for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Has your mind changed about trading for Jeudy?

Big Blue '56 : 3/14/2023 10:10 am
Last year, some were in, others not. Thoughts on this time around?
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
If the cost is 3+5, I'm in  
JonC : 3/14/2023 10:11 am : link
I hate trading #2's, those picks are gold most years.
I’d go as high as a second rounder  
eric2425ny : 3/14/2023 10:11 am : link
.
Adding him and a solid #3 in FA  
UConn4523 : 3/14/2023 10:13 am : link
would be great but yeah, I’m not giving up a top pick if I can help it. A 3rd plus next years 3rd would be my preference but not sure how realistic that is (probably isn’t).
no but i assume denver's hasn't either  
Eric on Li : 3/14/2023 10:13 am : link
they passed on whatever trade offers they got for him at the deadline before some of his biggest games with wilson, before sutton became publicly disgruntled, before they hired sean payton and went into a full court press to win.

presumably chicago offered them the same 2nd rd pick they gave up for claypool (who is not nearly as good of a player) and denver said no.

if jeudy gets traded im pretty sure it's costing the trading team a 1st or a 2nd++ other picks.
RE: If the cost is 3+5, I'm in  
Thegratefulhead : 3/14/2023 10:14 am : link
In comment 16063020 JonC said:
Quote:
I hate trading #2's, those picks are gold most years.
I would add another late pick to sweeten. NO way a 2.
RE: If the cost is 3+5, I'm in  
Jay on the Island : 3/14/2023 10:14 am : link
In comment 16063020 JonC said:
Quote:
I hate trading #2's, those picks are gold most years.

This^
RE: If the cost is 3+5, I'm in  
rnargi : 3/14/2023 10:14 am : link
In comment 16063020 JonC said:
Quote:
I hate trading #2's, those picks are gold most years.


This is where I sit. Unfortunately, they may have to part with the 2 because the options are very limited this year and rookie receivers are mostly a crap shoot.
RE: no but i assume denver's hasn't either  
Big Blue '56 : 3/14/2023 10:15 am : link
In comment 16063026 Eric on Li said:
Quote:
they passed on whatever trade offers they got for him at the deadline before some of his biggest games with wilson, before sutton became publicly disgruntled, before they hired sean payton and went into a full court press to win.

presumably chicago offered them the same 2nd rd pick they gave up for claypool (who is not nearly as good of a player) and denver said no.

if jeudy gets traded im pretty sure it's costing the trading team a 1st or a 2nd++ other picks.


2nd improbable, imo, a first? Not even a consideration by Schoen
RE: If the cost is 3+5, I'm in  
The Dude : 3/14/2023 10:15 am : link
In comment 16063020 JonC said:
Quote:
I hate trading #2's, those picks are gold most years.


^^^ +100
It depends on compensation. Would I trade more than a second rounder?  
mikeinbloomfield : 3/14/2023 10:15 am : link
no, probably not. But he's a young WR who did OK in a terrible offense last year. I think there's a lot of value there.

Absolutely worth a 2  
CornerStone246+17 : 3/14/2023 10:16 am : link
This team is starving for WRs and NYG are now 4 years in on failing to get Jones anything of strong value at the position.

After starting off the 2022 season relatively slowly, Jeudy exploded in the final six games , totaling 37 receptions for 523 yards and three touchdowns. He finished his third year with 67 receptions for 972 yards and six TDs all of which led Denver's receiving corps.

In an offense that was severely stunted by system maybe even moreso than Garrett, Jeudy's finish to the season was a strong sign of just how good a talent he is.

He is 23 years old and you can get him for a cheap contract along with a 5th year option next year.

He absolutely is worth a 2. If NYG somehow gets him for less, that's a major coup. However you have to give up something to get something.

No doubt our 2nd round pick could net us a WR too but it's no sure bet and it also comes with a learning curve.

If we want to maximize the chances the passing game finally takes off next year an established highly talented vet WR is the best path to go.

Close the deal and get this done.
RE: RE: no but i assume denver's hasn't either  
Eric on Li : 3/14/2023 10:17 am : link
In comment 16063034 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
In comment 16063026 Eric on Li said:


Quote:


they passed on whatever trade offers they got for him at the deadline before some of his biggest games with wilson, before sutton became publicly disgruntled, before they hired sean payton and went into a full court press to win.

presumably chicago offered them the same 2nd rd pick they gave up for claypool (who is not nearly as good of a player) and denver said no.

if jeudy gets traded im pretty sure it's costing the trading team a 1st or a 2nd++ other picks.



