for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

DeAndre Hopkins released

bigblue12 : 5/26/2023 1:05 pm
I don't think we will have interest, but interesting nonetheless
Link - ( New Window )
Pages: 1 2 3 <<Prev | Show All |
RE: RE: RE: Feeling around the league  
speedywheels : 5/26/2023 3:59 pm : link
In comment 16123791 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
In comment 16123783 eric2425ny said:


Quote:


In comment 16123766 ajr2456 said:


Quote:


Is he’s the Ravens to lose.



It shocks me any WR would want to play for the Ravens. They are a run first team. They have had one WR put up over 1k yards since Jackson became the starter in 2018. That was Marquise Brown with 1,008 yards in 2021. Mark Andrews also had 1,300 yards at TE that year. No receiver or TE over 1k yards in 2018, 2019, 2020, or 2022.



They haven’t had much talent at WR, either though.


But I've been told over and over - and over again - that elite QB's (like Jackson supposedly is) elevate the players around him.

I don't mean to nitpick, but he's a couple of weeks from being 31.  
Ira : 5/26/2023 4:01 pm : link
He'll want a multi-year deal north of 20 million per.
RE: Doubt  
ColHowPepper : 5/26/2023 4:04 pm : link
In comment 16123734 BleedBlue said:
Quote:
...That is the makings of an actual NFL offense skill group and really only puts IOL as the only question mark offensively and they look to have landed a starter in JMS...

Neal remains a huge question mark at RT.
RE: RE: Doubt  
BleedBlue : 5/26/2023 4:07 pm : link
In comment 16123861 ColHowPepper said:
Quote:
In comment 16123734 BleedBlue said:


Quote:


...That is the makings of an actual NFL offense skill group and really only puts IOL as the only question mark offensively and they look to have landed a starter in JMS...


Neal remains a huge question mark at RT.

Sure but show me an offense with NO holes or question marks? Every team has them. Point remains only thing we absolutely don’t have is a #1 wr. We are indeed close to being a very good group on offense
RE: RE: RE: djm  
djm : 5/26/2023 4:09 pm : link
In comment 16123805 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
In comment 16123800 djm said:


Quote:


In comment 16123787 Eric from BBI said:


Quote:


That's more than a bit disingenuous.

There were people who were saying a month ago that the Giants should trade away their 1st round pick for Hopkins, a 30 year old receiver.

Given where we are in the rebuilding curve vis a vis the Eagles, we weren't "one player away."

This is a different situation now given he would not cost us Deonte Banks.



Could not agree more and I never ever ever advocated for trading big pieces for Hopkins but you have people on this very thread saying not to sign him because " we aren't one player away."

I wouldn't trade a first for Hopkins 2 years ago let alone now. I actually think he's more a glorified possession WR than a game breaking weapon but he's still a very good player.

I never said to trade a first for him. People here are saying don't sign him.



I'm not sure you are understanding me. You said you were tired of the "not one player away" argument. I am saying that came up in the past when people were talking about trading away our 1st-round pick. As I said, this is a different dynamic now.

What I'm saying is the "one player away" argument changes when draft picks are involved.


I get you. And to some extent I would agree, but I still hate that line of thinking, it just depends on the picks going back. Of course I am not going to trade 1-2 high picks for an older player with maybe 1-2 years left in him. No one would.

Like I said, NYG traded draft capital for Rob Carpenter. You don't have to be one player away to make a good trade and it doesn't necessarily need to help the team win a title to be considered a good trade.

