44 am : link
In comment 16051369 Ivan15 said:
Quote:
In comment 16051360 jvm52106 said:


Quote:


Doesn't mean anything without direct knowledge but could very well be true.

I do think if we tag Jones, the likely outcome at this point, Barkley is gone.


The Giants hold all of the cards here.

_______________
Giants only hold one card. It’s an ace but that’s all they have. If they use the tag, Jones can force them to let Barkley go and paralyze them in free agency. Jones still controls the deck.


The Giants have 2 Aces. They have tag this year, 32 million and the tag next year, 38 million. That’s two powerful aces. And Jones has to accept them.

No Daniel Jones doesn’t control the deck.
RE: RE: The comment included without an agreement in sight.  
Milton : 3/5/2023 3:05 am : link
In comment 16051369 Ivan15 said:
Quote:
If they use the tag, Jones can force them to let Barkley go and paralyze them in free agency.
I don't view the loss of Barkley as that significant. I believe the reasons behind keeping him have more to do with locker room loyalty and his popularity with the fan base than with his on the field. Sad to say, but he is no longer special when healthy, and he isn't always healthy. As for Jones's franchise tag paralyzing them in free agency, that's just not true. They won't be able to spend like a drunken sailor, but I don't think that's their intention even if Jones were to sign a multi-year deal. There are several teams in the NFL facing difficult decisions because they are tight against the cap, the Giants aren't one of them.
Nothing about the Giants tagging Jones  
BlackLight : 3/5/2023 3:31 am : link
would paralyze them in free agency. It limits them, somewhat, but they can make moves to free up cap space as they need it.
All good  
Spider43 : 3/5/2023 3:52 am : link
It needs to be the tag. Really. It's best for all.
Barkley?  
Giant John : 3/5/2023 4:15 am : link
Hall of fame potential? He is going to have to stay healthy and put a string of top performing years together for that conversation to be realistic.
It’s a business and quite frankly Schoen has the leverage  
Rick in Dallas : 3/5/2023 5:13 am : link
The franchise tag imv.
Let the negotiations play out without all this hand wringing
“ with no contract resolution in sight, per sources.”  
Big Blue '56 : 3/5/2023 5:32 am : link
Per sources…Alrighty then..
I don't care for the way Jones has handled negotiations  
kelly : 3/5/2023 5:37 am : link
Quarterbacks have long careers and he will make plenty of money. But 45 million is rediculous. 15 touchdowns!

Draft Stetson Bennet and spend the money and draft picks to build the roster.

Let Jones play some where else. He's worn out his welcome as far as I am concerned.
RE: RE: The comment included without an agreement in sight.  
jvm52106 : 3/5/2023 5:39 am : link
In comment 16051369 Ivan15 said:
Quote:
In comment 16051360 jvm52106 said:


Quote:


Doesn't mean anything without direct knowledge but could very well be true.

I do think if we tag Jones, the likely outcome at this point, Barkley is gone.

The Giants hold all of the cards here.

_______________
Giants only hold one card. It’s an ace but that’s all they have. If they use the tag, Jones can force them to let Barkley go and paralyze them in free agency. Jones still controls the deck.


I disagree. They can tag him, non exclusive and let him go find a deal out there. If he does, we can match or we can take the compensation or work a sign and deal.

Jones being tagged only effects Barkley, my least overall concern this off season. Deals can be signed that are cap friendly elsewhere.

So much is going to happen across the league in a few days here.
RE: RE: I wouldn't assume Barkley is gone  
Ben in Tampa : 3/5/2023 6:04 am : link
In comment 16051379 djm said:
Quote:
In comment 16051376 BigBlueNH said:


Quote:


if he hits FA. How many teams are out there that have the cap space and are willing to commit $15M or so of it to a RB with an injury history and a fair number of miles? Maybe some, but I wouldn't be surprised if he tested FA and came back and took the Giants' offer.



He WILL definitely receive big offers. You’re fooling yourself.

How many teams want a stud RB under 27 with HOF potential?? Plenty.

Its the RB. Not the fucking punter.