2nd improbable, imo, a first? Not even a consideration by Schoen


i agree that they won't trade their first, which is why i think it's more likely they end up with 1 of the other wrs on the market who costs less.

i could see a 2nd this year and a conditional pick next year if they extend him or something. but im not sure denver does that. i would think they still far prefer trading sutton or patrick who both save more money in the first place.
RE: If the cost is 3+5, I'm in  
Optimus-NY : 3/14/2023 10:17 am : link
In comment 16063020 JonC said:
Quote:
I hate trading #2's, those picks are gold most years.


THIS
RE: RE: If the cost is 3+5, I'm in  
UConn4523 : 3/14/2023 10:17 am : link
In comment 16063031 rnargi said:
Quote:
In comment 16063020 JonC said:


Quote:


I hate trading #2's, those picks are gold most years.



This is where I sit. Unfortunately, they may have to part with the 2 because the options are very limited this year and rookie receivers are mostly a crap shoot.


Really? WR seems to hit often in the first round and this is a good WR class.
RE: Absolutely worth a 2  
eric2425ny : 3/14/2023 10:18 am : link
In comment 16063040 CornerStone246+17 said:
Quote:
This team is starving for WRs and NYG are now 4 years in on failing to get Jones anything of strong value at the position.

After starting off the 2022 season relatively slowly, Jeudy exploded in the final six games , totaling 37 receptions for 523 yards and three touchdowns. He finished his third year with 67 receptions for 972 yards and six TDs all of which led Denver's receiving corps.

In an offense that was severely stunted by system maybe even moreso than Garrett, Jeudy's finish to the season was a strong sign of just how good a talent he is.

He is 23 years old and you can get him for a cheap contract along with a 5th year option next year.

He absolutely is worth a 2. If NYG somehow gets him for less, that's a major coup. However you have to give up something to get something.

No doubt our 2nd round pick could net us a WR too but it's no sure bet and it also comes with a learning curve.

If we want to maximize the chances the passing game finally takes off next year an established highly talented vet WR is the best path to go.

Close the deal and get this done.


I agree with this, well laid out argument.
I'm in  
Gogiantsgo : 3/14/2023 10:18 am : link
WR is a HUGE problem for this team. Right now, the only healthy WR they have on the team is Hodgins. The others are all coming off season-ending injuries (Wandale Robinson, Sterling Shepherd, and Collin Johnson). Not crazy about bringing Slayton or James back, but they HAVE to do something. It's getting pretty desperate.
RE: no but i assume denver's hasn't either  
CornerStone246+17 : 3/14/2023 10:19 am : link
In comment 16063026 Eric on Li said:
Quote:
they passed on whatever trade offers they got for him at the deadline before some of his biggest games with wilson, before sutton became publicly disgruntled, before they hired sean payton and went into a full court press to win.

presumably chicago offered them the same 2nd rd pick they gave up for claypool (who is not nearly as good of a player) and denver said no.

if jeudy gets traded im pretty sure it's costing the trading team a 1st or a 2nd++ other picks.


These are valid points and it is quite likely they want to trade Sutton more than Jeudy at this point. Much higher contract and doesn't quite look as explosive as he did pre-injury.
I'm lukewarm at a 2  
AcesUp : 3/14/2023 10:21 am : link
That's something they should explore if there are no other real options to economically improve the WRs in a meaningful way this offseason. I think the UFA WRs not moving yesterday and Meyers coming in cheaper than expected opens up UFA a little my eyes. To at least set a floor with a veteran that can contribute and bring something unique to the team before the draft.

I'd be 100% on board for a 3+ though.
Jeudy  
Sammo85 : 3/14/2023 10:22 am : link
I'd offer the Toney pick and walk away from anything more than that. Not trading a #1 or #2 given how significant the roster needs are still for cheap, good talent going forward, given the mammoth cap hit contracts Giants will have with Lawrence, Thomas, Jones on books next couple seasons.

Jeudy will need/want a new contract soon himself. Broncos don't have a ton of leverage. I think they want to simply recoup draft assets more than they want to keep Jeudy.

I'd offer a conditional 2024 pick if Jeudy resigns. Say offer a 4th that becomes another 3rd if Jeudy plays 80 percent of games and resigns long term.
No  
AcidTest : 3/14/2023 10:22 am : link
because I don't think you're getting him for a three and a five. I'm not sure I would do that anyway, but I think Denver will want at least a two. Part of my concern is that potential trade partners will increase the price because they know we need WRs.
RE: I'm in  
CornerStone246+17 : 3/14/2023 10:22 am : link
In comment 16063045 Gogiantsgo said:
Quote:
WR is a HUGE problem for this team. Right now, the only healthy WR they have on the team is Hodgins. The others are all coming off season-ending injuries (Wandale Robinson, Sterling Shepherd, and Collin Johnson). Not crazy about bringing Slayton or James back, but they HAVE to do something. It's getting pretty desperate.


Maybe he wanted the Raiders and to play under McDaniel but man with how desperate NYG are at the position I would have considered Jakobi at those numbers too. That's a pretty cheap contract for a WR these days with maybe borderline #1 potential.
Mine has not  
SteelGiant : 3/14/2023 10:22 am : link
Because I am not trading 1 or 2 for him. I would rather draft my guy this year on a rookie deal, I would be slightly reach in the first round just so I can have a 5th year option, WRs are pricey
Do not know enough.  
George from PA : 3/14/2023 10:24 am : link

But a 3rd and 5th is worth the flyer
100% cost dependent  
Biteymax22 : 3/14/2023 10:26 am : link
I'd move the Toney compensation for him which would essentially be a Toney/Jeudy swap.

If they're asking for more compensation than that, no. There seems to be good depth in the draft to where you can get WRs in the 2nd and 3rd round. I'd prefer to keep building through the draft.
I  
g56blue10 : 3/14/2023 10:26 am : link
Would part with a 2nd and peer round pick for him. He’s got the potential to be a legit #1 or at least an excellent #2. Would not part with a 1st
You happily  
Mr. Nickels : 3/14/2023 10:31 am : link
Give your late 2nd and don't hesitate.

Quit being cheap fuvks

Jeudy was a top 15 pick
….  
BleedBlue : 3/14/2023 10:31 am : link
3 and a 5

Or a

2024 second

I think giants ultimately really need a deal like this.

I don’t see this passing game taking huge strides by just adding a rookie unless he explodes or we get lucky and he turns into a Jefferson

Personally I love the upside of Jeudy and he is very affordable for 2 seasons
I m in for whatever Schoen seems best. He s 23  
Blue21 : 3/14/2023 10:32 am : link
Even if we give up a 2. Can we get a guaranteed 2 in the draft that is as good as he is?
You can get a talented WR in the 2nd rd  
Jim in Forest Hills : 3/14/2023 10:33 am : link
so no on the 2nd. 3 + 5 would do that deal.
Give up a 2, and draft Hyatt JSN, or Flowers in  
barens : 3/14/2023 10:33 am : link
the first, and the receiving corp looks a lot different than in previous years.

2nd round pick would be tough to give up, choosing in the bottom of that round, I might be willing to part ways with that pick.
I'd give a 2nd - he is really starting to come into his own as a #1  
PatersonPlank : 3/14/2023 10:34 am : link
The last half of the season with Denver, who was not exactly a passing juggernaut, he did well. I looked it up, the last 6 games he averaged about 90 yds, 6.5 catches, and had 3 TDS.
For a 3 and a 5, in a heartbeat,  
Section331 : 3/14/2023 10:35 am : link
but I’m not sure why Denver would do that. He’s cheap this year, and it’s not like they’re deep at WR. He and Wilson seemed to get in a rhythm late last year, so moving Jeudy doesn’t make a lot of sense.
RE: For a 3 and a 5, in a heartbeat,  
Big Blue '56 : 3/14/2023 10:38 am : link
In comment 16063083 Section331 said:
Quote:
but I’m not sure why Denver would do that. He’s cheap this year, and it’s not like they’re deep at WR. He and Wilson seemed to get in a rhythm late last year, so moving Jeudy doesn’t make a lot of sense.


Well then, Schoen might have to PART with a 2, if he really covets him, assuming Denver is willing, which would appear is not the case?
From Overthecap.com  
CornerStone246+17 : 3/14/2023 10:39 am : link
The final thing is that there is no such thing as a post June 1 trade designation. The Packers can not trade Aaron Rodgers in March and declare it a post June 1 trade to break up the salary cap charges across the 2023 and 2024 league years. If Green Bay needed to split the cost (Rodgers costs more on the cap to trade than keep) they would have to find a team willing to delay processing any trade for Rodgers until June 2nd. If they trade him before that date there is no other option but to take all of the dead money in 2023.

-Taking above into account, Sutton if traded pre-June 1st is a 6.8M savings vs. 14M post June 1 . However he would be off their books as he has another 2 years on the contract at a fairly large number. Jeudy only saves 2.7M is they trade him now.
Don't shop hungry  
Heisenberg : 3/14/2023 10:39 am : link
hold on to the twos.
I'll get...  
2ndroundKO : 3/14/2023 10:41 am : link
behind it if we make a trade for him but to my untrained eye, he is not the #1 we're looking for and just isn't worth giving up picks for.
RE: RE: For a 3 and a 5, in a heartbeat,  
Section331 : 3/14/2023 10:43 am : link
In comment 16063085 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
In comment 16063083 Section331 said:


Quote:


but I’m not sure why Denver would do that. He’s cheap this year, and it’s not like they’re deep at WR. He and Wilson seemed to get in a rhythm late last year, so moving Jeudy doesn’t make a lot of sense.