Of course there are exceptions.
We weren’t one player away  
RicFlair : 5/26/2023 4:12 pm : link
When we gave up draft picks during this draft either.
Folks  
jc in c-ville : 5/26/2023 4:26 pm : link
He is about to turn 31 and is on the back 9 of his career. He wants to win a ring and our leadership is not going to get in a bidding war over this guy, for a year or two. I look at the Giants compared to other top NFC teams like SF / Philly and Hopkins isn’t going to get us past those two. A stud RT, now we’re talking. We have had a great offseason IMO and as everyone knows, Joe can’t completely fix this team in two off seasons. I simply would love a WR with his valid, even if it’s 75%? of himself but simply don’t think Joe is in the business of paying good money for him, after trading for Waller and trading up for WR.
Why is it that nobody is asking...  
DefenseWins : 5/26/2023 4:34 pm : link
why there were no teams offering anything for Hopkins. At this point, the Cardinals would have taken a 7th rounder for him.

Also, why did they just release him? It is either a very telling move based upon what they think of Hopkins, or they do not believe they can compete next year without their QB.
RE: Why is it that nobody is asking...  
ColHowPepper : 5/26/2023 4:53 pm : link
In comment 16123874 DefenseWins said:
Quote:
why there were no teams offering anything for Hopkins. At this point, the Cardinals would have taken a 7th rounder for him.

Also, why did they just release him? It is either a very telling move based upon what they think of Hopkins, or they do not believe they can compete next year without their QB.

Similar set up with NYG and Bradberry last year? Schoen was desperate to work a trade, JB was released
He’s not coming here  
MyNameIsMyName : 5/26/2023 5:19 pm : link
He wants to play with one of the top QB’s
RE: people forgot  
Gatorade Dunk : 5/26/2023 5:25 pm : link
In comment 16123830 BigBlueCane said:
Quote:
he got popped PEDS?

So did Dexter. Do you see anyone complaining about locking him up long-term?
RE: He’s not coming here  
Big Blue '56 : 5/26/2023 6:14 pm : link
In comment 16123881 MyNameIsMyName said:
Quote:
He wants to play with one of the top QB’s


True. What we have here is garbage. Not even back-up material.
RE: He’s not coming here  
No1MDGiantsFan : 5/26/2023 6:19 pm : link
In comment 16123881 MyNameIsMyName said:
Quote:
He wants to play with one of the top QB’s


🥱
No doubt  
tommcd66 : 5/26/2023 6:34 pm : link
The Giants are doing their due diligence investigating this. I imagine every team is pondering it. That great catch against the Bills was in 2020. I imagine they’d like him here if the price is right.
RE: RE: RE: This is an absolute no brainer...  
speedywheels : 5/26/2023 6:38 pm : link
In comment 16123814 The Mike said:
Quote:










Fair enough and I did see that DHop put out his favorite five quarterbacks and that is likely where he "wants" to go. BTW, it must have been truly shocking to many on this site that DJ wasn't included on his list...



Burrow is not on the list either. Just sayin'...
I don't get this for the Cards.  
BigBlueNH : 5/26/2023 7:30 pm : link
To save $8M against the cap they're willing to take a $20M+ dead cap hit, and get rid of the only real weapon Kyler has? I know they're not going anywhere this year, but how badly do they need that $8M that they're not going to even try to field a competitive team? Glad we're NJ it them.
RE: RE: Schefter tweet  
RCPhoenix : 5/26/2023 7:30 pm : link
In comment 16123818 OBJRoyal said:
Quote:
In comment 16123740 RCPhoenix said:


Quote:


Adam Schefter
@AdamSchefter
ESPN Senior NFL Insider.

@AdamSchefter

On a recent appearance on the “I Am Athlete” podcast, free-agent WR DeAndre Hopkins listed the five QBs he’d most like to catch passes from: the Bills’ Josh Allen, the Eagles’ Jalen Hurts, the Chiefs’ Patrick Mahomes, the Ravens’ Lamar Jackson and the Chargers’ Justin Herbert. Link - ( New Window )



He obviously wants to play w the best of the best at QB. Surprised no Burrow on that list


Herbert instead of Burrow on that list is a bit odd.
RE: RE: He’s not coming here  
OBJRoyal : 5/26/2023 7:31 pm : link
In comment 16123900 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
In comment 16123881 MyNameIsMyName said:


Quote:


He wants to play with one of the top QB’s



True. What we have here is garbage. Not even back-up material.


Has he named Jones as one of the QBs he WANTS to play with?? If so, I missed it being reported
Not  
BigBlueNH : 5/26/2023 7:31 pm : link
them.
RE: RE: He’s not coming here  
MyNameIsMyName : 5/26/2023 7:40 pm : link
In comment 16123900 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
In comment 16123881 MyNameIsMyName said:


Quote:


He wants to play with one of the top QB’s



True. What we have here is garbage. Not even back-up material.


Whatever you say
I’d be disappointed if we weren’t interested  
Rudy5757 : 5/26/2023 8:48 pm : link
That would turn this O from has potential to very good. Saquon, Waller, Hopkins plus everyone else would be amazing. No WR we have should prevent interest.

I doubt it happens but would love it.
RE: Doubt  
Wildcardgiants : 5/26/2023 9:16 pm : link
In comment 16123715 jc in c-ville said:
Quote:
They go after him. As echoed, Giants are not a WR away.


Why not? Were the 2007 Giants Superbowl contenders?
Does Jerry Jones sign Hopkins???  
Rick in Dallas : 5/26/2023 11:56 pm : link
You can never have enough offensive weapons for Dak
Hopkins would make their offense explosive as the Eagles
On top of a defense that is top 10
JJ isn’t getting any younger and his desire for a SB is unquestionable
RE: This is why I would have given up a fifth  
thefan : 5/27/2023 12:53 am : link
In comment 16123702 sec308 said:
Quote:
and I heard he is willing to renegotiate.


Sounds like him and his contract wasn't even worth a conditional 7th.
And for the record  
thefan : 5/27/2023 12:55 am : link
yes adding Hopkins would be exciting, no I wouldn't do it for the money he probably wants. You'd be sacrificing resigning someone, assuming you'd have to restructure someone else and on go the dominoes for a one year rental.
RE: RE: or he would serve as a 1 year mentor for Hyatt  
eli4life : 5/27/2023 2:58 am : link
In comment 16123822 JohnG in Albany said:
Quote:
In comment 16123690 fish3321 said:


Quote:


hmmmmm



Hopkins doesn't strike me as the mentor type these days.

And isn't he looking for huge money? Like $20M/yr huge?


Not saying he’d come for league minimum but you don’t need a huge contract to get him. He still has that guaranteed money coming his way. I think it’s like 23 million. At this point in his career I think he’s probably ring hunting this year and next year probably look for one more big payday
Hopkins  
stretch234 : 5/27/2023 6:46 am : link
Look at the teams mentioned

Eagles - he is not going to a team to be the 3rd WR. Guys like him do not do that, despite what he says. If he was 35 it is different

Bills - already have Diggs who bitches he already is not getting the ball enough even though the team is really good

Chargers - already have K. Allen, M. Williams and drafted Johnston

Chiefs - won a SB without him. He does not fit their type of WR which is quick elusive type

Ravens - seems the most likely, but they have 2 1st rd WR picks in Bateman and Flowers the last 3 years. They signed OBJ and Agholor

Other good teams already have players at WR: Bengals, Cowboys, SF, even Den, Sea have WRs

Who could be a good fit: Lions, Rams,

Watch him go to the Raiders
With health, we should  
Big Blue '56 : 5/27/2023 7:12 am : link
have ample firepower. We don’t need a 1 year rental
...  
Eric from BBI : Admin : 5/27/2023 7:43 am : link
DeAndre Hopkins Next Team

Dallas Cowboys

2/1

Kansas City Chiefs

4/1

New England Patriots

5/1

Buffalo Bills

6/1

Philadelphia Eagles

7/1

Baltimore Ravens

8/1

New York Giants

9/1

Chicago Bears

12/1

New York Jets

14/1

Cleveland Browns

16/1

Jacksonville Jaguars

18/1

Green Bay Packers

20/1

Los Angeles Chargers

20/1

Las Vegas Raiders

25/1

Tampa Bay Buccaneers

25/1
If we do spend any money  
blueblood : 5/27/2023 7:46 am : link
its better be on finding a third edge rusher..

which we need much more than a name on offense.
RE: If we do spend any money  
Big Blue '56 : 5/27/2023 7:52 am : link
In comment 16124002 blueblood said:
Quote:
its better be on finding a third edge rusher..

which we need much more than a name on offense.


This
RE: RE: RE: Schefter tweet  
Optimus-NY : 5/27/2023 8:07 am : link
In comment 16123925 RCPhoenix said:
Quote:
In comment 16123818 OBJRoyal said:


Quote:


In comment 16123740 RCPhoenix said:


Quote:


Adam Schefter
@AdamSchefter
ESPN Senior NFL Insider.

@AdamSchefter

On a recent appearance on the “I Am Athlete” podcast, free-agent WR DeAndre Hopkins listed the five QBs he’d most like to catch passes from: the Bills’ Josh Allen, the Eagles’ Jalen Hurts, the Chiefs’ Patrick Mahomes, the Ravens’ Lamar Jackson and the Chargers’ Justin Herbert. Link - ( New Window )



He obviously wants to play w the best of the best at QB. Surprised no Burrow on that list



Herbert instead of Burrow on that list is a bit odd.


My guess would be because the Bengals already have two top receivers, so he'd get limited touches as a result. The Bengals aren't exactly known as big spenders either; combine that with the fact that Joe Burrow isn't on his 2nd contract yet, and it's not an ideal fit for him. He's not after winning per se. He's after the bag, with winning being a nice side dish. The main course is most definitely the $$$.
RE: RE: Feeling around the league  
AcesUp : 5/27/2023 8:11 am : link
In comment 16123783 eric2425ny said:
Quote:
In comment 16123766 ajr2456 said:


Quote:


Is he’s the Ravens to lose.



It shocks me any WR would want to play for the Ravens. They are a run first team. They have had one WR put up over 1k yards since Jackson became the starter in 2018. That was Marquise Brown with 1,008 yards in 2021. Mark Andrews also had 1,300 yards at TE that year. No receiver or TE over 1k yards in 2018, 2019, 2020, or 2022.


They brought in Todd Monken this year, the narrative around the team is that they are going to air it out. They're not gonna run Lamar like they used to after making him the highest paid QB in football. I personally believe Lamar is a waaay better passer than the average fan realizes. He's not Mahomes or Burrow but he's a good NFL passer.

It doesn't even matter what I or anybody else thinks about Lamar, if Hopkins has faith in him as a thrower and he's up to speed on what Monken wants to do, it will be an attractive destination.
^  
ColHowPepper : 5/27/2023 9:50 am : link
Good substance there, Aces, tend to agree with the premises
If they try to turn  
mittenedman : 5/27/2023 9:58 am : link
Jackson into a passing QB it’s going to be really bad. He just isn’t that kind of player.

This was always why teams passed on him early. You’d have to build a college style O like BAL did, and they rode it about as far as you could. Which is not sniffing a Super Bowl.
lamar has improved a ton as a passer  
Eric on Li : 5/27/2023 10:06 am : link
last year he had worse receivers than the nyg and no running game, a beat up OL, and still carried that offense with strong passing numbers. his receivers dropped like 4 or 5 tds in 1 game.

im not sure they can fit hopkins in since he will probably get a deal not far off the one they gave obj from someone, but if he is willing to take a discount to go to an ideal situation that would probably be one. buffalo or kc the others.
RE: If they try to turn  
UConn4523 : 5/27/2023 10:35 am : link
In comment 16124034 mittenedman said:
Quote:
Jackson into a passing QB it’s going to be really bad. He just isn’t that kind of player.

This was always why teams passed on him early. You’d have to build a college style O like BAL did, and they rode it about as far as you could. Which is not sniffing a Super Bowl.


He was drafted 5 years ago. He’s a better passer now than when he entered the league and has made that progress never having an alpha WR. Getting Hopkins would make running and passing easier for Jackson.
Hopkin is older, but...  
Rod in St Cloud : 5/27/2023 10:44 am : link
Last year, he averaged 5.71 yards of cushion per target, the best rate in the league. The guy knows how to get open. So yes, he's not and never has been the guy with the elite RAS athleticism. So while most older players slow down, his speed has never been his selling point. Age will not affect him as much as other receivers. So let's not debate whether we could use him. We certainly could. The only issue is can we afford him?
affording him is 1 problem but so is the numbers game  
Eric on Li : 5/27/2023 10:51 am : link
hodgins was the teams best receiver last year, so i think it's safe to assume he'll play well enough to be in the top 3 this year.

campbell took a 1 year deal here and judging by the size of it, he had options and took that deal expecting to get playing time and targets assuming he's healthy.

they gave slayton a pretty healthy 2 year deal.

they drafted both robinson and hyatt high for a reason and once healthy they are unlikely to be cut or scratched.

add in the fact that waller is likely to be a 100+ target player if healthy, and it's just a crowded receiving room.

if they have the $, from the nyg perspective that may not matter but from hopkins perspective im sure he would prefer to take a 1 year deal somewhere where he can step right into the kind of 100-150 target role he's always played to earn himself a bigger deal next offseason which will likely be the last big contract he gets. kc, buffalo, baltimore each make a lot of sense if they can find the $. carolina and detroit could make sense too and both already have the $.
He would be a very good veteran for Hyatt to work with  
PatersonPlank : 5/27/2023 10:56 am : link
I don't know what he has left in the tank, but I'm sure he could teach Hyatt a lot about getting open in the NFL
RE: If they try to turn  
Gatorade Dunk : 5/27/2023 11:06 am : link
In comment 16124034 mittenedman said:
Quote:
Jackson into a passing QB it’s going to be really bad. He just isn’t that kind of player.

This was always why teams passed on him early. You’d have to build a college style O like BAL did, and they rode it about as far as you could. Which is not sniffing a Super Bowl.

It's wild to see posters try to knock Baltimore's offensive scheme without realizing that the underpinnings of the Giants' offense aren't completely different (they both utilize a mobile QB, are fundamentally run-game-dependent, and have their TE operating as WR1).

Going a step further, the Eagles run a similar scheme to Baltimore, at least in terms of college option concepts and dual-threat QB play - how is that not sniffing a Super Bowl?
RE: RE: This is why I would have given up a fifth  
Spiciest Memelord : 5/27/2023 11:23 am : link
In comment 16123985 thefan said:
Quote:
In comment 16123702 sec308 said:


Quote:


and I heard he is willing to renegotiate.



Sounds like him and his contract wasn't even worth a conditional 7th.


That's kind of the head scratcher, Balt couldn't even swing a swap of 7th round picks for him?
Balt -> Ariz  
Spiciest Memelord : 5/27/2023 11:24 am : link
.
I'm dying to see Baltimore  
Dave on the UWS : 5/27/2023 11:41 am : link
make their offense a pass first offense, and limit LJ running. I think that's a disaster in the making. His passing has ALWAYS worked off of his threat to run. Having him drop back, read a defense and throw is a completely different animal. His throwing motion is a bit funky, he has NEVER shown he can do more than 1st read then run. Good luck to them!
RE: I'm dying to see Baltimore  
UConn4523 : 5/27/2023 12:37 pm : link
In comment 16124091 Dave on the UWS said:
Quote:
make their offense a pass first offense, and limit LJ running. I think that's a disaster in the making. His passing has ALWAYS worked off of his threat to run. Having him drop back, read a defense and throw is a completely different animal. His throwing motion is a bit funky, he has NEVER shown he can do more than 1st read then run. Good luck to them!


They aren’t going to stop running him, lol. They are going to be more strategic about it.
RE: I'm dying to see Baltimore  
Gatorade Dunk : 5/27/2023 4:59 pm : link
In comment 16124091 Dave on the UWS said:
Quote:
make their offense a pass first offense, and limit LJ running. I think that's a disaster in the making. His passing has ALWAYS worked off of his threat to run. Having him drop back, read a defense and throw is a completely different animal. His throwing motion is a bit funky, he has NEVER shown he can do more than 1st read then run. Good luck to them!

The threat of Jackson running will lag for quite a while behind even a substantial reduction in rushing attempts. His physical ability makes him a threat to run, regardless of the scheme - I suspect Baltimore is counting on defenses still having to spy Jackson, and they'll certainly have a few plays in their pocket to exploit any defense that treats Jackson as a pocket passer.
RE: RE: Slayton's contract will in no way hinder  
LauderdaleMatty : 5/27/2023 5:45 pm : link
In comment 16123726 Anakim said:
Quote:
In comment 16123712 LauderdaleMatty said:


Quote:


Hopkins if they wanted to sign him. At this point Hopkins has are his millions and wants to go win somewhere. And Probably at a discount he won't offer the Giants.

If they want to give him good money he'd sign but that's not the smartest move. Is this team a D Hop away for a play off run?



We signed Slayton to 8/9M per. You don't think we could've used that money in better ways? We have Hodgins, who is our tall, jump-ball guy and we have Wan'Dale who is our shifty guy out of the slot. But since then, we added some more speedsters/HR threats in Parris Campell, Jamison Crowder, Jalin Hyatt, Jeff Smith and Bryce Ford-Wheaton. Slayton is redundant. Of course, we didn't know it at the time, but me thinks that if Schoen had an opportunity to do it over again, he would have used that Slayton money to address another position or two.

Like we did last year? We made it to the second round...


I don't think we should sign Hopkins, but that Slayton deal still sticks in my craw. Not a HUGE deal and there are certainly worse deals and players out there, but it just wasn't necessary. Same with Shepard, but at least Shepard's deal was a vet min. so he can easily be cut.


No. They signed Slayton to two years at 6 million. Pretty much what a WR who is a your 3rd or 4th guy would get on any team. My assumption is Schoen and Daboll like him. He was forced to take a pay cut. Never bitched and was of the reasons The offense did anything last year. He's who is But if the team wanted D Hop that contract in no way would stop them.


The contracts like Golloday's are why the money is short. And not needlessly extending Adore and Leo are the issue. Like both those guys but both are always dinged up. Do you want to give those guys 2-4 years to sign Hopkins?

And I'm ok you hating that contract lol. But again it's not the reason they can't sign Hopkins.
Agent complications  
mittenedman : 5/28/2023 9:11 am : link
Apparently DHop is represented by Omni who all NFL teams have been warned not to deal with

And he wants huge $$$, even though nobody was willing to trade for him at under 20M. We’ll see
RE: RE: RE: Slayton's contract will in no way hinder  
section125 : 5/28/2023 9:35 am : link
In comment 16124156 LauderdaleMatty said:
Quote:
And not needlessly extending Adore and Leo are the issue. Like both those guys but both are always dinged up. Do you want to give those guys 2-4 years to sign Hopkins?

And I'm ok you hating that contract lol. But again it's not the reason they can't sign Hopkins.


Leo is not always dinged up. Last year was unusual, but of course a DT playing 85% of the snaps is likely to get dinged. I believe he missed one game, maybe two in his career until last year.
Leonard Williams stats - ( New Window )
If he clears waivers  
EJNNJ : 5/28/2023 11:30 am : link
i'm ok with a contract offer but no way I'd be picking up his current deal. And tbh i'd rather stick with WRs we have this year and then be more aggressive next year if an opportunity presents itself.
Pages: 1 2 3 <<Prev | Show All |
Back to the Corner