What was the last big free agent running back contract? I honestly can’t remember.

All the big RB contracts in recent times have been franchises resigning their own. Zeke, CMC, Henry, etc.

Saquon may get a bigger offer than what the Giants are offering, but I don’t think he’s getting top end money. I could be wrong.
That’s good news  
Sean : 3/5/2023 6:18 am : link
I’m glad Schoen is holding firm. If Jones wants over $45M he can prove it on the tag. There isn’t a large enough body of work here. If another team wants to give it to him, I’ll be thrilled with two first round picks.
RE: RE: RE: I wouldn't assume Barkley is gone  
Mdgiantsfan : 3/5/2023 6:48 am : link
In comment 16051381 Ned In Atlanta said:
Quote:
In comment 16051377 UConn4523 said:


Quote:


In comment 16051376 BigBlueNH said:


Quote:


if he hits FA. How many teams are out there that have the cap space and are willing to commit $15M or so of it to a RB with an injury history and a fair number of miles? Maybe some, but I wouldn't be surprised if he tested FA and came back and took the Giants' offer.



Take a look at the skill position FAs, it’s barren. Barkley will be getting paid as a FA.



Let another team make that short sighted mistake.


And the Giants would also be possibly making a short sighted mistake by thinking they can replace their best offensive weapon with a mid to late round pick…because hey you can find a RB at low cost. Not that I want them to overpay for Saquon, but I ahidder to think about what this offense looks like w/o a threat like Saquon.
RE: I don't care for the way Jones has handled negotiations  
UConn4523 : 3/5/2023 6:54 am : link
In comment 16051396 kelly said:
Quote:
Quarterbacks have long careers and he will make plenty of money. But 45 million is rediculous. 15 touchdowns!

Draft Stetson Bennet and spend the money and draft picks to build the roster.

Let Jones play some where else. He's worn out his welcome as far as I am concerned.


Why take this personally and why make assumptions about what’s happening based on reports that may not be accurate?
RE: RE: RE: RE: I wouldn't assume Barkley is gone  
jvm52106 : 3/5/2023 6:59 am : link
In comment 16051404 Mdgiantsfan said:
Quote:
In comment 16051381 Ned In Atlanta said:


Quote:


In comment 16051377 UConn4523 said:


Quote:


In comment 16051376 BigBlueNH said:


Quote:


if he hits FA. How many teams are out there that have the cap space and are willing to commit $15M or so of it to a RB with an injury history and a fair number of miles? Maybe some, but I wouldn't be surprised if he tested FA and came back and took the Giants' offer.



Take a look at the skill position FAs, it’s barren. Barkley will be getting paid as a FA.



Let another team make that short sighted mistake.



And the Giants would also be possibly making a short sighted mistake by thinking they can replace their best offensive weapon with a mid to late round pick…because hey you can find a RB at low cost. Not that I want them to overpay for Saquon, but I ahidder to think about what this offense looks like w/o a threat like Saquon.


To be quite honest he wasnt their best weapon in the second half, it was Jones. He faded a bit after the big Houston game- a game that should be looked at with a somewhat skeptical eye as EVERY back had huge games against Houston and Barkley's wasn't that HUGE..

You mistake who Barkley would be replaced. Yes a mid round back would be added but most likely a committee with various talents would replace Barkley..
RE: RE: I don't care for the way Jones has handled negotiations  
jvm52106 : 3/5/2023 7:00 am : link
In comment 16051405 UConn4523 said:
Quote:
In comment 16051396 kelly said:


Quote:


Quarterbacks have long careers and he will make plenty of money. But 45 million is rediculous. 15 touchdowns!

Draft Stetson Bennet and spend the money and draft picks to build the roster.

Let Jones play some where else. He's worn out his welcome as far as I am concerned.



Why take this personally and why make assumptions about what’s happening based on reports that may not be accurate?


And Stetson Bennett is not the QB for this offense.

Logistically, if FA begins Tues  
DavidinBMNY : 3/5/2023 7:20 am : link
Then if they don't do a deal Monday, Barkley is likely to hit FA because they will tag Jones.
RE: RE: I don't care for the way Jones has handled negotiations  
Big Blue '56 : 3/5/2023 7:31 am : link
In comment 16051405 UConn4523 said:
Quote:
In comment 16051396 kelly said:


Quote:


Quarterbacks have long careers and he will make plenty of money. But 45 million is rediculous. 15 touchdowns!

Draft Stetson Bennet and spend the money and draft picks to build the roster.

Let Jones play some where else. He's worn out his welcome as far as I am concerned.



Why take this personally and why make assumptions about what’s happening based on reports that may not be accurate?


Because it’s BBI? 😎
Meh  
Sammo85 : 3/5/2023 7:46 am : link
As for Barkley, I think Jones needs Barkley next season a lot more than the other way around if that plays out. It may help fast forward a roster and talent pivot to come on offense for 2024 but this offense will be ugly as hell next year with no Barkley.
Schoen isn't telling  
Dave on the UWS : 3/5/2023 7:50 am : link
squat to anyone! ESPN is speculating, unless Jones' people are leaking stuff, which is likely. No one will know, until everyone knows. The rest of this is just crap being spewed for clicks.
RE: Meh  
jvm52106 : 3/5/2023 7:51 am : link
In comment 16051418 Sammo85 said:
Quote:
As for Barkley, I think Jones needs Barkley next season a lot more than the other way around if that plays out. It may help fast forward a roster and talent pivot to come on offense for 2024 but this offense will be ugly as hell next year with no Barkley.


That seems like an odd take considering what it was like the second half.

I think Barkley is a very good back but, teams across the league use multiple backs in place of a bell cow back.
...  
SFGFNCGiantsFan : 3/5/2023 7:55 am : link
Thank God neither Jones' agents or Joe have phones, Haha.
RE: Meh  
Big Blue '56 : 3/5/2023 7:59 am : link
In comment 16051418 Sammo85 said:
Quote:
As for Barkley, I think Jones needs Barkley next season a lot more than the other way around if that plays out. It may help fast forward a roster and talent pivot to come on offense for 2024 but this offense will be ugly as hell next year with no Barkley.


People have little to no idea how much SB’s shoulder could have hindered him, because that’s essentially WHEN his play began to suffer compared to pre-injury. And yes, that is a viable excuse.
I think a Jones Tag works out best for giants  
ZogZerg : 3/5/2023 8:00 am : link
let Barkley test FA Market.
In the end  
Lines of Scrimmage : 3/5/2023 8:00 am : link
it will be the NEFT if a deal does not get reached in the next couple days.

I don't see JS doing a deal that he can't get out of in the next 2-3 years. If it goes NEFT and a team offers a deal then JS will evaluate that versus moves he can make with the extra picks.

The talent gap is the biggest issue and I am more worried about the OL and front 7. Giants are not winning another SB till these units improve significantly.
Tagging Jones  
Teletran1 : 3/5/2023 8:08 am : link
If tagging Jones causes Barkley to leave, I think it hurts Jones negotiating position as the Giants can let him play without Barkley and see how his numbers look. Too many holes on the offense to fill and if they dont find a RB threat, teams will key on Jones instead of stacking the box.
Draft Stetson Bennett?  
redwhiteandbigblue : 3/5/2023 8:12 am : link
Holy crap! Cannot wait for this QB circus to be over. I just choked when I saw this suggestion. Either the drinking has started very early(or hung over from last night) or this was sarcasm at its best(I am hoping).Either way, kudos. Gave me a good laugh to start my day.
I admire Schoen for sticking to his guns  
gidiefor : Mod : 3/5/2023 8:16 am : link
and he is going to have a bunch of these negotiations coming up so it also sends a message

Don't come in here and expect me to give up the house
Derek Carr and 2 #1's?  
CornerStone246+17 : 3/5/2023 8:20 am : link
Or DJ?

This is going to come right doen to the wire.

But I do think a team WOULD pay 2 #1s for DJ maybe even starting with the Jets. They are in the same building and know the quality of this kids ability and character

This could be the other factor at play here. Agents are saying their is significant interest in my client and other teams will try to sign him. Other teams also may be willing to give the two 1's (if the Jets they could be late picks because they have a ton of pieces on that team just not the QB) and offer a bigger contract than you are offering right now.

Who is going to flinch. How bad do they want to keep DJ?
RE: RE: Meh  
Sammo85 : 3/5/2023 8:22 am : link
In comment 16051424 jvm52106 said:
Quote:
In comment 16051418 Sammo85 said:


Quote:


As for Barkley, I think Jones needs Barkley next season a lot more than the other way around if that plays out. It may help fast forward a roster and talent pivot to come on offense for 2024 but this offense will be ugly as hell next year with no Barkley.



That seems like an odd take considering what it was like the second half.

I think Barkley is a very good back but, teams across the league use multiple backs in place of a bell cow back.


Odd take? You’re not replacing the threat Barkley provides on offense with a bunch of street FAs, Matt Breida and a mid round draft pick.

Jones best games came with Barkley playing whether he was limited or not, his threat and deployment on the field opened up what he can do in running and better pass options. Defenses had to compensate for his ability to get outside as a runner or pass option.

We will eventually be fine replacing barkley  
UConn4523 : 3/5/2023 8:26 am : link
but it’s going to take time and people should brace for a regression unless things really break our way. We will likely need a big investment (FA and/or high picks) spent on G and Center and also find a couple backs who have skill and can last a season. I’m game for that, but don’t think it’s some slam dunk way to keep the running game strong. If Barkley walks he’s going to be missed, potentially for a while.
RE: RE: RE: Meh  
Big Blue '56 : 3/5/2023 8:28 am : link
In comment 16051446 Sammo85 said:
Quote:
In comment 16051424 jvm52106 said:


Quote:


In comment 16051418 Sammo85 said:


Quote:


As for Barkley, I think Jones needs Barkley next season a lot more than the other way around if that plays out. It may help fast forward a roster and talent pivot to come on offense for 2024 but this offense will be ugly as hell next year with no Barkley.



That seems like an odd take considering what it was like the second half.

I think Barkley is a very good back but, teams across the league use multiple backs in place of a bell cow back.



Odd take? You’re not replacing the threat Barkley provides on offense with a bunch of street FAs, Matt Breida and a mid round draft pick.

Jones best games came with Barkley playing whether he was limited or not, his threat and deployment on the field opened up what he can do in running and better pass options. Defenses had to compensate for his ability to get outside as a runner or pass option.


The attitudes at times, seem to indicate that there are a bunch of backs, cheaper backs, that could bring anywhere near the threat, that SB presents
RE: Derek Carr and 2 #1's?  
CromartiesKid21 : 3/5/2023 8:30 am : link
In comment 16051443 CornerStone246+17 said:
Quote:
Or DJ?

This is going to come right doen to the wire.

But I do think a team WOULD pay 2 #1s for DJ maybe even starting with the Jets. They are in the same building and know the quality of this kids ability and character

This could be the other factor at play here. Agents are saying their is significant interest in my client and other teams will try to sign him. Other teams also may be willing to give the two 1's (if the Jets they could be late picks because they have a ton of pieces on that team just not the QB) and offer a bigger contract than you are offering right now.

Who is going to flinch. How bad do they want to keep DJ?


You are on crack if you think a GM is spending 2 1st rd picks on Daniel jones
RE: RE: RE: RE: Meh  
Sammo85 : 3/5/2023 8:35 am : link
In comment 16051449 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
In comment 16051446 Sammo85 said:


Quote:


In comment 16051424 jvm52106 said:


Quote:


In comment 16051418 Sammo85 said:


Quote:


As for Barkley, I think Jones needs Barkley next season a lot more than the other way around if that plays out. It may help fast forward a roster and talent pivot to come on offense for 2024 but this offense will be ugly as hell next year with no Barkley.



That seems like an odd take considering what it was like the second half.

I think Barkley is a very good back but, teams across the league use multiple backs in place of a bell cow back.



Odd take? You’re not replacing the threat Barkley provides on offense with a bunch of street FAs, Matt Breida and a mid round draft pick.

Jones best games came with Barkley playing whether he was limited or not, his threat and deployment on the field opened up what he can do in running and better pass options. Defenses had to compensate for his ability to get outside as a runner or pass option.




The attitudes at times, seem to indicate that there are a bunch of backs, cheaper backs, that could bring anywhere near the threat, that SB presents


If you’re letting Barkley go, and there is an argument for doing so if again much like Jones the money and guaranteed ask over long term is frankly stupid and unreasonable. However from get go the offense is going to change it’s going to take a couple years to retool and Jones to gel with the playmaking spots and OL.
RE: RE: Derek Carr and 2 #1's?  
CornerStone246+17 : 3/5/2023 8:45 am : link
In comment 16051450 CromartiesKid21 said:
Quote:
In comment 16051443 CornerStone246+17 said:


Quote:


Or DJ?

This is going to come right doen to the wire.

But I do think a team WOULD pay 2 #1s for DJ maybe even starting with the Jets. They are in the same building and know the quality of this kids ability and character

This could be the other factor at play here. Agents are saying their is significant interest in my client and other teams will try to sign him. Other teams also may be willing to give the two 1's (if the Jets they could be late picks because they have a ton of pieces on that team just not the QB) and offer a bigger contract than you are offering right now.

Who is going to flinch. How bad do they want to keep DJ?



You are on crack if you think a GM is spending 2 1st rd picks on Daniel jones


If his number is approaching 40M + and his agents are syaing that is his value there stands a pretty good chance at least one QB desperate teams thinks so too. 40M+ is most definitely QB you can win a SuperBowl with territory.

Teams have given up more than two late 1s if they feel a QB is the big missing piece.

You may not see Jones that way doesn't mean other GMs who do this for a living see it much differently than you do.
CornerStone  
Sean : 3/5/2023 8:50 am : link
That is just your speculation. That also means the tag is an absolute no brainer because I have massive doubts Jones will get over $40M.

How much is Garoppolo worth then? Don’t tell me $25M with his playoff resume and his career record as a starter.
So he says no contract resolution in sight. Says who?  
Blue21 : 3/5/2023 8:51 am : link
We ve heard all kinds of statements. Did he think it would be done before they left the combine? Why? Who's his source? Doesn't even say he has one.
Just this year  
ajr2456 : 3/5/2023 8:52 am : link
You got very good production from Etienne, Walker, Allgeier, Pierce, Hall and Pacheco. All first year players.

The Giants will be fine if they let Barkley walk.
RE: Meh  
bw in dc : 3/5/2023 8:53 am : link
In comment 16051418 Sammo85 said:
Quote:
As for Barkley, I think Jones needs Barkley next season a lot more than the other way around if that plays out. It may help fast forward a roster and talent pivot to come on offense for 2024 but this offense will be ugly as hell next year with no Barkley.


Ugly?

So, if we upgrade the OL, add more WR skill, get healthy at TE, and modernize at RB with RBBC, the offense will have a pullback in 2022 because of the loss of Barkley?

The future of this offense is Jones and better surrounding parts. Not Barkley.

I'm continually amazed how many posters think a high-priced, bell cow RB is still a winning formula in today's NFL.
Always Been A Jones Supporter  
Jeffrey : 3/5/2023 9:05 am : link
but there has to be a point of reason beyond which the Giants cut their losses. The kid has had two reasonably good years and while he was certainly hampered by the lack of an OL and decent WRs, if his contract comes in too high he will continue to be hampered by his poor OL and lack of WRs because of the lack of assets to build these units up.

Giants have so many needs the question is whether it is easier to replace Jones than to try and patch together OLs and WRs who are unproven or very limited for the next several years.

Hope that reason prevails and the team can work something out with this kid, but if not go build the rest of the team and draft a young QB to develop. I think that the coaching staff proved last year that they can coach up a QB by scheming to his strengths.
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner