Y28- there was talk last week about the Giants using the

I do not believe he heard it from the Giants

because of the open roster spots, which no longer exist except for JMS. But he will sign any day now.

invited to the OTAs, and if so, who?

What I was stating was pure speculation on my part.

Simply stated, the Giants could have had 93 players (its voluntary) at Monday's OTAs if the final 3 draft picks were not yet signed.

That possibility no longer exists.

Regarding "tryout players", the OTAs don't include them. The OTAs are for players on the roster (and as of now-unsigned JMS).

I appreciate your comments, but I am just another fan-nothing more.

In comment 16119793 Y28 said:

Quote:

What I was stating was pure speculation on my part. Simply stated, the Giants could have had 93 players (its voluntary) at Monday's OTAs if the final 3 draft picks were not yet signed. That possibility no longer exists. Regarding "tryout players", the OTAs don't include them. The OTAs are for players on the roster (and as of now-unsigned JMS). I appreciate your comments, but I am just another fan-nothing more.

Thanks. Yes, I knew you were just speculating, but the idea had merit

In comment 16119773 Bill in UT said:

Quote:

invited to the OTAs, and if so, who?

UDFAs are undrafted rookie free agents who were signed after the draft. They will be at OTAs.

Don't confuse tryout players with UDFAs. They are not the same thing.

In comment 16120112 Eric from BBI said:

Quote:

In comment 16119773 Bill in UT said: Quote: invited to the OTAs, and if so, who? UDFAs are undrafted rookie free agents who were signed after the draft. They will be at OTAs. Don't confuse tryout players with UDFAs. They are not the same thing.

Thanks. I was thinking of the tryout guys