adding skill players. Said WR is up next. Did not mention trade or FA but I think the healthy bet is trade. Eyes on Jeudy with some unsubstantiated twitter noise on Aiyuk.
But trading him makes no sense from the niners pov. He’s their best outside wr and he’s still cheap. There’s also been no leaks or rumors he’s even on the block. I’ll go out on a limb and say no way in hell.
Jeudy sure, maybe. Aiyuk isn’t available.
“Unsubstantiated Twitter noise on Aiyuk”, so yeah, you’re probably right.
Aiyuk probably would be desirous just to finally have someone who can run a jet sweep well and is a threat.
Apparently you missed Cincinnatis Director of Player Personnel talking the other day. He made it crystal clear that they aren’t trading Higgins and if other teams want a good WR they need to go find their own
But trading him makes no sense from the niners pov. He’s their best outside wr and he’s still cheap. There’s also been no leaks or rumors he’s even on the block. I’ll go out on a limb and say no way in hell.
Jeudy sure, maybe. Aiyuk isn’t available.
“Unsubstantiated Twitter noise on Aiyuk”, so yeah, you’re probably right.
Don’t get me wrong I’d love to get him here but I don’t see it. Niners are obviously all in why would they trade a young and vital WR.
Yes. Denver is open for business but price needs to be met. Price on Jeudy jumped at the last second during the deadline to a 1st. Sounds like Denver has backed off on that.
I wonder if they’d take a 2 and 6 for him? They’re best is a 3rd this year.
They’d have 57, 67 from Colts, they’re own 67( that’d be the sell)?
They can’t pay everyone there and I would love to pry him away.
That's what I've been wondering for a couple of months. Jeudy is good, but Tae Higgins might be better. Bengals have to cough up for Chase and Burrow, makes it difficult to pay Higgins as well.
RE: RE: RE: No idea where the Aiyuk talk came from
But trading him makes no sense from the niners pov. He’s their best outside wr and he’s still cheap. There’s also been no leaks or rumors he’s even on the block. I’ll go out on a limb and say no way in hell.
Jeudy sure, maybe. Aiyuk isn’t available.
“Unsubstantiated Twitter noise on Aiyuk”, so yeah, you’re probably right.
Don’t get me wrong I’d love to get him here but I don’t see it. Niners are obviously all in why would they trade a young and vital WR.
Totally agree, I don’t see why SF would do that, but then again, I don’t know why Denver would trade Jeudy either.
But trading him makes no sense from the niners pov. He’s their best outside wr and he’s still cheap. There’s also been no leaks or rumors he’s even on the block. I’ll go out on a limb and say no way in hell.
Jeudy sure, maybe. Aiyuk isn’t available.
“Unsubstantiated Twitter noise on Aiyuk”, so yeah, you’re probably right.
Not sure how I happened upon this, but the thesis on this SF sports talk is that SF MUST HAVE a 1st to get a badly needed RT, and it would likely come from trading Aiyuk or Lance. Guys are split on who of the two would make most sense, but unified on Aiyuk must bring a 1st. Talk on Aiyuk is 2nd half of this. Long but interesting. Likely we're not giving a 1st anyway. Aiyuk Talk from SF - ( New Window )
Aiyuk probably would be desirous just to finally have someone who can run a jet sweep well and is a threat.
In theory, we got our big downfield receving threat in Waller . Preferably the quick separating crisp route running WR like Jeudy would be more ideal for this offense at this point.
Trade a bona fide WR for a chance to draft a right tackle who has never played a down in the NFL.
I guess salary plays a part too
Their reasoning (which makes sense) is that, with the addition of McCaffrey, Aiyuk now is their 4th target (including Samuel & Jennings). They are deep enough at WR that they could afford to let him go. Only opinions, but likely more informed than we are (but of course not Joe, I would think).
but Cincy has made it clear they aren't trading him. I believe their exact words were....go find your own Tee Higgins. People need to stop mentioning his name.
I am still fully on board with trading for a WR. If we can pull it off for a 3rd or even a 3rd and 4th, I'd be all for it. The chances of hitting on those picks is miniscule anyway. I understand the importance of hitting on those picks for team building, but we have a ton of picks in the draft.
I'd still consider giving up a 2nd for Hopkins, although you can probably play hardball and give up a 3 and 4 or a 3 and a future pick. Sutton, Jeudy. They all work for me.
Jeudy sure, maybe. Aiyuk isn’t available.
“Unsubstantiated Twitter noise on Aiyuk”, so yeah, you’re probably right.
Aiyuk probably would be desirous just to finally have someone who can run a jet sweep well and is a threat.
Apparently you missed Cincinnatis Director of Player Personnel talking the other day. He made it crystal clear that they aren’t trading Higgins and if other teams want a good WR they need to go find their own
Quote:
But trading him makes no sense from the niners pov. He’s their best outside wr and he’s still cheap. There’s also been no leaks or rumors he’s even on the block. I’ll go out on a limb and say no way in hell.
Jeudy sure, maybe. Aiyuk isn’t available.
“Unsubstantiated Twitter noise on Aiyuk”, so yeah, you’re probably right.
Don’t get me wrong I’d love to get him here but I don’t see it. Niners are obviously all in why would they trade a young and vital WR.
Aiyuk probably would be desirous just to finally have someone who can run a jet sweep well and is a threat.
You’ll probably need to trade #25 for Higgins. Would you do that?
Quote:
is Jeudy even AVAILABLE for trade?
Yes. Denver is open for business but price needs to be met. Price on Jeudy jumped at the last second during the deadline to a 1st. Sounds like Denver has backed off on that.
I wonder if they’d take a 2 and 6 for him? They’re best is a 3rd this year.
They’d have 57, 67 from Colts, they’re own 67( that’d be the sell)?
That's what I've been wondering for a couple of months. Jeudy is good, but Tae Higgins might be better. Bengals have to cough up for Chase and Burrow, makes it difficult to pay Higgins as well.
Quote:
In comment 16064065 djm said:
Quote:
But trading him makes no sense from the niners pov. He’s their best outside wr and he’s still cheap. There’s also been no leaks or rumors he’s even on the block. I’ll go out on a limb and say no way in hell.
Jeudy sure, maybe. Aiyuk isn’t available.
“Unsubstantiated Twitter noise on Aiyuk”, so yeah, you’re probably right.
Don’t get me wrong I’d love to get him here but I don’t see it. Niners are obviously all in why would they trade a young and vital WR.
Totally agree, I don’t see why SF would do that, but then again, I don’t know why Denver would trade Jeudy either.
Quote:
But trading him makes no sense from the niners pov. He’s their best outside wr and he’s still cheap. There’s also been no leaks or rumors he’s even on the block. I’ll go out on a limb and say no way in hell.
Jeudy sure, maybe. Aiyuk isn’t available.
“Unsubstantiated Twitter noise on Aiyuk”, so yeah, you’re probably right.
Not sure how I happened upon this, but the thesis on this SF sports talk is that SF MUST HAVE a 1st to get a badly needed RT, and it would likely come from trading Aiyuk or Lance. Guys are split on who of the two would make most sense, but unified on Aiyuk must bring a 1st. Talk on Aiyuk is 2nd half of this. Long but interesting. Likely we're not giving a 1st anyway.
Aiyuk Talk from SF - ( New Window )
I guess salary plays a part too
I guess salary plays a part too
Give us a 3rd and we will give your our first in aiyuk deal
Aiyuk probably would be desirous just to finally have someone who can run a jet sweep well and is a threat.
In theory, we got our big downfield receving threat in Waller . Preferably the quick separating crisp route running WR like Jeudy would be more ideal for this offense at this point.
I guess salary plays a part too
Their reasoning (which makes sense) is that, with the addition of McCaffrey, Aiyuk now is their 4th target (including Samuel & Jennings). They are deep enough at WR that they could afford to let him go. Only opinions, but likely more informed than we are (but of course not Joe, I would think).
I am still fully on board with trading for a WR. If we can pull it off for a 3rd or even a 3rd and 4th, I'd be all for it. The chances of hitting on those picks is miniscule anyway. I understand the importance of hitting on those picks for team building, but we have a ton of picks in the draft.
I'd still consider giving up a 2nd for Hopkins, although you can probably play hardball and give up a 3 and 4 or a 3 and a future pick. Sutton, Jeudy. They all work for me.
I'd prefer to address the position in free agency (OBJ or Smith-Schuster) and draft.
Quote:
They can’t pay everyone there and I would love to pry him away.
their gm said they want to extend him and aren't looking to trade him.
any young 1k yard receiver is likely going to cost a 1st+. aiyuk/jeudy/higgins included.
I think Higgins would be the most expensive in terms of trade acquisition cost, and rightfully so, he's a baller.
I don't see him getting moved.
I'd prefer to address the position in free agency (OBJ or Smith-Schuster) and draft.
I'm hoping that you're not preferring OBJ over Aiyuk. Juju's already gone...