This year. I was happy going in with him as TE1. You can keep him inline and play mismatches with Waller by splitting him out etc…
Imagine a 12 personnel with your two tight ends, Waller and Ballenger, as well as having on the outside, Hodgins, and Colin Johnson. Put Parris Campbell, Wan’Dale Robinson, or Sterling Shepard in the slot. That’s some freaking heavy duty blocking for Saquon or Jones to run. This could be a potential short yardage or red zone package.
This year. I was happy going in with him as TE1. You can keep him inline and play mismatches with Waller by splitting him out etc…
Imagine a 12 personnel with your two tight ends, Waller and Ballenger, as well as having on the outside, Hodgins, and Colin Johnson. Put Parris Campbell, Wan’Dale Robinson, or Sterling Shepard in the slot. That’s some freaking heavy duty blocking for Saquon or Jones to run. This could be a potential short yardage or red zone package.
I'm impressed that you got Wan'Dale correct and Bellinger wrong. Lol.
RE: RE: RE: We might see a good amount of 12 personnel
This year. I was happy going in with him as TE1. You can keep him inline and play mismatches with Waller by splitting him out etc…
Imagine a 12 personnel with your two tight ends, Waller and Ballenger, as well as having on the outside, Hodgins, and Colin Johnson. Put Parris Campbell, Wan’Dale Robinson, or Sterling Shepard in the slot. That’s some freaking heavy duty blocking for Saquon or Jones to run. This could be a potential short yardage or red zone package.
I'm impressed that you got Wan'Dale correct and Bellinger wrong. Lol.
Yep! If Bellinger kicks ass, we can definitely call him, Ballinger, because he would definitely would be Ballin.
RE: RE: RE: RE: We might see a good amount of 12 personnel
This year. I was happy going in with him as TE1. You can keep him inline and play mismatches with Waller by splitting him out etc…
Imagine a 12 personnel with your two tight ends, Waller and Ballenger, as well as having on the outside, Hodgins, and Colin Johnson. Put Parris Campbell, Wan’Dale Robinson, or Sterling Shepard in the slot. That’s some freaking heavy duty blocking for Saquon or Jones to run. This could be a potential short yardage or red zone package.
I'm impressed that you got Wan'Dale correct and Bellinger wrong. Lol.
Yep! If Bellinger kicks ass, we can definitely call him, Ballinger, because he would definitely would be Ballin.
Lol, I literally just posted this comment on another site. I wonder if they’ll announce him as “The Genetic Freak” as he runs onto the field this fall.
This year. I was happy going in with him as TE1. You can keep him inline and play mismatches with Waller by splitting him out etc…
Imagine a 12 personnel with your two tight ends, Waller and Ballenger, as well as having on the outside, Hodgins, and Colin Johnson. Put Parris Campbell, Wan’Dale Robinson, or Sterling Shepard in the slot. That’s some freaking heavy duty blocking for Saquon or Jones to run. This could be a potential short yardage or red zone package.
This year. I was happy going in with him as TE1. You can keep him inline and play mismatches with Waller by splitting him out etc…
Imagine a 12 personnel with your two tight ends, Waller and Ballenger, as well as having on the outside, Hodgins, and Colin Johnson. Put Parris Campbell, Wan’Dale Robinson, or Sterling Shepard in the slot. That’s some freaking heavy duty blocking for Saquon or Jones to run. This could be a potential short yardage or red zone package.
I imagine a flag for too many men on the field.
Yes. I imagine if either one of Colin Johnson, or Isaiah Hodgins is on the field with either Wan’Dale Robinson, Sterling Shepard, or Parris Campbell, it would be a 12 personal set. I think you miss read my comment or maybe I wasn’t clear.
Imagine a 12 personnel with your two tight ends, Waller and Ballenger, as well as having on the outside, Hodgins, and Colin Johnson. Put Parris Campbell, Wan’Dale Robinson, or Sterling Shepard in the slot. That’s some freaking heavy duty blocking for Saquon or Jones to run. This could be a potential short yardage or red zone package.
Agree. At least in opens us up to be more varied on offense
Quote:
This year. I was happy going in with him as TE1. You can keep him inline and play mismatches with Waller by splitting him out etc…
Imagine a 12 personnel with your two tight ends, Waller and Ballenger, as well as having on the outside, Hodgins, and Colin Johnson. Put Parris Campbell, Wan’Dale Robinson, or Sterling Shepard in the slot. That’s some freaking heavy duty blocking for Saquon or Jones to run. This could be a potential short yardage or red zone package.
I'm impressed that you got Wan'Dale correct and Bellinger wrong. Lol.
Quote:
In comment 16126849 Mattman said:
Quote:
This year. I was happy going in with him as TE1. You can keep him inline and play mismatches with Waller by splitting him out etc…
Imagine a 12 personnel with your two tight ends, Waller and Ballenger, as well as having on the outside, Hodgins, and Colin Johnson. Put Parris Campbell, Wan’Dale Robinson, or Sterling Shepard in the slot. That’s some freaking heavy duty blocking for Saquon or Jones to run. This could be a potential short yardage or red zone package.
I'm impressed that you got Wan'Dale correct and Bellinger wrong. Lol.
Yep! If Bellinger kicks ass, we can definitely call him, Ballinger, because he would definitely would be Ballin.
Quote:
In comment 16126854 DonnieD89 said:
Quote:
In comment 16126849 Mattman said:
Quote:
This year. I was happy going in with him as TE1. You can keep him inline and play mismatches with Waller by splitting him out etc…
Imagine a 12 personnel with your two tight ends, Waller and Ballenger, as well as having on the outside, Hodgins, and Colin Johnson. Put Parris Campbell, Wan’Dale Robinson, or Sterling Shepard in the slot. That’s some freaking heavy duty blocking for Saquon or Jones to run. This could be a potential short yardage or red zone package.
I'm impressed that you got Wan'Dale correct and Bellinger wrong. Lol.
Yep! If Bellinger kicks ass, we can definitely call him, Ballinger, because he would definitely would be Ballin.
Lol, I literally just posted this comment on another site. I wonder if they’ll announce him as “The Genetic Freak” as he runs onto the field this fall.
"You mean to tell me there are players using steroids in this league?"
@FrankBellinger
·
4h
Special shout out to Craig Fitzgerald, Giants Director of Strength and Conditioning!
I really haven't seen posts on BBI regarding Fitzgerald, but seems he is doing a great job with the players S & C.
Fitzgerald was hired by Joe Judge in 2020, and he was interviewed and retained by Brian Daboll.
Waller played an entirely different position IMO. Doesn't mean he won't ever block but think both will benefit a lot from the other's presence
Quote:
This year. I was happy going in with him as TE1. You can keep him inline and play mismatches with Waller by splitting him out etc…
Imagine a 12 personnel with your two tight ends, Waller and Ballenger, as well as having on the outside, Hodgins, and Colin Johnson. Put Parris Campbell, Wan’Dale Robinson, or Sterling Shepard in the slot. That’s some freaking heavy duty blocking for Saquon or Jones to run. This could be a potential short yardage or red zone package.
I imagine a flag for too many men on the field.
He did, even when he came back last year. This one may be better for him, however.
Quote:
In comment 16126849 Mattman said:
Quote:
This year. I was happy going in with him as TE1. You can keep him inline and play mismatches with Waller by splitting him out etc…
Imagine a 12 personnel with your two tight ends, Waller and Ballenger, as well as having on the outside, Hodgins, and Colin Johnson. Put Parris Campbell, Wan’Dale Robinson, or Sterling Shepard in the slot. That’s some freaking heavy duty blocking for Saquon or Jones to run. This could be a potential short yardage or red zone package.
I imagine a flag for too many men on the field.
Yes. I imagine if either one of Colin Johnson, or Isaiah Hodgins is on the field with either Wan’Dale Robinson, Sterling Shepard, or Parris Campbell, it would be a 12 personal set. I think you miss read my comment or maybe I wasn’t clear.