Well then, Schoen might have to PART with a 2, if he really covets him, assuming Denver is willing, which would appear is not the case?


It becomes less palatable with a 2, but I’d still consider it. He has the skill set to be a #1.
My question is, can he fill the  
Big Blue '56 : 3/14/2023 10:45 am : link
number 1 role and open up the O?
RE: If the cost is 3+5, I'm in  
djm : 3/14/2023 10:47 am : link
In comment 16063020 JonC said:
Quote:
I hate trading #2's, those picks are gold most years.


I'm close to this same feeling. I love 2nd round picks but also think Jeudy could be a steal or blossom in the right system/setting. Not sure we can get him for less than the 2nd, so I am torn. I reserve the right to change my mind if and when.
RE: RE: If the cost is 3+5, I'm in  
Big Blue '56 : 3/14/2023 10:48 am : link
In comment 16063104 djm said:
Quote:
In comment 16063020 JonC said:


Quote:


I hate trading #2's, those picks are gold most years.



I'm close to this same feeling. I love 2nd round picks but also think Jeudy could be a steal or blossom in the right system/setting. Not sure we can get him for less than the 2nd, so I am torn. I reserve the right to change my mind if and when.


Make up your mind now, or get off this thread….:)
RE: My question is, can he fill the  
CornerStone246+17 : 3/14/2023 10:52 am : link
In comment 16063101 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
number 1 role and open up the O?


If he is the player he was the last 6-7 games with Wilson in that terrible Hackett Offense he very likely can be a true #1 in Daboll/Kafka's offense that stresses route running and guys that separate.
This issue for the Giants and I think many fans  
LauderdaleMatty : 3/14/2023 10:52 am : link
Is that both DG and. Reese really sucked ass drafting over all. So people are just fine w dumping a draft choice. But you need to draft well or you are t winning shit inthe NFL. For performance as well as cap reasons.


For over a decade getting anything after round round 1(and even the) was pile dream. Great teams get value all over the draft. You can't keep trading picks. It messes up the age and the cap situations over all.
if the front office is truly sold on him  
islander1 : 3/14/2023 10:54 am : link
I'd trade the second.

You have to give to get. It's not like it's pick 35.
Yes  
Tim in Eternal Blue : 3/14/2023 10:56 am : link

We had arguable top 3, worst WR core in the league.

A 3 and a 5 would be great but I'd give up a 2. You just paid DJ, top 10 money, now give him weapons.
Some WRs that are talked around Rd 2  
Jim in Forest Hills : 3/14/2023 11:03 am : link
Jonathan Mingo
Rashee Rice
Cedric Tillman
Josh Downs

Not saying they are better than Jeudy but just for comp sake.


Probably not  
Spiciest Memelord : 3/14/2023 11:05 am : link
hate to do it but credit Roseman for getting AJ Brown, a relatively unknown sneaky good find. I'd rather not trade for a known "name" as that comes with a premium.
RE: Some WRs that are talked around Rd 2  
CornerStone246+17 : 3/14/2023 11:08 am : link
In comment 16063123 Jim in Forest Hills said:
Quote:
Jonathan Mingo
Rashee Rice
Cedric Tillman
Josh Downs

Not saying they are better than Jeudy but just for comp sake.



Tyler Scott
Michael Wilson
I wouldn't do it  
Chip : 3/14/2023 11:08 am : link
He is a free agent after next season and WR tag is high. Makes no sense without a deal going forward or you are doing a Gettleman deal like LW.
RE: Probably not  
Big Blue '56 : 3/14/2023 11:12 am : link
In comment 16063126 Spiciest Memelord said:
Quote:
hate to do it but credit Roseman for getting AJ Brown, a relatively unknown sneaky good find. I'd rather not trade for a known "name" as that comes with a premium.


Unless that “name,” like AJ Brown, can take us to that next level
I would give up a deuce  
Johnny5 : 3/14/2023 11:19 am : link
100%. The guy is a former 1st rounder who is a really good WR, even on a completely dysfunctional team.

A 3 and 5 is a no brainer, run to make the deal. But I would give up a 2nd rounder if needed to make the deal.

I read the Patriots are hot on making that deal with Denver as well, so there's competition for his services.
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner