So 2 part question here:
1- Did Barkleys injury occur on a hip drop tackle? To my eyes it did.
2- should the hip drop be banned?
I was against changing rules when it announced the NFL was considering it, but then I watched a video put out by the AFL (Australian rules) when they banned it and it convinced me. It’s a play that has an extremely high rate of ankle injuries and it’s unnecessary to the sport.
Hip drop tackle - (
New Window )
Right?
More obvious when done in the open field, DB's must love it.
I say ban it.
Hip-Drop Technique - ( New Window )
+1. Enoughs enough at this point. It sucks as a viewer that on 3rd down and we send guys you hope we wrap up the qb without actually tackling him to avoid a 15 yarder.
The whole sliding qb and hands to the face qb are kind of BS bc there’s little chance of injury with that contact. McKinney barely touched Dobbs and Dobbs arguably slid into McKinney. The arm swatting the qb in the head is also minimal when the defender goes for the ball and misses.
The hip drop tackle is different. It’s the same motion happening to the ball carrier as the horse-collar. I agree it should be banned.
Troy Vincent, the NFL’s executive vice president for football operations, said during the conference that the tackling technique became more prevalent last season, to the point that it resulted in an injury rate that he said is “20 times higher” than produced by other tackling forms.
The poster image of the technique comes from the NFC divisional playoff game in San Francisco, when Dallas Cowboys running back Tony Pollard was knocked out of the game with a broken leg and high ankle sprain that came on a hip-drop tackle
As mentioned in the article, the NFLPA is useless on this issue. Richard Sherman is the last person on the planet who should be speaking on player safety.
If and when NFL adopts a rule, NCAA will follow suit.
usatoday - ( New Window )
I dunno, there are lots of things that have become rarer since they were made against the rules. Crackback blocks, chop blocks, clipping, bump-and-run coverage, spearing, horsecollar tackles. Would banning hip-drop tackles eliminate them entirely? Almost certainly not. Would it reduce them? Almost certainly. I don't think it's in the category of the "illegal block in the back" which happens all the time, or even offensive holding. It's a relatively unusual play.
If you don't get the strip, you can look bad, and that's what happened. But that wasn't a situation where McKinney was afraid to make a hit. He goes for the ball a lot.
I think the only thing that would change with a ban on those types of tackles is the length of Gano's GWFG. The rest plays out exactly the same, IMO. I really don't think these tackles are intentional or malicious (maybe I'm just being naive), and it's just a defender trying to desperately get the ballcarrier down when he's already beaten at the point of attack. So ban it if you want, but I don't know if it actually changes the rate of injury too much.
That should go in the BBI HOF.
Now that angle is gone.
From the linked article above, the NFL is tracking injuries from the hip drop now, so it is not going to miss this one.
May add more than a few drops to the bucket needed to overcome inertia.
And, BTW, the "drop" on Barkley, if anyone needs to see it.
link - ( New Window )
If you don't like, start watching soccer.
If you don't like, start watching soccer.
I get where you are going, but soccer - European - is very physical.