roster spots for their unsigned top 3 picks as a way to get a look at some UDFAs during OTAs. That strategy has apparently not continued forward with the recent signings. Anything you've heard regarding any of the UDFAs?
Y28 suggested it might be a rational.....but I took it as speculation
Simply stated, the Giants could have had 93 players (its voluntary) at Monday's OTAs if the final 3 draft picks were not yet signed.
That possibility no longer exists.
Regarding "tryout players", the OTAs don't include them. The OTAs are for players on the roster (and as of now-unsigned JMS).
I appreciate your comments, but I am just another fan-nothing more.
Simply stated, the Giants could have had 93 players (its voluntary) at Monday's OTAs if the final 3 draft picks were not yet signed.
That possibility no longer exists.
Regarding "tryout players", the OTAs don't include them. The OTAs are for players on the roster (and as of now-unsigned JMS).
I appreciate your comments, but I am just another fan-nothing more.
Thanks. Yes, I knew you were just speculating, but the idea had merit
UDFAs are undrafted rookie free agents who were signed after the draft. They will be at OTAs.
Don't confuse tryout players with UDFAs. They are not the same thing.
Quote:
invited to the OTAs, and if so, who?
UDFAs are undrafted rookie free agents who were signed after the draft. They will be at OTAs.
Don't confuse tryout players with UDFAs. They are not the same thing.
Thanks. I was thinking of the tryout guys